Gorski's reaction to being caught and outed as dishonest and a liar is interesting. He does not care and even lies about his lies being lies and lying.

So he knows he is doing it and is clearly going to continue doing it regardless. Which suggests the inference that sciencebasedmedicine.org exists with him as its Managing Editor for the particular purposes of misleading and attacking anything which goes against the interests he is paid to pursue, at least insofar as Gorski's contributions are concerned.

What is clear also is that the base used is not science and the word "science" is used again to mislead that it is.

Again, whilst it might all seem obvious it is helpful to have specific evidence and examples documenting this and generated from the Managing Editor.

Whether the foregoing applies to all the editors/contributors to that site or not is a different question. However, even if it is assumed the other editors do not behave like Gorski, who would want to be an editor or contributor to a site with appears to exist for such a purpose? Or what kind of person would stay associated with such a site?

His blog isn't drawing many these days & he manages to discuss Salk's polio vaccine with no mention of NPAFP. He simply has no skin in the game i.e. couldn't care less about the truth.

CHS

The new euphemism of Gorski for lying ("fact based opinion") is the finest piece of casuistry since Lord Armstrong (head of British civil service in the 1980s) admitted to an Australian court in 1986 the he was "being economical with the truth" while trying to stop them allowing the publication Peter Wright's Spycatcher. Gorski is a liar.

Hi @False_Skeptics_Make_Me_Laugh,

"Gorski lies? Isn't that a bit like saying water is wet?"

Saying it is one thing and having it documented is another.

Gorski's reaction to this is interesting. He lies about him lying, claiming his lies are opinions - "fact based opinions". So that adds more. And it shows he knows he is lying but cannot care less. All very deliberate.

Kerry Ann-- they get away with this by saying it happens 1 in a million times. That is what th news reporter said. Such a number I wonder if it really was true - or something off off the top of his head.

Well this type of vaccine reaction is probably one in a million.

But there are about a million different types or reactions to the flu shot.

But no one knows what they look like and it is all just gentic fate that runs in the family.

Hi Dan, Gorski just lied and lied and lied.

Whilst you can read it at ChildHealthSafety here is the rest of the CHS post [and when you read it you can see that the comment here below on AoA by Associate Professor of Adelaide University Chris Preston is trolling. He has obsessively spammed CHS for months - sad but true]:

Ms Attkisson's report included:

The article in the Journal of Immunotoxicology is entitled “Theoretical aspects of autism: Causes–A review.” The author is Helen Ratajczak, surprisingly herself a former senior scientist at a pharmaceutical firm. Ratajczak did what nobody else apparently has bothered to do: she reviewed the body of published science since autism was first described in 1943. Not just one theory suggested by research such as the role of MMR shots, or the mercury preservative thimerosal; but all of them.

Vaccines and autism: a new scientific review By Sharyl Attkisson CBS News April 1, 2011

This is the part of Dr David Gorski's article in which the lie appears and it is a significant lie:

And she cites the anti-vaccine blog Child Health Safety as one of her references? The date of the CHS entry cited is June 30, 2010. All I could find was http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/vaccination-causes-autism-%E2%80%93-say-us-government-merck%E2%80%99s-director-of%C2%A0vaccines/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">this entry, which purports to argue that both Merck’s Director of Vaccines and the U.S. government have admitted that vaccines cause autism all based on the long known science showing that a maternal case of rubella while carrying a fetus can result in autism in the child, something that’s been known for several decades and is in fact one reason why vaccination against rubella is so important. How on earth did this get through peer review. Obviously, the peer reviewers of Dr. Ratajczak’s article were either completely ignorant of the background science (and therefore unqualified) or asleep at the switch."

Notice our emphasis added to just three words "all based on". Dr Gorski chose those words to make sure his lie would be all the more convincing. Those three words show how deliberate and calculated Dr Gorski was being in his lying and dishonesty.

And just to make sure we are comparing apples with apples, this is the CHS article Dr Gorski lied about http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/vaccination-causes-autism-%E2%80%93-say-us-government-merck%E2%80%99s-director-of%C2%A0vaccines/" target="_blank">Vaccination Causes Autism – Say US Government & Merck’s Director of Vaccines as it appeared when Dr Gorski wrote his blog post in April 2011.

Notice how in his article Dr Gorski admits he found and read the article. There is no mistake. And of course Dr Gorski was making claims intended to damage the reputations of Ms Attkisson and Dr Ratajczak among others. So it was deliberate, intentional and to cause harm to others. And it was bullying cyber abuse.

Now what you can also see here is that Dr Gorski not only lied about the CHS article but he also lied about a number of other things [and this is just looking at the one paragraph] and all for the purposes of attacking Ms Attkisson and Dr Ratajczak.

Most people do not click on links in blog posts. But this particular Gorski lie would be one CHS would know to be a lie without needing to refer to the CHS article concerned. But we make sure you can refer to it to so you can see just how dishonest Doctor David Gorski MD is.

Contrary to Dr David Gorski's contrived and dishonest claims, the admissions by Merck’s Director of Vaccines and U.S. government agencies that vaccines cause autistic conditions were not "all based on" autism caused by rubella infection. They were not based on that at all. And that is perfectly clear from the CHS article. So Gorski despite having found and read the CHS article clearly lied and did so deliberately and intentionally with a remarkable degree of dishonesty.

It is also plain for all to see that not only did the CHS article cover several known causes of autism and not just one [as the liar Dr Gorski claimed], but also the quotes admitting vaccines cause autism were in relation to further separate mechanisms by which that can happen.

In addition to that the CHS article quoted, cited and linked to original sources including a number of peer reviewed medical journal papers.

What is also notable is the causes of autism which Dr Gorski omitted are causes which he steadfastly has avoided referring to. It is difficult for him to deny the admissions made because they were made and the CHS article cited and linked to original sources showing that. That is another aspect of his dishonesty. He ignores completely evidence which goes against the political commercial views he publishes under contract on sciencebasedmedicine.org to support the drug industry and to support government officials in pressurising parents into giving dangerous unnecessary vaccines to their children.

But what it does show is that Dr Gorski knows those admitted causes are known real causes of vaccine-caused-autism. If he were to contradict that he would also have to claim Merck's Director of Vaccines and US Government agencies were lying when they made those admissions - admissions which were against their interests [but definitely in the public interest]. So Gorski avoids acknowledging the admissions, but in doing so tacitly confirms he knows they are true.

But Gorski did not stop there. He lied also about it being improper of Dr Ratajczak to cite CHS in a peer reviewed journal. But it would have been improper for Dr Ratajczak to take the benefit of the work of others without citing CHS as the source. To do that would have been plagiarism.

Dr Ratajczak properly cited the source of the information, which itself cited original sources. So Gorski lied again. And of course Dr Gorski knows that.

This also addresses a further lie by Dr Gorski, that the peer review system of the journal concerned was in some way defective by allowing such a citation. Clearly, it was not and could not have been.

And that brings us to a final point. That one Gorski paragraph is comprised of 133 words, yet it contains at least 3 lies. So on that basis one might estimate 75 Gorski lies in just that one blog post of 3333 words. And he blogs 6 days a week under contract, so that could be around 450 Gorski lies a week. And over the course of a year it could be 22,500 lies p.a. making Dr Gorski quite an impressive liar by quantity. And if sciencebasedmedicine.org contains that many lies from just one author, how many other lies might there be, if any?

You should not hold your breath waiting for the Michigan Board of Medicine to do anything. But what this information does is raise the question: if one doctor can lie that much in one year and so blatantly and publicly and get away with it, how many other doctors and "scientists" are lying too? How many in the US Centers for Disease Control for example?

CHS, this is all a little bit pathetic.

Poring over a three and a half year old blog post to find a few things that you disagree with and then claim they are lies? Gorski writes as a blogger, people disagree with him all the time. If you think he was wrong in the post, why don't you write to him and point out the errors?

A Florida woman says her daughter became paralyzed after getting a routine flu shot.

Carla Grivna says her child was happy and healthy until getting the flu shot just before the Thanksgiving Day holiday last year. Three days later, however, her daughter Marysue could not move or talk, Grivna said. The child is now a bedridden 10-year-old diagnosed with a rare viral infection of the brain called Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis, or ADEM. Carla Grivna believes what happened is directly tied to the flu shot.http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/11/02/mom-blames-daughter-paralysis-on-flu-shot/