The girls death has been blamed on diphenhydramine overdose. Ld 50 for diphenhydramine in rats is reportedly 500mg/kg. 40 to 50 kg would be normal for a 12 year old girl. At 25 mg per dosage unit an equivalent dose would be 800 to 1,000 caplets or capsules. Even if she was 10 times as sensitive as the average rat on a weight basis to the medication that would still require 80 to 100 dosage units to be fatal.

I read in another version of this story:

"Medical experts said the odds of a deadly reaction to the HPV vaccine are about one in a million."

http://www.wisn.com/news/me-waukesha-girl-did-not-die-of-hpv-vaccine/29274950

OK, so millions of doses a given out every year but when does the system ever admit a real rather than a hypothetical death.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports:

"Serious side effects from the HPV vaccine are rare, according to the CDC."

http://www.jsonline.com/news/health/medical-examiner-girls-death-not-caused-by-routine-vaccination-b99376029z1-280058462.html

OK, so where have you ever read of a single specific case being voluntarily admitted by ptb?

And mind you Eindeker advocates these vaccines on the unproven basis that they will save lives at some point of the future (meanwhile young women have to bear the risks). Where are the ethics in that?

Eindecker,
More likely that the girl was feeling like she was having a severe reaction to the vaccine and took antihistamine that interacted with the vaccine and the depressive and other adverse effects of both drugs were potentiated leading to her immediate death. I propose that we don't know how her body's reaction to the HPV vaccine may have altered her body's ability to eliminate the antihistamine as well, causing the latter to build up and appear to be a toxic dose on autopsy (if that is, in fact, what the autopsy did show).

I would have to see the autopsy report and speak to the coroner before I would buy the journalist's account. There are other flaws in that article, namely, that HPV vax prevents "most" cases of HPV related cancers (it is only theorized to prevent cancer - the outcome of this intervention remains to be seen and as far as effect on cancer incidence, is decades away. Also, as I'm sure you are aware, the current vaccine does not protect against all proposed cancer causing strains). It is dangerous and irresponsible that this author does not point out the importance of continued pap smears which is the real preventive measure and life saving medical intervention in cervical cancer.

The author also incorrectly states that the HPV vaccine is the only current anti-cancer vaccine. Of course, the Hep B vaccine is considered an ant-cancer vaccine as well.

You really should see the Danish documentary that I posted below. The Danes have found a correlation between elite athleticism and severe reactions to this vaccine.

Danish documentary about HPV vaccine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GO2i-r39hok&feature=youtu.be

Learned about it from Lawrence Solomon's excellent VaccineFactCheck blog:
http://vaccinefactcheck.org/2015/05/02/denmarks-coverup-surrounding-mercks-hpv-vaccine/

How many girls with autism have primary ovarian failure and have not received gardasil vaccine? We should take a survey. One of my girls has pcos and the other has primary ovarian failure. Hmmm

My children aren't getting this HPV vaccine. Everyone is lining up for it where I live, and they seem to feel that those of us who aren't doing it are "anti-vaccine". Also, one parent told me that this vaccine had a great track record in Europe many years before being used here--highly tested. Huh? I was nice, in my response, but tried to explain that this was brand-new in 2006 or 2007, not something that had been used in Europe for years! And that, back then, the Wall Street Journal published a story about how it was untested, and fast-tracked, without proof of efficacy! (Now, the WSJ, like all other newspapers, pushes the vaccine.) This story of the tragic death will not get coverage, as the papers instead cover the "problem" that not enough kids are actually getting this "great vaccine"--and that there is going to be extra funding allocated towards educating parents so there is greater uptake.

Gardasil vial package inset:

Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse events have been spontaneously reported during post-approval use of Gardasil. Because these events were reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not possible to reliably estimate their frequency or to establish a causal relationship to vaccine exposure.

Blood and lymphatic system disorders:
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, lymphadenopathy.

Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders: Pulmonary embolus.

Gastrointestinal disorders: Nausea, pancreatitis, vomiting.

General disorders and administration site conditions: Asthenia, chills, DEATH, fatigue, malaise. (I capitalized death because it is a side effect)

Immune system disorders: Autoimmune diseases, hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, bronchospasm, and urticaria.

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: Arthralgia, myalgia.

Nervous system disorders: Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, dizziness, Guillain-Barré syndrome, headache, motor neuron disease, paralysis, seizures, syncope (including syncope associated with tonic-clonic movements and other seizure-like activity) sometimes resulting in falling with injury, transverse myelitis.

Infections and infestations: cellulitis.

Vascular disorders: Deep venous thrombosis.

5.1 Syncope ( a fancy name for fainting)
Because vaccines may develop syncope, sometimes resulting in falling with injury, observation for 15 minutes after administration is recommended. Syncope, sometimes associated with tonic-clonic movements and other seizure-like activity, has been reported following vaccination with GARDASIL. When syncope is associated with tonic-clonic movements, the activity is usually transient and typically responds to restoring cerebral perfusion by maintaining a supine or Trendelenburg position. (tonic-clonic movement- seizure was once called grand mal seizures but that sounds too terrifying so again changing the name removes the malady. One of the causes of tonic clonic seizures is brain inflammation.)

6.1 Clinical Trials Experience
12.1 Mechanism of Action
…safety was evaluated using vaccination report cards (VRC)-aided surveillance for 14 days after each injection
(That’s what I call a long term safety study)

11 Description
Each 0.5mL dose of the vaccine contains approximately 225 mcg of aluminum (AAHS), 9.56 mg of sodium chloride, 0.78 mg of L-histidine, 50 mcg of polysorbate 80, 35 mcg of sodium borate.
Interested to learn more about aluminum adjuvants? Read Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? http://omsj.org/reports/tomljenovic%202011.pdf

Once injected into tissues, aluminum hydroxide forms a deposit, damages the injected tissue, elicits danger signals from stressed cells, attracts inflammatory and antigen-presenting cells and is subject to phagocytosis (process by which cells ingest or engulf other cells).[*]
Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe? http://www.meerwetenoverfreek.nl/images/stories/Tomljenovic_Shaw-CMC-published.pdf

12.1 Mechanism of Action
HPV only infects human beings, Animal studies with analogous animal papillomaviruses suggest that the efficacy of L1 VLP vaccines may involve the development of humoral immune responses. Human beings develop a humoral immune response to the vaccine, although the exact mechanism of protection is unknown. (UNKNOWN???????? HPV in the vaccine is a construct created from a Virus Like Particle and they don't know what it does or how? My confidence is real high isn't yours?)

14 Clinical Studies
CIN 2/3 and AIS are the immediate and necessary precursors of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix, respectively. Their detection and removal has been shown to prevent cancer; thus, they serve as surrogate markers for prevention of cervical cancer. …CIN 2/3 and AIS were the efficacy endpoints to assess prevention of cervical cancer.

Gardasil does not prevent cancer, instead it was shown to decrease CIN 2/3 and AIS. Most cases of CIN regress and are eliminated by the immune system without intervention. Most (90%) regress within 2 years. (Gardasil doesn't prevent Cancer so the marketing of this poison is fraudulent- “The marketing of Gardasil was much too aggressive. The ‘One Less’ campaign was deceptive.Quote from Dr. Diane Harper in the New York Times article cited above.”)

Interestingly enough, the majority of women who develop CIN are 40-50, average 45 so you start giving this poison at age 9?

Progression of CIN typically takes 15 (in some cases 40) years

Risk factors that have been shown to increase a woman's likelihood of developing CIN, including poor diet, poor personal hygiene, multiple sexual partners, lack of condom use, and cigarette smoking basically life style choices.

14.8 Immunogenicity
The duration of immunity following a complete schedule of immunization with GARDASIL has not been established. (Those who say it works rather those who are paid to say it works say the duration is 2 years or 4. Pick one because it has never been proven to work and it would take a minimum or 15 years to prove it because that's how long it takes cervical cancer to develop. Please note I stated cervical cancer not HPV because it has never been proven scientifically that hpv alone causes cervical cancer.)

According to the National Cancer Institute’s website, Gardasil might only protect against HPV for four years. “The duration of immunity is not yet known. Research is being conducted to find out how long protection will last. Studies thus far have shown that Gardasil can provide protection against HPV 16 for 4 years.”

The vaccine is administered at the age of 9 years old. Again, the majority of women who develop CIN are 40 to 50 years old.
-FDA-Vaccines, Blood & Biologics. Information Pertaining to Labeling Revision for Gardasil

How many have heard about this?
HPV Vaccines Less Effective For Black Women:
http://atlantadailyworld.com/2013/11/18/hpv-vaccines-less-effective-for-black-women/

The available vaccines only protect against four strains of HPV, which, according to this study from the Duke University School of Medicine, African-American women are half as likely as White women to carry.

“Compared with white women, we saw that African-American women had about half as many infections with HPV 16 and 18, the subtypes that are covered by HPV vaccines,” said study co-author, Adriana Vidal. “Since African-American women don’t seem to be getting the same subtypes of HPV with the same frequency, the vaccines aren’t helping all women equally.”

(Many in the Black community state this is another form of ethnic genocide because Black women aren't being told this information. Also, there are other ethnic groups that if infected by hpv maybe infected by the same strains as Black Women and therefore this stuff would be useless if they are injected with it.)

Merck’s Former Doctor Predicts that Gardasil will Become the Greatest Medical Scandal of All Time http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/mercks-former-doctor-predicts-that-gardasil-will-become-the-greatest-medical-scandal-of-all-time/

cmo -If this had been a measles death, not only would it be front page news in the US, UK, Australia and Europe, but the unfortunate Andrew Wakefield would once again be accused of being a murderer!! (Remember that CNN Anderson Cooper interview, following Brian Deer's BMJ article 'How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed', January 2011 -now the subject of Wakefield V Deer & BMJ litigation in Texas?)

At last the entire Gardasil issues are to be examined in a Spanish Court:-
"Gardasil: Criminal complaint filed in Spain"
August 2, 2014
http://sanevax.org/gardasil-criminal-complaint-filed-spain/

From above:-
"According to Attorney Don Manuel Sáez Ochoa,
(claiming) a possible exemption arguing that they did not know at the time of processing, the dangers of the vaccine (Gardasil) is laughable……Frankly this attitude seems clearly malicious and constitutes the offense of injury as per Artile 149.1 of the Criminal Code that states: To cause another, by any means or process, the loss or worthlessness of an organ or principal member, or a sense, impotence, sterility, severe deformity, or severe somatic or mental illness, shall be punished with imprisonment of six to twelve years.
Charges contained in the official criminal complaint:-

Merck-Sanofi Pasteur, Spain’s National and Regional (La Rioja) health authorities are charged with the following:
• fraudulent marketing and/or administration of an inadequately tested vaccine;
• failure to inform the public about the potential risks of using Gardasil;
• clear infringement of the right to informed consent;
• ignoring new medical conditions in those who used Gardasil despite the similarity of their symptoms and the relatively short period of time between vaccine administration and the onset of symptoms;
• ignoring established and new scientific evidence illustrating the potential harmful effects of Gardasil ingredients and manufacturing methods;
• callous disregard for those suffering new medical conditions post-Gardasil;
• failure to inform the public that HPV infections are simply one of the risk factors involved in the development of cervical cancer;
• failure to inform the public that 90% of all HPV infections clear on their own without medical intervention;
• failure to inform the publlic about alternative methods of controlling cervical cancer; and
• criminal liability for the injuries resulting from the administration of Gardasil"

If I may quote the law from the state where this death took place [Wisconsin]:
940.06  Second-degree reckless homicide.
(1) Whoever recklessly causes the death of another human being is guilty of a Class D felony.
Judicial Council Note, 1988: Second-degree reckless homicide is analogous to the prior offense of homicide by reckless conduct. The revised statute clearly requires proof of a subjective mental state, i.e., criminal recklessness.
The second-degree reckless homicide statute requires both the creation of an objectively unreasonable and substantial risk of human death or great bodily harm and the actor's subjective awareness of that risk.

why would the doc vaccinate a sick child! Was she already scheduled in for the shot or was this simply a visit regarding the sore throat