National Autism Association Give a Voice iPad Grant Period OPEN
Dachel Media Update: A(ttack) Jenny to Z(ambia) Questions Vaccines

Tricare Going AWOL on Military Autism Families?

Tricare photo

By Sarah Stockwell

Military families with a child with autism are used to fighting. The servicemembers fight on the battlefield when deployed and the spouses, with constant military moves in and out of states and school districts fight for their childrens’ right to an appropriate education as well as the daily battle to raise a child in a world they are ill-equipped for and vice versa. One fight that military families with children with autism should not have to face however is the battle to ensure their children receive appropriate medical care. There are estimated to be over 20,000 military children with autism.

One such fight is gearing up in the military community right now. Tricare, the military healthcare provider has made drastic changes to the way it provides ABA therapy for military dependents with autism spectrum disorders and these changes are due to take effect on the 25th of July.
Military families have been campaigning for years to improve access to autism therapies for their children and until now, have been making progress. There was a semi-victory in this respect for coverage for retiree families and wounded warriors, when a ‘pilot program’ was included in the recent NDAA. Shortly after Tricare announced (later than was originally required) the details of this pilot program in June, advocates in the community noticed that Tricare had made unannounced, extensive changes to the eligibility criteria and method of access for ABA under Tricare, which would apply to the children of both active duty troops, retirees and wounded warriors.

A small smattering of the changes –

•    Children will need to receive ADOS-2 and Vineland-II to ‘confirm’ their diagnosis of autism (after obtaining a DSM-IV diagnosis) for eligibility of ABA therapy and Vineland will need to be repeated every 180 days, ADOS-2 each year.

•    Children older than 16 require a ‘waiver’ to be granted ABA services, effectively imposing an age limit on the provision.

•    ABA will only be authorized for 2 years, one year at a time. Once the 2 years are complete, a waiver is required to continue treatment.

•    Vineland and ADOS are required to show ‘progress’ and the absence of progress, as measured by these tests, is a criteria for discharge from therapy.

•    BCBAs and BCBA-Ds are required to supervise the program. BCaBAs are now demoted to technician level therapists and cannot supervise programs.

Some might argue that ‘at least the military get something’ in terms of insurance and yes, that is true. Or at least it was.  Because of these changes, many children may be denied services for a multitude of reasons, some of which are outlined.

-    High-functioning children will be at risk, because their Vineland and ADOS scores might not be significantly impaired enough. This also includes children like my own son, who has progressed from moderate/severe autism to a high functioning child, BECAUSE of the intervention he’s received. He has progressed enormously, but he still has autism. He still has challenges that need intervention.

-    Children over the age of 16 will lose coverage without a waiver. There is no data that supports the lack of efficacy of ABA in children over 16.

-    What about the children for whom ADOS and Vineland are not suitable tests, or unable to be administered because of other special needs? Technically, since Tricare requires these for services, then they can also be denied.

-    If the local area doesn’t have qualified Tricare-authorized providers of these test batteries, or the waitlists for these professionals are long? If there aren’t scores on file, your child also won’t be approved for therapy, regardless of what those scores might eventually be. As a community, we already know that the wait to obtain a specialist evaluation for autism can be anywhere from 6-18 months, depending on location. If every military child needs retesting every 6-12 months, the strain this will put on an already limited supply of qualified professionals will be substantial and those children waiting for their initial evaluation will have to wait longer, as the demand for these professionals increases.

-    As one developmental pediatrician has pointed out to our community – the tests can be learned, so, every time they are run, especially within a short timeframe, they become less reliable.

A notable point about the requirement for standardized testing – no other medical therapy or treatment requires specific results for access to, or continuation of care. It sets a dangerous precedent for medical treatments and therapies to set conditions that can deny care based on standardized testing results, especially when our children with ASD are anything but standard.
The requirement for measured progress against these standardized tests can easily be derailed by a Permanent Change of Station (PCS) or deployment and, as written, this lack of progress could result in a loss of therapy at the precise time more is needed to counteract the change in routine or stress that the child is dealing with.

The new Tricare policy limits therapy to 2 years duration. We are all dumbfounded as to where they got this from. Can autism be remediated in just 2 years? What about a child that moves twice in 12 months (as we have done)? They will likely lose at least 3 months of therapy because of moves, delays in getting appointments and evaluations completed (and of course the testing batteries now required). Do those months count towards their 2 year time period? What if the child regresses (which is common with a PCS), will they be given ‘extra’ time to recoup those skills?

Military life is transient. Children move often and each move can spark a regression which can take months to remediate and the limits Tricare are imposing on therapy are simply without basis.

 What other chronic health condition has a limit placed on the duration of therapy or the age at which services end? For diabetes, does health insurance cut off treatment in the absence of progress? Is chemotherapy only available to people of a certain age? Of course not.

Tricare has no such limits on any other medical treatment or therapy and the military community believes this policy change to be specifically discriminatory to children with autism.  It is another dangerous precedent to set. It is also the only therapy that has never been provided to military children at the levels either their doctors prescribe, or as recommended by medical professionals.

ABA therapy is well-established as a medical therapy. It has been well-studied and researched. It is the only proven-effective therapy for children with autism.  It helps children and in many cases (sadly not all) can lead to a child becoming an independent adult. It is covered under Medicaid services, also a federal provision.

Legislation has been passed in over 30 states to mandate ABA therapy for children with autism. Unfortunately, Tricare is a federal provision, so none of this legislation benefits military children, even if they are assigned to a location in which there is autism therapy legislation. Medicaid waivers are available in some states for children with autism, although the wait lists are often considerable, in Colorado for example, the wait is approximately 4-5 years. Given that military families move every 2-4 years on average, they are rarely in a location long enough to benefit from these programs either and when moving from state to state, they go right to the bottom of the waitlist in their new location, assuming it is ever worth it to join the list in the first place.
Let’s consider how this policy change has been implemented. At the time of writing, Tricare has not formally notified either beneficiaries, ABA providers or physicians of these changes. On Thursday last week, just 2 weeks prior to the implementation date of 25th July, Tricare posted information on their website about the new criteria, but did not include all of the new policy points.  Their customer service representatives have no answers for families and even military contacts aren’t aware.

Instead of a managed, considered policy change that has a planned implementation and readily available clarifications for families, families are left in the dark, wondering whether their children will lose their therapy. If it weren’t for military family advocates we wonder if anyone would even know about these policy changes? Since when has it been acceptable to make such enormous changes without so much as a letter or email?

Our nation’s military families deserve better. Families who have a parent deployed in a war zone should not be subjected to this kind of uncertainty. They trust when they go off to war that the government will take care of their families. With this poorly thought out policy, the government is breaking promises to the military families that risk so much and that is not something that any of us should stand for, military or civilian.

Some might ask why they should care, after all, there are plenty of non-military families who don’t have therapies covered for their children.

Here’s one reason – much of the autism therapy legislation is based on the military provision. The federal government often sets the standards for treatment coverage and it is a much easier battle on a state level when families can argue that the federal government covers such a therapy, so therefore why should states not?

This is an enormous step backwards for all of us. It sets dangerous precedents for how medical treatments can be limited by non-clinically directed policies. What’s next? Why can medical treatment be provided for some conditions, but not others? If the Department of Defense and Tricare can do this, what’s to stop your state or insurer deciding the same, for any other condition?

Here’s another reason, from a cost standpoint, this makes no sense. It is far more cost-effective to treat children when they are young. The earlier the intervention, the better the long term outcome. Limiting the therapy to 2 years does not allow for a clinical decision to be made on time for discharge after appropriate progress. Not to mention the added costs, that will run into thousands of dollars, for each occasion of psychometric testing. Providers already have to submit progress reports using more appropriate reporting methods, such as VB-MAPP or ABLLS, so a progress report requirement is not new.

These policies have nothing to do with improving the quality of services available to military children. They have everything to do with cost savings and restricting, denying and creating barriers to care. This is a poorly-directed, at best, attempt to save money, from a healthcare provision that covers nicotine gum and Viagra.

Senators Gillibrand (D-NY) and Murray (D-WA) have sent a letter to Tricare asking for an explanation for the changes and on what basis they have been made.

Families are also urged to write to their representatives, asking for an explanation.  American Military Families Autism Support has also written a sample letter for those who wish, to send to their representatives. This letter can be found here.

As military families, we ask for your support. You know you can count on ours.

For more information on this issue, please see the AMFAS ABA Operations Center, which includes all information and news coverage on this issue.

The military community has come together and is calling for a halt to the implementation of the new policy until it can be reviewed by experts in the field, or a return to the old policies, which still required progress reports and periodic renewal of authorizations, but considered each child individually rather than how their progress compared to a standardized test score.

Sarah Stockwell is a former chemical researcher turned stay-at-home parent. She lives in Colorado Springs, Colorado with her husband Jeff, a Lt Col in the United States Air Force and their son Tom, who was diagnosed with autism at age 2. Together they work towards recovery whilst enjoying the beautiful Colorado outdoors. Sarah has written for The Autism File magazine and enjoys stained and fused glass art. 



Jennifer...sign up. Maybe you'll understand WHY they get that coverage.


As the spouse of a retiree, and parent to 3 children with autism, I was happy that ABA was finally covered for us, without the ECHO loophole (as well as others). Of course Tricare will weasel out, I guess after 20+years I can say I am not surprised. It's all about apoearance, not about actually helping. Good to see that the old attitude of "spouse and children didn't come with the seabag" hasn't gone away.


Every job has costs and benefits. My husband leaves on a 12 month deployment in August, not to mention the past 3 months that he has been gone for training. He has missed out on 5 years of my 11 year old daughter's life. If you don't like your insurance coverage, leave your job and join the military.

Concerned military mom

I have spent the past few hours looking over the Tricare policy changes and they are very scary. Specifically, the addition of a pre-authorization ABA assessment that has a BCBA (or military hospital personnel, if a BCBA is not locally available)determine annually:

"If the results of the ABA assessment indicate the beneficiary doesn’t support CURRENT CRITERIA of a diagnosis of an Autism Spectrum Disorder, then the second referral requesting one year of ABA can’t be authorized."

As a mom of two high functioning- thanks to daily ABA support- slipping this statement in is a slimy way to sneak the DSM-V and its corresponding under-diagnosis into the policy to dis-enroll high functioning kids.


Thank you Sarah! I hope everyone realizes this is not just a military issue - - it is a National policy issue that has not gotten the attention it needs. Yes I am military, but I also believe ALL kids (and adults) should have access to ABA therapy. By fighting for this we are helping set precedent and working toward the day when autism is treated like a medical condition across the board.

Angus Files

Continuum of policy never mind who gets in .

Its the mind game to make us all give up.

What you can do is vote for other candidates such as the Canary Party.

Just show these dick heads
Were still thinking,
Were not brainwashed,
Were not brain dead,
Were going to demand what is right for our kids...
Were going to vote out of the bubble because we don't want Continuum of policy

Were supporting The CANARY PARTY ..only way folks..

Milly Terry

"These people" serve our country and often REMAIN in the military rather than retiring and moving into the private sector so they can have coverage for their kids with autism. A double sacrifice. Have a heart for crying out loud.

Jessica Eastman

Thank you for writing this article. As a military family with a child with Autism, we are horrified at what Tricare is doing to our special needs community.


Well, I have insurance and it covers NO ABA, NO OT, NO PT, NO speech services and NO social skills classes. It covers nothing so sorry if I don't get out my violin for these people. At least they get some coverage.


The military decided to abandon billions and billions of dollars worth of military equipment in Afghanistan, and probably tripled the loss with having to pay for new equipment and support the defense industry and it's self-supporting war mongering. Now they seek to finance it on the backs of their own children. Autism: The new collateral damage.

Keep going, congress, and soon the health freedom movement will also have the entire population of disabled veterans with disabled children, and all the democratic peace activists that back them up, on its side, too.

Their decision will backfire on them. Military parents will be forced to abandon re-enlistment hopes just to care for their children, will be forced to look beyond ABA and not stop seeking more cure based on its imperfect results. Seeking out additional medical care, even if at their own expense, will open more eyes. The more open eyes the better. I say all of this in the hope that God will work his mysterious ways to make something good come out of this evil war and health for profit government approach.

It's a truly awful decision to abandon your own fighters. Isn't there some military honor about not leaving your fellow soldiers on the battlefield? But it's okay for the people that sent you to fight to abandon you in the postwar crisis, it seems?

Bob Moffitt

So much of what you right is so true .. as it applies to all of us ... not just the families of our courageous volunteer forces.

Admittedly, I have no idea what lies ahead for us when "Obama Care" becomes our reality .. but .. it would not surprise me to see the same government agencies responsible for implementing Obama-care ... use Tri-care as their model for reducing costs .. by "restricting, denying and creating barriers to care".

Such as you warn in your comments:

"Vineland and ADOS are required to show ‘progress’ and the absence of progress, as measured by these tests, is a criteria for discharge from therapy."

" What other chronic health condition has a limit placed on the duration of therapy or the age at which services end? For diabetes, does health insurance cut off treatment in the absence of progress? Is chemotherapy only available to people of a certain age? Of course not."

"These policies have nothing to do with improving the quality of services available to military children. They have everything to do with cost savings and restricting, denying and creating barriers to care."

"The federal government often sets the standards for treatment coverage and it is a much easier battle on a state level when families can argue that the federal government covers such a therapy, so therefore why should states not?"

We should all be concerned that our basic health insurance coverage can change ... by the stroke of an indifferent bureaucrat .. whose job performance is rated on cutting costs rather than providing proper health care coverage.

Will military families in the grip of Tricare bureaucrats
eventually be recognized as the "canaries in the coal mine" of health care coverage in the United States?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)