Deirdre. I have to assume you believe what you say. However, for those of us who have witnessed a severe reaction to the shot, followed by loss of speech/regression, resulting in young, non verbal adults who require 24/7 care, your post is not convincing. The other point I would make is that you suggest it is congenital. How can this be when there has been no 'autism' in any family member, in any generation?

Surely the fact that the rate of autism has increased from 1:10,000 in 1970s to approximately 1:35 today should give you pause for thought and, please, no 'better diagnosis' because that implies that parents before 1980/90 did not notice that their children could not talk or lead and independent life.

For all hose who link vaccines to autism. A huge longitudinal study in Denmark (which has outstandingly complete medical records) has disproved this. The researchers took two groups, one of children who had been vaccinated and the other in which no children had been vaccinated. The incidence of autism was identical in both groups. In other words, it is a congenital disorder which often can be seen in family history.

Of course this has been proven to be false, but there are still televangelist types making a living spreading fear.

Even if we buy that propaganda that vaccine is safe it’s still wrong way to combat diseases.
Anyone who pro vaccine must understand that we have children and babies dying from thousand of different diseases , so by thinking pro vaccine we must create thousand vaccines and inject every new born with thousand different vaccines. And this, even most hardcore pro vaccinist will agree, create major problems. And than what? will have to vaccinate against previous vaccination?
It’s just road to hell. No logic ,but money , NWO, and dumb population.

Vaccines do cause autism. Th1 is bypassed and th2 is overstimulated. Subdermal smalpox and oral polio avoided this problem and allready carried unavoidable danger. The immunesystem which is not mature before age 2 is being put in overdrive. All lymfatic tissue, research GALT/MALT/BALT and even brain lymfatics, is involved. A chronic reaction, call it allergy, infection,autism, deterioration, neuropathy, is the result. Difficult to label in one pathology.

In it's worse form it results in anafylactic shock or strokes.
The synergy of adjuvants and preservatives is involved in this proces and NOT researched. Even and especially in the minute doses currently used and injected intramuscular.

Read. Research. Discuss. Spread the word. Time is ticking.

Love to all with an open heart.

Greetings from Belgium

Kevin,
Sorry, I just read your comment, which explained how the excessive inflammatory response evoked by vaccines causes the strokes which result in autism. Clogging up of capillaries by white blood cells. Really elementary. I wasn't trying to plagiarize your comment.

Eindecker, I know you will correct me if I am wrong, but I understood that Japan does not use MMR. It is not easy to find out for sure, but I gather they only use single vaccines - or MR (no mumps).

As far as your info on number of cases of measles is concerned, doesn't 'cut much ice' with me. When I was young, most children had measles. They did not get them as a young baby as mothers passed on the natural measles antibodies. No-one I knew was scared of them because nobody knew of anybody who had died. Nor had anyone heard of autism.

I know you will only respond, if at all, with information about Japan's vaccine schedule/incidence of measles. I know you will not respond re the fact that children today are far less healthy or the current high incidence of neurological damage (that did not exist until late 1980s).

I don't believe you care at all about the suffering of families with autism. I believe you only care that children are vaccinated according to the schedule laid down by their governments.

Peter,

I think it would be more productive to study brain damage caused by strokes, because that's what autism is. When the immune system mounts a strong inflammatory response to the invasion of the strange ingredients in the vaccine, or, if present, to the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, etc., a lot of white blood cells are called up to fight it, and the massive amounts clog up the capillary beds, most critically in the brain, and impede normal blood circulation, just like a stroke. The absence of oxygen then causes cell death, on a spectrum, of course, depending on how long the vaccine encephalitis continues. Really the only answer is to create new neural circuits by modeling and imitation, ABA theory extended to every area of life.

Ok lets see if i can add some personal eyewitness knowledge without being attacked by pro vaccine bullies like usual.
Lets start with my son having autism. He first became autistic after his first round of shots. It was very slight. Afterward was still progressing well starting to talk and had good eye contact and paid attention, he just liked lining up toys and doing hand twinkles. Time went by and it came time for another round of shots. Since the ACTUAL misinformation out on the web said clearly from all the most trusted sources cdc, all main stream news etc that vaccines dont cause autism i dumbly beleived them. Got the second round and since he was almost 2 years old i immediatly could tell something happened to him. He stopped eye contact. He stopped trying to talk. He began getting angry frequently and hitting himself in the face really hard. And of course now i know that the vaccines caused this to find out my son is left behind and forgotten about and has had his livelyhood and happiness ripped from his future.
Now to explain the link that i have seen NO reports on and if i post it anywhere its bullied then taken down. So here it is in simple explanation of all common knowledge facts.

1-First lets start with blood flow. Some parts of your body including sensitive parts of your brain are fed by capillaries so small that red blood cells travel through in single file. In fact they deform to oval shape to fit through.

2-white blood cells are up to 10x the size of red blood cells.

3-injecting large amounts of foreign substances into the body causes an influx of white blood cells that can clog these small capillaries.

4-cutting off blood flow to parts of the brain is a stroke. Its a small undetected stroke that in most cases doesnt kill children and since they are so helpless they arent able to tell you they are having massive head pain or dizzy and sick.
5-A stroke can happen all over the body. Your other organs also are fed by capillaries and can be clogged and cause cell death. Which in turn can cause mutations of the heart, liver, kidneys lungs or other vital organs.
____________
So if you feel the need to vaccinate your children please spread the doses out so it doesnt cause an over influx of white blood cells. My son had 7 vaccinations in 2 shots in 1 setting and his life is ruined.
Of course they dont want to admit what theyve done to these children. Criminals rarely turn themselves in or offer evidence to incriminate themselves. Besides to give my son monetary damages in a similar case that wasnt elite protected such as a corporation causing similar dehabilitating damage with lifelong injuries the price tag would be 50 to 100 million usd. In fact i wouldnt accept 100 million usd to inflict this on my son. And with several million children in america alone having this happen im sure it would bankrupt them. Honestly id like to see justice for my son and see the perpetuators of this crim serve prison time life sentences along with anyone who had a hand in silencing the information that could have saved my son had i been able to read it before falling into this trap.
One day i and his mom will be deceased. Then noone will be there that loves him enough to keep him comforted when he doesnt understand whats happening in his little world of autism.

Japan removed Merck’s MMR vaccine from the schedule in 1993 and is doing just fine.
They have ~500 cases/year and ~1 serious event per 1000, in a country with 127,000,000 people.

https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/en/iasr-measles-e/865-iasr/8019-458te.html

They are also tied with Finland for the lowest infant mortality among developed nations.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_05.pdf

The United States brings up the rear for infant mortality, corrected for premature births or not.

1 in 34 - NJ Autism. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/ss/ss6706a1.htm?s_cid=ss6706a1_w

US Population 327,167,434

US census under 18 = 22.6%
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217

Under 18 US Pop = 73,939,840
Therefore Autism = 2,174,701

No wonder there’s 5 classrooms in my son’s high school dedicated to autism.

If the rate was still 1 in 10,000
Autism = 7,394

No matter how you run these numbers, it’s devastating. And it’s not a matter of IF your family will be affected, just WHEN.

"1973: An American dentist suffering from MS, Hal Huggins, DDS, met a Brazilian dentist, Olympia Pinto, at a conference in Mexico City. Dr. Pinto shocked Huggins by telling him that amalgam fillings are unstable and mercury from amalgams can trigger illnesses like Hodgkin’s disease and sickle cell anaemia."

Are you sure sickle cell anaemia is a genetic condition ?

Respectfully, it is a circular logic that stops science. In the absence of a genetic blood test performed at birth, a disease cannot be attributed to environmental causes. Thousands of diseases exist in this world yet only a handful are genetically screened at birth and it makes no sense to screen for environmental diseases since the cause is not genetic.

For example, lung cancer is a devastating disease primarily caused by smoking. There is no blood test at birth, yet scientists have concluded that smoking is the primary etiological agent. First, correlation studies linked smoking to cancer and subsequent research revealed that smoking was the primary insult.

Autism is a devastating disease primarily caused by vaccines. There is no blood test at birth, yet some scientists believe that Merck’s aluminum adjuvant is the primary etiological agent. First, correlation studies linked vaccines to autism and subsequent research is revealing that metals are the primary insult.

Fred,
You're putting the cart before the horse in saying that screening at birth for SCD proves it's genetic. If it wasn't screened for the condition would very soon become apparent from the symptoms. The very obvious symptoms of severe autism are in most cases absent at birth and arise later, usually after vaccination. If it was tested for at birth that would give us more evidence that autism is not genetic, but caused by vaccines, if any more evidence were needed.

Angus,

There isn’t universal screening of newborns and a simple blood test for autism.

Angus,

For sickle cell anemia there is universal newborn screening at the time of birth in all 50 states. Since it's diagnosed immediately and all infants are screened you wouldn't expect the percentages to change over time.

Paul,

Sickle cell anemia is diagnosed at the time of birth with a simple blood test. It's been that way for decades.

Hi Chris, I am guessing you are new to this ( and don't have young children, or you would know the current vaccine schedule) but the short answer is wrong on all counts...
Kim has already addressed the genetic point, but if you need more info, we can provide it.
Re the vaccine schedule; nope.
Vaccines are now given in utero ( before the baby is born, to the mother) and the first vaccine on the schedule is given on the day of birth. ( Hep B). After that, 68 more vaccines to go in the next five years or so.
But you shouldn't take my word for it. Here is the link to the CDC. ( Center for Disease Control, in charge of our vaccine schedule). You will notice some shots contain multiple vaccines, and there are so many given between birth and 15 months, that it needs its own schedule.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html

Just reading through this thread should give you a lot more facts. And you might want to ask yourself who told you that all autism is genetic and happens neonatally, and that no vaccines are given before a year old. What reason did they have to lie to you? If you have more questions, ask them. It is how you will learn.

Chris

Autism is not a genetic disorder - there is much scientific discussion of this on these pages, however we also note that it was declared not to be a genetic disorder by the present director of NIH, and former director of the Human Genome Project in a letter to Congress in 2006:

https://www.ageofautism.com/2009/11/iaccs-dr-francis-collins-gives-the-game-away-on-autism.html%20

Karen

Of course it didn’t, but you betray a complete ignorance of autism if consider it to be more trivial than polio.

The research seems so conflicting I just do not know what to believe

Oops! Twitter - but maybe 'witter' is appropriate

Bill Gates: Logic is missing from your comment. Nobody has asserted that vaccines cause autism in all cases. That would be unscientific, and demonstrably false. Autism results from neurological injury leading to chronic neuro-inflammation. There are many environmental factors which can produce this, but it is clear, the evidence from multiple disciplines is overwhelming, and the reports from many thousands of parents undeniably compelling, that over-vaccination is indeed causal in the majority, if not most cases. There is a great deal of good science showing this to be true. I can provide you with a detailed list of books and scientific papers, if you wish to educate yourself.

Hey Johnny Zero,
Thanks for the link. With quick glance, it does look like we share similar ideas. I will bookmark Genereux's page and do some reading this afternoon.
Cathy

Ariannah,

Many of us who support Age of Autism have spent thousands of hours researching vaccines.

You make very definite statements that vaccines do not cause autism and that children are dying because some children are not vaccinated. Please can you post the research that supports these comments?

Thank you.

Rage

The US govenment knows that vaccines cause autism (behind a thin semantic veil). HHS HRSA officials told journalists Sharyl Attkisson and David Kirby on different occasions:

"The government has never compensated, nor has it ever been ordered to compensate, any case based on a determination that autism was actually caused by vaccines. We have compensated cases in which children exhibited an encephalopathy, or general brain disease. Encephalopathy may be accompanied by a medical progression of an array of symptoms including autistic behavior, autism, or seizures."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20016356-10391695.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-and-david-kirby/vaccine-court-autism-deba_b_169673.html

And Julie Gerberding, when she was head of the CDC, and before she took the revolving door to Merck's vaccine division told CNN over the Poling case:

“Now, we all know that vaccines can occasionally cause fevers in kids. So if a child was immunized, got a fever, had other complications from the vaccines. And if you’re predisposed with the mitochondrial disorder, it can certainly set off some damage. Some of the symptoms can be symptoms that have characteristics of autism."

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0803/29/hcsg.01.html

The mainstream media now have another strange disease: collective amnesia. It does not of course do to admit that not only do vaccines cause neurological impairment, including autism and epilepsy, but it can happen relatively often and the more you vaccinate unfortunately the more like it is. Dr Offit tells us that if we give an infant 10,000 vaccines in one go it is "theoretically" safe but of cours that is for a "theoretical" infant. But if you see what an infant gets mandated in the US in the first months of life it is becoming more like Atlanta roulette.

For Common S;
What happens after someone gets a traumatic brain injury ( for example, hit on the head)?

Well, according to this peer reviewed study

Neuropsychological Impairments and Changes in Emotional and Social Behaviour Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Quote form the article

"Compared to matched healthy controls, the patients were impaired at recognising facial and vocal expressions of emotions, detecting social faux pas and nonverbal fluency"

Wow. So brain injury (at any age) can result in social behaviour problems, not understanding social mistakes, not being able to read or understand other peoples emotions..( sounds a lot like autism to me..) Who knew that damaging the brain after birth could result in symptoms of autism?
I wonder how many of these brain injured people now qualify for a diagnosis of autism?

Common S,

Autism can be acquired:

"Encephalitis from various kinds of viral infections, especially if it occurs in the early years of life, can also give rise to an autistic disorder" - Lorna Wing (The Autistic Spectrum A Guide for Parents and Professionals 1996 (p69))

And from the US National Library of Medicine (Medlineplus)

https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001415.htm

"Other causes of encephalitis may include an allergic reaction to vaccines"

Common sense tells us that when a child with normal development reacts badly to vaccines and afterwards he or she loses eye-contact, appears deaf, stops speaking and socialising even with family members that something has happened to his or her brain. This is not "symptoms just beginning to show up".

It's possible that autism numbers are going up due to folate and Vitamin B levels in mothers that are too high. See this: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/high-folate-in-pregnancy-ups-autism-risk-study-finds-051316.html

Vaccines do cause Autism, the studies were manipulated by certain scientists whom attempted to cover it up. Fact is, vaccines do more harm than good.

Hera, There seems to be some misunderstanding as to my position on vaccine safety, likely due to the formatting of my message to Maria Aja.

Maria wrote: "....vaccines have never claimed to be safe" and I was pointing out how mistaken she was by posting the link to the California Immunization Coalition and quoting from their section on vaccine safety: "the AAP, IOM and WHO agree that vaccines are even safer than vitamins", and added, "Please do some reading and you will discover that other statements you've made are equally as false".

Do you have a single fact to back that up?

I'm sorry that many of you on this site have seen children injured by vaccines. However, vaccines have never claimed to be safe. Sadly, there us a chance of being injured by a vaccine. The risk is very low, with less than 1% of vaccinated persons reporting serious injury. This data can be found on the CDC's website. The government admits that vaccines are not safe for all children, with immunocompromised kids unable to be vaccinated. Another thing to consider is that children less than 1 year old, usually between 2 and 6 months of age, are most likely to begin being vaccinated. At this age, infants are at greatest risk for certain medical adverse events, including high fevers, seizures, and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Some infants will experience these medical events shortly after a vaccination by coincidence. This data is pulled from the VAERS website, a government site that allows people to report adverse effects caused by vaccines. The government does not ignore those affected, and the data is easily available. Vaccines are promoted because they have been proven to reduce the chance of coming down with a possibly deadly disease. The chances of being injured by a vaccine is low and worth it when you consider the thousands of children that die of preventable diseases in countries lacking access to vaccines.Vaccines have saved countless lives, and should not be feared. Smallpox was not eliminated by a cleaner world. Vaccines did their job to eradicate the awful disease. Vaccines are not the cause of autism or other developmental disorders. Coincidence and timing of vaccine injections to when most disorders are noticed has caused a lot of unnecessary fear.

Hi Kohl,
In the comments below there is a link to over a hundred peer reviewed journal articles suggesting a link between vaccination and autism.

You also ask why "everybody" doesn't get autism from vaccines.

That applies to almost every reaction and disease.
Can you explain why a peanut allergy can kill some people yet I can eat peanuts?
According to your logic, peanuts can't cause an allergic reaction, or everyone would react to peanuts.
What about people with life threatening reactions to strawberries ,or shellfish, or those who get sick from wheat (celiacs?)
Can you eat these things?
If so, does that mean that all these people (and their doctors) are lying?
Does that mean the people who died from allergic reactions to these things did not really die?
Do you tell these people that you can eat peanuts, so everyone who says they react badly to them is wrong?

Or do you think it is possible that some people can react differently than other people ?

Actually even the manufacturers have acknowledged that some people will be injured or die from vaccines.
In fact that is the reason we have the federal governments vaccine court. It was developed to give compensation to people who died or had lifelong injuries from vaccines.

It is called VAERS. You can google it.
Is all autism caused by vaccines? No, about 6% of autism is genetic ( fragile X etc).

But autism rates have increased from 1 in 10 000 to 1 in 68. According to the National Autism Association, about 40% of people with autism do not speak. Ever.( though some "regress" and loose the ability to speak that they were developing as young infants.)

Do you really think that doctors and parents in the 70's never noticed that their children weren't able to speak? they just said "Johnny is doing just fine" , and sent him off to school, where the teacher did not notice anything either?

It seems very unlikely, doesn't it, and we are talking huge numbers of people that couldn't ever talk, even as adults yet who no one noticed existed.

VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM

I have been saying that just like the above for about 7 years now on all my post here at AOA. Funny how those three little words can cause so much angst isn't it?

I never thought AOA would ever get around to posting it just like that actually as I never thought you guys had the courage to print that truth, glad you came around though.

A lot has happened since I have been here regularly, I figured out how it works with autism and how it happens now I just got to work backwards to fix it. It really is quite simple and been there in front of your face the whole time as I knew it would be. I will not boar you with the details until I can fix it because I do not want to end up like Dr. Bradstreet not that I would go that quietly.

In any case glad everyone is on board. The usual suspects will oppose as always as they troll for these types of opportunities as it is their job and it is what they are paid to do and that will come out as well. The term is "coconspirator" or "accomplice liability" and since they accepted money to blog for Pharma their fate is sealed under the Pinkerton doctrine and I am sure Droit is aware.

In any case one day we will wake up and this will all be a bad dream that ends positively for our children and us.

VACCICES CAUSE AUTISM

Andre Lee;
you state
If you really wanted your child to live, you'd vaccinate

When I hear statements like that , I just wonder
What do you say to parents whose children died from a vaccine, after you make statements like that?

You do know that children have died from vaccines?

https://hopefromholly.wordpress.com/

The lack of facts in this article is so disturbing... I don't see a single source anywhere. In fact, I believe the only source was a comment containing a link to a 480p low quality youtube video. Not a credible source.
I'll focus on what appears to be the headline of this website - mercury is in vaccines.
Again, ignoring the fact there is no evidence (that one paper that was immediately disproven as fraudulent and a scheme to promote alternative methods of disease prevention... you know what I'm talking about. I'm not linking it because if you don't know what it is, you don't need to), vaccines contain thimerosal. Thimerosal is a form of mercury, specifically ethylmercury. The CDC does actually inform us thimerosal is in vaccines, here. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/
I'm assuming that since this website still receives comments everybody conveniently ignores that in 1999 the CDC and FDA decided to reduce the content of thimerosal in vaccines. In 1999, 6 vaccines out of 31 administered regularly to children under 6 contained ethylmercury: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/UCM096228
Since then, only 2 still contain thimerosal.

Even then, we know thimerosal DOES NOT HARM THE BODY.
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?sort=DA-SORT&docType=Article&tabID=T003&prodId=GPS&searchId=R1&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchType=BasicSearchForm&contentSegment=&currentPosition=1&searchResultsType=SingleTab&inPS=true&userGroupName=carmelhs&docId=GALE%7CA223908626&contentSet=GALE%7CA223908626
First of all, that is what a real source looks like. Second of all, here is the first sentence in case you don't want to read:

Three judges ruled March 12 in three separate cases that thimerosal, a preservative containing mercury that has been used in some vaccines, does not cause autism, the "New York Times" reported.

I'd like to quote another line from the source:

"A normal fish-eating diet by pregnant mothers" is more likely to deposit mercury in the brain than vaccines are, she wrote.

Literally, you are more likely to "cause autism" in your child by eating tuna or sushi than you are with a vaccine. Again, we are assuming ethylmercury causes autism (which, again, it does not).

Another comment I've seen: "but what about the increased rates of autism? Clearly the government is to blame, what with their vaccines trying to kill us!"

Here's a scientific journal:
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?sort=DA-SORT&docType=Brief+article%2C+Report&tabID=T002&prodId=GPS&searchId=R2&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchType=BasicSearchForm&contentSegment=&currentPosition=4&searchResultsType=SingleTab&inPS=true&userGroupName=carmelhs&docId=GALE%7CA179080831&contentSet=GALE%7CA179080831

In case you are too lazy to read once again:

But a recent investigation of data collected in California suggests that the elimination of thimerosal has not lowered the autism rate, which increased steadily throughout the study period (1995 to 2007).

There is zero connection of thimerosal (50% ethylmercury) to autism. You are putting your child in more danger by leaving them vulnerable to polio, measles, and other life-threatening diseases which by the way, have killed far more people than autism. If you really wanted your child to live, you'd vaccinate. Here's a link to a pretty picture showing you measles deaths (on the decline, mind you):

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?sort=RELEVANCE&docType=Diagram&tabID=Images&prodId=GPS&searchId=R5&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchType=BasicSearchForm&contentSegment=&currentPosition=1&searchResultsType=SingleTab&inPS=true&userGroupName=carmelhs&docId=GALE%7CCT3294261211&contentSet=GALE%7CCT3294261211&source=TextResults

Pretty sure I've said something like this before, but that comment got moderated (great job looking objectively at an argument).

Good suggestions Linda1.

And David, if you can stomach it, you might want to follow up with this youtube video. 6 minutes of your time, and you don't even have to watch the whole thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu7C5clA4q0

This is the autism that is not like yours.

But I am very glad that your life is going really well and is happy; that is wonderful news.

If you feel a bit embarrassed after realizing what severe autism looks like, don't worry; lots of people aren't aware either.
Wishing you all the best
Hera

your choices are a slightly higher chance for your to get relatively minor developmental disorder or a much higher chance at your child dying. why is this even an argument? seriously, it's not like autism is a life threatening illness, i have autism and i am able to (at least mostly) live a completely normal life. seriously, autism isn't as big of a problem as you think it is.

Robert Vandion:

Tom Insel head of the NIMH said that the worse out come of disease was mental retardation He did not say death.

He then went on to say - that vaccines had not taken care of that worse outcome - mental retardation.

What he did not say was -- under the ever growing number of vaccines mental retardation has actually increased. Nope not in that speech -- but in his TED Talk that you can find on U tube -- He does quote a bunch of stats on the ever increasing problems with mental health. It is increasing he says.

but let us not stop there -- auto immune diseases are increasing too - and that includes diabetes and thyroid.

Autism - causes by an immune system running on the hot side called inflammation.

Damaging nerves, and blood vessels and organs - oh, and the brain too- and I suppose this dividing brain nerve thingy too perhaps --

I don't know what I am tired of, I suppose the lies too but not at the top of the list, maybe deceit that is different than lies --then there is stupidity.

Oh, at the top of the list would be when I am called a liar. Yeah something about me witnessing my son, daughter, husband receive a vaccine - spike a temperature have a seizure, or stroke, or the belly bloat and I have some little - troll come on here and tell me what it is not.

Yeah = that is the top of the list.

If you're so sure, use your name, for crying out loud.

this article and these toxic comments are the reson autisim exists (and mabey crystal meth)

fact: the incidence of Autism years ago was so low that it was unheard of in my part of the world. Now there is an explosion of it and parents are desperate for answers.

What changed?

Vaccine protocol - we only received a few core vaccines
Diet - too many ingested chemicals nowadays, including in water.

I believe it's a combination of these factors that trigger Autism.

Curious as to what evidence you have that makes you think the CDC skews their statistics? Pretty bold statement.

Before the anti science people had their pockets loaded with funding from god knows who..cdc? pharmaceuticals? to distort the truth and vilify scientists who dared take on biological studies..and the effort to supplant them with head counts and manipulated stats was put into place..before google and even facebook were censored the material facts concerning thimerosal were available.Grab your youtube while you can..pubmed has printed an article where they are trying to figure out how to censor youtube..take a look at how ethymercury will leave more inorganic mercury within the brain to do far more damage than methyl..we are talking decades of damage..to omit is to lie..and all media and several journals were on someone's payroll ...clearly that's what they've done..and that's what liam and others believe.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R17-kWmv0rg

This is of course and example of the infantilism and stupidity we are up against. Anyone wants to follow the link (which is presently broken) will come to a page with the words in large letters 'THEY F-CKING DON'T'. So much for civilised, rational discourse!

PS Jordan, we have seen it before.

Liam, I appreciate your effort to be civil.
Your facts are incorrect.
The CDC who is in charge of giving vaccines states on its website that the multidose flu vaccine still contains thimerosal.
It appears they did not get your message that it was all removed years ago.
Thimerosal is toxic; look up the Material Safety Data Sheet on the web. Are you aware that in 1977 ten babies in a Toronto hospital died when an antiseptic containing thimerosal ( the mercury in vaccines) was mistakenly dabbed on their umbilical cord sites.
By the way, our digestive systems handle mercury better than when we inject it. Eating and injecting is not the same. If you think about it, you can drink apple juice. But do you think injecting it would necessarily be safe?
You have told us "stories" about children who caught a disease and blamed unvaccinated children.. You have told us that stories don't count, and Sasha has told us that good parents who love their children shouldn't blame others if their children get injured, (or sick, I assume) they should just get to work helping them. Bit of a double standard there, perhaps? Or are these also "bad parents looking for something to blame?"
I'm glad you came here, there is a lot for you to read and learn.
all the best,
Hera

Good evening Liam don’t take us the wrong way or think we are trying to insult your intelligence either .You see on here at AOA most of us report as parents of vaccine damaged children from all corners of the world ,and we all have the same similar stories to tell. Our babies vaccinated with a vaccine, and straight after a catastrophic change ,high temps, red rash, encephalitis, green puss coming from the ears, high pitched scream this is straight after the vaccine has been administered some babies die. The “lucky “ones survive and mostly need 24 hour care for the duration of life ,life at a level which you cannot even imagine. For the record we were all pro-vaccine at one time, if we weren’t our poor babies wouldn’t have got in this situation in the first place and I for sure wouldn’t be hanging over a computer typing to you at close on midnight (I’m anti vaccine and proud of it just in case you haven’t guessed).
Whatever planet you come from to us humans on earth Mercury is toxic in any form whether it be ethyl mercury, methylmercury or breathing it from you amalgam fillings ,you’re a dead man walking if you start taking it in any size or form. On plant Liam you can eat it abundantly brilliant…. The funny thing is (ha ha),is that the main studies that say vaccines don’t cause Autism were falsified and this has been admitted to by whistle blower William Thompson of the CDC to whom we are eternally grateful. Just scroll on here and you can see how the news unfolded.Again hundreds of studies prove vaccines cause Autism ,hundreds.
If you have the time the link below is of a brilliant great Dr called Russell Blaylock take the time to listen to this video below.He has many more start with this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiFqwzxKqp0

MMR RIP
.

Hi Sasha

You might to look here and see how many vaccines and infant has had by 6 months

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/downloads/parent-ver-sch-0-6yrs.pdf

To "You are..."

Are you advising we trust a group that is essentially enthusiastically pedaling their shining new bicycle (vaccine schedule) on a "liability free" slope, upgraded every few years with more gadgets and gizmos and shiny dangling in-their-eyes boondoggles, who frequently turn to look behind them and shout, "Look, Mom! No hands (control group)!?! and has no idea why we have so many injured children in the whereabouts of the side walk or where it looks (to us at least) like they are headed? At this point I think the feet are coming off the pedals, the speed governed now more by the slippery slope than the pedaling, and I'm not sure any amount of breaking can prevent a full-stop crash.

No one here went to the internet and said, "I like this narrative about what I'm seeing and hearing in regards to what's going on with my child. Yes! Vaccine injury! Environmental injury! That's the ticket. I'm going to latch onto this!"

To the contrary it is about as unappealing a narrative as it is to those who are desperately pedaling blind, maybe more--I can't tell you what it was like to start waking up to the concept of vaccine/immune system injury even though (or maybe because) I'd been living in a family probably burdened with various degrees of it for generations.

We, I, to a great extent chose the environment, including the vaccines (though the system is revealing quite clearly with a country wide legislative push that vaccination was never intended to be voluntary on the part of some)?!? I chose, through little investigation on my part, to subject my child to more of what I'd hoped I could protect her from! And I did it with the help/pressure of many trusted institutions, also apparently not cognizant of how compromised the information they were promoting was (or maybe just plain prepared to be self-serving, even at the expense of the health tiny, vulnerable infants).

It's a pretty sucky, uncomfortable view of how fallible, blind (or corrupt) human institutions can be. Why would anyone "choose" to see things this way, if there wasn't anything to it, if this wasn't the view necessary to scrutinize to uncover real remedy and healing?