Dr. Poul Thorsen, Principal Investigator on the Danish Autism Studies 3 Years on Most Wanted List
Dachel Media Update: Autism No Crisis, No Cause, No Chance It's Vaccines.

ABC News Disposes of the Evidence Quickly in Tragic 2001 Chicken Pox Death Resurrected as Vaccination "Lesson"

Abc news nowBy John Stone

In the small hours US time I posted a comment on ABC News’s Duffy Peterson story  Home> Health Mom Whose Child Died After Catching Chicken Pox Advocates for Vaccines.. Tragically her daughter Abby, who was born without a spleen and was therefore immune compromised, died from chicken pox, and Duffy has become the latest weapon in the war of the vaccines (or perhaps against the reputation of Jenny McCarthy). I wrote:

It is always very troubling when one of set of parents is being manipulated against another set. But it is also intolerable if children are being loaded with a burden of unquantified risk on the basis that they are protecting other people, and very often they are not really - for instance, the nasal flu vaccine where the manufacturers insert warns that the recipient must not come into contact immune compromised persons for weeks after receiving the vaccine : in the UK this is set to be rolled out for all school children this autumn. The only consistency  from people who actually don't care about anybody's child is that it is siphoning off huge amounts from the public purse to benefit big business (note Fluenz is identical with Flumist in the US).

Another blatant example is chicken pox vaccine where it has been known for a very long time that the harm in mass vaccination is much greater than the benefit (even before we get to the side effects)

What, of course, is required is a return to the ethic of ‘Primum non nocere’ (first do no harm) and the greatest care to be taken with all children.

It is worth noting that these fully justified comments were supported by (1) the manufacturer’s own insert for Fluenz/Flumist and (2) a report from the British government’s Health Protection Agency (in the UK the chicken pox vaccine is still not on the schedule). Despite this the comment was removed within minutes.

As a parting shot I quoted from a Pubmed listed article the disclosure of the article’s expert William Schaffner who had told ABC among other things:

There is no injury to children getting vaccinations simultaneously. A child’s immune system is more capable, powerful and flexible than you would think it is.

It reads:

'Potential conflicts of interest. W. S. (William Schaffner) is a member of data safety monitoring boards for Merck and Sanofi-Pasteur and occasionally consults for Pfizer, GlasoSmithKline, and Dynavax.'

Naturally, it never appeared - it has long since ceased to be job of news media to warn you of such things.

Vaccines are the biggest racket the earth has ever seen.




Could we do the same to their comments? Do you want to contact me by private email to talk about banding together to do so?

I don't think that's the answer. Lowering myself to their level is repugnant to me. If the comments are abusive, by all means they should be flagged but a blanket flagging of all comments I think will get people blocked from sites and there are good folks out there trying to wade their way through the BS of the vaccine/CDC industry. Besides, the "Informed Consent" group, which is what I call this movement, doesn't have deep pockets like big pharma. I don't believe this is being led by big pharma and the CDC, this is a well thought out organized full head on media campaign being financed by the government, not just the CDC that began over 50 years ago with the Polio campaign. Most genuine historical writings will tell you that was more Hollywood than a public health service. Take a look a some of the articles that have been written about this effort:

-Misinformation and Its Correction: Airbrushing the Truth – Psychological Science in the Public Interest: http://therefusers.com/?s=internet+trolls
-How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
-Internet Trolls May be Trained Government Agents According to Leaked Document: http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/internet-trolls-may-be-trained-government-agents-according-to-leaked-document/
-CIA-Sponsored Trolls Monitor Internet & Interact With Users to Discredit Factual Information: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/01/cia-trolls-infect-the-net/
-PAID INTERNET TROLLS: http://www.theburningplatform.com/tag/paid-internet-trolls/

Talk about taking a walk on the wild side. These are just a few articles on the net. There is no way to meet their money as well as the number of people they have at their disposal. Internet trolls for the government and vaccine industry are engaged in a psy operation and they have professional people heading these units. It's like a mini army. Over dramatic you think? No. I don't think this explains the half of it.

I'm not sure you're familiar with Dr. Horowitz? He was a victim to this activity. They go after individual people as well as internet sites. Think about what happened to Dr. Wakefield. Horowitz has a short video that's kinda of dramatic but if you can get through it you will get an understanding of some of the people behind this: http://www.waronwethepeople.com/nsa-cia-hacktivist-trolls-destroy-heroes-profit-villians/.

Personally I believe exposure of the troll when they attack you on a comment board is effective. To be effective you need to know what they are doing so study misinformation techniques so you can see the patterns because they are there. I saw lots of it on the ABC thread. There are some site that encourage the behavior like HP. However they all take their marching orders from The Powers That Be. Besides exposing the trolls it's good to let people now that the number of people who oppose vaccines, the practice of vaccination as a means to maintain health is not as large as they are being led to believe. Maybe in doing so more MD's will come forward and support choice rather than the present agenda.

Just in


AOL, CNN, MSNBC, ABC all suck.

cia parker

I'd appreciate insight into the newest wrinkle on the ABC chickeponx article. Both Be Strong wrote this morning to say her account has been hacked, and that comments she writes are on her Disqus string but not posted. She said a comment I sent her cut and paste commenting on another site (PBS) she's been posting on was not among the comments. And it was only a pedestrian one-liner, why waster my time? Nancy Drew said this morning that since she's following me, she got a string of beginnings of my comments, but doesn't see any of them on the article.
What does this mean? Is there any method to the madness? Just insane whack-a-mole trying desperately to silence dissent?


Just in

This is not an issue on other alternative sites or anti-vaxx as you would call them is because the moderator normally is one of the editors or writer of the site. Such as in case Vac Truth. Jeff is the moderator and he also writes articles. Gaia, run by the late Heidi Stevenson ran the site and was also the moderator. Huffington Post had what people began to refer to as the moderator police or Nazi moderators because they had free reign to do whatever they pleased. They were allowed to censor comments they didn't agree with despite the commenter following the guidelines, they would hold comments for a day or more before posting if the comment proved the article posted was untrue or misleading. This was acceptable to HP and it got worse when AOL purchased it. ABC, MSNBC, CNN have deep pockets and they contract out.

But that's not the big issue as you know. The bigger issue is the abuse of the trolls on all MSM sites and the free reign that MSM sites give them.

Just in

Danchi, interestingly this problem with comment censoring doesn't happen on other (let's say alternative) sites.

cia parker

Could we do the same to their comments? Do you want to contact me by private email to talk about banding together to do so? ciaparker2@gmail.com


Over on natural News the posters were discussing censoring on mainstream sites and sites that use Disqus. Sites that use Disqus generally use outside moderators-ABC,CNN and others probably contract the job to some pharma/CDC hand picked group who have instructions to censor any comments supportive of vaccines, critical of vaccines comments that provide verifiable data that contradicts the myth and lies that vaccines work and are safe and comments that reveal the incestuous relationship between the government agencies and the pharmaceutical companies. So that's one means of censoring.

The other way our comments are not being posted is "troll initiated". If a comment is initially posted through Disqus that contradicts the article posted, such as the article that's the topic of this thread, the trolls that are infesting the site will flag or contact trolls with instructions to down arrow the comment and also to "FLAG" it.
When a comment gets a certain number of flags, the moderators or the software they are using immediately deletes it despite the fact that it was posted earlier. This way if the moderators don't censor the comment-the trolls will. The way the main stream sites are being monitored removal can be done in a matter of minutes. Apparently the number of upticks don't matter. There was a comment on NN with 52 upticks but was flagged by trolls and it was removed-days after it was originally posted. So this is the new game plan. The only way I can see to deal with this is contact Disqus and complain that these are orchestrated attacks by a group or groups paid to manipulate the flow of information and they need to make sure that they are offering the same fairness to everyone. Presently they are not. I'm sure if they get hundreds of emails telling them they need to find a remedy to this abuse,information may get to the people who want it.

cia parker

Strong got back this response to their complaint of censorship. Just a brush-off. ABC wants to appear democratic and eager to allow all sides to express their opinions, but it is only that, appearance, while they madly cut most of the comments critical of vaccines, to give the impression that there is a world consensus that vaccines are very very safe, while chickenpox is deadly. End of story. Don't care about the dead and disabled children many commenters had seen, just care about vaccine profits.

"As you can imagine, we receive thousands of messages a day from our viewers and
while we appreciate you taking the time to provide feedback regarding our
programming, we are not able to respond to each one directly.

We encourage you to continue to communicate with us!

-- Many of your questions can be answered on the ABCNews.com website:
Go to ABCNews.com
Go to the top bar and click on the name of the news program.


-- You can send your questions and comments to ABCNews.com:
Go to ABCNews.com
Go to the bottom of the screen and click on “Contact Us”

--You can search
Go to ABCNews.com
Go to the SEARCH box at the top of the page.
Type in a few keywords

Liz Mallin

I'm not sure why this mother, over a decade later has become a vaccine industry advocate, but I can assuredly say that had she had the chicken pox vaccination, she'd have had a negative response since it is contraindicated in asplenic patients. This child unfortunately died from sepsis brought on by the gram negative strep bacteria, a serious complication of asplenia. Most attenuated and live vaccines are contraindicated for individuals like her daughter, without spleens. It is my opinion, that the pneumococcal vaccine could have prevented the septic fatality, but conversely, the chicken pox vaccine would have quite possibly caused serious and permanent damage in her daughter.

A mom

Cia, I chose to have my children get chicken pox and they were fine. They even swam in polluted lakes. We don't overuse the anti- bacterial products which I think can be a factor for some of the secondary problems that can happen.
I would report the censorship. You have given ABC many chances and this is wrong.

cia parker

Strong says ABC has taken down his/her comment (posted multiple times) about the censorship violating their own comment policy again.

I just posted these, and if they take them down, I'm going to lodge a complaint: these are relevant and on-topic, and every parent needs to know the risk before consenting to these, or any, vaccine.

"The shots are not risk-free, as is stated here. The varicella vaccine can cause, according to the package inserts, anaphylaxis, thrombocytopenia, Henoch-Schonlein purpura, encephalitis, transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell's palsy, seizures, aseptic meningitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, pneumonia, pharyngitis, shingles, and death. No one has the right to force a parent to give their child a potentially disabling or fatal vaccine. If they are not afraid of chickenpox and prefer to take the risk of a usually mild and beneficial disease, it is our right. I refused it, my daughter got chickenpox (a typical, meaning mild, case), and I was happy.

Prevnar, like all shots, is not risk-free either. The following conditions, which in many cases meant trips to the ER or hospitalization within 3 days of the shot , have been reported to have occurred , and the parents reported them from their certainty that they had been caused by the vaccine. From the package insert: congestive heart failure, aplastic anemia, autoimmune disease, diabetes mellitus, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, pneumonia, bronchiolitis, colitis, otitis media, asthma, wheezing, croup, seizures, hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode, and death. Breastfeeding is the best preventive measure, and risk-free. Nearly everyone carries the germs for this and other kinds of meningitis/pneumonia much of the time, without any symptoms of illness. Most adults have achieved immunity through sub-clinical infection. Again, the parents must make the decision, no one else. No one else will bear the burden and the guilt if the vaccine causes disability or death in the child."


To talk about vaccine safty some act like it is worse than profanity!
Thanks Cia -- your tireless!

Right to choose, especially medical interventions

CIA, keep fighting there and keep us posted. Hold Natalie Gewargis to her word. That outside company needs some "outing."

Right to choose, especially medical interventions

Danchi, I would add that it's important to keep reminding people when they dredge up stories about being being blinded or whatever by measles etc., that its a little more involved than parents just getting a damned measles shot. They now have to get MMR-V in many cases which has a higher risk of febrile seizures. Today's parents are forced into combo shots (and so many shots,period!) that I don't think single or older people even realize how complex or "grey" the subject is. I think the general public (who is comprised of many parents) is just getting tired of the black and white manner in which the topic of vaccination is presented. It insults our intelligence and doean't serve anyone. In fact, I daresay it leads people to just distrust even more what is happening in terms of these "health interventions."

cia parker

I just saw all three of Strong's comment about the comment policy, they must have put them back since their taking them down clearly violated the policy.

cia parker

The great commenter Be Strong posted this two hours ago, saying it was the third time he/she had posted it, on the deletion of comments policy at ABC. They deleted it the first two times, and I probably got it in the nick of time.

"This is the third time that I have submitted this post:

"A Note About Comments Being Deleted" by Natalie Gewargis, Oct. 1, 2008, ABC News

"There is an outside company that monitors comments, which ABC News hired. If some of you have had comments deleted in the past that did not contain an outside URL, and were not in other ways a violation of ABC News policy (against profanity, or defamatory attacks, for instance), please post them and tell me when they were deleted and I will forward to the people in charge. The goal of the comments policy is to create a forum for lively but civil debate.

I take very seriously the charge that there are ideological considerations being given to our monitoring blog postings. ABC News takes the charge very seriously as well.

Posters of all political stripes are more than welcome to contribute lively and civil comments."

david m burd

cia parker,

Thanks for your tireless efforts, and correct you are as to the giant profits' motivation about poisoning several+ generations now, and destroying millions of families' lives.

Equally - but actually more culpable in my estimation - are our so-called Health Leaders. They are even worse as they have utterly abrogated their assigned duty as their sworn duty to protect our children, because they (all of them in Government positions) put their personal and agencies' reputations first and foremost.

They, Fauci at NIH, all CDC Directors, et al., are the literally the worst that has ever happened in the history of medicine, and that says a lot.


A lot of the shills there and elsewhere have recently simplified their message so that they put only: Vaccines do not cause autism.

That's right out of Edward Bernays playbook. All governments, corporations and Wall Street use it. Make the message short and repeat it often. When I read article such as the one on ABC and Yahoo where it was up this morning I read it with these two quotes in mind:

*If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.


*All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.

Both quotes of Adolph Hitler, a believer in the Bernays approach to mass manipulation.

I haven't commented on ABC or CNN lately. The last time I commented on CNN was during the Texas measles outbreak. Of course I was hit with what I call the troll clown car where one troll, probably a team leader makes some sort of bullying comment that include name calling and than 4-6 other tag along and their only comments are name calling-thus the clown car. I just started calling them out and telling them I know what they are doing and it's not working. I demand they discredit the information I have posted and stop trying to distract others from reading it.CNN also held my comment for at least two days before it was posted. The last time I commented was on Raw story, another measles outbreak and the one response after I told the trolls none of them discredited the information and if they couldn't-they were just blowing smoke because they were trolls. That one response wanted me to present my information as if I was presenting it in a court of law. After I stopped laughing, I responded by putting as much of the Simpsonwood transcript as I could online, I put names and Drs quotes which proved the CDC has been lying for over a decade, I put Dr. Hookers recent information, CDC information on live viral vaccine shedding etc. That response must have been at least 7 pages, not what the person was looking for but my purpose was to put as much information out there because someone will read it. I believe the only was to counter the "vaccines work and are safe" and "vaccine do not cause autism" lies is to saturate the boards with counter information with links to "official" data, demand proof when they say vaccines work, demand independent studies, when they save vaccines have saved millions of lives-I ask for data and studies-independent of course.

The lies of the pro-pharma vaccine industry must be countered. I feel you must give people alternatives and where that information can be found. I also don't feed into the "hook" when they call me an anti-vaxer. I tell them people have the right to information-informed consent is a federal law which is violated by the medical profession every day. It is the constitutional right of anyone, parent or adult to question what is being injected into their body, ask where are the studies, side effects-etc. It doesn't make a person anti-vaxx, it demonstrates responsibility. It what a parent does. It what a Grandparent does or any relative that is concerned about the health and well being of a child.

I read an article on Family Health Freedom Network http://www.fhfn.org/these-9-magic-words-prove-that-vaccines-cause-everyday-harm/
a couple of sentences from the article:

"The next time you visit your doctor, after your doctor is done telling you how safe vaccines are, ask him this question with the 9 magic words:
“If this vaccine injures my child, who is responsible?”

Your doctor will likely blush, get angry with you, or avoid the question altogether. What the doctor will avoid telling you is that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe! This means that even if vaccines are handled and given properly, some children will die or will be hurt.

The reality—and the answer to the question—is this: You are responsible if your child is injured!" (I add on that the vaccine industry has blanket immunity and give them the link to the article http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-man-behind-the-vaccine-mystery/

I've started ending comments with this. Some of my comments have not been responded to when I do this. I don't see any other way to counter the lies of the pharmaceutical industry. The MSM will not because profit, greed, arrogance, denial, control of all information, and protection of careers are the reasons the system continues to operate. There are too many with too much to lose if the truth should be known.

Not surprised

Cia, tell it sister. The real story is much different from what Duffy or news says. I'm sorry but they can forget it if they expect me to risk my healthy child w unproven medical interventions.

cia parker

Thank you, Benedetta, you have encouraged and comforted me. A guy there last night said I must not have a life to spend so much time commenting. I said I think this is the most important issue of our time, and most people are not aware of the truth and how they are being bullied, manipulated, and lied to, for vaccine profit.


The "Tragic 2001 Chicken Pox Death" is similar to the endless use of the "debunked 1998 Wakefield paper."

It has now been replaced by nearly 20 other papers from a number of other countries that show the same "vaccine strain measles gut virus" problem.


If that is what they are doing Cia - then yes to shorten them -- after all unlike them you are not a robot just a very passionate on the subject person.

cia parker

They already took down the comment I cut and pasted here. I just put up this:

I just posted Proponent's defense of your censorship and my reply at Age of Autism. I will post this comment there as well, as I know you will take it down."

cia parker

A lot of the shills there and elsewhere have recently simplified their message so that they put only: Vaccines do not cause autism. Period. DR, who's apparently off for Passover, says: Vaccines do not cause autism, asthma, or allergies. Is that simple enough to stick in people's minds as the gospel truth?

cia parker

Nancy Drew said that they would have vaxed her for everything had they known she had no spleen, but also put up a quote from a medical source that said that she would have been advised to stay away from people who had recently gotten a live vaccine like Varivax, as it would endanger her health. Someone else said vaccination would have been contraindicated for an immunocompromised child like her. Can anyone make any sense of that?

cia parker

Proponent put up this comment thirteen hours ago, to justify their censorship. I had said I was outta there, no point in wasting my time if they take most of my comments down.
"You've posted near a dozen times since your statement above about being 'outta here'.

And in sofar as your friend's comments being deleted.. I am guessing it might be that this site at least respects and acknowledges that it is not helpful to anyone if..

"... allow others to speak their mind in the belief that an open forum benefits everyone. However, there comes a point when allowing fallacious comments regarding vaccines to share equal time with legitimate questions causes distress to parents needing information."

And two, comments posted such as your friend, 'guest'.. should never make it past moderation regardless.

Careful.. 'guilt by association'.. will taint any arguments you put forth if you continually upvote that kind of crap.
3 △ ▽

⥅Share ›

I'm ba-ack! But I'm putting up shorter comments, so as not to have wasted too much time enumerating the facts if the editors take them down. I'll see later if they were allowed to stay up. Did you see the Age of Autism article this morning about the censorship being carried out here? (Good-bye comment!)"


Oh; Cia;

I would not want to be on the opposite side of you - my little bull dog.

Which is what is it going to take -- many people like you.

david m burd

cia parker, Yes - censorship is the nuclear weapon of PharmaHell Power (this includes our criminal CDC and NIH abetting the pharma industry).

America's complicit news media is not limited to only censorship, but willful manipulation and omission of anything that refutes our unaccountable criminal CDC and NIH. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, so demonstrated every day in every way by America's civil servant (hah!) leaders.

Whatwilltheysay Whenit Happens2Them

The answer is so simple but they refuse to consider it: Everyone responds to every medical intervention differently. For a child without a spleen, it's probably a good idea to get vaccinated. For a child who has already shown he or she goes into seizures or other terrible effects after a vaccine, vaccination is not a good idea. Who are the best people to track and figure out which child should get which intervention? DUH. EDUCATED PARENTS. Because we can't trust our doctors to do this as long as they are being told the bizarre truth that, alone of all interventions, vaccines are 100% safe for all, despite the package inserts that admit that they are not!

cia parker

It's even worse from that. I had only glanced at the story, and didn't notice this, but a more observant reader did, commented on it yesterday, and immediately turned the tide. Abbey did not die of a chickenpox infection, although that is what the headline says. She got chickenpox, but, because she had no spleen, never recovered her health before she died several months later of pneumococcal pneumonia. The shills then tried to blame everyone not only for not having vaxed her for varicella (which would have been contraindicated had they known she had no spleen and was more prone to vaccine reactions), but for not having given her a vaccine for pneumococcal pneumonia. The child died in 2001. Dr. Mike said that Pneumovax had been on the schedule for some time, but that is not correct for the U.S., maybe it was in the U.K. where he is. One of the shills said that Prevnar had been put on the schedule in 1993, but that is not correct: it was never offered to my daughter from her birth in May 2000 until and including November 2001, when she got the fateful DTaP booster that erased her only two words. They offered her the varicella vaccine at that time, which I refused. Prevnar was added at the clinics here in 2002, after Abbey had died. But sure, let's spin it to make everyone feel guilty or worried and vax.

Many comments have been deleted from ABC's story. If you look at it, you'll see MANY "comment deleted" insertions, with just allusions in the following comments to what had been there. A comment of mine about the true history of the smallpox vaccine, one about the stupidity of the worn-out pharma meme about correlation and causation: science is FOUNDED on the fact that correlation OFTEN means causation. And many more. Two more commenters said last night that their comments had been deleted, very good ones, a number of very intelligent vaccine critics, including John, had commented and been censored.

For a while the talking point was, wouldn't you rather have an autistic child than a dead one? I said last night (I don't know if it's still up) that that wasn't the issue, the issue was whether it was a good or a moral idea to compel vaccination against the parents' wishes, or even with them as long as they are not well-informed, if it ruins the minds of 100,000 children to possibly save the life of one. Do the ghosts of the children who would have lived to lead happy, normal lives had they not been vaccine-damaged not count? The vast, vast majority would never have gotten the VPDs vaccinated for, or, if they had gotten them, would have had the typical mild or fairly mild cases and recovered with permanent immunity. So there is no way to elude the question: how many deaths equal how many lives of vaccine-caused disability? Would it not be better to educate parents on how to protect against the diseases in young infancy (breastfeeding and avoidance of daycare, preference for single caregivers) and how to care for the diseases when they occur (antibiotics when helpful, naturopathic, vitamin C and A therapy, homeopathic, bed rest, adequate hydration, NO Tylenol or other fever reducers)?

One very aggressive immunocompromised woman insisted that everyone HAD to give their children Varivax, as it otherwise put her in danger. I said that there was no mandatory vaccine for most adults, and that most of us are decidedly not up on all our vaccines, that why would you have a right to endanger the lives of innocent children by forcing vaccines on them? It is not moral to say that children MUST get vaccines even when their parents think it's too dangerous to do so: this is to say that a certain number of deaths and cases of disability from vaccines are acceptable on the theory that it might protect a few immunocompromised people from getting a dangerous or fatal case of the disease. Are their lives worth more than those of innocent, healthy children?

I had said that food allergies were nearly always caused by vaccines (especially peanut allergies by the Hib vaccine, citing Heather Fraser's The Peanut Allergy Epidemic). There were no peanut allergies anywhere in the world until peanut oil was used to adjuvant penicillin shots starting in the 1940s, at which time they appeared. There is NOTHING better at creating an allergy than injections of anything. The bloodstream was designed to be a closed system, and the immune system is programmed to react to any foreign substance appearing, ANY vaccine ingredient, by reacting to it with sensitization and an autoimmune response when encountering it or a similar substance again. Another shill informed me that that was not true, that the ancient Greeks had described peanut allergy. I put up that peanuts were first cultivated in Paraguay, not leaving the New World until some contemporary of Pizarro, that Lucretius had never SEEN a peanut.

So there you have it, all of the pharma tactics compressed into one article and its shill commenters: manipulate, exaggerate the dangers of chickenpox, deny the dangers of the vaccine, try to make people feel guilty for not vaxing their children, ignore the fact that immunity would wear off in adulthood, when the disease can be more dangerous, bully with the fear of lawsuit, lie, and, when all else fails, delete the comments of the vaccine critics. So that what is left gives the overwhelming impression that the vaccine is safe and absolutely necessary for everyone.


If a child without a spleen died from a vaccine injury, we would be told that this was not caused by the vaccine but by this extremely rare condition, and that without a spleen the child would surely have died at a young age anyways, and that she is statistically insignificant.


I am so sorry the child was born with out a spleen.
I am sorry that a little boy is buried close to my sister - who died of in the womb rubella - heart complications in 1976.

It is now 2014 and I am also really sorry for my children's brain injuries, that it is epidemic that my friends have lost their young adult children to drug addictions, or heart attacks, or still have their adult kids still living at home and always will from brain injuries too.

It is a choice of two evils.
As a young parent - I would go with - what is best for my child -- just my child -- I am not responsible for the rest of the world's health problems.

DOes that sound selfish?
Parents are suppose to be selfish when it comes to their kids. It is their job.

Vaccine Information

They are working to push the Chicken Pox shot onto the world schedule, therefore the demonization of what was once a non-reportable, routine childhood illness.
Ataxia UK says "Complications in less than 1/100k natural infections", http://www.ataxia.org.uk/data/files/info_publication/health/ataxia_and_chickenpox.pdf Save this page as it may go away when linked to.
Here is the fear mongering http://www.nursingtimes.net/nursing-practice/clinical-zones/dermatology/complication-of-chickenpox-infection-without-skin-rashes/5069179.article
Chicken Pox vaccine added to the MMR visit increases the normal MMR febrile seizure rate from 1/3500 to 1/2500. Using the Pro Quad four in one increases it again to 1/1250.

John Stone

David, Danchi

You wouldn't say you were getting any more from Schaffner than advertising copy - but actually if it was advertising there might be greater sanction against loose statements. There is little about this that he can state as fact. This is one misuse of the media. Someone can come on loaded with professional interests, make statements which are both insupportable and potentially damaging, and no one can do anything about it.

From the Vanderbilt website btw I have this:


"Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program

"The Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program is improving the lives of children, families, and the community by conducting scientifically rigorous and ethically sound clinical research. Our goal is that tomorrow will be better than today.

"The Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program is one of only eight Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units (VTEUs) in the U.S. to receive a new contract to continue evaluating innovative vaccines for malaria, pandemic flu and other infections over the next seven years. The program is recognized internationally for its work on vaccines against serious childhood infections including respiratory syncytial virus and haemophilius influenzae"


The Doctor quoted in the article:
Dr. William Schaffner, a professor at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tenn. “Vaccines have virtually wiped out a number of diseases that used to plague this country –- and they do not cause autism.”

If you go to Dollars for Doc: http://projects.propublica.org/docdollars/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&term=Vanderbilt+University+&state[id]=43&company[id]=&period[]=&services[]=

You will see that Vanderbilt University School of Medicine receives substantial amounts of money from the pharmaceutical industry. I would say COF.

david m burd

Thanks John, What is (of course) kept out of "news" stories about a baby dying from such as chicken pox is that most always the child has been treated with any number of toxic antibiotics that, in fact, can actually bring about fatal reactions. But the Pharma Propaganda Machine (leading the gullible Press by its collective noses) conveniently suppresses the entire truth and just screams "DISEASE" to fear monger the also unwitting public.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)