Dachel Media Update: Jackson and Sharpton Silent on CDC Whistleblower
Back-to-School Shots - You Have Exemptions

Minority Report: A Covert CDC Program Inoculated Black Babies with Deadly, Experimental Measles Vaccines

Vax af amBy Neil Z. Miller

A Senior Scientist with the CDC, Dr. William Thompson, recently admitted that he and his co-authors intentionally omitted statistically significant information from their 2004 study that was published in the journal Pediatrics. The excluded data showed that "African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism."(1,2) Dr. Brian Hooker, an independent scientist, re-analyzed the original CDC data and published his results confirming that "African American boys receiving their first MMR vaccine before 36 months of age are 3.4 times more likely to develop autism" when compared to African-American boys who receive MMR after 36 months of age.(3)

For more than 10 years, the CDC buried scientific evidence that young Black boys who receive the MMR vaccine have a significantly increased risk of developing autism. The CDC kept this crucial information confidential. The CDC refused to warn the public. The parents of Black babies were not provided with informed consent and their human rights were violated.

Concerned parents are now wondering whether this callous and potentially criminal behavior by the CDC is a one-time fluke or part of a larger pattern. Actually, the CDC and World Health Organization (WHO) have a history of violating the human rights of Black families by unethically experimenting on their babies with dangerous measles vaccines.

A CDC and WHO Catastrophe

In developing countries where children are malnourished and health care is inadequate, measles fatality rates between 5 and 10 percent are possible.(4-6) However, infants up to five months old are usually protected by maternal antibodies that they received during birth.(7-9) Standard measles vaccines do not work in babies under nine months of age.(10) Thus, authorities reasoned that if an effective vaccine could be developed for this vulnerable period -- from 5 to 9 months of age -- the measles death rate could be lowered.

Scientists pinned their hopes for a new measles vaccine on "high-titer" shots that are up to 500 times more potent than standard measles vaccines.(11) In the early 1980s, they tested one of these -- the Edmonston-Zagreb (EZ-HT) strain -- on Mexican and Gambian babies 4 to 6 months old.(12-15) During the next few years this high-titer measles vaccine was also tested on babies in Guinea-Bissau, Togo, Senegal, Haiti, and impoverished minority communities in Los Angeles, California.(16-22) The general public was informed that EZ-HT "produces a better immunological response than standard vac­cines," but a large, randomized controlled study published in The Lancet confirms that it was experimental and deadly.(17)

The Senegal study

From 1987 to 1989, scientists set up a research center near 30 remote villages in central Senegal. Their stated primary objective was to study the clinical efficacy of two high-titer measles vaccines: Edmonston-Zagreb (EZ-HT) and Schwartz (SW-HT).(17) However, researchers had already done several studies demonstrating that high-titer measles vaccines produce a better immunological response than standard vaccines when given to children younger than nine months and as early as four months.(13-16; 18-21) Therefore, scientists conducting the Senegal study might have had another agenda. In fact, an elaborate "mortality surveillance" was established to check safety, evaluate the vaccination strategy, and perform "independent checks on child deaths."(17)

Researchers might have suspected the vaccine was dangerous when the results of earlier studies began to filter in. But they were probably reluctant to abandon their high-titer shot without testing it at least one more time to be sure. Senegal must have seemed ideal; the region was extremely remote, and less than 4% of the mothers who "consented" to the study were literate.(17)

To begin the study, researchers randomly assigned comparable children to three vaccine groups: a) EZ-HT administered at five months; b) SW-HT given at five months; and c) placebo at five months, followed by a standard low-titer measles vaccine at 10 months. All of the children were followed for up to three years. When the results were tabulated (using eight statistical procedures) it became clear that children who received the high-titer measles vaccines had significantly higher mortality at 41 months than children in the standard low-titer measles vaccine group. But they were not dying from measles. Most of the deaths were from other common childhood diseases. Apparently, the high-titer measles vaccines lowered overall immunity making the children fatally susceptible to diarrhea, dysentery, malaria, malnutrition, acute respiratory ailments, and other infectious diseases.(17)

Children who received the Schwartz strain (SW-HT) died of other diseases at a rate 51% higher than children who received a standard vaccine. There were 48 excess deaths for every 1000 babies vaccinated. Children who received the Edmonston-Zagreb strain (EZ-HT) died of other diseases at a rate 80% higher than children who received a standard vaccine. There were 75 excess deaths for every 1000 babies vaccinated.(17) Mortality remained consistently high in the second and third year after the EZ-HT vaccine was administered, whereas it declined substantially in the control group. One of every six babies vaccinated with EZ-HT died within three years.(17)

When it started to become clear that mortality in the high-titer vaccine groups was excessive, researchers refused to end the study. Instead, they sought out new babies to take part in more tests of their deadly shots.(17) They said, "these findings suggest a need to reconsider the use of high-titer measles vaccines early in life in less developed countries."(17) [Author's emphasis added.] The implication is that EZ-HT and EZ-SW may be okay for use in more developed countries. In fact, the Senegal researchers were willing to develop "other strategies to reduce mortality from early measles," but apparently only "if these findings are confirmed in other settings."(17)

The Los Angeles study

Vaccine researchers were unwilling to abandon their deadly Edmonston-Zagreb high-titer measles vaccine. Instead, they set up a study base in Los Angeles, California. In 1990, three years after the Senegal study was initiated, the first American Black and Hispanic babies were inoculated with EZ-HT.(22)

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the CDC knew about the high mortality associated with EZ-HT but considered the data "preliminary."(23) Thus, the Los Angeles trials were permitted to occur. However, Dr. Joanne Hatim, an active proponent of vaccine safety, questioned the experimental study and was able to muster public outrage.(22) In 1991, the Los Angeles trials were halted, but not before nearly 1500 minority babies were experimented on.(24)

The CDC was dishonest about the Los Angeles study on several points, both before and after it was conducted:

1) The "informed consent" form provided to parents violated U.S. and internationally accepted ethical codes of conduct regulating human experimentation. The mothers and fathers of the babies who were used as research subjects were not informed that EZ-HT was unlicensed in the U.S. It was registered as an investigational new drug to be used for experimental and research purposes only.(22) Nor were they informed of earlier studies in Guinea-Bissau, Senegal and Haiti where the EZ-HT measles vaccine had shown a significant increase in mortality.(22) The Los Angeles babies were used as sacrificial guinea pigs because it was well established before they were injected that this experimental vaccine was a killer.(22)

2) Parents were told that millions of doses of the Edmonston-Zagreb vaccine had already been used in Europe. But the Los Angeles, California babies were not receiving that vaccine; they were being injected with the significantly more potent, high-titer shot.(22)

3) The CDC claimed that the communities targeted for the experimental vaccine were hardest hit by a recent outbreak of measles. Babies in Inglewood, East Los Angeles, and West Los Angeles received the shots.(24) However, according to data obtained from the Los Angeles County Department of Health, 14 of 24 regions within Los Angeles County had a greater number of confirmed measles cases than East Los Angeles, and 16 of 24 regions had more measles than West Los Angeles. Inglewood was ranked fourth. In other words, communities targeted for the experimental shots were not hardest hit by the recent outbreak of measles.(22)

The three regions chosen to receive the experimental shots were predominantly Black and Hispanic. In fact, 88% of the babies were minorities. Several mixed-race and White communities harder hit by the recent outbreak of measles were not chosen to participate in the study.(22

4) The CDC claimed that no children were adversely affected by the experimental vaccines. However, one baby died from a rare bacterial disease.(24) Furthermore, according to investigative journalist Keidi Obi Awadu, several children "experienced what parents are describing as long-term immune system impairment, seizures and other acute conditions consistent with vaccine-induced injury."(22)

5) Dr. Stephen Hadler, director of the epidemiology and surveillance division of the CDC's national immunization program, claimed that babies died in the earlier studies because they were malnourished and did not have access to adequate health care.(24) However, the Senegal study emphasized that "the three vaccine groups were comparable as regards various social, family, and health characteristics."(17) If the babies vaccinated with high-titer shots were malnourished, so were the babies in the control group, yet mortality was 80% higher in the group receiving EZ-HT.(17) Regarding the claim that babies did not have adequate health care, the Senegal study also noted that "intensive medical care [was] provided during the project."(17) For example, "Free drugs and medical services were provided to all children. As a consequence, overall mortality was substantially lower than during the three preceding years."(17)

6) The Los Angeles study might have had a hidden agenda. In Senegal, researchers established that "there was no significant difference within the study group in mortality by sex,"(17) yet scientists claimed the vaccine had a "mysterious gender bias," with girls more likely to suffer from the vaccine-induced delayed mortality.(23) E. Richard Stiehm, an immunologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, speculated that girls mount a superior immune response to the measles vaccine, then suffer from a hypersensitivity that leaves them immunologically disadvantaged later on. Kenneth Bart, director of the National Vaccine Program Office in Rockville, Maryland, provided a sociological explanation: boys and girls probably get sick equally in the years after vaccination, but girls receive less adequate health care causing them to die at greater rates. However, Lauri Markowitz, an epidemiologist with the CDC, thought there might be a biological explanation, and claimed there is no evidence that boys in the earlier studies were treated better than girls. To shed light on this gender enigma, Markowitz planned to measure antibody levels and immune cell counts in Los Angeles children who received the high-titer vaccine.(23) Is it possible that these babies' lives were placed in jeopardy to satisfy scientific curiosity and settle an academic debate?

In 1990, WHO requested 250 million doses of the deadly EZ-HT measles vaccine to be dispensed throughout the world.(22) However, data from Guinea-Bissau, Senegal, and Haiti continued to confirm that EZ-HT doesn't save lives -- it increases mortality.(23) By June of 1992, the link was irrefutable; WHO called for a moratorium on use of the disputed vaccine.(23) By some estimates, this might have prevented 18 million baby deaths.(22) Four years later, the CDC issued a tepid letter of regret by declaring, "a mistake was made."(24) Yet, the entire debacle was unnecessary. In the Senegal study conclusion, the authors refer to a Togo study that used a low-titer measles vaccine and produced a good immunogenic response at six months.(20)

Researchers also discussed another Senegal study where standard measles vaccines "were safe, even when given at 4-6 months."(17) Furthermore, "since most complications of measles occur during the 2nd and 3rd weeks after onset, early treatment is possible."(17) In fact, "a systematic treatment of complications in [the other Senegal study] reduced the case-fatality rate among children below three years of age by 78%."(17) Thus, non-fatal options were available.


A top scientist at the CDC recently admitted that he and his co-authors omitted crucial information from a study that was published 10 years ago. The excluded information showed that "African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism."(1,2) Less than 20 years before their study was published, the CDC tested deadly, experimental measles vaccines on African infants and then again on inner-city American babies. These examples provide strong evidence that the CDC is engaged in a pattern of cavalier, unethical and potentially criminal behavior whereby the human rights of Black families and minority children are being violated. You should trust the CDC and their measles vaccines, including MMR, at your own peril.


1. DeStefano F, Bhasin TK, Thompson WW, et al. "Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a population-based study in metropolitan Atlanta." Pediatrics 2004 Feb; 113(2): 259-66.

2. Press Release. "Statement of William W. Thompson, Ph.D., regarding the 2004 article examining the possibility of a relationship between MMR vaccine and autism." August 27, 2014. www.morganverkamp.com

3. Hooker BS. "Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data." Translational Neurodegeneration 2014 Aug 8; 3: 16.

4. Henderson RH, et al. "Immunizing the children of the world: progress and prospects." Bull WHO 1988; 66: 535-43.

5. Hayden GF, et al. "Progress in worldwide control and elimination of disease through immunization." J of Pediatrics 1989; 114: 520-27.

6. Gold E. "Current progress in measles eradication in the U.S." Infect Med 1997; 14(4): 297-300; 310.

7. Van Ginneken JK, et al. Maternal and Child Health in Rural Kenya. (London: Croom Helm, 1984).

8. Black FL, et al. "Geographic variation in infant loss of maternal measles antibody and in prevalence of rubella antibody." American J. of Epidemiology 1986; 124: 442-52.

9. Garenne M, et al. "Pattern of exposure and measles mortality in Senegal." J of Infectious Diseases 1990; 161: 1088-94.

10. WHO-EPI. "The optimal age for measles immunization." Weekly Epidemiology Records 1982; 57: 89-91.

11. Job JS, et al. "Successful immunization of infants at 6 months of age with high dose Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine." Pediatric Infect Dis J 1991 April; 10(4): 303-311.


12. Sabin AB, et al. "Successful immunization of children with and without maternal antibody by aerosolized measles vaccine. I. Different results with undiluted human diploid cell and chick embryo fibroblast vaccines." JAMA 1983; 249: 2651-62.

13. Sabin AB, et al. "Successful immunization of children with and without maternal antibody by aerosolized measles vaccine. II. Vaccine comparisons and evidence for multiple antibody response." JAMA 1984; 251: 2363-71.

14. Whittle HC, et al. "Immunisation of 4-6 month old Gambian infants with Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine." Lancet 1984; ii: 834-37.

15. Whittle HC, et al. "Trial of high-dose Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine in The Gambia: antibody response and side-effects." Lancet 1988; ii: 811-814.

16. Aaby P, et al. "Trial of high-dose Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine in Guinea-Bissau: protective efficacy." Lancet 1988; i: 809-811.

17. Garenne M, et al. "Child mortality after high-titre measles vaccines: prospective study in Senegal." Lancet 1991; 338: 903-7.

18. Whittle HC. "Effect of dose and strain of vaccine on success of measles vaccination of infants aged 4-5 months." Lancet 1988; i: 963-66.

19. Khanum S, et al. "Comparison of Edmonston-Zagreb and Schwartz strains of measles vaccine given by aerosol or subcutaneous injection." Lancet 1987; i: 150-53.

20. Tidjani O, et al. "Serological effects of Edmonston-Zagreb, Schwartz, and AIK-C measles vaccine strains given at ages 4-5 or 8-10 months." Lancet 1989; ii: 1357-60.

21. Markowitz LE, et al. "Immunization of six-month-old infants with different doses of Edmonston-Zagreb and Schwartz measles vaccines." NEJM 1990; 332: 580-87.

22. Awadu KO. Outrage! How Babies Were Used as Guinea Pigs in an L.A. County Vaccine Experiment. (Long Beach, CA: Conscious Rastra Press, 1996).

23. Weiss R. "Measles battle loses potent weapon." Sci 1992 Oct. 23: 546-47.

24. Cimons M. "CDC says it erred in measles study." L.A. Times (June 17, 1996).

Neil Z. Miller is a medical research journalist and the author of several articles and books on vaccines, including Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Parents and Health Practitioners.



Toby C

Thank you for a well written and thoroughly researched piece. Why this information about the link between autism and vaccines is not more widely known beggars belief. Conspiracy? It sure looks that way.


Psalms 37:11

david m burd

Susan, Regarding the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic: It was a "fabricated pandemic" by the likes of the U.S. CDC and WHO as they ran tens of millions of more/extra flu tests beginning the late Spring and through the Summer of 2009 - this volume of tests not normally done, AND, they shoved virtually all of the various flus into the H1N1 Swine flu category. That done, the CDC and WHO pushed extra (toxic) flu shots on top of the needless usual flu shot onto the panicked public through the the Fall months, and also treated millions of flu-cases with toxic antiviral drugs. Summing up: Massive extra testing of course found positive flu cases that have always been with us, but just not tested for, then pushed a fear-mongered public into taking extra (toxic) flu shots, and also treated with toxic antiviral drugs. Voila! Massively more testing, massively more toxic shots, massive toxic treatments, therefore higher than usual "flu-associated" mortality. Thank you, CDC.

Jenny Allan

Just to enlarge on a few items from Angus Files's UK Daily Mail link (below):-
"New(UK)government figures show there are 1.5 million children in state schools classed as having a learning difficulty or disability
• Almost one million boys have special educational needs compared to around 500,000 girls who have been diagnosed with SEN
• Can include behavioural issues, emotional and social difficulties and speech, communication and language needs."

"It reveals that as of January, just over one in six pupils (17.9 per cent) were considered to have special educational needs (SEN) - a total of 1.49 million youngsters.
Black pupils are most likely to be diagnosed with some form of learning difficulty or disability, the figures show, while Chinese youngsters are the least likely.
The most common types of need for pupils classed as having special needs are speech and language difficulties and behavioural and emotional issues, a Government analysis of the data concludes."

It's interesting to note in the UK as well as the US, black children are the "most likely to be diagnosed with some form of learning difficulty or disability."

As in the US, this worrying UK report has not apparently worried anyone in the educational, medical or political hierarchy. Autism is NOT specifically mentioned in the main article, but there's a separate report below the article about a US study which claims girls are less susceptible to autism because their brains are GENETICALLY wired differently from boys. OH YEAH!!


Your Right Susan.
Perhaps then we can put these tales of horror together for some kind of giant confessionday-- I heard that "All Saints Day" Is in there somewhere close to Halloween.

Cherry Sperlin Misra

This is one of those reasons why you just want to tell a poor mother in India (where I live) -" Dont go to doctors Dont go to a hospital when you deliver a baby "
Here were little African babies who had a normal chance of having a life and it was actually taken away from them- And FOR WHAT ? - for a measles vaccine that they did not need because they were breast feeding ! they could get their immunity from their mother .
Where was the study that showed that babies in Africa were dying before 9 months of age from measles ? Show us THAT study.
This study did not satisfy the Do No Harm principal.
What this study proves is that medical personele around the world, have been brainwashed to believe that vaccines are sacred and good and anything you do with them, must be good. This belief needs to be demolished.
No one should respect the WHO until they change their approach to vaccine ingredients and vaccine safety. There are two big WHO offices in New Delhi and I would be willing to bet that none of the higher ups would ever vaccinate their kids in India- or if they are Indian employees, they would go to one of the tiny handful of doctors who state from the get-go that they use only certain imported vaccines.
All of the large health-oriented organisations and associations want us to trust the modern medical practises. They have achieved the opposite.


These are kids regardless of their colour or culture. All adults should be outraged and demanding action.


A few months before the big swine flu propaganda and vaccine push Baxter pharmaceuticals sent vaccine ingredients out to be made into vaccines. The lab technician wasn't scheduled to test the ingredients but decided to do so anyway, he found live bird flu virus mixed with the ingredients. This wasn't covered by the media but a medical doctor (who became a nun) tells people about it in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0JqQyl09zQ
Another thing she said was strange was how WHO changed the definition of "pandemic" just in time for swine flu to be declared a pandemic..anyway it's a very interesting lecture she gives. It shows how sinister these big organizations are.
Benedetta, about your suggestion...I don't think the halloween celebration is a good idea,they'd probably take it as a complement since Halloween is said to be the favorite time of year for devil worshipers and their ilk.

Laura Hayes

Thank you, Mr. Miller, for an eye-opening read. How sad that I was not shocked in the least. In my 18+ years of vaccine research I have learned that TIME AND AGAIN our government regulatory agencies have lied, covered-up inconvenient truths that would jeopardize their ridiculous vaccine program, maligned parents and doctors who have spoken the truth about vaccine dangers and inefficacies, refused to inform the public as sordid truths have arisen, and goodness only knows what else. The immoral and unethical things they have done, and their unconscionable abuse of power, is mind-blowing.

Regarding your final statement, "You should trust the CDC and their measles vaccines, including MMR, at your own peril."...that needs to be expanded quite a bit to something like:

"Should you trust any government regulatory agency, be it the CDC, FDA, USDA, EPA, etc., you are doing so at your own peril. Many who work there have proven themselves to be some of the most dishonest, corrupt, and evil people on the planet."

So much for liberty, human rights, and medical choice freedom in the U.S.A. I see corruption and tyranny everywhere I look these days.

By the way, one of the first vaccine books I read was by you, Mr. Miller: "Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?" Simply awesome book! Thank you. Link for those who might be interested to purchase it for themselves, a friend, or a relative:


Jack Humph

Having followed Peter Aaby's work for some time it's good to see greater public awareness of the irregularities in vaccination that his work exposed that are drowned out by pro-vaccine hysteria generated by big pharma.


Not only can death and debility apparently be manipulated when vaccinating, but it can be focussed on specific groups by race and gender, by type of vaccine as Miller states and also by the location of a vaccine in a schedule.

This knowledge can be used wisely and altruistically, but it also provides a terrible opportunity for those (as were exposed with Project Coast) of psychopathic/sociopathic bent that may exist within the CDC/NIH.

Between 2001 and 2005 many microbiologists with strong association to "Project Coast" and similar race specific research biowarfare projects (such as UK's Dr David Kelly) met their deaths in extremely suspicious circumstances coincident with the CDC suppression of the vaccine dangers to African American male children, could there be a link?
Are psychos in charge of the asylum? The truth certainly seems greater than fiction.






Stephanie Seneff

I just got a new tip about a possible link between MMR and autism. Turns out MMR is one of only a few vaccines that contain glutamate. Autistic children are known to have high glutamate levels in their blood as well as a glutamate-based chronic low grade encephalopathy (inflammatory brain disorder). [Glutamate is a well-known excitotoxin] I can imagine that glutamate injected directly into the body with the vaccine could cause an acute neurotoxic reaction in their brains. There's a link to glyphosate (the weedkiller Roundup) here as well, because glyphosate chelates manganese (makes it unavailable) and manganese is essential for the enzyme that converts glutamate to glutamine, thereby detoxifying it.

cia parker

I think even the basic premises for giving the measles vaccine to babies 5-9 months old were flawed. I have read in several places that placental immunity to measles lasts for nine months, two sources said a full year, but I'm sure it differs from one child to another, and breastfeeding by a mother who had recovered from natural measles conferred some degree of protection for as long as she continued breastfeeding. Mothers who had never had measles, only been vaccinated, were able to ocnfer little or no protection to their babies. Did they alter the facts to get the justification they needed to give experimental vaccines to babies in the first year?


As Boyd Haley noted...In Washington USA in November 2002 Professor Boyd Haley graphically demonstrated how elevated testosterone in conjunction with mercury compounds created vulnerability to neuron damage...

Of course the CDC would agree to differ..liars



A brilliant book written by Edward Hooper 'The River ' about polio vaccine trials in Africa is a must read



Yes, boys are more likely to be diagnosed with LD and autism than girls, and blacks, especially black males, are now being reported to be at greater risks for these two conditions. Could testosterone fully account for this, and further pointing to how it may aggravate vaccine insults? Black males on the whole are said to have more testosterone than white males, and which for instance puts them at greater risk for developing prostate cancer.


Sorry meant to quote...

Black pupils are most likely to be diagnosed with some form of learning difficulty or disability, the figures show, while Chinese youngsters are the least likely.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2743449/Boys-twice-likely-diagnosed-special-needs-girls-new-figures-reveal.html#ixzz3CMAXWJAz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



Boys are twice as likely to be diagnosed with special needs as girls, new figures reveal




I heard on the radio that Halloween is the second after Christmas for money spent and in popularity.

Halloween parties --- are a big thing. Time for horror stories. I elect this one. There are a ton of others involving CDC, NIH - vaccines and brain injuries over the years.

A good idea for the whole month of October is to get these stories together and presenting them on Age of Autism. Get us ready for those Halloween Party - Mad sceintist - tales of the Crypt.


In the second to last meeting after all the parents left and they were sitting around the tabel Tom Insel and the gang at the IACC said that the minorities -- the blacks and hispanics had been some what lower than the whites in cases of autism -- but now there has been a rapid rise in recent years.

They were trying to point that the blacks and hispanics are finally being dignosed and getting services like the whites have had all the time.

I have worked in many school systems in my area -- they all get tested equally. Now I don't know about the other school systems --

So this is all true -- how do we get the public to hear the truth? Besides face book and the intenet -- all news stations -- nothing.

Radio is still some what opened though aren't they?


Exactly Greg when the boot is on the other foot..don't even joke about the vaccines... EVER!!


At no point did anyone take Hugh Jackman seriously last night at the Golden Globes when he joked about the lack of importance of getting a flu shot.

Because, you see, it was a joke — he had the flu. He didn't like the flu, and he wasn't promoting how easy it was to have the flu. He was joking because he SHOULD HAVE gotten a flu shot.

Yet, here's the CDC losing their damn minds over it!

Here's what a rep said:

"I don’t know if he really meant that vaccination was not a good thing to do, but each year millions become ill with influenza; more than 200,000 may be hospitalized; and between 3,000 and 49,000 will die. The first and most important step in protecting against the flu is to get a flu vaccine each season."

Wow, thanks for that Debbie Downer of the CDC.

Give us a break. Here's what he said, jokingly grinning the whole time and obviously feeling terrible:

"Sorry, I’m at the tail end of this flu and I was kicking myself for not getting the flu shot … but it appears actually you don’t need one. I feel great!"

No CDC member needs to waste their time clarifying!

Congrats, Hugh!

MMR RIP (No Joke)


Perhaps the most sickening part about the whistleblower scandal is not that the CDC lied and covered up the link between MMR and autism in black boys, but now that the truth is out nothing is being done. Seriously -- how many black kids around the world today will be vaccinated on an early schedule that puts them at an increased risk of developing autism? Shame on everyone who do not speak up, and especially shame on all black leaders who are staying quiet and not defending your community.


Boom, now you've got CDC, WHO, and likely some high powered academics beyond the CDC crowd implicated. Further, you've got field-scale evidence that high titer measles vaccines produce 50-80% higher mortality... and then discounting the evidence, this group decides that they need to test this same unlicensed vaccine in LA minority neighborhoods because they 'don't believe the results'?

This stretches the bounds of ethics and legality to such a point that it defies comprehension. The terms 'medical racism' and perhaps 'genocide' come to mind.

This perspective (and study series) might be a bit bigger and more inflammatory issue than the Thompson CDC data suppression.

It also puts the recent unsettling Wakefield video detailing the Tuskegee syphilis study and Thompson's CDC revelations into proper context.

Dan Burns

Tiger by the tail.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)