asdf

Thank you for pointing this out - they should now.

i don't know, ive never seen more "sick' people in my life nor my fathers nor his dads, WE ARE BEING POISEND

Australia

Lisa,

Swinburne Autism Bio-Research Initiative here in Australia tested 8 vaccines listed on the Australian Childhood Immunisation Program Schedule -

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a920240947

One vaccine (Infanrix hexa) tested positive for Hg at 10ppb.

At least someone is caring enough to do something.

AussieMum

Go Amish!
Right now the only reasonable solution to keep children safe is NOT to vaccinate them, or vaccinate just with a few delayed vaccines. Drug companies cannot be trusted a bit, as they have a long history of poisoning people with their drugs and hiding these facts for years. I am following the philosophy of Amish – who do not vaccinate, do not use hospitals for deliveries, and have infant mortality similar to that of their white rural neighbors, despite of having high prevalence of genetic risk factors due to inbreeding. This suggests that if white non Amish infants, who do not have defective genetic load , were also not vaccinated, their mortality would probably be much lower than present, similar to that in EU countries, where only about 1/3 of children are vaccinated. Vaccines increase infant mortality by causing SIDS - this in addition to making about 50% of vaccinated chronically ill or crippled for life. The risks from vaccines are much higher than benefits , this is a plain fact! There is no point of waiting for more data, which will take many years and will always look controversial, and continue injuring more children with toxic vaccines.
1.
Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Jan 15;139(2):173-83.
Perinatal, infant, and child death rates among the Old Order Amish.
Acheson LS.
Department of Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Abstract
The Old Order Amish are a distinct ethnic group with a very high birth rate and patterns of perinatal risk factors quite different from those of the general population. This study reports marital fertility and perinatal, infant, and child death rates for an entire Amish settlement of approximately 10,000 individuals, centered around Geauga County, Ohio. All 6,623 births from 1948 to 1988 listed in a directory of Geauga Settlement Amish households were studied. The childbearing experience of all 475 married women over the age of 44 years was also described. Women aged > 44 years had a median of 8.3 births; 24% of the births were to women aged > 34 years. Despite a higher prevalence of several risk factors for perinatal and infant death among the Amish, neonatal and infant death rates for Geauga Settlement Amish have been very similar to the corresponding rates for white children in rural Ohio and the state as a whole. The beneficial aspects of Amish society that may lessen the impact of perinatal risk factors on mortality merit further study.

I think Twyla wrote a great column on "trace" amounts and whether anyone is checking to see that the mercury is no longer in the vaccines (short answer: not really) here:

http://www.ageofautism.com/2007/12/emails-from-cdc.html

Maybe this one bears re-running as a "best of AoA"...

Angie,
Thanks for your response. It does help.

However, I still think that we urgently need to have some syringes full of Hep B vaccine tested for the supposedly "trace amount" of mercury they contain. I will not be surprised at all if each syringe full full of Hep B vaccine has very different amounts of mercury, some of which would not qualify as being "trace."

My intuition from all the reading I've done is that this epidemic started with the Hep B vaccine, given on day one of the child's life. Along with Hep B and aluminum, it had a heaping dose of mercury, which was repeated twice more in the first few months of life. This, then, set up the so-called "susceptible" children for a dysfunctional immune system response to MMR, pertussis, and other vaccines in the heavily overloaded schedule, triggering the epidemic of neuro-developmental and immune system disorders with which the schools are overwhelmed today.

My intuition is that the reason these problems are not decreasing is because children are still getting heaping doses of mercury in the Hep B vaccine.

Is there anyone out there who could launch an investigation into exactly how much mercury children are now getting with their Hep B vaccines and boosters? Not how much the drug companies "say" is in the vaccine (i.e. "trace amount"), but the actual amount. And does this amount vary from syringe to syringe, based upon how the vaccine is stored and whether the dose comes from the top or the bottom of the vial?

I'm pretty convinced that most everyone involved in the vaccine making business knows of the dangers. I watched a Documentary on The Gerson Therapy for curing Cancer called "Dying to Have Known" (you can watch it on youtube). About 4 minutes in they are talking to a man on the airplane. He said, "my neighbor's father is a world renowned immunologist. He studies vaccines" "But, my neighbor does not vaccinate her children." He is asked why? And the man responds "perhaps she has enough information about vaccines to know better."

Lisa, just a quick note..I have had many people ask me the same thing..."well if they have taken it out of most of the vaccinesm then why aren't rates of Autism/Asthma/ADD/allergies gone DOWN since the levels they are getting are going down too?"????

Actually, no. There are a few parts to the answer (anyone out there have anything to add, please feel free, this is part of my personal responses when asked, and would LOVE ton add more if I am missing anything)...
1. The manufacturers label "TRACE" amounts of Thimerosal, what's a "trace amount" and WHO regulates it?
*no one has any set amount that equals trace, nor does it have to be or tested FOR what amount "trace" equals. From what I have read directly from the CDC's website, the manufacturers, once the vaccine is approved, that the manufacturers themselves do their OWN policing and testing of their products, writing (I believe) annual reports to the CDC, and if they change a part of their process (ingredients or production or anything about it) they also test and report it themselves to the CDC.

2. Sure, maybe it SEEMS at first that the children get "less" Thimerosal than before since it's been said to have been "drastically" lowered to only "trace amounts" (see #1), BUT...

*...the actual NUMBER of vaccines have been increasing by pretty big percentages in the last 10-15-20 years, a look comparing the "recommended" vaccination schedules of the kids born prior to 1990-1991 to today is dramatic. My rough numbers from memory (someone jump in with specifics):
* in the 80's, a "fully vaccinated 5 year old child",  had 3 different vaccines with a total of 11 actual vaccinations;
* at last count in today's "fully vaccinated 5 yr old children" are being vaccinated with 11 different vaccines for a TOTAL OF 36 ACTUAL VACCINATIONS!
*My brain is fogging on me and I can't remember if the flu or pneumonia vaccines are IN these figures or not, my instinct says they are not, but in could be wrong, either way it's DRAMATIC differences to say the least!
*Basically, since about 1989 there have been 8 NEW vaccines added to the schedule that includes a total of 25 added actual vaccinations!
 * SO, even IF the Thimerosal WAS reduced (from what to what, I would LOVE TO know those specifics instead of "lowered TO trace amounts" with NO REGULATION ton what trace equals"), there would still be a pretty BIG INCREASE in Thimerosal being injected into our children given the pure number of vaccines being given now compared to before.

3.  Let's look at it this way, IF there were the exact same number of vaccines given now that were given prior to the Autism Tsunami (started in the 90's with the huge increases of the number of vaccines and number of vaccinations (see#2)), with the exact same production, ingredients, and everything else exactly the same except they took out, let's say 99% of the Thimerosal (I am giving a huge benefit of the doubt, the actual removal numbers are not able to be calculated because no one is required, because of "trade secret" laws, to report on just what "trace" equals (see#1) ).  
 *So, the only difference is there now is only 1% of the amount of Thimerosal in the vaccines, no more ingredients, no less, the same kind/number of vaccines are given at the same timeframes and everything.  Now, shouldn't THIS prove that the Autism numbers should ALSO be decreasing because 99% of the Thimerosal was removed, so shouldn't there at LEAST be some DECLINE in Autism rates IF Thimerosal could be considered to contribute to the Autism rates even in the slightest? NOPE!  I look at it this way, a poison is a poison, period.  MERCURY is a NEUROTOXIN a terrible one, the WORST one out there, so compared to let's say, a much LESS toxic (but still toxic and very dangerous of course) is cigarettes/smoke  If you smoke a pack of cigarettes per day and your identical twin smokes 1.5 packs per day does one have a 50% higher chance of getting lung cancer or other side effects than the other? Of course not, or there would be no such thing as people getting cancer from, other terrible tobacco related diseases from, or even dying from SECOND HAND SMOKE now would there be?
Now take a minute to think of the much more dangerous (and cigarettes are filled with some disgusting and very dangerous toxins of course) toxin..well, NEUROTOXIN Mercury, which IS what Thimerosal (I believe Thimerosal is 50% Mercury by weight)  IS...look at that, would you think that a teeny tiny (unknown) "trace" amount is OK a few times here or there compared to even 99%more here or there..of course not!

There are many other things to consider as well, because there are SO many variables to this. I believe that all of us who have had our children injured, brain damaged, regressed into Autism after one or a series of vaccinations will all agree that we believe that there is not one specific answer or one specific "cause" to our children's injuries.

Oh gosh, I could keep going, but here is the quickest answer I have, even if its a long answer..lol!

This usually turns into the person then asking "why so many vaccines now than before"...of course it opens another big can of worms because I too often wonder what disease has come along since we were kids, since the 90's that could EXPLAIN there could be a high enough BENEFIT to equal the RISK from the untested results of giving more than one type of vaccine at the same time at the same visit, in the same spot or in different spots...there certainly can't be, or they would be screaming the specifics off of the rooftops...

Add up all of the toxins and live viruses in the extra 11 vaccines and the extra 25 actual vaccinations added since 1989, then add in all of the other new environmental toxins in our air, water, products and furniture in our homes, cars, schools and work,,,AND add the FOOD and how we eat and what we eat, add it all together and you can EASILY explain the terrible health of kids born after 1990 AND THE SUDDEN increases of kinds and numbers of new cancers, allergies, asthma in kids AND ADULTS...and the increases in the number of and types of various physchotropic drugs because of depression and anxiety and other dramatic rises in other metal illnesses....

It's OBVIOUS, and relatively simple to solve...IF WE KNOW SOMETHING CAN CAUSE HARM TO SOME PEOPLE, even if it's "only" the 1% of kids today that have Autism, AND it CAN BE PRODUCED WITHOUT than harmful ingredient, WHY RISK IT, JUST REMOVE IT!

If we just started to remove the KNOWN TOXINS in our environment, we could really start seeing changes. Too bad it's already too late for so many of our kids!

Well, I have to stop now I have gone off topic a bit..have to go actually EAT dinner, it's been on My plate waiting till I was done "doing a quick chk on AoA before I ate!)...LOL!

I hope Lisa, it helped you understand a bit, answered your question...

Thanks!
Angie
Mom to Ethan, Alex, and Megan

John,
You are right that they would never admit voluntarily to their crimes. No criminal does it, until he is forced to do so. I am afraid, shareholders care nothing about poisoning children with thimerosal, they only care for profits. The more poisoned and sick the US population, the more profits for the shareholders and CEOs of big pharma. Shareholding capitalism became evil.

Mercury is now being added to many other products for infants, including baby formulas (as a corn syrup), diapers, baby lotions etc. It seems that big pharma is working hard to poison American infants in many different ways. All for profits.
http://www.parenting.com/article/corn-syrup-in-formula

I am still very confused by all of this. As a teacher, I can tell you that the amount of autism, ADHD, processing and memory disorders, asthma, food allergies, and diabetes is not diminishing. I am now seeing the younger siblings in my class with the same disorders of their older siblings. So many of the kids with learning disorders also have severe (and peculiar) food allergies. One seven-year-old I have in my class with severe dyslexia also has ADHD and is severely allergic to tomatoes and strawberries, among other things. Another child whom I had a few years ago (and is now 10) has a processing and memory disorder. Curiously, she is also very pale relative to her older siblings (they are from the Middle East). I asked her the other day if she tans very easily. She said, "I don't tan at all. I try, but I can't get a tan. Now I have her younger (six-year-old) sibling in my class and it's the same thing with her - processing disorder, very pale, can't get a suntan.

If this was all caused by mercury, it should be diminishing at least somewhat, right? I mean, the total amount of mercury exposure has been reduced, though not eliminated. I'm starting to wonder if the manufacturers have actually taken the mercury out of the "childhood vaccines" like they were supposed to. I am particularly suspicious of the Hep B vaccine. I don't know why. It's just a hunch. Right now they are allowed to have "trace amounts" of thimerosol in the Hep B vaccine. But how do we know it's only trace amounts? Has anyone actually tested it? I would love to steal some vials and have them tested. Any takers? Anybody here with access?

They keep using poisonous thimerosal in vaccines, because the manufacturer paid bribes to some govt. officials to keep this toxin in medical products. Rich and smart people to no vaccinate their children and themselves, they know vaccines are poisons, poor and naïve people vaccinate and get killed or crippled by vaccines, but nobody in govt. cares about them.

What part of "Thimerosal is a neurotoxic mutagenic teratogen at nanomolar levels" is so hard for other scientists to understand?