A Hurricane of Blue
Dana Ramdwar Napoleon Presents A Pictorial Proclamation of Autism Vaccine Injury

Best of AofA: Who Cares that 54% of American Children Suffer from Chronic Illness

Captain salutesManaging Editor's Note: We ran this post last June. Seems little has taken place to put true health on the radar screen.  Children continue to become and remain sick in droves.

By John Stone

An Open Letter to the National Institutes of Health (Dr Marina Volkov answering on behalf of Director Francis Collins): 54% of American Children Suffer from Chronic Health Problems .

Dear Dr Volkov,

I acknowledge receipt of your e-letter of June 20 in response to my letter to Dr Collins (‘An Open Letter to National Institutes of Health's Dr Francis Collins: 54% of American Children Suffer from Chronic Health Problems, 1 in 6 has a developmental disorder’ reproduced below). I have to admit that I am less disappointed that Dr Collins has not answered in person than that you have insultingly not bothered to address any of the issues I raised in my letter, contenting yourself with a recital of NIH expenditure on autism research, some of which may be directed to looking at environmental causes. 

On reflection, it strikes me that you may not be remotely competent to answer, but this does not reflect well on the NIH in any case. With the nation’s health in meltdown the refusal to address the fundamental problems that Dr Collins himself first raised to Congress 5 years ago is astonishing. Let me give a single example – nothing to do with autism  - from Dr Collins’s NIH budget request for 2012 which indicates the inadequacy of the position (HERE) .

Dr Collins writes:

"We face a similar economic threat from diabetes. If current trends continue, by 2050 as many as one in three U.S. adults will be diagnosed with diabetes. Total costs of diabetes, including medical care, disability, and premature death, reached an estimated $174 billion in the United States in 2007...According to analysis from the UnitedHealth Center for Health Reform & Modernization, more than 50 percent of Americans could have diabetes or pre-diabetes by 2020...Furthermore, the center’s analysis predicts diabetes and pre-diabetes will account for an estimated 10 percent of total health care spending by the end of this decade, at an annual cost of almost $500 billion.

"But I can offer some hope. NIH spearheaded a landmark clinical trial on type 2 diabetes prevention that showed that people at high-risk for diabetes can dramatically reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes through modest exercise and dietary changes that achieve modest weight loss. Called the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), the clinical trial included 3,234 adults at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes, including those with a family history of diabetes, as well as other risk factors. One-third of these individuals participated in a lifestyle program that included exercise training and dietary change implemented under the guidance of lifestyle coaches. The DPP research team found that this approach lowered risk of diabetes by 58%..."

The UnitedHealth Centre report (HERE) projects 15m US citizens with diabetes by 2020 (>5%) and 52% with diabetes or pre-diabetes, but Dr Collins tells us we can only perhaps avert 58% of this by identifiable life-style changes, leaving some unidentified underlying cause of the phenomenon and still more than 1 in 5 Americans with pre-diabetes or diabetes by 2020, according to these figures.

In this regard it is not so unreasonable to ask not what we can do to treat these problems, but a very much more fundamental question of what is causing them in the first place. In a recent study the cost of autism in the UK was calculated at £28b a year (with an undoubted over-projection in the adult population) but leaving a net cost of £50k ($80k) a head (including issues like loss of employment and productivity). If you have just 3m Americans with autism you have an annual cost of $240b on these figures. Frankly, this is unsustainable. 5 years ago Dr Collins stated that the rise of autism was real and could not be genetic, so we have to ask why the present indifference to our concerns?

With regard to the substance of your letter, it has been pointed out to me that (disgracefully) the CHARGE project which you described in your 3rd paragraph will shut next month, funding having been withdrawn by the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences and the Environmental Protection Agency, as will the Center for Child Environmental Health, University of California, Davis. Katie Wright has pointed out to me $13m spent on completely useless projects to do with MRI scans and face recognition (Autism Centers of Excellence). But all this money is chicken-feed beside the scope of the catastrophe facing us – and the pharmaceutical is not going to fix this.

Having said which, what I actually believe is that already there is almost enough science published to pinpoint the environmental triggers and processes of autism, it is just being arrogantly sidelined.

Please, what are you going to do? Presently, the ship is going down while the captain salutes the flag.

John Stone



An Open Letter to National Institutes of Health's Dr. Francis Collins: 54% of American Children Suffer from Chronic Health Problems

Dear Dr Collins,

I am writing to you about the health catastrophe currently engulfing US children, but not only US children. Just five years ago you gave testimony to Congress as director of the Human Genome Research Institute (HERE ):

‘But genes alone do not tell the whole story. Recent increases in chronic diseases like diabetes, childhood asthma, obesity or autism cannot be due to major shifts in the human gene pool as those changes take much more time to occur. They must be due to changes in the environment, including diet and physical activity, which may produce disease in genetically predisposed persons. Therefore, GEI [Genes and Environment Initiative] will also invest in innovative new technologies/sensors to measure environmental toxins, dietary intake and physical activity, and using new tools of genomics, proteomics, and understanding metabolism rates to determine an individual's biological response to those influences.’

The calamity that we face today is that in 5 years barely a single child has been saved from environmental harm by any government initiative, and new studies report that no less than 54% of US children suffer from the chronic diseases (HERE ) and from the CDC itself that 1 in 6 has a developmental disability (http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2011/05/19/peds.2010-2989.abstract ), all of which you indicated  all that time ago are due to environmental changes.  These new studies come in the same week as one which shows that in an investigation of pregnant Canadian women 93% tested positive for the presence a GM insecticide Cry1Ab (HERE ). It comes as the pharmaceutical industry and its scientists plot to further exploit vaccination mandates and their newly established prosecution immunity ever more widely (HERE ), with US children already expected to receive over one hundred vaccines in combination by the time they become adult (HERE ) – and without any studies which investigate their cumulative impact on a child’s immune system (HERE ), even if they were individually adequately tested (which they are not HERE ). I do not know when it was scientifically established that it was safe to modify a child’s immune system in this way, even before we consider all the adjuvants and excipients that are a concomitant exposure of the programme: substances which enter a child’s body through their muscles and blood stream, and not through their digestive tract. It comes with the Food and Drug Administration displaying ever greater pusillanimity over the toxic substances to which adults and children are daily exposed.

Bearing in mind that in 2006 you held a brief for gene research I cannot help thinking that your request to Congress for funding was nevertheless putting the cart before the horse. The real imperative can only be to stop the great industrial experiment on our children by reducing and eliminating toxic exposures whether through food or pharmaceuticals. Investigating which random gene combinations might indicate greater susceptibility to those toxic harms will be barely productive in the face of what is becoming a slow but inexorable genocide of children, many of whom will not outlive their parents, not have children of their own, and be further prey to the pharmaceutical industry (HERE), at the same time as placing an ever more impossible social, medical and financial burden on the shrinking pool of the fit and able.

In 2006 you at least spoke plain about the general causes of the chronic sickness phenomenon. The new reports are far more evasive, and years have been wasted. Immense resources and effort have been put by government agencies and industrial lobby groups into denouncing and abusing people who are simply stating the obvious: that it cannot go on any longer. It is long passed time that the public dance of lies, misinformation and evasion came to an end. I believe you know truth and it is time to speak out so that your nation and the world finally hears.

John Stone

UK Editor, Age of Autism

Response from Marina Volkov, Acting Director, Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communications, National Institute of Mental Health, June 20, 2011 (Subject: Your recent email to Dr Collins)

Dear Mr. Stone:

Thank you for your May 24 e-mail to Dr. Francis Collins, Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  Dr. Collins’ office asked that the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) respond to your inquiry.  We would like to address your concerns regarding the role of genetics research in addressing autism, and the interplay between NIH’s genetics research programs and environmental research programs.  There has been considerable research and progress related to autism in the last several years, particularly in the last two years, thanks to funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).  In addition, your concerns are echoed and reflected in the 2011 strategic plan of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC), which identifies priorities for autism research across the Federal Government and provides a basis for partnerships between Federal agencies and private organizations to further biomedical and services research efforts.

NIH is dedicated to addressing the growing public health challenge that autism spectrum disorders (ASD) present.  In FY 2010, NIH invested $160 million from its annual appropriation in research on autism and another $58 million in ARRA funding. A total of $122 million in ARRA funding was devoted to ASD research from FY 2009 through FY 2010.  The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) recently highlighted these efforts on their ARRA website (http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/autismandrecovery.html).  Funded projects address a broad range of topics, including diagnosis; disparities; potential risk factors, such as infection during pregnancy and the impact of immune response on fetal development; behavioral and potentially pharmacological interventions for improving social interactions; and, job skill development for transition-age youth. In addition, NIH has issued several funding opportunity announcements to encourage research designed to elucidate the causes, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and optimal means of service delivery related to ASD. Thus, while NIH continues to support groundbreaking research on genetic risk factors for autism, that represents only a portion of the agency’s ongoing commitment to autism research.

The 2011 IACC Strategic Plan for ASD Research also addresses some of the concerns you mentioned in your e-mail.  Chapter 3 of the Strategic Plan, titled “What Caused This to Happen and Can It Be Prevented?,” addresses research related to the possible causes of autism.  This chapter contains several research objectives on environmental factors, gene-environment research, and longitudinal epidemiologic studies. Moreover, NIH continues to support a range of studies focused on environmental factors.  For example, in 2003, researchers jointly funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency launched CHARGE (Childhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment), a large case-control investigation of underlying environmental and genetic causes for autism and triggers of regression. The CHARGE study has enrolled over 1200 children to date and is addressing a wide spectrum of chemical and biologic exposures, susceptibility factors, and their interactions.  Environmental risk factors under investigation include pesticides, flame retardants, chemicals in plastics, mercury and air pollutants.

Finally, NINDS continues to support an epidemiological study in a large Norwegian cohort of mothers and their infants to explore how multiple genetic, environmental, and clinical history factors might contribute to the development of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

In a section of Chapter 3 focused on the new gap areas that have arisen, the 2011 Plan highlights the need for greater collaboration between genetic and environmental science investigators. That is, the IACC recognizes that studies collecting genetic information should include data on environmental exposures and vice versa; that large data sets are needed to allow mapping of detailed genetic, environment, and phenotypic information, including co-occurring medical conditions, inflammatory markers, pattern of onset, developmental course, and family history—echoing the concerns you have raised.

NIH is constantly monitoring the latest science, including developments in the areas you mentioned, and regularly updates its funding priorities to reflect new breakthroughs and research needs, to help people autism and their families.

Thank you again for sharing your thoughts and concerns.


Marina Volkov, Ph.D.

Acting Director

Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communications

National Institute of Mental Health

National Institutes of Health




John Stone


"However, it is obvious by now, that we must stop appealing to the ignorant, arrogant and hostile bureaucrats from the NIH and other health agencies."

With this I pretty much agree. The letter here was written published first and sent nearly a year ago and was predictably ignored. But it is clear from last week's debacle that there is not a shred of credibility left among the public agencies, and they just remain impeding progress and denying the obvious. I note the new nonsensical statement by Insel, a close associate of Collins.


Since humans are composed of genes it is unavoidable that autism must be the result of some collision from the environment with genes, but it is asking the wrong fundamental question.

These people just deserve our derision. They will go on bungling and offering offensively stupid answers just so long as they are allowed.

Bob Moffitt

Perhaps it is time that parents and Congress demanded Public health agencies treat the mystifying autism epidemic as Justice Department agencies routinely treat "cold case" investigations that remain unsolved for many years.

First .. Congress .. acting on behalf of the people .. should demand Public Health agencies (CDC, IACC, FDA, HHS, etc) publicly accept responsibility for their failure to find the cause for the autism epidemic.

Second .. Congress should then publicly declare autism be treated as a medical COLD CASE.

Third .. any public health "investigators" who .. for at least a decade .. have labored without any success identifying what "causes" autism should be thanked for their efforts .. and .. THEN PROMPLY REMOVED FROM ANY FURTHER INVESTIGATORY RESPONSIBILITIES.

Fourth .. all public health agency computers should be seized for forensic analysis.

Fifth .. new investigators should be IMMEDIATELY appointed and begin CRITICAL evaluation of existing research to identify any conflicts of interest or corruption of data that may be responsible for previous investigations that expended so much time, energies and scarce resources AVOIDING urgent pursuit of likely environmental sources of the epidemic.

Albert Einstein defined insanity as "doing the same thing over and over .. expecting to get different results".

I think Albert would agree .. keeping the existing "experts" in their role as "investigators" after so many years of failure would qualify as INSANITY.



I salute you for your unceasing efforts to bring the issue of massive damage of American children by vaccines/environment to the attention of health and political establishment. There is no more important existential problem facing our nation now. However, it is obvious by now, that we must stop appealing to the ignorant, arrogant and hostile bureaucrats from the NIH and other health agencies. These people’s financial interests are heavily intertwined with the interest of big pharma. They espouse and practice ideology – profits above all, even over dead bodies of American children. This mentality is not different form mentality of Nazi criminals, who exterminated millions of people in their death camps – for profits and racist ideology.

We must learn from the experiences and success of the American Civil Rights Movement. We must become as strong, as numerous, as vocal and omnipresent as they were in the 1960. We should unite with the parents and whole families of those 54% of vaccine/environment damaged children: i.e. children with ADHD, learning disabilities, seizures, other developmental and neurological damages, diabetes, asthma, severe allergies etc. That will make nearly the entire nation. And we must stop vaccinating, we must demand reimbursement of at least $10,000 of tax money from the government for private education of our children, if the government insists on pushing genocidal vaccines on them.

We should march million men strong on Washington, as African Americans marched in the 1960-ies. I believe this is the only option left to us now. Appealing to heartless, corrupted and brain damaged health bureaucrats, who are benefitting from pharma’s generous “contributions and sponsoring” is pointless at this time, as they proved to us that they don’t care at all about the welfare of children and the whole nation.


Using 21st century information technology it ought to be possible to track the rates of illnesses a lot more thoroughly and accurately than the methods used by study that came to the estimate of 54%, and to do so would be the single most obvious first step to take in addressing the problem, yet the health authorities have done nothing. To do so would of course also be to document their own failure.

Judy Brasher

This came from directly from the MMR package insert on Merck’s website. There needs to be a vax vs. unvaxed study looking at this as well as autism.
M-M-R® II (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live)
Body as a Whole
Panniculitis; atypical measles; fever; syncope; headache; dizziness; malaise; irritability.
Cardiovascular System
Digestive System
Pancreatitis; diarrhea; vomiting; parotitis; nausea.
Endocrine System
DIABETES MELLITUS (I added the caps)


Vaccines are causing a host of unintended immune problems.

Vaccines are causing the obsesity epidemic.
Vaccines are causing the diabeties epidemic.
Vaccines are causing the thyroid epidemic.
Vaccines are causing the rise in asthma
Vaccines are causing a rise in heart problems
And sometimes in l.136 percent of the cases it causes autism and brian injury.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)