AofA Science Summary: Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations
Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations
Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity
in pediatric populations (HERE)
L Tomljenovic1 and CA Shaw2
1Neural Dynamics Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,
Canada and 2Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Experimental Medicine and the Graduate Program in Neuroscience,
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Immune challenges during early development, including those vaccine-induced, can lead to
permanent detrimental alterations of the brain and immune function. Experimental evidence
also shows that simultaneous administration of as little as two to three immune adjuvants can
overcome genetic resistance to autoimmunity. In some developed countries, by the time children
are 4 to 6 years old, they will have received a total of 126 antigenic compounds along with
high amounts of aluminum (Al) adjuvants through routine vaccinations. According to the US
Food and Drug Administration, safety assessments for vaccines have often not included
appropriate toxicity studies because vaccines have not been viewed as inherently toxic.
Taken together, these observations raise plausible concerns about the overall safety of current
childhood vaccination programs. When assessing adjuvant toxicity in children, several key
points ought to be considered: (i) infants and children should not be viewed as ‘‘small adults’’
with regard to toxicological risk as their unique physiology makes them much more vulnerable
to toxic insults; (ii) in adult humans Al vaccine adjuvants have been linked to a variety of
serious autoimmune and inflammatory conditions (i.e., ‘‘ASIA’’), yet children are regularly
exposed to much higher amounts of Al from vaccines than adults; (iii) it is often assumed that
peripheral immune responses do not affect brain function. However, it is now clearly established
that there is a bidirectional neuro-immune cross-talk that plays crucial roles in immunoregulation
as well as brain function. In turn, perturbations of the neuro-immune axis have
been demonstrated in many autoimmune diseases encompassed in ‘‘ASIA’’ and are thought to
be driven by a hyperactive immune response; and (iv) the same components of the neuroimmune
axis that play key roles in brain development and immune function are heavily targeted
by Al adjuvants.
In summary, research evidence shows that increasing concerns about
current vaccination practices may indeed be warranted. Because children may be most at risk
of vaccine-induced complications, a rigorous evaluation of the vaccine-related adverse health
impacts in the pediatric population is urgently needed. Lupus (2012) 21, 223–230.
Vistor;
This article was one of my favorite.
I know that mercury darn well plays a role in all this too. I was amazed at the stupidity back in 2000 when Boyd simply added up the sum of merucy in the the vaccines together.
But I think the real problems with adding aluminium and causing more adverse reaction started way back in the mid 70's.
They had to do something new to the vaccines sometime in that time period, and I think it was adding more alumiunium. Before the mid 70's alziheimers was rare and a very fearful disease, and before that --- my generation had DPT shots with not much problem, that is my husband and I -- and no problems with tetanus shots either. I had no idea someone would have a seizure from a tetanus shot like my husband after all the ones he had had in the past with no problem. And I had no idea that kids could react with 105 temp from a DPT shot????
It had to be the vaccine manufacturers during this time did something different to the vaccines. So, more mercury, or more alumiunium. Or both!!!!!
Posted by: Benedetta | February 05, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Michael Wagnitz: Scientists find correlation between autism and aluminum in vaccines
http://host.madison.com/ct/news/opinion/column/michael-wagnitz-scientists-find-correlation-between-autism-and-aluminum-in/article_61a5c82c-4fc7-5a17-96d7-10356f19b13f.html
Aluminum only stimulates the immune sytem, it can't effect immune function in a bad way. Correlation does not equal an honest study of this issue when the possible finding is unwanted.
Posted by: Visitor | February 05, 2012 at 09:00 AM
For those to young to remember there use to be a hard hitting news program called
"60 Minutes"
Posted by: Benedetta | January 25, 2012 at 03:45 PM
the Science has been here all along; -- back in the 70s they all knew it was Al in the brain of Alzheimer's patients -- now they just call it Alzheimer's Plaques.
But I had no idea that 60 minutes showing that old couple was also my kids.
Posted by: Benedetta | January 25, 2012 at 03:43 PM
Carol;
Then if you want your child to be safe from its vaccine boosters and its immune system over doing it and going wild, wild, wild then just feed it PFCs.
Problem solved.
Posted by: Benedetta | January 25, 2012 at 03:37 PM
Just because it's interesting:
"Children exposed to chemicals called PFCs — used in some non-stick cookware, stain-resistant coatings, fast-food packaging and microwave popcorn bags — have a reduced response to vaccines, raising the possibility that the compounds could prevent children from being adequately protected against disease, a new study shows....
The study involved 587 children born from 1999 to 2001 in Denmark, where people eat a lot of seafood, which can be heavily contaminated with PFCs. The results are very relevant to American children, whose PFC levels are even higher, says the study, sponsored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Danish government.
Grandjean acknowledges that his study's design doesn't definitively prove that PFCs compromise children's vaccine response. It's possible that something else affected their response, says Paul Offit, chief of infectious disease at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. For example, it would help to know if children with higher PFC levels have any basic immune system problems, independent of vaccines...."
http://yourlife.usatoday.com/health/story/2012-01-24/Chemical-exposure-may-compromise-vaccine-response/52774114/1
Posted by: Carol | January 25, 2012 at 11:46 AM
Wow! This is a silver bullet to Pharma's zombie brain - huge thanks for AoA for posting it.
Will this critical info ever reach the American public? Certainly not by mainstream media who have long sold out any integrity to scores of $billions of advertising dollars Pharma massively pumps into their coffers.
Of course America's health generals should be jolted upright from their lounge chairs when they read this - oops, silly me - to think of the likes of NAID's Anthony Fauci actually ever seeing (or caring) about the carnage wrought by the Immunization Schedule for Ages 0 to 6.
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/downloads/child/0-6yrs-schedule-pr.pdf
david burd
Posted by: david burd | January 25, 2012 at 09:14 AM