As far as I am concerned Gates is still a salesman , since he became a saint helping others he has worked as top salesman for the big Phama industry , Monsanto GMO , amd Geoengineering via Calgary university !! The latter two strangly linked and worthy of closer inspection, as our main media will not touch the subject regardless of grave public concerns. Watch "WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE THEY SPRAING" In depth report on youtube.

I agree Lou so if money is meant to make them happy why when they have it inflict misery on the have nots..sick turds that they are ..nouvo riche of the greater good..

Bill take the vaccines you mandate for all on TV and see how you get on ..

Angus

thanks for those links Thomas Malthus

We all need reminding of this regularly .

The Bill Gates bandwagon is getting more slick .
He tried addressing his previous mistakes last night ......too late Bill , we have your card .

I complained to the BBC (and copied it to Fergus Walsh) about their coverage of the "Polio eradication" stories last Feb quoting Dr Jacob Puliyel's concerns about AFP

I then attended a lecture hosted by Fergus Walsh and talked with him afterwards... He said everyone was aware of the risks with the live polio but that it was necessary in these countries but he was not aware of the huge numbers of AFP. He brushed them off at the time as the price to pay for eliminating Polio but I am pleased that he did not sweep Dr Puliyel under the carpet.

There were some very good questions raised by journalists at the GAVI conference last year in London, like clean water, and a vaccine damage payment fund for the developing world, but none were reported in the press. We would have done better if we had shown our bottoms...

Not so far-fetched.

http://thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm

http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/new_world_order/HcG_Vaccine_for_Pop._Control.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9083611

Isabella Thomas - I wish I could believe you were correct .
But dear old Bill declared we could reduce the world's population , if "we do a really got job on vaccination" .

If I remember Bill was talking of a reduction of about 15%
and that translates to a reduction of over a billion people . how do vaccines reduce the global population ?
I am afraid I will never understand that one.
This conference where he declares this , was one about climate change and is easily found all over the internet .

@ Bob Moffitt

"It is only a matter of time .. that the widespread and growing body of evidence of harm being done by vaccines eventually overwhelms all denials to the contrary."

It is a nice thought Bob but more is needed.

7 million children die annually in the third world despite vaccines and because we have no effective treatments for basic childhood diseases. We don't have the treatments because people like Bill Gates won't pay to develop them.

Government and medical officials have gotten away with the myth that vaccines are our saviour since Edward Jenner's time and still keep the information about widespread and serious adverse reactions uninvestigated.

It is well documented over a century or so that smallpox vaccine killed as many, nearly as many and sometimes more than smallpox.

The myth that smallpox was eradicated by any vaccine is such utter tosh. Any vaccine which took 100 years to "work" didn't. But this unscientific myth still exists today.

You can see here what factors scientifically confound the claim:
"Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication"
http://wp.me/pfSi7-14T

The medically well-known natural process of attenuation - the steadily diminishing severity of infectious disease over time - carried on as it always had as had the emergence of less virulent strains - in the case of smallpox: Alastrim. On top of that with steadily improving economic conditions came improvements in water supplies and quality and nutrition which by far have had the greatest effect on improved human health and resistance to infectious diseases.

In comparison vaccines have had a miniscule effect but the hype for them has been huge.

And people have been questioning for years what has been causing non polio paralysis in children. Guillain-Barré syndrome is one "cause" and other cases of paralysis have been clinically diagnosed as it. Guillain-Barré syndrome is known to be caused by vaccines.

The 47,500 Indian cases of non polio acute flaccid paralysis increased in direct proportion to the numbers of polio vaccines administered.

So here is the math - a couple of hundred cases of polio in three countries only vs 47,000 cases in just one country of a disease which is twice as deadly as polio [who knows how many other cases there are in other countries].

Philanthropist Bill Gates thinks that math is fine - tell that to the paralysed or dead children and their mothers Bill.

That is equivalent to 200 years worth of cases of children with polio paralysis.

Is that worth it?

It obviously is not. That is what makes it clear Bill is not interested in children's lives or health. He is interested in being famous as a philanthopist rather than as a businessman who ran a company found guilty of serious illegal business practices and fined nearly US$400 million.

After all - he could do all this charitable giving anonymously and quietly but he appears on BBC and all over instead. And we can think of more attractive people to see on TV.

The BBC did not freely acknowledge criticism of Bill Gates' plans by Dr Puliyel. They were embarrassed into it and have not even dealt with the criticisms. Fergus Walsh's treatment is barely professional.

The problems identified by the Puliyel paper have been known for at least 10 years including by acknowledged experts in WHO and elsewhere.

Here are some CHS links which provide useful information about the issues and cited publications discussing them:

"Bill Gates – Buying Immortality In History – By Beating An Already Beaten Disease & Killing Kids"
http://wp.me/pfSi7-1Lb

"New Paper – Polio Vaccine – Disease Caused by Vaccine Twice As Fatal – Third World Duped – Scarce Money Wasted – Polio Eradication Impossible"
http://wp.me/pfSi7-1u2

See this comment for links to papers dealing with some of the issues:
http://tinyurl.com/ae2g5xs

PS Jenny

I also think that the BBC can scarcely recapture the reputation and authority it once had -some of which was deserved. There is general bad odour about it now. Just another crony establishment institution, which will stop at nothing over personal interest. You only have to look at the image of the recent head of BBC news (and for years Fergus Walsh's boss) grinning as she is embraced by the late Jimmy Savile to see how far it has fallen.

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/medianews/article3577596.ece

John

I'd be careful Fergus Walsh , if I were you .

Daring to slip in any criticism , or daring to question vaccines could mean you end up looking for a new job !

You might end up on childrens TV Cbeebies - "Get Well soon".

Yes- I am presently watching the BBC Breakfast television programme, (UK Time 07.40am), and the Dimbleby Lecture, due to be delivered this evening, is being very heavily promoted. The presenters are stating Bill Gates's 'dream' is to eradicate polio worldwide; he is being given 'hero' status by the BBC.

If the BBC programme planners are aware of the terrible and widespread damage to children in India, from an illness 'indistinguishable' from polio, and apparently caused by polio vaccines financed by the Gates Foundation, then the BBC has completely lost all collective ethical sense and integrity.

The BBC has gone steeply 'downhill' on what was previously excellent science reporting, ever since the BBC was somehow 'persuaded' to commission a Science Media Centre report, which 'dictated' the content of science coverage. We licence paying members of the public are now getting only 'one sided' so called 'mainstream' science reporting, apparently heavily 'vetted' by the SMC.(For mainstream, substitute corporate and political vested interests, many of which finance the SMC).

Science is an absolute concept and certainly NOT something which can ever be 'opinion based', mainstream opinion or otherwise. There are plenty of good reputable scientists who disagree with prevailing scientific opinion, and thank goodness for that. Without radical hypotheses we would still believe in a flat Earth! The latest 'controversy' over so called 'man made' global warming, is slowly being exposed as nothing more than a sham, devised to enrich so called 'green' industries.

Professor Steve Jones, who wrote the BBC report, was described as a 'geneticist' by the BBC. However, on the recently 'made over' Science Media Centre website, Prof Jones is called an 'independent nuclear and environmental consultant'. This latter is in connection with the SMC's 'take' on the Fukushima, post nuclear meltdown. I have never read such rubbish in all of my life, all playing down the terrible post nuclear aftermath of the Fukushima disaster. Of course Fiona Fox and her corporate sponsored cohorts are all 'pushing' nuclear power as the safe 'answer' to reducing our so called 'carbon footprint'. Personally I prefer carbon dioxide to radiation poisoning. The SMC is also 'pushing' GM foods and technology.

It's not too late to 'pull' the televised Dimbleby Lecture and replace it with another programme, but instead, Bill Gates will be fawned over and promoted, like some latter day saint. Someone should make him a halo!!