Continued Collaboration Between CDC and Danish Poul Thorsen
DC Press Conference March 3: Bruesewitz Family to Discuss Supreme Court "No Liability" Vaccine Ruling

Ugly Experiments: A New Generation

Questions By Anne Dachel
The current AP story by Mike Stobbe, Ugly US medical experiments uncovered, (HERE) was actually talked about last fall.
THIS version is being picked up all over.
Stobbe sounds outraged…. “Shocking as it may seem, U.S. government doctors once thought it was fine to experiment on disabled people and prison inmates. Such experiments included giving hepatitis to mental patients in Connecticut, squirting a pandemic flu virus up the noses of prisoners in Maryland, and injecting cancer cells into chronically ill people at a New York hospital.

“Much of this horrific history is 40 to 80 years old, but it is the backdrop for a meeting in Washington this week by a presidential bioethics commission. The meeting was triggered by the government's apology last fall for federal doctors infecting prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala with syphilis 65 years ago.

“U.S. officials also acknowledged there had been dozens of similar experiments in the United States - studies that often involved making healthy people sick.

An exhaustive review by The Associated Press of medical journal reports and decades-old press clippings found more than 40 such studies. At best, these were a search for lifesaving treatments; at worst, some amounted to curiosity-satisfying experiments that hurt people but provided no useful results.

“Inevitably, they will be compared to the well-known Tuskegee syphilis study. In that episode, U.S. health officials tracked 600 black men in Alabama who already had syphilis but didn't give them adequate treatment even after penicillin became available.

“These studies were worse in at least one respect - they violated the concept of "first do no harm," a fundamental medical principle that stretches back centuries.

"When you give somebody a disease - even by the standards of their time - you really cross the key ethical norm of the profession," said Arthur Caplan, director of the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Bioethics”.

This is what Stobbe said has been discovered:

Stobbe cites Dr. Arthur Caplan as backup.  Caplan?  I wrote about him in this regard last Oct.
(HERE) Furthermore, back in 2007, Mike Stobbe said autism only seemed to be increasing. (HERE) In 2008, Stobbe wrote US Measles Cases Highest In A Decade Due To Vaccination Fears (HERE) .

There he reported, ...The Academy of Pediatrics has made educating parents about the safety of vaccines one of its top priorities this year. That's partly because busy doctors have grown frustrated by the amount of time they're spending answering parents' questions about things they read on the Internet or heard from TV talk shows.

...Questions commonly center on autism and the fear that it can be caused by the measles shots or by a mercury-based preservative that used to be in most vaccines. Health officials say there is no good scientific proof either is a cause. Also, since 2001, the preservative has been removed from shots recommended for young children, and it was never in the measles-mumps-rubella combination vaccine. It can still be found in some flu shots.

[Ari] Brown said she wrote a 16-page, single-spaced document for parents that explains childhood vaccinations and why doctors do not believe they cause autism. She began handing it out this spring, and thinks it's been a help to parents and a time-saver for her.

(This is the same Dr. Ari Brown who was just on Dr. Oz, still defending vaccines against a charge that they cause autism.)

Mike Stobbe is incredible.  He stands up for medical ethics in regard to PAST ACTIONS BY OUR GOVERNMENT, but there's no concern about WHAT’S HAPPENING RIGHT BEFORE HIS EYES….
Why isn’t Stobbe writing things like this…

“Shocking as it may seem,” U.S. health officials have allowed deadly, untested mercury to be used in vaccines given to pregnant women, babies and small children.

“Shocking as it may seem,” there was a secret meeting of U.S. officials and drug company reps at Simpsonwood in GA in 2000 to discuss the alarming increase in autism that coincided with the additional number of mercury-containing vaccines in the childhood schedule.

“Shocking as it may seem,” U.S. health officials closed their eyes to the exponential increase in autism during the last 20 years and pretended it was all just better diagnosing.

“Shocking as it may seem,” Julie Gerberding, former head of the CDC and a long time denier of any link between vaccines and autism, is now head of the vaccine division at Merck Pharma.

“Shocking as it may seem,” no health official has ever called an autism rate of one percent of U.S. children, a crisis.

“Shocking as it may seem,” no official has ever asked for a simple study comparing the autism rate in vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

All of these are the “ugly” side of medical experimentation and official denial.

Stobbe is so sure vaccines don't cause autism.  He sees no need to look into this controversy. 
Either Stobbe is a naïve and trusting soul and can't consider that the same government that allowed horrific medical experiments in the past also allowed our children to become vaccine guinea pigs, or he’s afraid of an issue that’s just too controversial to talk about here and now.  It’s much safer to attack what went on in the last century.

Maybe 70 years from now, some enterprising reporter will bring up the ethics of injecting known neurotoxins in pregnant women, babies, and small children.  

Maybe around 2080, they'll ask why no one ever demanded independent studies on the cumulative effect of so many vaccines, so soon, on the health of a baby.  Or why there was never a simple vax-nonvax comparison study looking at autism rates.

Maybe they'll bring up the revolving door between the vaccine makers and our health offiicials.
Maybe they'll ask why no one sounded an alarm over the epidemic of autism happening everywhere.
Maybe...maybe....if there's anything left by then..............
Anne Dachel is Media Editor of Age of Autism.




Perhaps we should call the times we live in “Paradise Lost”. Just make sure to bring a little extra bug spray the next time you decide to do some R&R in paradise. We should all pray that God forgive them, for they know not what they do.

“Biosafety Concerns Involving Genetically Modified Mosquitoes to Combat Malaria and Dengue in Developing Countries”.

JAMA, March 2, 2011 – Vol 305, No. 9

Seriously, tourists to the Cayman Islands had really better bring their bug spray. Vacationers are now being “turned” into unwilling Guinea Pigs. Pharma’s complete disregard for the Precautionary Principle and Informed Consent is appalling.

“Mosquitos as ‘Flying Syringes’?”

“Can GM Mosquitoes Eradicate Dengue Fever?” by Prof. Joe Cummins on August 12, 2010.

“Genetically Modified Mosquitos” by Brandon Turbeville on December 13, 2010.

“Deadly Medicine: Foreign Clinical Trials - Vanity Fair”


"In widely covered congressional hearings in 1973, pharmaceutical industry officials acknowledged they were using prisoners for testing because they were cheaper than chimpanzees."

“Yes! Cheaper than chimpanzees! Gotta love Big Pharma for their cost-saving efforts, eh? This is yet another example of the mindset of Big Pharma and "scientific" researchers who put humans lower than animals on the value scale.”

“Dr Jonas Salk, inventor of polio vaccine, exposed as criminal-minded scientist who conducted illicit medical experiments on mental patients” by Mike Adams on March 2, 2011.


“Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary”

“This section begins with a summary of the excipients included in licensed vaccines in the United States, as of the revision date at the bottom of the page. Excipients are inactive ingredient­s of a drug product necessary for production of a finished pharmaceut­ical formulatio­n.”


This is FRAUD pure and simple. Neurotoxic metals, endocrine disruptors­, phase transfer catalysts, ionophores­, and non-human DNA are NOT inactive. It’s time that they were called-out on their lies!



I was there, and reporters were present. There is NO mention of the public comment section, positive or negative, in ANY coverage of the bioethics commission proceedings.

Please check out the actual video coverage (session 10). Or you can review my article on the subject.

As far as media coverage concerned, it's like the testimony never happened.

Down the memory hole!


Thanks Patrons, for letting us know about Triton 100, polysorbate 80 and Tween 80 (an infertility agent also found in Gardisil)... vaccines and the ingredients in them are effectively bioweapons our government has given pharma permission to poison us with and render our children infertile.


Gardasil Vaccine Ingredients - Roach Killer, Aluminum, and Polysorbate 80


This is why i LOVE sequential/integrative homeopathy.

Over my dead body i give again one single allopathic medication to my child.

I have learned the lesson the hard way... but i have learned it.


Jane Johnson

Posted on behalf of Julie Penny:
This reminds of when the EPA, around 2004/2005—and against the wishes of its own scientists—wanted to experiment with pesticides on orphan and mentally handicapped children. Senator Barbara Boxer was horrified. She was quoted at the time by as saying: “The fact that EPA allows pesticide testing of any kind on the most vulnerable, including abused and neglected children, is simply astonishing...” Suzanne Wuerthele, a regional toxicologist for the EPA had said: “I am somewhat dismayed that this rule was presented in such a complex—and I would have to say, tricky—way.” Senator Boxer certainly fought against it at the time (even, Rep Henry Waxman). In February 2006, the EPA was sued over its Pesticide Human Testing Rule because it was riddled with loopholes and “still had not wholly rid the provisions permitting tests on mentally or physically impaired children.” I don’t know the final outcome of the case. It just goes to show you that monsters inhabit our government agencies that dance lock-step with industry—and do their bidding. No different from the Nazi, Joseph Mengele, who experimented on the Jews during World War II. We have a government complicit in damaging its own citizens, even its children, for the wholesale profit of corporations and Wall Street. A government consistently given to hiding the damage it does. What does Mike Stobbe think of this? This has happened recently (and may still be happening for all we know). Exposing kids and humans experimentally to pesticides in the here and now, not just experimented on 50-80 years ago. Will he be investigating this recent experimenting of pesticides on helpless children? At heart, it’s the same mindset. The Stony Brook University study says Hep B given to infant boys increases their risk of autism almost threefold. I don’t hear the mainstream media or Dr. Oz shuddering over that fact, demanding a look/see of why this is so.


Well, I just now read this article online right before reading this article by Anne on AoA. I just sat here, wondering to myself "Why don't I feel shocked anymore?" As Anne wrote "Shocking as it may seem", nothing is shocking to me anymore after Autism hit and that research opened my eyes to the evil behind the vaccine industry.

Prior to this, the last time I was truly shocked was when I was researching conventional cancer therapies for my daughter when she was diagnosed with cancer about 15 years ago. Not only does the chemo and radiation not work to cure the cancer, the patients are all tortured to death and die miserably after so much anguish and suffering. The so called "studies" that claim that any of these so called "therapies" have any beneficial effect are manipulated and contrived by the cancer industry. So I was not shocked when I saw this recurring theme in the vaccine industry. Recent studies have shown that none of these therapies even extends the life span of the patients, therefore if they are going to die of cancer, why be horribly tortured first and have the final months of their lives evolve into total misery?

On the other hand, if the patients are alive and functioning they might get online and discover that there are literally hundreds of successful cancer therapies that have been successful in addition to not being toxic or damaging in any way. I recovered with natural therapies for breast cancer years ago before I even had a computer so I knew that what my doctors told me was a lie when they said that "My only hope was double mastectomy, radiation and chemotherapy". "Shocking as it may seem" no doctor ever gave me any other options, and here I am 25 years later.

My daughter has also been cancer free for 15 years after I discovered Essiac Tea, Calcium and Spirilina. What the heck, she gave it a try and when she went back for her third biopsy, instead of the doctor reporting that she needed a hysterectomy, he couldn't understand why she no longer had cancer. "Must have been a coincidence". Yeah, that's what the doctor told us about my grandson regressing into autism immediately after his last batch of vaccines: "It was definitely a coincidence". YEAH RIGHT.

Nothing shocks me anymore since I learned the horrible truth about vaccines and autism, but all of it still DISGUSTS me.



Remember "The Town of Allopath"?

The old hermit could not convince the current generation that "skid marks disease" was invented by Roadaceutical to sell Teflon.

Frustrated by the towns peoples response the hermit disappeared to wait patiently for the next generation to emerge and hopefully educate them about Roadaceutical.

This is what I am doing with my 12yr old daughter, passing my knowledge onto her now.


Mike Stobbe is playing the new PR game strategy in which players imply or state that medical corruption only happened in the old days, and that if any problems occurred now, those in charge would rectify the situation.

For those in the know, however, such self-delusion is painful to watch.



Thank-you patrons99, you have previously directed us to this very informative website-www.sailhome.

I have gained some knowledge about vaccines and intend to use this knowledge at a meeting today with a psychologist who condones the use of restraining my son.

I wonder how she will cope with being bombarded on the facts of vaccines.

Mum to 9 yr old, Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Global Development Delay, Autistic, non-verbal and vaccine injured son & 12 yr old daughter (NOS)


If a vaccine doesn't kill or disable you suddenly, via the vaccine-induced acute colloidal instability, abnormal blood flow dynamics, and microvascular ischemic/anoxic effect on multiple organs, it can still kill or disable you subacutely via pathogenic immune complexes or via mimicking membrane attack complexes, or chronically, by means of horizontal gene transfer. Statistically, “slow kill” will predominate over sudden death which makes pattern recognition difficult, but not impossible.


Arthur Caplan and the AAP need to know that they have been called-out. These moral entrepeneurs have used an entire generation of citizens as guinea pigs. Their intent is clear. They intend to use the next generation of citizens as guinea pigs. While they may have fooled us once in the past, we won't continue to tolerate their schemes and scams in the future. Our God-given inalienable right to refuse them must be memorialized and protected in law. Personal freedoms must be protected against excesses by government under the pretext of "security".

Birgit Calhoun

Reading this article, I am reminded of a book I read just recently "A Terrible Mistake" by H.P. Albarelli Jr. ( It is an account of the suicide (or is it murder?) investigation of Frank Olson. The story revolves around LSD experiments in this country and abroad (Pont St. Esprit, France). Reading this I am not surprised about anything anymore.

It seems to me that there is a certain mindset in many people that allows ethics transgressions such as poisoning our children with vaccine ingredients or adding fluoride to the water supply as long as one can claim the moral high ground by balancing these horrible deeds with the pretext of health, safety and security (en mass vaccination or the Patriot Act). Reasoning probably won’t help here. Educating people about this will take a long time. I hope we'll succeed.


I really and truly have a hard time understanding people that have seemingly contradictory views. Can someone play devil's advocate and explain it to me? How can good liberal journalists not see the corruption?

Media Scholar

Total fiction from the AP.

Stobbe fully knows the Supreme Court decision acted as a rubber stamp of approval for over two hundred new experimental vaccines. People don't care about our children. Stock prices for vaccine manufacturing drug companies are now soaring.

As children will certainly continue to be stricken down by the experiments the industry will simply hypnotize itself into believing the sacrifice of American babies is vital to their survival.

Stobbe is essentially a propagandist attempting to dismiss any sense of unethical and immoral conduct is now going to take place.

If you really wonder how Hitler did it, you needn't look any further than the American media to figure out propaganda is the fascist's main tool.


Re: a new generation of ugly experiments on an unwary public

What do Corexit and certain “excipients” in the vaccine schedules, Tween 80 and Triton 100, have in common? They are endocrine disruptors. Wake up people! Educate yourselves. Don’t just accept vaccine “madness” on faith. Should children be on THESE medications? Real question.

Fluarix has both a spermicide (triton 100) and an infertility agent (polysorbate 80). Triton 100 (Octylphenol Ethoxylate) is also present in Fluzone. So we’re supposed to just roll up our sleeves on demand! What is going on here?

“Injected detergents trespass on an immune process that holds life and death control over cells...”

“Detergents and emulsifiers promote tumors and cause cells to leak or explode by weakening their walls, with no mechanism for regulating destructive activity. Detergents are used extensively in cell research precisely because of their ability to break cells open for further analysis. This catastrophically mimics the membrane attack complex (MAC).”

The vaccine schedules are nanoparticulate drug delivery systems, designed to serially deliver non-human antigens, and neurotoxic metals, including aluminum, mercury, fluoride, and borate, across biomembranes, in the brain, heart, lungs, gut, pancreas, and kidneys. Vaccines are cumulatively, synergistically, and systemically toxic and unreasonably dangerous.


It is the combination of ingredients, excipients, contaminants, and recombinants in the vaccine schedules that make them much more acutely, subacutely, and chronically toxic than any them alone. They are all unreasonably dangerous. They cannot be “greened”. We are missing the point by looking at each vaccine individually. We are missing the point by taking a nuanced approach to vaccine safety. I strongly oppose all vaccine mandates. No vaccination should take place without a proper informed consent.


Thanks for Another Great Post, Anne! The ugly experiments on the public are growing in both scope and pace. Global vaccine policy is a case in point. The resultant vaccine epidemics are cases in point. I blame the arrogance of Pharma. It is a false flag operation against the people, motivated by individual and corporate greed.


Yes it's pretty ironic for the press to be wringing its hands over past crimes, and actively defending new ones!


This was the part of the article that struck me the most ' "There was definitely a sense — that we don't have today — that sacrifice for the nation was important," said Laura Stark, a Wesleyan University assistant professor of science in society, who is writing a book about past federal medical experiments.' Really?! It seems like we sacrifice children every day for the the vaccine program. I think the people in the AAP and the government still have that sense unfortunately. Our nation is no better today than it was back then in this regard, they just have more savvy PR people.

David Taylor

Anne--It's pretty simple. Matt has a job that he doesn't want to lose. At that job, it is permitted to say some things, not permitted to say others. This code is internalized and becomes the journo's working reality, to be defended until death or the code is changed.

Sometimes some incident or information will break through and restructure an individual's reality, as it has ours. But that is rare.

One thing we do know--your efforts at education and truth telling are having an effect. The code is changing, one parent at a time.


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)