Excellent video and visually well explained.

Elizabeth Gillespie

To my fellow parents: Why aren't not we suing or legally challenging the gov't on these two fronts?

1. The CDC, ACIP - Promoting an unsafety tested vaccine schedule, not backed up by science. The untested vaccine schedule is the CDC achilles heel.

2. The unconstitutionality of the Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 which denies constituional right of due process to our children (vaccine "court" does not even come cose)

Direct attacks on vaccines have failed but these might be an angle we can explore more.

CMO, excellent analysis of the insanely adversarial vaccine court, and they act like its an 'extremely' fair process.

CMO,

Your Toyota analogy is perfect. You should put your comment up on Youtube.

So clear, so precise, so well documented, but still we are not believed. Maybe if it were fiction, more people would believe it.

Suppose for a moment that your one-year-old develops a symptom that's on the list for autism diagnosis. But one symptom does not constitute a diagnosis... more symptoms follow, but your AAP pediatrician always says, "He'll grow out of it."

Three years later, professionals make the autism diagnosis, so you begin reading, reading, reading. Comparing medical literature and other families' experiences with your child's medical history, a pattern emerges. So you file a vaccine injury claim with the VICP.

Speedy justice, right? No. A decade later, the case is tossed out because the 3-year statute of limitations supposedly began with your mention of that first single symptom -- so time ran out while doctors kept saying, "He'll grow out of it."

According to the VICP, "[T]he statute of limitations begins to run when the first symptom appears, even if a medical professional recognizes only in retrospect that the symptom marked the onset of the injury."

VICP has conceded a small sampling of very severe and obvious vaccine injury cases, which are just the tip of the iceberg. Countless other vaccine injury cases are being ignored, from mild to moderate to severe.

HHS and medical professionals have enormous financial and professional disincentives against recognizing vaccine injury. That is not ethical, nor is it just. And countless children are suffering as a result of VICP mismanagement, CDC concealments, and AAP collusion.

Please watch the 5 minute video and forward the link -- and encourage others to do so.

The CDC Vaccine Court legislation from '86 seemed a reasonable measure to compensate children/families for "unusual side effects" in light of the larger greater good. Eliminate the arduous legal process and make sure the children were compensated and the family could seek out resources to assist their affected child. I'm sure that was all well and good until the sudden (no, wait just better diagnosed!) Age of Autism. As far as I have learned this "court" was meant to be a non-adversarial process and to allow families devastated by vaccine injury a way to cope with the genetic "luck of the draw" and get on with their shattered lives and allow the vaccine makers to provide the immunity we all want against deadly and infectious diseases.
However, we see a more calculated strategy behind the scenes. If autism is just better diagnosed- Why the mish-mash of studies? Everything appears to cause autism except vaccines. Why don't they just put a rider in for the Vaccine Court that says, "We're willing to hear, compensate and provide funds to any vaccine injured child/adult who doesn't present with autism. I mean, autism like symptoms, or brain damage that looks like autism but you know, isn't." If we could take the autism equation away from the Vaccine Court and just say, "Yeah, here are the "unusual children with "unusual side-effects" who have been vaccinated and need to be heard in an open court-of-law to decide whether or not this medically acknowledged damage is worth recompense or thanks for the "greater good."

I hope our elected representatives will consider this.

Most American parents do not know how the CDC Vaccine Court system works.

In 1986, Congress removed the product liability from the vaccine industry that was about to collapse with their "10 vaccines by age 5" schedule, mostly due to litigation with the DTP vaccine.

After a hot batch of DTP killed 8 children in Tennessee...

The DTP vaccine was found to have major faults, was removed from market, and replaced by the somewhat safer, DTaP vaccine. ( parents were correct on the DPT issue / Shot in the Dark / by Barbra Loe Fisher http://www.nvic.org/ ).

Since 1986, the CDC toddler vaccine schedule has grown from 10 to 36 "liability free vaccines," which can be mandated in all 50 states.

A 75 cent tax per vaccine is now placed into a Vaccine Injury Fund. A "vaccine court" in Washington DC was created to hear all vaccine injury cases.

Parents are expected to travel to Washington, hire attorneys and pay for experts to testify for their case. American parents, not the CDC, have to prove that a vaccine is unsafe.

Since 1990, nearly 1.8 billion dollars has been paid out to vaccine injured children by the Vaccine Court. This could indicate a problem with the CDC vaccine schedule. Anyone who might see a problem with the above situation would be considered "Anti-Vaccine..."

The "CDC vaccine court" is similar to having a single, separate "Toyota court" in Washington D.C. where the same (accelerator) issue would have to be proven over and over again by each Toyota owner.

the Hannah Poling Autism case.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20015982-10391695.html.

The "CDC Vaccine Court" settled the Hannah Poling Autism/ vaccine injury case for nearly 20 million dollars.

Hannah Poling's father is a neurologist, the mother is a nurse with a law degree. Obviously, they were able to provide proper tests and documentation of what medically happened to their daughter....

At 19 months of age, Hannah Poling received NINE VACCINES on the same day, measles, mumps, rubella, polio, varicella, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and Haemophilus influenzae.

Hanna received four live viruses and about 75 micro grams of mercury at the same "well baby visit." Per the EPA, a child should ingest no more than 1 micro gram of mercury per day.

The case was conceded without any medical testimony & documents the Poling's were prepared to provide.

The CDC demanded all medical tests & records for the Poling case ....be SEALED.... they are not available to the public.

Thousands of other Autistic children who were given the same nine common vaccines as Hannah Poling, would need to travel to Washington DC and present their case.

Very well done. Thank you Rob Schneider and The Canary Party. Does anyone know which congressmen will be on the November 2013 congressional hearings? We need those congressmen who are sympathetic to our cause be strongly represented at those hearings.

What an excellent video! Thank you to everyone involved in it's creation!