The Age of Autism: Featured Advocacy Reception at Autism One/Generation Rescue Conference
Dallas Rock Against Autism April 9

Offit and Tsouderous Team Up in Online Autism Vaccine Denial-a-thon

Tweedle-dee-and-tweedle-dum1 By Anne Dachel

At noon on Tuesday, March 22, I went online for “an hour-long chat about vaccines, vaccine safety, the anti-vaccine movement and vaccine injury, with the Tribune's health reporter Trine Tsouderos and panelist Dr. Paul Offit.”

Here’s how Offit was described:

“Dr. Offit, a pediatrician, is the co-inventor of the RotaTeq rotavirus vaccine, chief of the division of infectious diseases at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and author of the new book, ‘Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All.’ Offit is an expert on vaccines and the anti-vaccine movement. He has written widely about the science behind them in both books, the popular press and medical journals, debunking common myths about these ubiquitous medical interventions.”

 (The online chat was done with typed comments from participants that appeared on the screen and several minutes later there’d be a typed response from Offit or Tsouderos.  You can read what was said here:,0,7963322.htmlstory)
I’ve noticed that whenever Offit gets the floor to talk about vaccine safety, there’s never a problem with vaccines and there’s never a real concern over autism.  The only thing wrong is that a vocal minority of parents are questioning the mandated schedule and creating fear and distrust.  And this was the tone of that day’s chat. 
There were 22 questions posted and answered.  And although the discussion was supposed to be about “vaccines, vaccine safety, the anti-vaccine movement and vaccine injury,” it really wasn’t.  
In answer to one question, Offit said, “Vaccines are well-tested before they're given to children in concomitant-use studies. Vaccines cannot be added to the schedule unless it has been clearly shown that the new vaccine does not interfere with the safety or immunogenicity of existing vaccines and that the existing vaccines don't interfere with the safety or immunogenicity profile of the new vaccine. Also, the immunological challenge from vaccines is pretty trivial when compared with the challenges babies typically encounters in the environment.”

He added, “Clearly, more vaccines have been added. As technology improves, it's been easier to make some vaccines now than we could in the past. Specific advances have occurred in protein chemistry, protein purification, and recombinant DNA technology. All has made for better, safer vaccines.”
To another question Offit replied, “The problem with today's vaccine safety discussion is that most of what you read or hear about aren't really problems with vaccines (e.g., autism, learning disabilities, MS, diabetes, and others).”  Offit blamed the controversy over vaccine safety on “inaccurate websites on the Internet.”
So it was clear that neither “vaccine safety” nor “vaccine injury” were really topics for discussion since as Offit informed us, we already have the safest vaccines possible and there’s no link to serious side effects.  That left us with most of the hour devoted to “the anti-vaccine movement.”
Of the 22 questions, only two were actually on vaccine safety.   One was from Jamie Deckoff-Jones MD:

“Are you concerned that the current epidemics of ME/CFS, ASD and GWI are related to vaccines? These neuroimmune disease cohorts are all of mysterious etiology and share many clinical similarities: sensory and cognitive processing deficits, susceptibility to and inability to clear certain infections, an unusual susceptibility to stress, increased oxidative stress, glutathione depletion, methylation blocks, mitochondrial defects, high levels of heavy metals, inflammatory bowel issues, hormone abnormalities and a suspicion that vaccines are implicated in pathogenesis.
The pathology in humans is extremely similar to what is known of simple retroviral infections in animals. We have evidence that xenotropic and polytropic MuLVs are infecting humans (Lombardi et al Science Oct 2009, Lo et al PNAS Sept 2010). Given the history of the use of mouse and chick embryo cells for vaccine production coinciding with the history of Epidemic Neuromyasthenia (as documented by Henderson and Shelokov, NEJM 1959), the known presence of animal retroviruses in those cells, and the documented ability of these viruses to infect human cells, aren't you the least bit concerned?”
Offit ignored most of the points Deckoff-Jones made and said simply, “The xenotropic murine retrovirus story as a cause of neurologic disease, including chronic fatigue syndrome has clearly fallen apart. And for those of us old enough to remember, many careers have fallen off a cliff claiming retroviruses as a cause of a variety of illnesses: most noteworthy, MS and Kawasaki's disease. Retroviruses are so ubiquitous and such a frequent lab contaminant that they're the Sirens of the lab.”
I actually posted my comment several days before the “chat” and it was included in the ones that Offit answered.

Me: “As a parent, an autism advocate, and a writer for the blog, Age of Autism, I would like to see Dr. Offit address the issue of a comparison study of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.  Why has there never been an official study comparing the health of children who are fully-vaccinated with the health of children who've never been vaccinated?  If never-vaccinated kids have the same problems as average American children, including exploding rates of asthma, severe allergies, and diabetes, along with a one percent autism rate, it would be proof that vaccines aren't responsible.  We could move on from this controversial issue.  The failure of our health agencies and the medical community to call for such a study raises serious concerns among parents.  What are these experts afraid of finding out?  There are now more and more parents exempting their children from vaccinations, so the study group is out there.  Why isn't Dr. Offit insisting on this research?”
Offit: “The best way to study vaccine safety is prospectively. Obviously, you could never ethically do this study prospectively because it would be unethical to withhold vaccines, which are known to prevent suffering, hospitalization, and death. Some retrospective studies are starting to emerge. One published by Charles Woods and Michael Smith in Pediatrics looked at fully vaccinated and relatively unvaccinated children and, not surprisingly, found no difference in neurological outcome. But all of the biological evidence for autism points away from vaccines, so calling for such a study seems off the point and largely unfair to parents of children with autism.”
The other twenty questions were pretty non-confrontational.  They allowed Offit to proclaim the safety of vaccines and warn us about the growing danger from the “anti-vaccine movement.”   They couldn’t have been more ideal for him if he’d written them himself.  They included things like,
“Is there harm in stretching out the schedule of vaccinations?”  (Offit: Of course there is.  Children “need to be protected as soon as possible.”)
“How do we convince parents who are currently disbelievers, to vaccinate their children?” 
From Stephen Barrett, MD: “Can anything be done about the problem of talk show hosts who repeatedly provide forums for guests who give irresponsible health advice?”
“Do you think we should have vaccine mandates for adults …similar to the mandates for public school children?”
From Ken Reibel: “April 2 is World Autism Awareness Day.  What kind of stories would you like to see the news and entertainment media cover, and what advice can you offer to general assignment reporters who are told to find an ‘autism story’?” 
Offit: “I work in a hospital with David Mandell, Hakon Hakanarson, and Bob Schultz, all excellent researchers in the field of autism. And the story of the cause or causes of the disorder is clearly emerging. There's been a lot of wonderful research in this area that involves specific genes, the proteins those genes make, when they make them, structural abnormalities in the brains of children with ASD and others that offers some real hope for the future. I look forward to the time when these stories are the main story, rather than the unfortunate focus on a dead-end hypothesis like vaccines. That discussion has only hurt children with autism, causing some to miss vaccines from which they would have benefited.”
There was praise for Offit too.
From a researcher: “Paul, you are a hero to those of us that value objective science and not anecdotal nonsense.” 
From a doctor: “I am currently reading your new book.  It is excellent….”
Dr. Robert Block: “Paul, as President-elect of the American Academy of Pediatrics, I want to thank you for your work and for your book, ‘Deadly Choices.’  What is the single best strategy for helping Parents separate the junk from the real facts about vaccines?”
When I first heard about the “Live Health Chat,” I thought it was going to be a real call-in show where Offit would respond to random questions.  I thought it was going to deal with vaccine injury and the one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule.  I should have known better.  Offit had the option of choosing questions that allowed him to promote his views and ignore anything that challenged them. 
One of my friends in the autism community submitted NO LESS THAN ELEVEN QUESTIONS.  Here are some of them:
--Every time someone asks you to call for a totally vaccinated v totally unvaccinated study of children you always say it's unethical. However, there are thousands of children unvaccinated in the US that you can use. Why don't you?  
--You said that the study has been done of vaccinated v relatively unvaccinated.  Excuse me, Dr. Offit, but that is not the same as totally unvaccinated so you cannot conclude that there were no differences.
--You say everyone needs to be vaccinated so those too young or those with immune problems who cannot be vaccinated--will be protected.  Does that include our children, diagnosed with autism, who have immune dysfunction now?
--There have never been studies on the synergism of so many vaccines given at the same time. Do you dispute this?
--Since you do not believe that vaccines cause autism, then please tell me what does?
--Do you believe that autism is more than a psychological-neurological problem?
--Do you believe that the autism numbers have increased since 1940?
--Trine-Why are you responding?  Do you consider yourself an expert on autism?  Do you have a child with autism?
Not one of these questions was considered.  Instead, Offit pretended that he had all the science on his side and he didn’t bother to get into any of the concerns of parents.
I’ve long noticed that autism is never a main focus in talks like this.  It’s never anything to worry about.  Offit continued to act as though genetic research is giving us substantive answers about the cause of autism and that it “offers some real hope for the future.” 
(Trine Tsouderos also responded to several of the questions, but I omitted her comments in my story for the same reason she dismissed Dr. Robert Sears’s credibility.  Tsouderos wrote, “One problem I have as a reporter about Dr. Sears is that he really is not an expert on vaccines at all. I would not use him in a story as an expert on vaccines.”  Since she’s not even a doctor, I had to wonder why she felt qualified to take on any of the questions submitted.)
The site had a poll question: Have you vaccinated your children? And the overwhelming response was YES.  Considering the topic, I had to wonder why the poll question wasn’t, Do you believe that vaccines cause autism?
If this had been a genuine discussion of vaccine safety and the controversy over vaccines, we’d have heard from more than one incredibly conflicted expert.  Offit wouldn’t have controlled the discussion and he’d have had to give real answers to serious questions. 
I asked for the one study that could end the debate over vaccines and autism.  WE NEED THIS RESEARCH.  SHOW US THE NEVER-VACCINATED KIDS WITH AUTISM.  If never-vaccinated children have as much autism as fully vaccinated ones, Offit could proclaim it on every network news show.  Instead, he talked around the question and made the bizarre claim that “calling for such a study seems off the point and largely unfair to parents of children with autism.”
Anyone tuning into this issue can understand the logic of my request.  And the fact that Offit obfuscated and pretended that Charles Woods and Michael Smith’s look at “fully vaccinated and relatively unvaccinated children” is proof of anything, showed that Offit didn’t want to honestly address this question.  Offit must have missed the letter from Lawrence Rosen, MD published in PEDIATRICS concerning this study. Rosen cited the inaccuracies in their findings and pointed out that they have considerable ties to the pharmaceutical industry.  Smith and Woods wrote back to say that although they may have “unrelated interactions” with the vaccine makers, this study was not funded by them.
So why can’t seemingly earnest scientists like Smith and Woods do some really significant research on vaccine safety and compare the health of fully-vaccinated and never-vaccinated children?  The findings they came up with are hardly noteworthy.  Why not do something really worthwhile?

I’m curious about what Offit said about a vaccinated/unvaccinated study during a radio interview. 
(HERE)   Offit brought up a comparison study what supposedly disproved any problems with the MMR vaccine:

"Hundreds of thousands of children who got the MMR were compared with hundreds of thousands of children who didn't get MMR to see whether the risk of autism was greater in the vaccine group and it clearly wasn't."

Why did Offit allege that it would be “unethical to withhold vaccines” for such a study and yet cite research that used “hundreds of thousands of children” who weren’t vaccinated for these diseases?  And why didn’t he bring up this research when he answered my question?   I’m very curious about this large scale study.  How did they come up with hundreds of thousands of unvaccinated kids?
There isn’t a lot of time left for Offit to put on shows like this.  Right now, there’s no real concern over what autism is going to do to this nation.  According to Offit, the cutting edge autism research involves hunting down the faulty genes that cause our kids to end up with autism, although no significant findings have yet come from science like this. 
Offit needs to wake up to the fact that other expects aren’t convinced and they challenge all the suppositions he’s invented.  I submitted a second question that never got aired: “On CBS News in 2008, Dr. Bernadine Healy, former head of NIH, publicly said that we can't say there's no link between vaccines and autism without a study looking at the children who suddenly and dramatically regressed after certain routine vaccinations.  Is she correct?”
If vaccines aren’t the cause for regressive autism, what happened to these kids?  That may have been a question that was too tough for Offit to explain away in an online chat.  He never answered it.
Offit needs to be made aware of what the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) created by Congress to deal with autism had to say about autism recently, (HERE)  "Two decades ago, autism was a little-known, uncommon disorder. Today, autism is more common in the United States than childhood cancer, juvenile diabetes, and pediatric AIDS combined, and the increasing numbers of children being diagnosed with autism has created a national health emergency. ...

“The most recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) prevalence estimates of ASD for children are 1 in 110 (CDC, 2009). These estimates, more than tenfold higher than two decades ago, raise several urgent questions: Why has there been such an increase in prevalence? What can be done to reverse this alarming trend? How can we improve the outcomes of people already affected, including youth and adults?”

Dr. Thomas Insel head of the IACC has talked about the fact that 80 percent of the people with autism are under the age of 18 and that we need to prepare for a million adults with autism "who may be in need of significant services.”   In Offit’s “Autism’s False Prophets,” he adamantly denies this is true.  According to Offit, there’s been no increase.

As for vaccines, though Offit may think that “all of the biological evidence for autism points away from vaccines,” there are a number of official vaccine-autism studies planned.  This includes study announcements from the CDC, the Dept. of Health and Human Services, and the IACC.  While many of us question the right of those already connected to the vaccine program to conduct such studies, one thing is obvious--this issue is as heated as ever.  Vaccines have not been exonerated. 
Offit ended the chat with, “Thanks, Trine.  That was fun.” 
It may have been a lark for Offit, but these two are going to have to try a lot harder to convince the public that they’re right, especially with a growing population of dependent adults with autism that no one can explain.  They’ve got their work cut out for them.

Anne Dachel is Media Editor of Age of Autism.



"... It may have been a lark for Offit, but these two are going to have to try a lot harder to convince the public that they’re right, especially with a growing population of dependent adults with autism that no one can explain. They’ve got their work cut out for them. ..."


This is a wonderful article, but the reason I’ve highlighted the above paragraph is that I’ve come to realize that this assumption epitomizes the problem

I’m not pointing this out to criticize, because in an honest and fair world, the above sentiment would be 100% correct. And these clowns WOULD be under intense scrutiny right now, because their ridiculous claims would be debated ( and summarily destroyed) in any form of an honest debate. Instead, these goofballs get paid gobs of money to spout senseless rhetoric, by the same companies who have all the power they need to ensure that they’re never held accountable for their lies.

Everyone here knows that characters like Paul Offitt and Brian Deer and lying through their teeth, but our unique insights are largely the result of a life experience that has driven us to find the truth. Average people who lack that drive have no real concept of the reality we face, and for most of them it’s a matter of “There, but for the grace of God, go I”. While these people do see us, and they do kind of feel for us… there are huge forces at work to make sure they never hear us.

I'm not big on quoting song lyrics, but I recent heard a song by John Mayer which contained the lyric: "When you watch your television, what you get is what you got..... 'cause when they own the information, they can bend it all they want"

The forces behind this poisoning of a generation, the same forces who hire and then protect idiots like Offit and Deer … own the information.

Jill Fenech

"That was fun." Seriously? Those three little words kept playing over and over in my head all day yesterday after reading this article. "That was fun." And off he goes, out the door, into the sunshine and into the perfectly controlled world Offit lives in. No worries here. Wow. A new low - even for Offit.


Now that his financial interest has been exposed how can anyone consider him objective.Would he say anything negative about the safety of his own product that puts money in his bank account?


The vax/non-vax study will never happen simply because the result would be a horrendous blow to vaccine policy. We would find out that vaccines not only cause autism but asthma, allergies, cancers, diabetes, juvenile arthritis, early onset multiple sclerosis and other chronic autoimmune conditions. In adults the list also includes Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.

Adam M

‘Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All.’ - well quick then Dr Offit, make us a vaccine against the "dangerous anti-vaccine movement" that threatens us all. So which is it? Do your vaccines work or don't they? If they work and they are safe (as you claim) then those of us who don't take them are the only ones with something to lose. If you're concerned about those "too young to be vaccinated" why wait? If you can give an entirely inappropriate/ unnecessary vaccine on the day of birth then why not give them one (or 9) for a disease they are likely to get before they leave the hospital? Of course, that might be little too conspicuous with a nation wide rash of sids deaths right there in the hospital nurseries.


Rather ironic that people who hubristically dismiss "anecdotal nonsense” still promote web polls.

Parent anecdotes are empirical evidence that physicians rely on heavily for prescribing medical treatment. Those vital information exchanges happen every hour in clinics worldwide.

Treating parent reports of vaccine injuries as nonsense is perverse, inhumane and ultimately unscientific. How Offit can insist that vaccines merit no further study once administered to consumers is beyond comprehension.


I can't wait to see what Offit has to say publically once the science becomes widely accepted in his own work place (CHOP). Its going to be awkward...


I'd add a few more questions:

Why is the public NOT told that the only "safety studies" run by the vaccine manufacturers compare a group that gets their vaccine with a group that gets...a different and UNSPECIFIED vaccine?

Why are you still telling the public that vaccines are extremely safe when there are 1400-odd ADMITTED and COMPENSATED cases of vaccine-induced brain damage?

Why are you claiming that children need to be "protected" by vaccines as soon as possible, when many of those vaccines, such as Hep B and the flu shot, are both unnecessary AND have a high rate of severe adverse reactions?

Why is the public never told that the flu shot is ineffective, according to the Cochrane Collaborative?

Why do doctors insists that those with autoimmune disorders be vaccinated for such things as flu and shingles, when studies have never been done on either safety or effectiveness in people with autoimmune disorders?

Why do you continually insist that "vaccines are safer than ever because they use a lower number of antigens than previously," when there is a vast amount of SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH showing damaging effects from the non-antigen ingredients of a vaccine, such as the preservative, the adjuvant, the antibiotic, the growth medium, etc?


"I’ve noticed that whenever Offit gets the floor to talk about vaccine safety, there’s never a problem with vaccines and there’s never a real concern over autism. The only thing wrong is that a vocal minority of parents are questioning the mandated schedule and creating fear and distrust."

That really sums Offit up in a nut shell. So well said.

John Stone

Hmmm, which is it?

I imagine Offit has heard of VAERS:-

Found 184 events where Vaccine is ROTHB5 and Patient Died

Passive reporting, of course.


Dr. Offit has a canned answer for any vaccine question which usually involves not answering the damn question in the first place.

He simply uses the words "study or research" meaning the "beautiful bullshit of epidemiology."

When will Dr. Offit understand that "problems that will not go away" will not go away... ???

not a rhetorical question

Why is Trine Tsouderos allowed to continue being a journalist for a major national newspaper when she is openly involved in public relations for the vaccine industry?

Hmmm, which is it?

Either Offit is a very good liar, or he's never heard of the VAERS database.


What scumbags.

Katie Wright

These 2 would make GREAT used car salesmen!

That lunatic writer thinks she is a doctor. Trine proudly declares that ignorance is bliss and advocates that other journalists should not examine or write about both sides of this story. In her infinite wisdom based upon her close collaboration w/ vaccine makers, Trine has declared that all vaccines are sacred, only to be discussed in hushed reverent tones!

Offit spouts bizarre non facts and alleges that families prefer Wakefield to him because Wakefield is better looking than he is. Offit there isn't enough time in the day to explain why families prefer Wakefield to you but I can assure you it is not based upon your looks.

This moronic tag team are provide our community with the 2 best reasons why we need comprehensive and independent vaccine safety research.


A couple of years ago, the Texas Department of Health was asked to participate a publicly-held panel discussion regarding vaccines. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and Dawn Richardson (PROVE) represented one side and the State sent their own MD representative. He was somewhat apologetic about being the only medical provider there, and attibuted it to reluctance on the part of State employee representatives because "these discussions never end well." This event clearly proved his point. While he was busy clinging to the standard pro-vaccine talking points, Dr. Tenpenny and Ms. Richardson inundated him with factual evidence that refuted it. The audience was clearly on the side of vaccine safety, and he was the clear loser.
Offit has been invited numerous times to publicly defend his ridiculous claims--so far, he has declined all but the spoon-fed variety this article reviews. It's difficult to understand how someone who is so convinced he's right could be such a coward. Money is certainly intoxicating, even temporarily hides the blood on one's hands.

Lisa Thompson

Love the Tweedle Dum(b) and Tweedle Dee Dum(ber) graphic! It speaks volumes.


Again, I'm sick and tired of the poop that comes out of his mouth and the media who eat it up. I won't mention the stupid doctor's out there who don't do their own research to fact-check.

Bob Moffitt

Offit: "Clearly, more vaccines have been added. As technology improves, it's been easier to make some vaccines now than we could in the past. Specific advances have occurred in protein chemistry, protein purification, and recombinant DNA technology. All has made for better, safer vaccines.”

Just how "improved" is any technology that ALLOWS pig viruses to contaminate rotovirus vaccines?

In fact, when the FDA learned both rotovirus vaccines are contaminated with two distinct types of "pig viruses" .. and .. they made no effort to stop injecting those pig virus contaminated vaccines into children .. ostensibly because the FDA has .. "no evidence that pig viruses are harmful to humans"?

Talk about "callous disregard" for the future health of an entire generation of children.....


'That was fun'.

It is worth repeating:

'That was fun.'

What goes on in the head of a doctor so insensitive to patients? What motivates his activities, other than self interest? Who would turn for help to a man who claims discussing devastating illness is fun?

Offit will no doubt still be telling his nurses that vaccines don't cause autism as they wipe the rice pudding from his bib; but by then another generation will be running the research, and they can not do a worse job than this one.

BTW, I think the 'hundreds of thousands' MMR study must be Madsen - the one with the RR of 0.92 and 95% CIs of 0.68 - 1.24.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)