Just saw this article about another child, Isaiah Rider, being horrifically abused by the system. Published 2 days ago:

http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/illinois-stops-teen-from-going-to-mayo-clinic-legalized-terrorism-claims-distraught-mom/

Another child kidnapped:

"Sick Teen Defends Mom Who Lost Custody
Boy posts video on Facebook after hospital requests he be placed into temporary protective custody. Christian Farr reports."

Jun 24, 2014

Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/video/#!/home/top-videos/SickTeenDefendsMomWhoLostCustody/264487611#ixzz35fqB5SqB
Follow us: @nbcchicago on Twitter | nbcchicago on Facebook

"Massachusetts Judge Orders Justina Pelletier To Be Returned To Her Parents"

http://benswann.com/massachusetts-judge-orders-justina-pelletier-to-be-returned-to-her-parents/

Presidents tend not to worry about first amendment rights. Maybe because people listen to them. Check out "Alien and Sedition rights and Founding Fathers". First Amendment rights aren't "right" or "left". They are ground up.

Linda where is Obama on this kind of tyranny? My mother always goes on about "poor Obama" but honestly, where does he stand on so many of these injustices? So all the NSA surveillance is okay? All these kinds of instances where parents' rights are trampled on so blatantly is okay? The first candidate that actually stands up for some of these First Amendment rights will triumph. Anything else will not be tolerated.

Linda, several groups/lawyers are deeply troubled by this case. For now, they may have enough lawyers involved.

From Boston Globe "Meanwhile Jessie Rossman, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Massachusetts, said Monday that it has been reviewing the First Amendment issues arising out of the gag order and that “we are deeply concerned about multiple aspects.”

She said no final decision has been made about whether to join the case, “but we are looking at ways that we can be helpful.”

All Americans need to rise up against this tyranny. I think we can all agree that several crimes have been committed here. The hospital's and the state's actions are indefensible. I think that part of what we need to do is to start a legal defense fund to protect parental rights.

Where is the ACLU on this?

This sad story goes way beyond a loss of rights and parental freedom.Initally diagnosed and cared for by the fine medical team at Tufts, Boston Children's Hospital- the Psychiatry department took it as an opportunity to undiagnosed her mitochondrial disorder and rediagnose her as having a mental/psychiatric illness by the name of "Somatoforum" illness. It appears that they could publish their findings in psychiatric journals as a way to become famous and gain funding. However the question becomes, "How much money does it cost to keep a teen locked up in a hospital for more than a year while they use her as a guinea pig for their reports, watching idly as she went from being able to figure skate and evolve into the crutch of a wheel chair?" "Who will pay the millions of dollars to keep her prisoned in the hospital?" To remove a child from her loving family in a control freak experiment, gain custody, pay children protective services (rather children violation services), the courts, attorneys, judges is a crime against humanity. At this point I urge my clients to stay away from all "Children's Hospitals" especially the one run by Dr. Offit who pushes Aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, cells of pigs, cows, chicks, caterpillars, dogs, ether and more toxic chemicals upon newborns, children and teens, then writes books on how vitamins are not natural and orders the hospital to not permit vitamins, even amongst children with cancers. The exception might be if a child needs a heart transplant but even then I shudder.

This case, and similar ones at Children's Hospitals represents how low we have gone to bow down to the medical authorities and the loss of our constitutional rights. It shows how authorities will stop at nothing to further erode parental rights and split up intact families because in their opinions, families do not matter?

Shell of "Recovering Autism, ADHD, & Special Needs."

All psychiatric illnesses have a traceable cause. You can easily Google to learn them. For example, "borna virus Bipolar abstract" or "OCD Strep abstract". If she has Somatoform disorder, than I wouldn't know about that because in all my many years of thousands of mental illness clients, I have never seen it. So, not sure if it even exists.

I have talked to numerous people who were diagnosed with mental illness who later found out that they actually had a medical condition and were able to finally leave their disabling conditions to attend work or school. Most docs and testing here in America, just plain suck, and it's because they are getting paid even when they don't help or do "accidental" harm. We can't sue, so the medical establishment is not kept in check, except for the very obvious intentional crimes.

So, just saying, any doc anywhere can say someone has Somatoform disorder at any time because it's so easy to meet the criteria. I actually used to think people imagined illnesses as well due to what I was taught in college. But, in real life experience, I realized that it's not true. I have seen many people lose psychiatric diagnoses on pure medical treatments alone, which was definitely my proof. College/licensing/regulating agencies teach people to rule out medical conditions before diagnosing with psychiatric illness, but it's not done (which is against the medical rules.) There are good people here and there. Maybe you can file charges against the hospital, to include criminal charges. Not by lawyer, but file against the licensing bureau that licenses the doc and hospital and the specialty credentialing. Actually, you should easily find many medical causes that mimic Somatoform disorder symptoms and show that they were not tested for. Do the legwork. The strategy will come to you. I have always won my battles with strategy. Remember, most people are lazy and will not look up such things or even take the time to do things correctly. Get researching; you can do it! Oh, and also, I am sure the doc has something in his past that makes him look bad. It's has always worked for me. I'll bet even his colleagues will turn on him if approached. That has also worked for me. Get busy. But, remember, everything has to be done cleverly and legally. Where there is a will, there's a way. And remember, the most successful strategy, that has won all battles, is perseverance.

The problem is the law. There is this concept that "if in doubt", we should err in the side of depriving children and parents of their liberty to "for the best interests of the child". It seemed reasonable to be overly cautious when it comes to a child's safety, but it is actually NOT reasonable at all to deprive people of their basic human rights without a very high standard and incontrovertible just cause. The evidentiary standard should be what it is in any other case where we deprive a person of their liberty -- "beyond a reasonable doubt".

I have very reasonable doubts about this case. Anyone else?!