Autism Researcher Poul Thorsen Indicted
TACA Invites You to Meet Kim Stagliano All I Can Handle I'm No Mother Teresa Author

Dr. Offit, Tell Us What Happened To These Children

Great_powerful_oz By Anne Dachel

I found a recent story from the Stanford University Medical School called, A national health challenge: How the anti-vaccine movement threatens us all.  It was all about  the wonderful job Dr. Paul Offit is doing defending the vaccine program for America’s doctors. HERE 

Offit was described as “one of the most public faces of the pro-vaccine movement for childhood immunizations. He's a hero to pediatricians around the country for taking on an aggressive anti-vaccine movement that makes erroneous claims that vaccines are dangerous to children's health and can cause autism and brain damage.”

To parents in the autism community of course, Offit is the constant voice out there in the media challenging anyone who dares to propose that the ever-expanding vaccination schedule is responsible for a host of chronic and debilitating conditions affecting our children, most notably autism.

Offit can explain away anything that happens to kids following vaccinations.  I’ve read his books, watched videos, and read countless articles where he’s featured.  His message is always the same.  Studies disprove serious reactions.  Our vaccines are incredibly safe.  The public is being misled by the “anti-vaccine movement” that fuels parents’ fears about what vaccines can do their children.

He’s also very outspoken when it comes to government’s vaccine compensation program.  Offit has a whole chapter in his book, Deadly Choices, simply called, “Justice.”  His idea of justice is anytime government rulings reject the idea that serious side effects can result from the mandated vaccine schedule.  

According to Offit, what can look to parents like direct and immediate vaccine damage, is merely coincidence.  He has this mantra so ingrained in his thinking that the most dramatic and debilitating changes following routine vaccinations are dismissed as happenstance.  The problem is that when you start to look into the claims of vaccine damage, it’s a little hard to believe that thousands of healthy children would have suddenly gotten sick without the common denominator of being vaccinated at the same time.

A Jan 2011 story from CBS News should have set off alarms everywhere, but it didn’t.  Sharyl Attkisson wrote about a bittersweet victory in federal vaccine court involving a little boy named Elias Tembenis. (HERE)

“The tragic death of little Elias Tembenis is yet another vaccine injury case you probably won't hear much about. Yet some medical experts believe it could teach us something about how to make vaccination safer.

“According to court and medical records, Elias was born on Aug. 23, 2000 and appeared healthy until Dec. 26 when he received his second dose of DTaP vaccine. His parents noticed some swelling around the injection site. According to court records:

“Early in the morning on December 27, 2000, Elias's parents found him seizing in his crib and took him to the emergency room ...Within one day, he developed a fever, which led to a complex febrile seizure. Subsequently, Elias developed epilepsy. This fact pattern is commonly seen in the Vaccine Program.’

“According to court records, after the DTaP reaction, the once-healthy baby ended up with debilitating medical problems, including features of autism, ear infections and developmental delay. His parents first filed their case as one of the ‘omnibus’ group of autism cases to be heard in federal vaccine court.

“According to those familiar with the case, the couple felt their chances of winning with the autism cases was slim because the idea of a link between vaccines and autism is so controversial. So they separated their case from the autism group and filed on the basis of their son's epilepsy and seizures.

“They recently prevailed in court. It's one more example where vaccine-injured children who end up with autism are quietly winning their cases, but only when they focus on the more general argument of seizures or brain damage rather than autism.

“Some victory. On Nov. 17, 2007 Elias' illnesses became to much for him. The little seven year old boy died.”

In Sept, 2010, Sharyl Attkisson had another story called, “Vaccines, Autism, and Brain Damage: What’s in a Name?”  She wrote, “CBS News has found nearly 1,300 cases in which vaccine-related brain damage has been compensated in court over the past 20 years.

“The debate over any links between vaccines and autism - a behavior problem triggered by brain damage - couldn't be more contentious. The great majority of medical opinion holds that vaccines don't cause autism. However, many of the same experts don't dispute that vaccines can, in rare instances, cause brain damage.

“Our examination of federal vaccine court decisions over the years reflects this. Children who end up with autistic symptoms or autism have won vaccine injury claims over the years-as long as they highlighted general, widely-accepted brain damage; not autism specifically. But when autism or autistic symptoms are alleged as the primary brain damage, the cases are lost.”

Attkisson added, “The case of Michelle Cedillo, now 16, couldn't have turned out more differently. Her autism claim was a "test case" in federal vaccine court. If she'd won, it could have opened the floodgate for thousands more vaccine-autism claims to be paid. Michelle's attorney argued that an MMR shot on Dec. 20, 1995 directly caused her severe autism. But the federal vaccine court couldn't have been firmer in smacking down the claim last year, saying there was no credible proof that vaccines caused her autism. Michelle is also diagnosed with severe encephalopathy. Her mother, Theresa Cedillo, feels they could have won if they had simply based their case on encephalopathy. Mrs. Cedillo doesn't regret her daughter being a landmark autism case, even though they lost. But for future families, she says: ‘if you want to be compensated, I would say stay away from the autism word.’

“Since the late 1980's, more than 2,100 families have received compensation for vaccine injuries under the federal program designed to help in rare instances of severe vaccine side effects. And more than half of those awards are for brain injuries.”

I mention all this because in Deadly Choices, Offit has a lot to say about these cases in his “Justice” chapter.  According to Offit, the vaccine court made wrong judgments for years and only recently starting getting them right with cases like the one involving Michelle Cedillo. 

Offit said, “During the twenty years of its existence, the [Vaccine Injury Compensation Program] had been generous with its money.”

“Vaccine court was an unusual place.  When it first started awarding money in 1988, the compensation table was relatively loose and the VICP compensated injuries that weren’t caused by vaccines. …The court also routinely compensated parents whose children died from Sudden Infant Death Syndrome even though studies had shown that SIDS wasn’t caused by vaccines.  Other awards were even more bizarre.  Petitioners successfully claimed that a child’s crying or irritability or sleeplessness following DTP was evidence of brain damage leading to attention deficit disorder.”

 Then in 1995 things changed.

“To applause from the medical community, the VICP’s vaccine-injury-compensation table was tightened.  No longer could parents successfully claim that DTP vaccine caused permanent brain damage or SIDS or genetic disorders.” 

And according to Offit, the biggest accomplishment of the vaccine court had to do with the vaccine-autism controversy. 

“By July 2002, vaccine court… had received more than three hundreds claims that vaccines caused autism.  It was only the beginning—the number would eventually exceed five thousand.”

Offit explained that the court set up three test cases in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding involving Michelle Cedillo, Yates Hazlehurst, and Colten Snyder to rule on all the pending claims that autism could be caused by vaccinations.  In the end, all three cases lost in vaccine court. 

In the case of Yates Hazlehurst, the special master wrote, ‘The Hazlehursts’ experience as parents of an autistic child…has been a very difficult one. [I am] moved as a person and as a parent by the Hazlehurst account and again extend to the Hazlehursts very sincere sympathy for the challenges they face with Yates.  [My] charge, however, does not permit decision making on the basis of sentiment but rather requires a careful legal analysis of the evidence.’

With that it seems that justice was finally served in vaccine court and the special masters were now basing their judgments on the scientific evidence and not on misguided compassion for the suffering of these children.

In his book, Offit said that things had changed over the years since the beginning of the VICP.  “[Now] studies showed that children who received the pertussis vaccine weren’t at greater risk for permanent brain damage and that the real cause of the damage was a defect in how brain cells transported certain elements, such as sodium, across the cell membrane. …When the Omnibus Autism Proceeding started, epidemiological and biological studies had already gone a long way toward exonerating vaccines.  The science was in, and the special masters knew it.”

The only way anyone can climb on board with Offit’s theory that the study findings are valid, is to never look too closely at those studies and who funded them or listen to any of the parents’ stories of what actually happened to their children.  The elephant in the room that Offit never really addresses is the question: If it wasn’t the vaccines, what happened to all these kids to cause such a sudden and dramatic change in their health? 

Are we to believe that because of some genetic defect, thousands of children, for no apparent reason, suddenly develop seizures, sleep disorders, bowel disease, and encephalopathy?   Countless children stop talking and lose learn skills, eventually ending up with an autism diagnosis.  Doctors have no explanation for why these things happen, except that it can’t be the vaccines because all the studies say so. 

Offit’s position is simply not supported by real world evidence.  In fact, everything he says flies in the face of logical thinking.  The only things he has to back his position are the vaccine court rulings and “the studies.”  No matter how many thousands of parents protest that they saw direct side effects after having their children vaccinated, he can pretend they’re wrong.  Making the vaccine court cases go away was the best way to do that.  It also sends a clear message to parents that vaccines can’t be held responsible in case of injury.  If all the science says they’re safe, what claim can parents possibly make?

I recently read A Shot in the Dark by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fisher.  published in 1985.

This book is a careful analysis of the scientific evidence in the medical literature that the "P" or pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine in the DPT shot can cause brain inflammation and the claims made by parents that their children were severely and even fatally damaged by the diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine.  This is the vaccine that Offit feels was falsely implicated in some of the early vaccine court rulings.  Reading clinical descriptions by doctors in the medical literature and the first-hand accounts by parents of the horrific suffering described in this book, leads me to ask again, if it wasn’t the DPT vaccine, what happened to these children?

Consider this example from A Shot in the Dark.

Richie, aged 2 months, received his DTP vaccine.  “By that evening, … Richie’s hip started to swell … Richie’s hip then turned from red to dark purple, and later the purple started to spread out from the site of the injection in round patches.  ...

“When he woke up [the next morning], he started screaming off and on.  He sounded like a cat in pain.  His scream was high and forceful…”

Then severe diarrhea started.

“His diapers were full of light brownish diarrhea with a lot of mucus.  He fell asleep for about two hours and woke up crying.  When I picked him up, he was completely soaked through two receiving blankets.  …

His mother gave Richie a bath and said, ‘He was limp and he just stared at me with dark eyes as if he was mad at me.  I noticed his hands were ice-cold.  From the wrists down.’ 

“In the afternoon, [his mother] changed three more diapers, all of them containing yellow diarrhea.” 

(The mother explained that she didn’t call the doctor because Richie had the same reaction that his older brother had had.  At that time, she was told by the pediatrician that it was ‘a normal reaction to the DTP shot and not to worry.’)

By that evening, Richie’s condition had continued to deteriorate and he felt cold.  His mother phoned the doctor and described his symptoms.  She said that the doctor “didn’t sound worried and agreed that it was probably a DPT reaction.”  She was told that if she wanted to, she could bring her son to the hospital. 

While she was getting him ready, ‘he stopped breathing.’  They called an ambulance but it was too late, her son was dead. 

“Richie had died thirty-three hours after he received his first DPT shot.”  At the emergency room, the mother asked the doctor, ‘Why didn’t you tell me that the vaccine could do this to my baby?’  The doctor replied, ‘Oh, the vaccine couldn’t have done this to your baby.’

The mother challenged him, ‘Don’t tell me that.  My son Ryan had the same reaction.’

This story will have to serve as just one example of the dozens and dozens of accounts I’ve read.   A Shot in the Dark is filled with many reports equally stunning.  How do doctors and nurses witness these happenings and not have to face the truth?  Are they able to convince themselves by repeating over and over, “Studies show no link”?

Offit mentioned A Shot in the Dark in his book and I’m left mystified that he could have read accounts like this and simply shrugged them off as unrelated to the vaccine this child received right before he got sick.

And if it only involved a handful of children, maybe the coincidence idea would be convincing.  But there are many thousands such claims of vaccine damage. 

In Deadly Choices, Offits talked about the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, (VAERS).  This is a place for people to report suspected vaccine reactions.  Offit cited Dr. Robert Sears’s claim that between 1991 and 2001 people reported eighteen thousand severe side effects that ‘resulted in a prolonged hospital stay, a severe life-threatening illness, a permanent disability, or a death.’

This doesn’t bother Offit.  He wrote, “VAERS can, at best, alert public health officials to the possibility of a serious side effect from a vaccine.”  "VAERS, however, cannot determine whether a vaccine caused a side effect.  Only controlled studies can do that.  The problem with VAERS is that two groups of people never report to it: people who get a vaccine and don’t suffer any side effects and people who suffer the same illness as is reported to VAERS but never got the vaccine.” 

Evidently, if we also looked at those two missing study groups, there’d never be any evidence of a bad reaction to a vaccine.

I would like to tell Offit that the real problem with VAERS is that most parents have never heard of it and most doctors discount the reaction they’re seeing and don’t report it.  Health officials acknowledge that only one to 10 percent of vaccine injuries are ever reported to VAERS.  So if the eighteen thousands incidents Bob Sears wrote about are only one to ten percent of the real damage, we’re looking at the possibility of hundreds of thousands of unreported reactions.  Parents really do have to question the safety of the one-size-fits-all vaccine program.

Offit has his studies but the damage claims continue to mount.  How much coincidence can the public be expected to swallow?   Offit feels supported by the Omnibus rulings in the cases involving Colten Snyder, Yates Hazlehurst and Michelle Cedillo.

Rolf Hazlehurst had this to say about his experience with the vaccine court:  “My son [Yates] is eleven years old.  He suffers severe and permanent brain damage. In all probability, he'll spend his adult life locked in a mental institution. ... When you consider that the rate of autism has risen from one in 10,000 to one in 100 in less than twenty years, we as parents have a moral obligation to legitimately question vaccine safety….

“For twenty-five years, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986 has kept vaccine-injured children out of state and federal court.  It should be called the National Vaccine Manufacturers Protection Act. ...  For twenty-five years, the government has said that before you can go to a court of law, you must first go to vaccine court.  It's highly misleading for the government to refer to Vaccine Court as a court.  In Vaccine Court, there is no judge, no jury, and the most basic rules of law do not apply.  The rules of evidence do not apply.  The rules of civil procedure do not apply. The rules of discovery do not apply.  In Vaccine Court, the rule of law and the American legal system has been replaced by what is known as a Special Master.  A Special Master is nothing more than a politically appointed, government attorney.  Vaccine Court is nothing more than a procedural hurdle that has kept the vaccine-autism issue out of court for twenty-five years.  I truly believe that if it were not for the Vaccine Act of 1986, the autism epidemic would not be possible.  I've been an attorney for 15 years and in my personal opinion the actions of the government officials in Vaccine Court is part of the most frightening and blatant abuse of power that I've ever witnessed.”

And Theresa Cedillo said this:  “For the past fifteen and a half years, our daughter Michelle has suffered profoundly from the severe injuries caused by her childhood vaccinations.  Michelle was born a healthy and normal baby. She received all of the recommended childhood immunizations. She reached all of her baby developmental milestones on schedule until receiving the Measles, Mumps Rubella vaccine. Seven days following the MMR vaccination, at the age of fifteen months, she developed a very high fever.  That day marked the beginning of a brutal regression.  Michelle lost all language and communication skills, she stopped eating solid food for almost twelve weeks.  She withdrew into a world of her own, no longer turning to the call of her name.  She was so withdrawn, we thought she had lost her hearing.  Her GI health deteriorated with the beginning of chronic diarrhea and vomiting.  Unfortunately, her health and the disease process has continued to worsen.  Today, Michelle is under the care of eight pediatric specialists.  She has been diagnosed with severe autism, severe static encephalopathy, a life-threatening seizure disorder, inflammatory bowel disease, inflammtory arthropathy, severe bilateral pes planovalgus deformities, uveitis, glaucoma, and osteoporosis.  The optic nerve damage from the IBD associated eye disease has left Michelle legally blind.  She has bone deformities in both feet from the arthritis and osteoporosis. She has great pain and difficulty walking and standing.  She receives all of her nutrition via a jejunal feeding tube.  She receives 18 doses of medications per day. She needs assistance when walking. She requires 24 hour care by two people.

 “The thimerosal containing vaccines she received altered her immune system so that when she received the MMR, it was the final insult throwing her into a full blown regression.  Michelle has tested positive for vaccine strain measles RNA in her colon tissue biopsies.  Michelle has undergone five genetic evaluations at top medical facilities.  Each more in-depth than the previous.  She has no existing genetic abnormalities. There is no alternate explanation for her current medical condition. Michelle is vaccine injured.

“Justice was not served for Michelle.   Her injuries and diagnoses are the same as other children awarded in the VICP. She was punished for using the "autism" word.  The decisions in her case were political statements, and not what Congress intended for this program or injured children.” 

I ask again, if it wasn’t the vaccines, what happened to these children?  How long are we going to accept that no one knows anything, except that it couldn’t be the vaccines?

Anne Dachel is Media Editor of Age of Autism.



World Congress of vaccine mafia. Please take a look at their strategies to impose world-wide mandatory vaccines and create markets.


Hhhhmmmm................somehow my daughter Julia's compensation with VICP can help out all the autism families.....just trying to figure out how............WE WON. Encephalitis 9 days post MMR...........


Interesting links, Carol and Anne. Maybe reporters like Matt Lauer are quitting due the pressures to lie and be biased towards pharma. I bet the Lauer kids aren't vacced to the max. Maybe PBS has grown a brain and is reporting more in line with what viewers know and want. Good for them!


My local Boarders is going out of business. I went over today to shop the slim pickens at the 80% off entire store sale. Obviously no one cares what Offitt has to say since there were more copies of Deadly Choices on the shelf than any other book in the health section.

Anne McElroy Dachel

PBS has posted their link to the 15 min. video of part 1 of the autism series.
There's a place for comments.
Anne Dachel


@ AussieMum
Are vaccinations in Australia mandatory or only recommended? Also, it seems that your govt wants to depopulate Australia from all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. This schedule, as the US schedule, surely looks like a Nazi plan for genocide. Nobody can survive healthy such abuse.


This is a must-see video. The grandson of Robert MacNeil (yes, *that* Robert Macneil) is autistic and has gastrointestinal problems.


CMO, LMAO! the great and powerful Oz does not know what causes autism, but he knows for sure it's not the vaccines!



@ david burd

Here is our vaccine schedule: -$File/nip-schedule-card-july07.pdf

The last study commissioned by the Austalian Advisory Board on A.S.D led by Perth paediatrician Dr John Wray back in 2004 and concluded the rate of 1:160. The figure was not released to the media until March 2007.

Our government has not commissioned any further studies to determine the current rate. Some Australian Autism websites quote a rate of 1:100 which is probably a more accurate figure.

I think our government are running "scared" of what they may find,if they do commission another study.

Perhaps our Federal Health Minister, Nicola Roxon should stop spending $200 million when she purchased the "swine flu" vaccine from C.S.L back in 2009 and could only shift 1/3 of the stock onto the gullible.

As for the rest of us, the word "Thiomersal" was clearly and prominently displayed on the vial. That was the "red flag" and the vaccine to avoid like the plague!

Once again good article Anne!

Mum to 9 year old, non-verbal & vaccine injured son.

My 12 year old daughter did suffer from some of the vaccine injured symptoms but since the Biomedical treatment she is doing extremely well and is looking forward to her University years studying law and medicine to learn more about what happened to her little brother.



What a joke to say that the NVICP was ever "generous" with its money (which is in fact OUR MONEY, collected from a tax on every vaccine administered)!

In the NVICP, the maximum amount a person who was injured or killed by a vaccine can be awarded for "pain and suffering" is a pathetic $250,000.

A lifetime of often excruciating pain and unfathomable suffering multiplied by the pain and suffering of the child's family for a paltry $250k.

Truly sickening.

Birgit Calhoun

My son Erik died at age 40 around Christmas last year. He died of kidney failure. He was a patient at Stanford on and off all his life. He did not talk. Early on he visited the birth defect clinic at Stanford. The doctor at the time couldn't find the metabolic disease he wanted Erik to have, so he told us that he was not interested in Erik any longer. Early on I learned that Erik had some kind of autistic disorder; they just never really put that in writing. I resorted to giving him large doses of vitamins including vitamin D for which I was chastised. Erik wound up with Vitamin D deficiency that caused him around 100 broken bones. Stanford Hospital and Clinics is very compartmentalized, and the individual departments don't talk to one another very much. I work here at Stanford so I can't be too critical. At one of the doctors' visits I told one of the orthopedic surgeons a joke. Here goes: “A skeleton goes into a bar. He says ‘bar tender please, give me a Scotch and a mop.’" The surgeon (a professor) didn't get the joke. Years later I found out that he wrote about me in his report that I was belligerent. At the same time the man forgot to tell me that Erik had severe kidney disease. The man neglected to connect the bone problems with the kidneys. He also put in Erik's--he was 29 years old then--report that he had cerebral palsy. This way he could cover up the fact that he had goofed. The doctor is not at Stanford any longer. Erik has never had cerebral palsy. He did not have it when he died. I tried to erase the cerebral palsy diagnosis from the records. But from then on, every doctor who came in contact with Erik wrote in his report something like: "This unfortunate young man with cerebral palsy..." I could go on. I am only giving you a hint of the types of things I have experienced through the years. But maybe you can guess what I think about that clinic. And remember I work here at the University. Oh, and they never put in writing that Erik had kidney failure until we read it in the pathology report.

Melissa T.

"We the People" need to band together and pound the steps of the HIGH COURT/Supreme Court explaining how the NVICP is UNCONSTITIONAL. We/our children are NOT getting our/their "constitutional right" to their day in court, only our attorneys representing our injured children will EVER be paid in this program. This is UNCONSTITUTIONAL at so many levels.

Carolyn M

There was an article in the Washington Examiner yesterday regarding vaccines: "New vaccine method could help boost newborns' immune systems". It was not in the online edition.

Apparently, vaccine researchers are looking for a way to vaccinate newborn babies with more than just the Hep B vaccine. They want to increase the production of cytokines, in order to do this. The article reports that the researchers may have found two "chemicals" that increase cytokine production in newborns and states "That suggests that the immunce systems of newborns who received vaccines paired with these chemicals would be better prepared to learn immunity from the vaccines." The article also states that this study was published in the Public Library of Science ONE.

I think this is the study in question: Age-Dependent Maturation of Toll-like Receptor-Mediated Cytokine Responses in Gambian infants.

I hate to think of how many more vaccine injuries this will cause if they implement this.



You know, sometimes a little humor, black though it may be, is needed. I read your post and couldn't help myself - I died laughing; well, make that laughing and crying at the same time.

Have no fear; I'm sure karma will take care of our dear Dr. Offit.


Dr. Offit:
Oh geez, you mean it was easy to get compensation in the 80's!!! Oh my gosh, I guess I really messed up and didn't get my free money then I guess! I mean - since they were just eager to give it away. I guess there were lawyers were beat'in down my door as I treated my children's vaccine injuries. I paid out about a 1000 dollars to get justice but maybe I should have spen more - I am such an idiot for not getting all that government give away money!!!

BUT The biggest
PROBLEM of all: Is the Three years period a parent has to act upon a vaccine injury. Maybe that sounds reasonable, if it was an adult that had a stroke - well damage is easier to see- an adult is walking and talking and then not - well that is pretty easy. Unlike a 9 and half month old that the mother claims was just starting to walk and is not now????

Also not only is a vaccine injury immediate - it is also a slow progressing thing too.

For my own family it has been something new every year. We are in our third decade here and it still continues.

The first decade was sick all the time/not talking/trouble in school.
The second decade was a struggle to just get treatment for increasing intensity of epilepsy.

Not much time in those first two decades to understand that my other child was sick too and was slowly progessing into full blown bipolar.

But oh, if I had just ask in the 80s I would have got some money!!!!


Thanks, Anne -- such excellent points!!

cmo, great comment about the car! Thanks for the dark humor.

Donna L.

Thank you, Anne, for your relentless efforts to demand the truth from these liars. I keep dreaming of the day we'll read a headline that says, "What Happened to Paul Offit?".


It would be somewhat amusing to bump into Dr. Offits ( Mercedes? ) and leave a brief note.

"Dr. Offit, pardon me, but I bumped into your car in the CHOPS parking lot.... NINE times. A lot of people observed this so I am leaving a note. You might think I am leaving my name and address... you would be mistaken."

"You might think I have liability insurance... you would be mistaken. From what I can tell, the damage to your car and the damage to my car is just "a coincidence" and certainly not causal. I have a nice car, and I can not believe it could do any harm to anyone or anything. Of course, it would take 10 to 20 years of research to actually figure out what has happened."

The video tape of my car causing your car to "spin" does not mean anything...

"One out of 110 cars in this parking lot have similar damage, which might be due to the cars being so close to the freeway. Are funds available for further study in this area ?"

I believe there is a "Car Court" in Washington DC where you can take your car problems, however thousands of cases similar to yours, have already been thrown out.

Have a nice day.

Dawn R

We're in a medical dark age.

John Stone


I wish these people were just funny.


david burd

Anne, Your logic and commonsense post says it all. Your piece belongs as an article in a national publication. However, since Pharma spends $75 Billion a year on drug ads, there's little chance for this.

I offer again to AoA readers the U.S. Immunization Schedule; I call it America's Weapon of Mass Self-Destruction. I hope readers copy it and pass in on to anybody and everybody:

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)