Weekly Wrap: Renaming Autism Won’t Work Forever
Lloyd Grove and Daily Beast Take Misogynistic Turn at Bat Against Vaccine Informed Consent

The Ebola Situation: From Common Sense to Chaos

Screw fearBy Cathy Jameson

I wasn’t expecting to see any breaking news Thursday night right before I went to bed, but breaking news was happening.  CNN had just reported a confirmed case of Ebola. 

Oh, boy.  Here we go again, I thought. 

I know I’m not the only one shaking my head at what I’ve deemed as breaking news lately.  The headlines and the knee-jerk reactions being reported have been downright laughable. 

I mean no disrespect to those who’ve been directly affected by Ebola, but the regular news headlines have been riddled with hype and fear for quite a few weeks now.  Because of that, I’ve stopped going to certain news sites.  I even stopped reading about Ebola.  I need facts, not fear.  I want tips, not terror.  I want straight up answers not scared-out-of-my-mind thoughts running through my head right before I go to bed.  But that’s what’s being published in news stories and the follow up news stories lately:

Patient might have Ebola!  Oops.  She doesn’t. 

Pentagon entrance closed—is it a possible Ebola victim?  Nope, she wasn’t. 

Man vomiting—he may have Ebola!  Our bad.  Dude just had a tummy ache. 

I know that the media uses headlines to draw in its readers and viewers, but how they were hyping what didn’t need to be hyped was getting a bit ridiculous.  Until it wasn’t. 

Thursday night, things got serious.  And I’m not talking about the Ebola virus. 

Did you see it? 

While reading the CNN article, something caught my eye.   I saw it three times within the article and found it quite disturbing. 

A Doctors Without Borders physician who recently returned to New York from West Africa has tested positive for the Ebola virus, a law enforcement official briefed on the matter told CNN.

Investigators took the case seriously from the outset because it appeared the doctor didn't quarantine himself following his return, the law enforcement official said

The law enforcement official said the doctor was out in public. Authorities also quarantined his girlfriend, with whom he was spending time since his return from Africa.

Now, I was worried about Ebola just like a lot of people are, but I’ve been keeping my wits about me and using common sense to protect my family and to keep as healthy as I can.  After reading that article, what I’m more worried about is that law enforcement has stepped in. 

Law enforcement and health care.  We’ve seen that mix before.  Remember Justina Pelletier?  And you’ve heard the latest medical cases where authorities have stepped in, right?  Two sisters,  a baby,  and a boy named Jaxon  now have to deal with more than just their medical issues.  Somehow, instead of getting necessary support, it seems that an authority figure muscled their way into the situation.  Law enforcement got involved.  If you followed Justina’s story like many of us here did, you asked yourself over and over again, how did any of that involvement help her?  It didn’t.  

Mixing law enforcement and health care doesn’t seem to have such great outcomes.  So why are law enforcements joining the Ebola situation?  How’d they get involved?  What exactly are they monitoring?  More importantly, who’s providing their services?  And, well done, CNN, for adding that law enforcement bit so seamlessly in your article so as not to raise too much of a concern!  But I have a few questions now that it’s been brought up:

Was law enforcement called in because the US didn’t take precautionary steps early enough? 

Was it because the US didn’t close the borders in a timely fashion and opened a further threat on its citizens? 

Were they on standby when this situation got more serious, or is this another knee-jerk reaction to quell fears the media is attempting to broadcast? 

And now more specifically, these law enforcement people—who are they? 

The article mentions authorities are overseeing them.  Which authorities? 

Are those authorities and the law enforcement folks Ebola ready? Ebola trained? Ebola immune?

Will they be donning the same protective gear that has finally been suggested to medical staff when they are working with a suspected Ebola patient? 

One more question, how long are they planning on sticking around?

Maybe I’m too young to remember other national health situations such as the one we’re reading about now, but I don’t ever recall needing law enforcement for past health crises and outbreaks.  The CDC and vaccine-pushing folk may make us feel like the other situations and diseases are always deadly, and that we should all get our flu shots for diseases that have nothing to do with the flu, but has anything ever warranted the authorities, law enforcement, or a uniformed officer to stand at the ready to protect us? 

Unless the ultimate goal from the authorities is not to protect us but to control…

Ebola plushFrom what I have read and seen these last few weeks about the Ebola situation, not much of it has been controlled.  The media is working overtime trying to influence the public’s reaction while the government previously downplayed the situation.  Too bad, because this situation haSnyderman soups become the butt of jokes,  and those who are in certain positions regarding health have lost all sorts of respect and credibility.

We’ve recently watched those in position of responsibility make up their own rules and later break the rules.  We’ve watched those in authority blunder and flounder on the news.  We’ve watched our nation go from respected to being ridiculed.  We’ve also watched the Ebola situation unfold from barely a blip on the radar to national panic.  We’ve seen more knee-jerk reactions and chaos than common sense be used all along too.  With this new layer of authority though, with this addition of law enforcement being added to the mix, I’m really hoping that it was a common sense move to add them and nothing else.  But I have a nagging feeling.  I’m frightened of where this could lead, and I can’t help but think, what will stop them from stepping in other health care situations down the road? 

If you didn’t think you needed to find a way to protect your family, your children, and your health care rights, let me sound a warning:  my health care and your health care could be in jeopardy.  Now’s the time to learn how to protect yourself.  It has to be now, because it doesn’t feel like those who are in a position to help are truly prepared to do so. 

Cathy Jameson is a Contributing Editor for Age of Autism. 



"But it seems that patient zero was a two year old toddler, who some news reports say may have caught Ebola from a "contaminated needle"

(CNN) – The worst outbreak of Ebola, which has killed 961 people and triggered an international public health emergency, may have started with a 2-year-old patient in a village in Guinea. http://pix11.com/2014/08/11/patient-zero-ebola-outbreak-traced-to-2-year-old-researchers-say/

Ebola MAY have been started by this family. However, I can't find anywhere this has been lab confirmed. As Jon Rapport stated in his article on Ebola:
“I saw people die from Ebola.”
No you didn’t. You saw people die. You yourself have no idea what killed them. You can pretend you know, but you don’t.
“The doctors know what kills people.”
You win a gold star for your faith. You’re now a fully-fledged member of the Church of Biological Mysticism.
Death doesn’t=someone’s opinion about death: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/death-doesnt-someones-opinion-about-death/

Meliandou in Guéckédou, where family lived. The area in southern Guinea is close to the Sierra Leone and Liberia borders. These are the epic-centers of the outbreak. Firestone has a huge rubber plantation in this area and run off from the plant has contaminated the water, soil, the food the people eat, the air. Fish are dying. Crops are failing. That means malnutrition, hunger. That means chemical assault on their immune systems. People in Africa are overly vaccinated. People are developing sores, lesions, fevers, respiratory problems, digestive problems, including diarrhea. These symptoms mimic Ebola. Without multiple testing on the people who are now deceased, why is it assumed it's Ebola. Thousands of people across Africa die daily from all kinds of illnesses-doesn't mean it's Ebola because the WHO & CDC say it is.

Do we even know if any of the Americans had Ebola when they arrived. When is it not Ebola? When it walks off a plane like Dr. Brantly. Brantly was diagnosed with Zaire on July 22. 9 days later on the 31 of July he is given a mysterious serum that had “miraculous” effects within an hour, he showered himself the next day, got on the private plane and he arrived in the US on August 2nd. That's not happening. Ebola Zaire is the most severe and aggressive strain of the viruses. By day 4 of this strain the person is critically ill. Brantly was given the experimental drug on day 9. This is how CNN reports on this:

In the monkeys, the experimental serum had been given within 48 hours of infection. Brantly didn’t receive it until he’d been sick for nine days….\
Within an hour of receiving the medication, Brantly’s condition dramatically improved……By the next morning, Brantly was able to take a shower on his own before getting on a specially designed Gulfstream air ambulance jet to be evacuated to the United States.

So Brantly started showing symptoms of “ebola” infection on July 22, 9 days later on the 31 of July he is given a mysterious serum that had “miraculous” effects within an hour, he showered himself the next day, got on the private plane and he arrived in the US on August 2nd.

Dr. Kent Brantly, received his first dose of the medication after being ill for 9 days. He was reportedly near death at the time he received the dose, but recovered dramatically within hours of it being administered. One doctor called his recovery “miraculous,” CNN reported.

At this stage of Ebola "near death" there is nothing on the planet that reverse it to the point where within 1 hour the person has recovered enough to take a shower and walk the next day. Why? Ebola is so feared not because the mortality rate is extremely high, and that it kills so quickly, but because of the method of death. Basically, in the Ebola Zaire virus liquifies all your internal organs, and if you don’t die from the fever and extreme dehydration, you bleed to death out of every orifice or drown in your own blood. Seriously. Once a patient gets to a certain stage of infection, miracle serum or not, there would be no way to save their life because the damage to their internal organs- liver, lungs, intestines and stomach in particular- would be irreversible.

CNN told the world that Brantly was on deaths door step, and that after one shot of the “miracle” serum was miraculously recovering. That the very next day he took a shower by himself, and then when he arrived in the US, he WALKED into the hospital?!?

If Brantly had Ebola he'd be dead already. Zaire has the shortest gestational period, is the fastest killer and has the highest mortality rate of all the Hemorrhagic Fevers. Yes, there is a percentage of patients that survive Ebola Zaire, but in those that do, the infection/symptoms do not escalate beyond the fever and vomiting/diarrhea stage. This is a very well established medical fact. If CNN was correct about his condition "near death", he most certainly didn't have Ebola.


Cia parker,

Mostly I tend to believe in organizations acting from self interest rather than large conspiracies involving all areas of the government.

When you described a kid being filmed pretending to have Ebola, what seemed likely imo was that some film crew, given the choice between exposing themselves to a real patient and maybe getting sick, and paying some local kid to lie on the ground and look sick, with no risk to themselves, chose the latter. Agree with you that this in no way proves Ebola does not exist.

How did Ebola start this time? If it had begun in a bunch of hunters, I'd have been right with you re the bush meat theory.

But it seems that patient zero was a two year old toddler, who some news reports say may have caught Ebola from a "contaminated needle". Which begs the question, contaminated how? And what was he being injected with at the time? Is the assumption that the nurses or doctors did not notice that they dipped the needle in bat droppings before injecting him with something?

Or as also seems possible, was someone working with Ebola for some reason whether as a vaccine or weapon, and made an error?
Or was the infection deliberate?

We do know that for whatever reason, this virus has left more survivors in Africa this time, than it has in the past.

Given that historically African countries have been the places of choice for medical experimentation that other countries keep stricter controls on, it is not impossible that intentionally or not, someones' little science experiment got out of hand.

Or it could just be the bush meat, as you say.

Similarly the idea that the vaccine manufacturers could see the possibility for a major windfall in this situation, whatever its cause, seems pretty self evident.

And the fact that the military in the Ebola areas will be mandated to take a vaccine as soon as it becomes available is also very likely. Right now, the military are still required to take the anthrax vaccine if they are going into risky areas.

It seems unlikely that against previous policy decisions, soldiers will this time be given a choice about taking the Ebola vaccine.

Don't know if all this seems to make sense to you or not. And either way its fine for us all to have our own opinions on this. By the way, I have found your comments on teaching your child about learning the basic rules of speech to be very helpful with my son, and I do enjoy reading them.


Additional interview of Dr. Francis E. Boyle:


cia parker

When Ebola appeared in Nigeria and the Ivory Coast, it was immediately stamped out. In one case an Ebola patient tried to leave the hospital and a heroic woman doctor refused to let him out. He and she both died of Ebola, but her action prevented the disease from going any further. In Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone, there was only a small number of hospital beds for thousands of Ebola patients. So yes, a lot of patients were left lying in the streets spreading around their infected body fluids, and a lot more were cared for at home, where they often gave Ebola to their family members. The U.S. military has been setting up hospital tents with thousands of beds where the sick can be cared for, and where it is less likely that they can spread the disease to others. This is a good thing, a compassionate measure, and will certainly limit the spread of the disease. It may be too late to make a lot of difference, a lot of efforts now are going to educating the family caregivers on ways to minimize exposure to the virus, since there is no other place for the sick to go. Eventually the epidemic will burn itself out, just like with the Spanish flu, eventually every single person in the world alive in 1918 had antibodies to that flu. Many died, others got it and recovered, and others got immunity through subclinical exposure. It has been and will be the same with Ebola.

It has always been unpredictable where it would pop up. It's probably always carried by a small percentage of fruit bats, which it doesn't harm, but is transmitted to ape populations from time to time, and decimates them. And humans get it probably from the apes or bats, maybe from other animals that can carry it, and then transmit it person to person in their body fluids. This time is different because it's the first time it has appeared in a big city, but it's not surprising that it has done so. I really don't see any reason to believe that there has been a conspiracy to propagate and spread it. Everything that has happened this year has happened many times in the past forty years, but on a much smaller scale, because this time it arrived in big cities and because transportation across the jungle has become so much easier.


Interview of Dr. Francis Boyle re: Ebola:


Jeannette Bishop

I'm hearing that the Chinese have been making financial/trade inroads into Africa and some feel the Western powers want reasons to increase their presence also.

This is probably something like what those in the region are hearing:


Whatever they believe in Liberia, I doubt they want our military (maybe I should say western financiers' military) there. "Humaniarianism" and "preemptive self-defense" are ways military intervention and really sometimes wars of aggression are sold to us in the U.S. If you read some alternative media, one thing becomes clear. We do not get much honest coverage of the complexity and important factors when the U.S., NATO, or the UN get involved in a nation from our corporate media.

Here at home I don't know whether to say hmmmm over NY and NJ being the states that jumped in with what appears to be an aggressive police quarantine show, but it occurs to me. I'm pretty far away from the East Coast, but the same same states sometimes sound like Vaccine Central way out here, not that that necessarily means anything in this situation, but the whole thing might be engineered to test the public willingness to bow down to police state tactics and violations of self-determination.

Whatever the real public danger (I'm not confident there's none--I'm actually less confident the more power our current government assumes), I'm pretty certain they hope to set complete Constitutional/Bill of Rights shredding precedents.


Interesting link:



1 Completed Evaluating an Ebola and a Marburg Vaccine in Uganda

Conditions: Ebola Virus Disease; Marburg Virus Disease
Interventions: Biological: Ebola vaccine; Biological: Marburg vaccine; Other: Placebo injection

2 Not yet recruiting Phase 1 Trial of Ebola Vaccine in Mali

Conditions: Ebola Virus Disease; Hemorrhagic Fever
Intervention: Biological: Ebola Chimpanzee Adenovirus Vector Vaccine (cAd3-EBO Z)

3 Recruiting A Study to Assess a New Ebola Vaccine, cAd3-EBO Z

Conditions: Ebola; Ebola Zaire

Interventions: Biological: cAd3-EBO Z at 1 x 10^10 vp; Biological: cAd3-EBO Z at 2.5 x 10^10 vp; Biological: cAd3-EBO Z at 5 x 10^10 vp

4 Completed Experimental Vaccine for Prevention of Ebola Virus Infection

Conditions: Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever; Ebola Virus Disease; Ebola Virus Vaccines; Envelope Glycoprotein, Ebola Virus; Filovirus

Intervention: Drug: VRC-EBOADV018-00-VP


In furthering my comments, I find the below extremely troubling (this excerpt is contained within the first link I provided in my earlier post):

..."Reports narrate stories of the US Department of Defense (DoD) funding Ebola trials on humans, trials which started just weeks before the Ebola outbreak in Guinea and Sierra Leone. The reports continue and state that the DoD gave a contract worth $140 million dollars to Tekmira, a Canadian pharmaceutical company, to conduct Ebola research. This research work involved injecting and infusing healthy humans with the deadly Ebola virus. Hence, the DoD is listed as a collaborator in a "First in Human" Ebola clinical trial (NCT02041715, which started in January 2014 shortly before an Ebola epidemic was declared in West Africa in March.) Disturbingly, many reports also conclude that the US government has a viral fever bioterrorism research laboratory in Kenema, a town at the epicentre of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. The only relevant positive and ethical olive-branch seen in all of my reading is that Theguardian.com reported, "The US government funding of Ebola trials on healthy humans comes amid warnings by top scientists in Harvard and Yale that such virus experiments risk triggering a worldwide pandemic." That threat still persists.


The U.S., Canada, France, and the U.K. are all implicated in the detestable and devilish deeds that these Ebola tests are. There is the need to pursue criminal and civil redress for damages, and African countries and people should secure legal representation to seek damages from these countries, some corporations, and the United Nations. Evidence seems abundant against Tulane University, and suits should start there. Yoichi Shimatsu's article, The Ebola Breakout Coincided with UN Vaccine Campaigns, as published on August 18, 2014, in the Liberty Beacon..."


@Cia Parker

You stated: "It seems as though many Americans have become so cynical about official news of any kind that we think that if we don't deny it and disbelieve it, then we're being foolish and unwisely credulous. So there's no such thing as Ebola. Maybe there's no such thing as cholera or malaria either..."

You may want to read through the following links:




US Bio-warfare Laboratories in West Africa Are The Origins Of The Ebola Epidemic

Professor Francis A. Boyle interviewed by Aggeliki Dimopoulou

..."Could Ebola Have Escaped From US Bio-warfare Labs? American law professor Francis A. Boyle, answers questions for tvxs.gr and reveals that USA has been using West Africa as an offshore to circumvent the Convention on Biological Weapons and do bio-warfare work.

Is Ebola just a result of health crisis in Africa -- because of the large gaps in personnel, equipment and medicines -- as some experts suggest?"

"That isn't true at all. This is just propaganda being put out by everyone. It seems to me, that what we are dealing with here is a biological warfare work that was conducted at the bio-warfare laboratories set up by the USA on the west coast of Africa. And if you look at a map produced by the Center of Disease Control you can see where these laboratories are located. And they are across the heart of the Ebola epidemic, at the west coast of Africa. So, I think these laboratories, one or more of them, are the origins of the Ebola epidemic."


"Are we being told the truth about Ebola? Is that big outbreak began all of a sudden? How does it spread so quickly?

"The whole outbreak that we see in the west coast of Africa, this is Zaire/Ebola. The most dangerous of five subtypes of Ebola. Zaire/Ebola originated 3,500 km from the west coast of Africa. There is absolutely no way that it could have been transmitted 3,500 km. And if you read the recently published Harvard study on the DNA analysis of the west Africas' Zaire/Ebola there is no explanation about how the virus moved there. And indeed, it's been reported in the NY Times that the Zaire/Ebola was found there in 1976, and then WHO ordered to be set to Porton Down in Britain, which is the British equivalent to Fort Detrick, where they manufacture all the biological weapons for Britain. And then Britain sent it to the US Center for Disease Control. And we know for a fact that the Center for Disease Control has been involved in biological warfare work. And then it appears, at least from whatever I've been able to put together in a public record, that the CDC and several others US bio-warriors exported Zaire/Ebola to west Africa, to their labs there, where they were doing bio-warfare work on it. So, I believe this is the origins of the Zaire/Ebola pandemic we are seeing now in west Africa."

Why would they do that?

"Why would they do that? As I suggested to try to circumvent the Biological Weapons Convention to which the US government is a party. So, always bio-warriors do use offensive and defensive bio-warfare work, violating the Biological Weapons Convention. So effectively they try to offshore it into west Africa where Liberia is not a party and Guinea is not a party. Sierra Leone is a party. But in Sierra Leone and Liberia there were disturbances which kept the world from really paying attention of what was going on in these labs."

USA sent troops to fight Ebola. What do you think about that move?

The US military just invaded Liberia. They send in the 101st Airborne Division to Liberia. That's an elite division of combat and they have no training to provide medical treatment to anyone. They are there to establish a military base in Liberia. And the British are doing the same in Sierra Leone. The French are already in Mali and Senegal. So, they're not sending military people there to treat these people. No, I'm sorry."

Weren't they afraid Ebola's going to go out of control even in the USA or EU in a massive way?

"It's already gone in the USA and the European Union. So, there it is. Which raises the question: Was this Zaire/Ebola weaponized at any of these labs? I don't have an answer to that question. I am trying to get an answer. And therefore it is much more dangerous than the WHO and the CDC are telling everyone. The WHO and the CDC are up to their eyeballs in this. They know all about what 's going on. It was the WHO that ordered the original Zaire/Ebola in 1976 to be sent to Porton Down for biological warfare purposes. So this could be more dangerous than the WHO and the CDC are saying.

"And you can't believe anything they are telling you because they are involved in that. But certainly I can't say it has been weaponized. I don't know that yet for sure. I have the Harvard genetic analysis of it. When I was in college I had very good courses in genetics, and biochemistry and population biology but I am not a professor of genetics. I have a friend who is a professor of genetics and he is going to take a look at this and try to figure out if there's been DNA genetic engineering perpetrated or performed on the Zaire/Ebola. Is there a genetically modified organism at work, a GMO? I don't know. But if a GMO is at work that's a pretty good sign it's been weaponized. But anyway, it is far more dangerous than the CDC and the WHO are telling anyone, because it's clearly transmitted for a certain distance -- we don't know how far -- by air. Breathing and coughing and sneezing. So, anyone treating people, seems to me, are going to need not only a protective suit but probably a breathing apparatus, at minimum. And you saw what happened to that Spanish nurse and that Spanish priest that were brought in, infected with Ebola. So right now the WHO and the CDC are telling healthcare workers that in addition to suits they need breathing apparatuses. So, again, I don't believe you can trust anything the WHO or the CDC are telling you. And I really don't know about the European Health Agency... If they're believing the WHO and the CDC then, in my opinion, they're not properly protecting the health of the European people. And it's simply bizarre that the CDC and WHO are relegating the screenings to the people in west Africa. It's just bizarre. They need to be protecting health of their own people and they aren't doing that. I read some of the European press but I'm not sure precisely what the European Health Agency is recommending but they certainly can't rely upon the WHO and the CDC. As for Greece, I know you have your own Health Ministry there and they cannot rely upon them at all, as well...."

Another link you may want to read through:


Interview of the following:

Francis A. Boyle is a leading American professor, practitioner and advocate of international law. He was responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. He served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia - Herzegovina at the World Court. Professor Boyle teaches international law at the University of Illinois, Champaign. He holds a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University.


..."Back in 1985, I was down in Nicaragua investigating atrocities of the Contras there and all of a sudden the country was hit with an outbreak of a hemorrhaging Dengue Fever which is similar to Ebola. And it seemed pretty suspicious to me. So I met with some of the highest level officials of the Nicaraguan government and said: “you know, this very well could be US bio-warfare against Nicaragua. They did the same thing to Cuba. And my advice is you convene health care medical experts, not politicians, to look into this. And if you agree with me and that’s the result, file a complaint with the UN Security Council for violation of the Biological Weapons Convention against the USA”. And eventually that is what they did. Here I am not recommending the Greek authorities to file a complaint against the USA. What I am recommending is the same thing I did to the Nicaraguans. That you need to convene some of your top experts geneticists, doctors, etc."

@Cia Parker:

I certainly do not believe, as a few others have commented here, that Ebola isn't real; of course it is. But you have to read between the lines with all of this and understand that all is not (nor is it ever) what it seems.

Some of us who comment over here, I am now more than suspecting, have had more than our fair share of run-ins with some of these black ops units. BELIEVE ME when I tell you that you learn the HARD WAY when you become personall involved with some of these black units that things are not as they appear in this world.

After some of these things happened to me - at times - just getting out of bed and getting a shower was a major victory. My world and how I will forever view it, will never, ever be the same. As someone one said, you can't unring that bell.

I am so grateful that others out there are willing to speak Truth as it pertains to the onion layer of information they may personally be privy to. For me to have even dared mention the issues with my own family's involvement with some of these groups, was a major issue for me.


You get - at times - a lot of truth, or very little truth, sandwiched in between falsehoods that are then perpetuated by our MSM in so many ways, via our Net, our TV screens, newspapers, bloggers, big pharma, etc.

When I started putting two and two together with my own family's situation, was back in 2006. FOR ME, the vaccine issues platform was the very platform that propelled me to the realization that there is VERY LITTLE TRUTH DOWN HERE. In anything!

I just assumed that once folks started putting two and two together with the vaccine issues themselves, they would arrive at this same conclusion. But that's not the case, which saddens me, because I really did start connecting the dots as to what sort of a world we're living in, when the vaccine issue became a main focus for my own family.

Someone over here mentioned that this is NOT an anti-vaccine movement - that it's more like an Awakening.


We've all been awakened on various levels, but not everyone has yet fully connected the dots with all of this.

A willingness to keep an open mind and ACCEPT that perhaps some of what we've held so near and dear to our hearts AS TRUTH may not have been truth whatsoever. Beliefs for the most part, become FACTS with most of us. So it's an instinctive measure when we start hearing opposing viewpoints that don't coincide with our beliefs, to want to deny them as long and as mush as possible.

This is precisely what you are witnessing with the vaccine related issues we've all been dealing with over here. Now just spread that issue to other layers of information in our society and you'll find the oppositional forces within those camps operate in the same fashion.

So it's not that Ebola isn't real. I get it; yes, it's real. But something else much more sinister is going on here. That's not something I really want to accept, but there's just too much information out there about all of this that just doesn't add up.

Betty Bona

I read the long link about the US history of testing on humans that Danchi posted. It was very scary. It's interesting how names pop up in such different settings. The New York attorney, Ken Feinberg, was painted in a bad light as someone who was instrumental in ramming down an insufficient settlement for agent orange victims. Today he is known as the payout czar because he has administered so many payouts funds such as the 911 payout, the Aurora theater shooting payout, and many others. I wish I could go back to my old life where I believed most people, including people in positions of authority, were motivated by good intentions.


One more thing; it seems that there is an easy solution to the problem of "not enough volunteers willing to go to Africa or to take care of domestic Ebola patients"..
Pay them. Pay them a lot. There are plenty of people, health care workers being no exception, who are willing to do something dangerous for a lot of money.
I've seen some RNs work double and triple shifts simply because the pay on the second and third shifts was so much higher due to overtime.
Military members get combat pay, and serious tax breaks on pay earned in combat locations. It would not be hard to give something similar to people who were taking care of Ebola patients. And 21 days of highly paid stay at home quarantine at the end of it would probably be less of an issue.
Altruistic volunteers are great. But paying people to do a job no one else wants also makes a great deal of sense.

cia parker

I just watched a video by the editor of The Daily Sheepie about how Ebola doesn't even exist at all. I think this is crazy and irresponsible. Watch these instead:



The Sheepie video thinks that since the slogan "Ebola is real!" was coined and is being used a lot, this means that it is not real, that it's all just a scam. She shows a video of a boy fraudulently pretending that he had Ebola, and really did not, and his father seems to have been paid for their participating in the fraud. And this proves that thousands of Africans are NOT getting and dying of it? How so? She says that Africans do not believe in Ebola. Really? Every African, even when their whole family dies of it? It's ALL a scam? Many Africans believe it is caused by sorcery, a curse put on certain people by envious neighbors, not by the government at all. THAT must be it! She says that many people are being diagnosed with Ebola who really have cholera or malaria, and this proves that Ebola is not real. Again, really? Ebola has been identified with electron microscopes as being a filovirus, unusual in being long and thread-like, in the same family as Ebolaviruses such as the one which causes Marburg. They originated in animal populations, but what with bushmeat providing 80% of the protein for tens of millions of Africans, meat which, when handled raw or when undercooked, can transmit the virus. Many outbreaks have started when people have eaten chimps or gorillas found already dead of Ebola. Scientists have tracked them and found entire areas, formerly with huge ape populations, suddenly denuded, with dead or dying individual apes found whose livers were teeming with Ebolavirus.

People who are compelled to eat bushmeat because they have no other way to meet their need for protein are going to have a psychological reason to deny that it might transmit Ebola to them. The population of Africa has tripled in recent decades. Traditional food animals like cows cannot survive in the tropical heat. Millions and millions of hungry people turning to the fruit bats, rats, porcupines, chimps, gorillas, elephants, duikers, and any other animal that live in the jungle. Some of them can be carrying Ebola during outbreaks. The Vice videos linked above show how, despite a government ban on bushmeat, it is still being sold on the black market by the tons. The people selling and buying it insist that there's NO WAY bushmeat could EVER transmit Ebola. Really?

The VICE journalist shows a mosque where the dead body of an Ebola victim was prepared for burial in a traditional ceremony which involves close contact with the body fluids infected with Ebola, even though this is at present against the law. People are giving bribes to the Red Cross safe burial squads coming for the bodies so that they can carry out the traditional ceremony: it is believed the souls of their dead cannot enter Heaven unless their bodies have been cleaned in the traditional way. The video shows a mosque where a body had recently been cleaned, and everyone who touched the body got Ebola.

It seems as though many Americans have become so cynical about official news of any kind that we think that if we don't deny it and disbelieve it, then we're being foolish and unwisely credulous. So there's no such thing as Ebola. Maybe there's no such thing as cholera or malaria either. Have you ever actually seen someone with them? Maybe that's a scam too, and actually NO contagious disease really exists, they're all scams dreamed up to rake in money for the medical cartel and all its subsidiaries. Maybe NOTHING any scientist EVER says is true. Over 10,000 dead from what they SAY is Ebola since March? Were you there? Maybe all those health centers overwhelmed by the numbers are all just lies to get donations to Medecins Sans Frontieres. The U.S. government really created the Ebola virus in 1976, and released it in small villages and injected it into gorilla and chimp populations to see how quickly it wiped them out? The scientists in the jungle tracking them were REALLY injecting them with it and causing it? All in order to eventually unleash an iatrogenic epidemic to persuade governments of developed countries to pay millions for a vaccine to be given to all Africans? To everyone in the world? Are they going to mandate the vaccine here, but instead of giving the vaccine, they're really going to shoot us up with Ebola, to ratchet up willingness to take the vaccine when the disease goes viral, and say that it has to be taken one month before exposure or it won't work? Maybe those 10,000 and counting Africans SAID to have been killed by Ebola have really been sent to a desert island where they are now living in comfort at the expense of the vaccine companies? The Spanish nurse and the two American nurses, the several doctors and aid workers treated in Western countries, didn't REALLY have anything. The nurse's dog was killed just for propaganda purposes.

Just a few weeks ago a large number of Americans were certain that Ebola was not only real, but was going to cause an epidemic here as well as in Africa. That couldn't have been the case, because it is not airborne, and there has been no known case of a virus ever mutating so much that it changes its mode of transmission. Who knows? Maybe hundreds of thousands of Americans are dying of Ebola, and they're JUST NOT TELLING US, until they have a vaccine and a drug for it. But I think most people have realized that that fear was unfounded, and have moved on to the fear that we're all just being jerked around again by Big Pharma, who this go-round has either invented a disease that doesn't really exist or created it in a test tube, or modified it to make it more dangerous, and is either deliberately spreading it around, or lying about how many have it, have died of it, how serious it is, or any other possible chink through which they might be trying to lie to us and bamboozle us. This is silly, and eventually there are going to be books published on this unusual panic, and the foolish, credulous ones are going to turn out to be those who bought into the denial bubble.


Interesting that the nurse was working for the CDC.
I am glad though that the new quarantine regulations appear much more sensible; home quarantine with the state paying a wage for those three weeks if the employer does not. And importantly instead of people having to beg others to get them food, the state will assign someone to make sure the person in quarantine has food.
IMo, the CDC may possibly have been hoping for a small spread of ebola here, so they could use it to increase CDC funding. It was after all the first thing they bought up when Ebola first hit the news, that they needed more funding. Until someone pointed out that their funding had not dropped...
They possibly did not realize how little trust the general public has in them. And that people are not willing to go along with "we know best' when it looks like decisions are being made that could be unsafe.
I have never understood why mandating 3000 military members (who are not volunteers) to go into an infectious zone where descriptions of Ebola patients lying in the streets mean that infection is potentially everywhere, was considered a good idea.
My real guess is that it is so there are some trial subjects available who could be ordered to take the Ebola vaccine when it comes out( Military members can't refuse vaccines and face court martial if they do so.)
And military doctors have been notorious over the years for "losing" information about side effects in several different situations. As a military doctor, noticing things you are not supposed to notice does your career no good.
I am guessing that this situation is not going to turn into the easy CDC fund raiser they may have been hoping for, though.


Thanks for the information -- Reader


Oh, the pretty wavey hair - strawberry blonde, squeaky wheel nurse just coming back from Africa is working for the CDC and don't like quarentine.

Ohhhh, the CDC. Is is me or does it seem that ALL Federal Agencies stinking with corrupt as rotting road kill -but the CDC is the worse stinker of all and mostly under the radar of the public but now is starting to smell the the worse like - a warm day and the major egg producer is spreading his manure on all his fields. Perhaps the public will take notice - finally????

By the way:

EIS officer at CDC headquarters.
EIS officer (MD, PhD) with supplies for the 2014 Ebola outbreak response in West Africa.

So what is the job description for the Epidemi Intelligence Service. Hmmmmmm

The Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) is a unique 2-year post-graduate training program of service and on-the-job learning for health professionals interested in the practice of applied epidemiology.

Since 1951, over 3,000 EIS officers have responded to requests for epidemiologic assistance within the United States and throughout the world.

EIS officers are on the public health frontlines, conducting epidemiologic investigations, research, and public health surveillance both nationally and internationally.

Recent EIS Investigations

Assistance with tracking cases in multistate outbreak of fungal meningitis associated with injection of methylprednisolone acetate solution
Shelter surveillance after Hurricane Sandy
Investigation of suspected organ-transplant associated human rabies case
Legionnaires disease outbreak at an acute care hospital
Investigation of necrotizing enterocolitis in infants receiving feeding thickening agents, Washington state
Multistate outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium infections associated with exposure to microbiology laboratories
Teen driving practices and parental perceptions of teen driving in rural North Dakota
Legionnaires' disease outbreak associated with travel on a cruise ship, Louisiana
Invasive listeriosis among pregnant women exposed to contaminated cantaloupe, Colorado


A report lists nurse Kaci Hickox as a CDC employee- an EIS specialist- Epidemic Intelligence Services.

Wouldn't real health professionals view quarantine as necessary?

I agree with "Good for..." There is something odd, almost cavalier about some of these doctors without borders people such as the bowling doctor and Kaci. I can't put my finger on it but there is a self righteousness in their actions, words. I prefer the idea of quarantine to forced vaccination.

Also, in my mind, if these professionals only wish to go over and help look after extremely ill people but not act on ways that quietly keep people safe (after all, "do no harm" is the credo) by self quarantining for a few weeks when they return, they come across as thrill seekers.


Good for Governor Christie and Governor Cuomo!

Do we really know if any of them actually had Ebola? There are millions of Africans in the US walking around with the virus in their systems and became immune to it. They were asymptomatic after they contracted it so what about them? Is there going to be a goon squad rounding up all people of African heritage and people who have traveled to African and give them Ebola test? Of course not. Just because you're exposed to the virus doesn't mean you'll contract it. Vinson is a nurse, she knows the symptoms and I believe she is responsible so if she felt she was contagious she would have taken appropriate measures to seek medical attention. The authorities should have tested her after she arrived and if no virus in her system, send her home with instructions to return to a medical facility for treatment & isolation. Even if tested for Ebola according to the creator of the test-it's inaccurate: The Ebola test: let the test’s inventor speak-
as I’ve written, the PCR test has problems. It is open to errors. One of those errors occurs right at the beginning of the procedure:
-Is the sample taken from the patient actually a virus or a piece of a virus? Or is it just an irrelevant piece of debris?

Another problem is inherent in the method of the PCR itself. The test is based on the amplification of a tiny, tiny speck of genetic material taken from a patient—blowing it up millions of times until it can be observed and analyzed.

Researchers who employ the test claim that, as a result of the procedure, they can also infer the quantity of virus that is present in the patient.

This is crucial, because unless a patient has millions and millions of Ebola virus in his body, there is absolutely no reason to think he is sick or will become sick.

So the question is: can the PCR test allow researchers and doctors to say how much virus is in a patient’s body?

Ebola as well as the HIV test is used by the medical profession to test for virus in the bloodstream. What it can't test is the amount or how much virus is there:

“Kary Mullis… is thoroughly convinced that HIV is not the cause of AIDS. With regard to the viral-load tests, which attempt to use PCR for counting viruses, Mullis has stated: ‘Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.’ PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.

Kary Mullis is a biochemist. He is also a Nobel Prize winner (1993, Chemistry). Mullis invented the PCR.
Mullis’ answer was succinct: “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.”
Translation: the PCR test can’t be used to say how much virus is in a person’s body: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/10/06/the-ebola-test-let-the-tests-inventor-speak/ & http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/08/05/ebola-the-us-diagnostic-test-is-utterly-ureliable/

So the question continues to be: Do we(the public)know what the individuals in Africa are dying from given thousands of people across Africa die every day.

Question: Why are law enforcement personnel involved in this? This is a health matter. Why is this not being coordinated by Health authorities? IMHO TPTB wants to condition the populace to not only get used to seeing law enforcement as a "normal" part of daily life but also to accept without questions or resistance law enforcement intrusion into their lives.

Question: If Ebola is so contagious and a threat to humanity, why are there thousands of military personnel over in the "Ebola Zone" without protective suits?



I have a family member that was in the military and in one of the covert organizations of our government. I know the trepidations you feel attempting to obtain information on your Dad. Our family was "followed" for years after this family member left the military. For years we heard from neighbors, teachers at school, extended family member, employers about men asking questions in regards to our family. I have a cousin who is an FBI agent. I asked him if he could find out what the deal was with the men in black visiting friends & family years ago after the Viet Nam war ended. His advise to me was: Drop it-period. Don't ask questions, don't make any phone calls to any authorities, don't write letters asking questions. He than asked "you hear what I'm saying?"

Those who feel the government is their friend and only there to protect them-they are in for a rude awakening.

Jeannette Bishop

Re the New Jersey nurse, Kacie Hickox, the statement by Gov. Christie, if quoted correctly, that she is "obviously ill" is curious. Was he speaking from a different understanding of the reasons she was placed in quarantine? Even if I wasn't a rather paranoid person, I would be pretty uncomfortable being locked down by people not honestly representing the situation. But as such, it makes me want to ask if there was reason, cynically maybe, they expected her to be ill by this point in time, or at the very least, if whoever was running the show misrepresented the circumstances of the quarantine to those whom we might want to think run the show.

autism uncle

All, From the corrupted CDC et al. that brought you the phony Swine/H1N1 Flu, and our Vaccine Carnage, how can anybody listen or trust what they say about Ebola?

Listen Up! There is no realistic fear from an "ebola" virus. Millions of people have visited and explored Africa for the last 200 years, and no new "ebola virus" has been contagious, or transferred to other continents.

This "ebola" hysteria is typical media generated, abetted by such as CDC/NIH to promote their own power and control, and ever gigantic budgets.

Ebola is nowhere remotely dangerous. Stop, think about it. It's real bullsh**t.

But! This generated fear of ebola then promotes instituting ever more vaccine carnage, and terribly damaged children!


In answer to some of your queries about 'agendas,' etc., here is the website the gentleman from the Stanford Research Institute referred to me, shortly after our telephonic conversation:



"This website provides a concise, reliable introduction to vital information of which few are aware. We specialize in providing fact-filled news articles and concise summaries of major cover-ups and corruption which impact our lives and world. All information is taken from the most reliable sources available and can be verified using the links provided. Sources are always noted, with links direct to the information source provided when possible.

WantToKnow.info presents this information as an opportunity for you to educate yourself and others, and to inspire us to join in working together for the good of all. We shine light into the unconscious shadows of ourselves and our world with the intention of inviting us both individually and collectively to make more conscious choices which allow us to step ever more fully into our magnificence and to build a brighter future for us all.

Return visitors can explore our most recent posts and summaries of recent news articles that should have made front page news. And don't miss key excerpts from 20 of the most revealing major media news articles ever published. For those new to this website, please read on.

Did you know that:

Twenty leading journalists, including winners of several Emmys and a Pulitzer, have described being prevented by corporate media ownership from reporting riveting stories on major cover-ups.

BBC News has exposed plans of the U.S. military to "provide maximum control" of the Internet, as detailed in a declassified secret Pentagon document signed by a U.S. Secretary of Defense.

Government documents released through the Freedom of Information Act show the top Pentagon generals once approved plans to foment terrorism and kill innocent civilians in major U.S. cities.

CBS News quotes Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, "According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." That's $8,000 for every man, woman and child in the US.

Multiple reliable sources show that you may be eating genetically modified food daily which scientific experiments have repeatedly demonstrated cause sickness and death in lab animals.

Detroit's leading newspaper reported the 1908 Ford Model T boasted a fuel economy of 25 miles per gallon. Yet over 100 years later, the EPA average mileage for all cars is still around 25 mpg.

A highly decorated US General wrote the book War is a Racket, which depicts how he was manipulated, and how most wars are waged to keep the coffers of certain big corporations filled.

The former chief of a prestigious medical journal has revealed that the total profits of the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 were more than the profits of the other 490 businesses combined.

Declassified CIA documents open to the public leave no doubt that through hypnosis, drugs, and electric shock, secret mind control projects created super spies, terrorists, assassins, and more.

3,000 respected leaders, including government officials and professors, have expressed harsh criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. Many allege government complicity in the 9/11 attacks.

Explore a list arranged by category with links to excerpts of the most revealing major media articles ever published covering a wide variety of fascinating and vital topics..

Note: If you are already aware of these cover-ups, visit our page which will take you even deeper..."

Denise Anderstrom Douglass

Thank you, Cathy. I believe you are right on the dot of the real fear here. And, no, it's not being crazy. Those who don't know or ignore history are doomed to repeat it.

ebola is manmade

information on Doctors without Borders Funding source



ebola is manmade

I thought Doctors without Borders was being accused by citizens in Africa of actually injecting the ebola virus while pretending it was other vaccines?

A Mom

adding on

Perhaps there could also be more preparation for those of us with no options if we knew what the "agenda" or "agendas" are.

A Mom

Lately I've been thinking that we, the poor, the disabled, and the elderly are going to be dealt the same "fate" as the original Native American Indians. Will we all be relegated to cinder block homes on "reservations"? How could we possibly fight something like that if it is part of, or the "agenda" people are whispering about? I'd like to know what all of the "agendas" are, now. Perhaps if everyone knew what they are, there could be more push-back. ???

Good for Governor Christie and Governor Cuomo!

I guess I have a slightly different take on this. We have already seen multiple people who have lied and exposed others in our country to ebola, despite our use of "the honor method" and treating them as mature adults in good faith. Mr. Duncan lied about his exposure. Dr. Nancy Snyderman lied about her intent to adhere to her quarantine. Nurse Vinson travelled when not feeling well, and now we have Dr. Spencer in NY who was out bowling and eating until the very next day, when he felt sick -- with freaking ebola, of all things. If Dr. Spencer had been quarantined, he wouldn't have exposed others to this deadly disease. But he wasn't quarantined, so he potentially did. Can anyone prove that Dr. Spencer's spittle the night before he felt ill on the dinner glass or plate he ate from wasn't infectious with even one tiny little ebola virus particle? Dr. Spencer did whatever he pleased during the disease incubation period. I don't know about you, but I see a disturbing pattern here. Now, Nurse Hickox feels inconvenienced? I doubt she would have agreed to even a voluntary, comfortable isolation at her home. How is that okay?

I am not opposed to quarantining those exposed to a deadly pathogen with a fairly long incubation period. I say this as the alternative to a quarantine is forced vaccination, as soon as a vaccine becomes available. I would much rather experience quarantine, than forced vaccination. Right now, we have a chance to prove that quarantine, alone, is all that is needed to stop the ebola disease from gaining ground and spreading throughout our country. I shudder to think what will happen once the fast-tracked vaccines become available if we do not utilize quarantine. I think Ms. Hickox should be given some good books that she would like to read so she can occupy her time until she can prove she is not infectious. That's what I think.



THANK you again for posting your comment re: this Ebola scenario.

I've never stated this publicly before, but my Father was used in one of those experiments listed on that link you provided. I found out about that in 2007, after I'd contacted someone connected to one of our abc's about this program my Dad had been placed into (in 1953 or thereabouts).

It just sickens me to know this. Absolutely breaks my heart. I've been in contact with someone in the past who also knew about my Dad's situation - he's with SRI (Stanford Research Institute). When I gave him my maiden name over the phone (deliberately), he knew immediately who my Dad was. I was warned by this same gentleman to watch my step, afterwards.

This same man gave me the name/number of another gal that knows about some of these black programs. She, too, warned me to watch myself when I revealed to her, who my Dad is.

I'm actually more than a little nervous as I find myself saying this, but it feels tremendously cathartic at the same time, to do so.

So - when I've hinted over here via many of my comments that there are certain Powers That Be that have agendas, I speak this having true personal knowledge of these type programs. The effects of this one particular program have impacted my family in more ways than I could possibly explain, here. I no longer consider myself the same person as I was, prior to finding this out. It's changed my world paradigm in more ways than I could have ever imagined.

No, you cannot always trust the government, at least not the one we have now. I'm not sure the government we thought we had years and years ago, was ever truly what we've been taught it was, either.

So forgive me if I sound somewhat cynical or pessimistic re: my world view. I realize how much beauty there still is in this lovely world we live in, but there's a dark side as well.

I like that saying, "Your mind is like an umbrella; the only way it works is if it stays open."


Thank you for posting such a concise scenario re: this Ebola issue, Danchi.

It's hard for many people to believe the government they've been so conditioned to accept as being their savior, is anything but.

I hope many who read some of these comments will really spend some time researching some of the so-called alternative news websites. I'm certainly not saying all of these websites are credible, but many give a better descriptive re: what's really going on in this world than you will ever, ever find via our MSM.

Truth is stranger than fiction...and sometimes, it's a bit more harsh than we would like to accept.


Unless the ultimate goal from the authorities is not to protect us but to control…

You are correct. There is so much more to this psy-op than many realize. The ultimate goal is control of the populace. That has always been the goal of TPTB. Many believe the goal is a police state. Read how the nurse from Doctors without Borders was treated upon her arrival in NY.

-Nurse being kept in quarantine despite showing no Ebola symptoms says conditions are like a prison with no shower or flushable toilet and claims her 'basic human rights have been violated' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2808684/This-inhumane-Nurse-returning-West-Africa-kept-quarantine-despite-showing-no-Ebola-symptoms-compares-experience-prison-says-basic-human-rights-violated.html.

This is being done not to say we are protecting the populace, this is to say we are in control.

Ebola is a man made virus:
Human ebola virus species and compositions and methods thereof CA 2741523 A1

Here are two pages from the Department of Defense Appropriations Committee. Notice the date: July 1, 1969.
Scroll down until you see the two copied pages.


The Ebola virus first appeared in 1976 in Africa. The first major outbreak was in 2003 in Gabon and the Congo. Since 2003, there has not been a single major outbreak in any country, including any African country, until the present outbreak in Sierra Leone, Senegal and Liberia. We are told that the virus in the latter three countries is the same one from the outbreak in Gabon and the Congo in 2003. How did that same Ebola virus get from Gabon and the Congo to Sierra Leone, 2000 miles away? No answer has been given. If you look at the time line from July 1, 1969 to 1976. 7 years from the window stated in the in section 2 of the synthetic biological agents section.

Some reports state a strain of the virus, Reston has become airborne-transmitted by air. However, in a CBS report dated August 10, 2014, 25 years ago there was a covert crisis in an office park near Washington Dulles International Airport.

Fall of 1989, dozens of macaques imported from the Philippines suddenly died at Hazelton Research Products' primate quarantine unit in Reston, where animals were kept and later sold for lab testing. Company officials contacted the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infect. Researchers thought it was hemorrhagic fever but testing showed Ebola, Zaire strain which had a 90 percent fatality rate in humans. Four workers at the quarantine facility tested positive for exposure to the virus. Amazingly, they never even got sick. Researchers eventually realized they were dealing with a different strain, one now known as Ebola-Reston. Though its appearance under a microscope is similar to the Zaire strain, Ebola-Reston is the only one of the five forms of Ebola not harmful to humans. Read article at: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/25-years-ago-in-virginia-a-very-different-ebola-outbreak/

Point is all outbreaks have been contained. Suddenly with all the updated technology a outbreak couldn't be contained? Hundreds of people dying in Africa from what is being called Ebola probably is not true. Are the WHO& CDC testing every individual that died? Most likely not. If you're in the Ebola zone and you die, you died from Ebola. Just like in Flu season. If you have a respiratory illness, go to the Doctors or ER they diagnosis you with the Flu. Even though it's not lab confirmed. Even if you were tested the test for Influenza is said to be about 90% inaccurate. You have a cold, it's Flu. If you die (God forbid) while you have a cold-you died from the Flu. Same goes for Ebola.

This brings me to my next point: Project BioShield. Research it.

Under Project BioShield, during the last 10 years the US government has made available 5.6 billion dollars – this to be expanded with another 2.8 billion dollars between 2014 and 2018 – to among other objectives buy up vaccines and other medical countermeasures (MCM) as part of the US government’s “Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness” policies and objectives. The U.S. government passed an act in 2004 to set aside $5.6 billion over 10 years for the stockpiling of drugs and vaccines that could protect against a bioterrorism attack, creating a potential buyer for any company able to prove it had a safe and effective vaccine. – Bloomberg

HR307 makes it perfectly clear that a number of waivers are available that allow the testing and use of ALL and therefore even possibly deadly agents (not necessarily MCMs) without anyone ever being brought to justice in the event that populations and individual human test objects die along the way. That’s also why the UN had earlier declared the outbreak an “international health crisis,” that’s what triggers and allows the full deployment of Project BioShield, including all the features that will protect the US government and the pharmaceutical corporations from any claims made by victims from their MCM test frenzy.

So in short, the Ebola fraud allows the procurement of any and all medical countermeasures by the US government – whether or not safe and effective. Medical corporations get to stick their hands DEEP into the royal cookie jar of Project BioShield along the way and no one will ever be brought in front of a judge for the crimes that have been committed in the process.

So that's what it's all about. A psy-op for all the players in the medical/military industrial complex to get their hands on 8.4 billions dollars and the golden opportunity to test the various vaccines and other drugs, not limited to just Ebola, on the populace via volunteers who are terrorized into believing that the purpose of the vaccines & drugs is to prevent them from contracting Ebola. Icing on the cake: NO LIABILITY.

Drugmakers may need indemnity for fast-tracked Ebola vaccines: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/23/us-health-ebola-vaccine idUSKCN0IC0TZ20141023

Drugmakers are looking for some kind of indemnity from governments or multilateral agencies against possible losses or claims arising from the widespread emergency use of new Ebola vaccines in
Africa. … GlaxoSmithKline (GSK.L) Chief Executive Andrew Witty said a system of indemnity made sense given the unique situation … Witty said indemnity … would be needed when vaccines were rushed into much more widespread use.

THE VIRUS EBOLA WAS HANDLED BIOLOGICALLY BY USA AT FORT DETRICK AS A WEAPON:http://progresismohumano.wordpress.com/2014/08/17/the-virus-ebola-was-handled-biologically-by-usa-at-fort-detrick-as-a-weapon/

The US government has a long history of "testing" on the American people. Maybe if the populace were aware they have been test subjects from the moment they were born they would know not to trust the CDC/Vaccine Industry and their Doctors when they are told Vaccines are safe and effective. Read: Secret US Human Biological Experimentation: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/experiment.htm


Here's an interview Kaci did with CNN:


cia parker

I just googled it, and it SAYS that she's being kept in isolation at a hospital, in a room. Maybe the tent at the airport was just for a short time while they figured out what to do next.

Jeannette Bishop

I think this is only a step or two away from law enforcement administered vaccination, etc. It's been on the books since the time bird flu was threatening to become the next big pandemic that "we are due any day now."

The question to me is are we prepared to surrender all our rights to a few tyrants (who have captured our government and media and are working on capturing our healthcare choices) for perpetuity in order to feel a little safer temporarily?


It seems if reports are accurate, that the new York quarantine of the nurse is inhumane.
Apparently the nurse is being kept in an isolation tent, has been given paper scrubs to wear, has no blanket, no shower, none of her personal supplies , no books, magazines or access to TV, and even though Doctors can talk to her in normal clothes through the window, they won't let her lawyer talk to her.
She describes the fact that mostly she "stares at the walls." Her temperature is normal, and she has tested negative ( at least at this stage ) for the virus. She doesn't know how long she is going to be kept there.
While I can see the possible need for quarantine in some cases, this isolation in a tent without basic human comforts is something different. And could potentially cause psychological damage.
Seems a variation on the same type of callous treatment meted out to Alex S.
Not surprising there are media reports that no one wants to care for the Ebola patient in New York. Knowing that even if you don't get sick, if someone else does, then you are likely to be shoved into a tent in solitary confinement for 21 days is not an inducement to provide nursing care.


I think you raise a very important issue. I guess it depends largely on the quality of one's own local law enforcement. It's good to hear that Vicki had a good experience in Texas. New Jersey's response to the landing and quarantine of a nurse coming home from West Africa after volunteering with Doctors Without Borders isn't as impressive. Reports are that she has been treated like a criminal. So I do think that it is important to be aware and to make sure that people are treated well and that civil rights are maintained.

cia parker

I'm proud of what the U.S. military is doing to help in Liberia, setting up tent cities with cots to get the sick off the streets and out of their homes. I'm proud of our airstrikes that let the Kurds take back Kobani, and of those which are ongoing now. I gave to the Red Cross and Médecins sans Frontieres Ebola campaigns in Africa the other day, and am proud that so many thousands of First Worlders have the compassion and courage to serve these suffering people. I think cynicism is misplaced in these situations in which we see the best of human decency.

cia parker

I disagree too. I don't think Ebola would ever get a foothold here, but in cases like this, with a doctor who had been in close contact with Ebola patients, close enough to have become infected, then, for the protection of those close to him, he HAD to observe a careful quarantine for at least three weeks. Unfortunately (see Nancy Snyderman and Eric Duncan), it looks like a lot of people just can't be trusted to maintain the quarantine from a sense of personal responsibility, and so I support a legally enforced quarantine, again, not an onerous one, but one of strict isolation but comfortable living conditions for the length of the quarantine. Yes, it looks like it's not transmissible until you have violent symptoms, but what is the margin? This doctor felt unwell for several days, went bowling with his fiancée and friends Wednesday evening, then had a fever and diarrhea the next morning. Is it certain he wasn't infectious until ten o'clock Thursday morning? Maybe six o' clock? Maybe nine Wednesday evening? Surely it's not worth taking the risk of infecting other people. Since these intelligent, well-educated people were not able to police themselves, then I think other people's lives are worth enforcing the responsible behavior they should have displayed themselves. Again, how big a deal is it? Sit around eating and watching T.V., reading, listening to music, talking on the phone or on the Internet. It's NOT the same as any of the vaccine-preventable diseases. NONE of them would cause an epidemic in which anything close to the Ebola numbers would die, and, since the vaccines themselves can disable or kill, it must be left up to individual choice as to whether or not to get them. If something as deadly as Ebola became epidemic in the U.S., then it would be a completely different conversation as to where individual rights were superseded by the greater good.

Vicki Hill

Sorry, Cathy, I disagree. I live in the Dallas area, so I've heard all of the local news here that you did not. Law enforcement has been involved from day one when Eric Duncan was diagnosed and hospitalized; they were not newcomers to this issue. The first 3 or 4 days were, unfortunately, haphazard, as the newly written guidelines did not work so well in actual practice and had to be re-worked. But by the time nurse Nina Pham was diagnosed, law enforcement had a protocol in place. They immediately quarantined her apartment. They notified every neighbor in a 4-block area so they would understand about the situation and the extra vehicles in place, as well as the roped off apartment building. The state brought in its own hazmat crew, which had been given more explicit instructions as to what to do. (That resulted in nearly all of Ms. Pham's possessions being saved, as opposed to most everything in the apartment where Duncan had stayed being destroyed.) They made arrangements for her dog, and the two have been reunited this weekend (although the dog is still under quarantine for a few more days. He can't expose her, but there is a miniscule risk that he could expose someone else.)

I am proud of what Texas law enforcement has done to keep hysteria down in this area.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)