Court Protects Vaccine Manufacturers, Not Injured Children
OK 7 Year Old with Autism Savannah Martin Wanders, Drowns

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Children: Some Data are In and They are Disturbing

Safety first sign By Maria  D.  Majewska

While  in western countries  government officials  and their corporate sponsors  aggressively  resist conducting the studies comparing health of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children , such studies have been, in fact, conducted in Africa.   Below is the abstract of one such study from Guinea-Bissau, which  shows doubling of   mortality rate among infants vaccinated with a single  dose  of DTP vaccine, and more than quadrupling after the second and third dose.    VAERS data also show high infant mortality in the US  after DTP vaccination (much higher than from pertussis, diphteria and tetanus together,  hence  it  is clear that DTP vaccine is  harming more children than saving.  In the EU,  there is a relatively high incidence of pertussis (more than 20 000 per year), but  total mortality due to this disease was  4 in 2009.   At the same time, infant  mortality index in western EU  countries  is 2 or 3 times lower than in the US.  These data speak for themselves.

Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;33(2):374-80.

The introduction of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine and child mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau: an observational study.

Aaby PJensen HGomes JFernandes MLisse IM.

Bandim Health Project, Apartado 861, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau. [email protected]

Comment in:

Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;33(2):381.


BACKGROUND: and objective Previous studies from areas with high mortality in West Africa have not found diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine to be associated with the expected reduction in mortality, a few studies suggesting increased mortality. We therefore examined mortality when DTP was first introduced in rural areas of Guinea-Bissau in 1984-1987. Setting Twenty villages in four regions have been followed with bi-annual examinations since 1979.

SUBJECTS: In all, 1657 children aged 2-8 months. Design Children were weighed when attending the bi-annual examinations and they were vaccinated whenever vaccines were available. DTP was introduced in the beginning of 1984, oral polio vaccine later that year. We examined mortality for children aged 2-8 months who had received DTP and compared them with children who had not been vaccinated because they were absent, vaccines were not available, or they were sick.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality over the next 6 months from the day of examination for vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

RESULTS: Prior to the introduction of vaccines, children who were absent at a village examination had the same mortality as children who were present. During 1984-1987, children receiving DTP at 2-8 months of age had higher mortality over the next 6 months, the mortality rate ratio (MR) being 1.92 (95% CI: 1.04, 3.52) compared with DTP-unvaccinated children, adjusting for age, sex, season, period, BCG, and region. The MR was 1.81 (95% CI: 0.95, 3.45) for the first dose of DTP and 4.36 (95% CI: 1.28, 14.9) for the second and third dose. BCG was associated with slightly lower mortality (MR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.33), the MR for DTP and BCG being significantly inversed. Following subsequent visits and further vaccinations with DTP and measles vaccine, there was no difference in vaccination coverage and subsequent mortality between the DTP-vaccinated group and the initially DTP-unvaccinated group (MR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.44).

CONCLUSIONS: In low-income countries with high mortality, DTP as the last vaccine received may be associated with slightly increased mortality. Since the pattern was inversed for BCG, the effect is unlikely to be due to higher-risk children having received vaccination. The role of DTP in high mortality areas needs to be clarified.

PMID: 15082643 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Free Article





Read this if you really care, it's from the same source as the above article


It is obvious that neither the fda nor doctors function perfectley. If you want to be truly healthy, you must stay active minded, and focus on new information. Don't get scared of things like cancer, because cancer is actually easy to beat.


My son had one DPT shot at 3 months of age before we had made the decision to stop all vaccines. At the time we did not have a CLUE that he would be diagnosed as GDD (globally developmentally delayed) which has now, just recently, been rediagnosed as Aspergers. I can't imagine what his life would have been like had we continued his vaccination schedule, even back in the late 80's!! At almost 5 years old he did not have functional language... and he kept getting further behind. He would babble like a 1 year old and only use words from time to time and he kept getting further behind.

He is 24 now and due to a program called NACD (National Association for Child Development - that we started when he was almost 5, he has come a long way... but still somewhat impacted.

I've told lots of people... stay AWAY from vaccinations!! Know your RIGHTS!

Concerned mom


Don't forget to consider Prof Aaby's follow-up work from this paper.

The link is here:


The BBC actually did an amazing series of broadcasts about Peter Aaby and his work (he is the lead author here), ironically the same week that they were dragging Wakefield through the mud in January. I was dumbfounded at what leading vaccine experts will say on air when not talking about kids in the developed world. The head of the WHO Vaccine Safety Advisory Committee even said that given the choice between an effective vaccine and the potential serious adverse reaction, that's a tough public health policy question and not easily answered. They also interviewed a woman researching how the vaccines effect the immune systems of boys and girls differently by looking at blood samples. I'm telling you, this is amazing stuff! There are links to listen on my blog here:

kathy blanco

Ok, the next time someone says a slower schedule saves children, I want to bop them in the head. My child in the early eighties got the DPT vaccine, which injured him for life, sentence....autism, seizures, and even heart conduction problems which required a pacemaker in his late twenties. The Dtap is not much better, even in their information sheets, it says it can cause autism. How plain does the media and powers that be need, a two by four, a riot of Cairo proportions? I think the best thing to do, with this scenario now, when no one wants to take ownership of damage, is to avoid ALL vaccines. That's what they are afraid's high time we give them their worse nightmare.


The death numbers after DTaP and DTP vaccinations recorded in VAERS are nearly identical: 779 after DTaP and 739 after DTP, hence no way anybody can claim that DTaP is safer than DTP. Both are nearly equally toxic and deadly.

The recorded (in VAERS) numbers of serious adverse reactions after both these vaccines are 10,760, which means the real numbers are well over 100,000 of seriously injured children. If we add to this hundreds of thousands of injuries resulting from other pediatric vaccines, the real numbers of seriously vaccine injured children will be close to half million. Autism cases are among these numbers.




The VAERS database shows 1512 reported deaths after DTP or DTaP vaccinations. Assuming that the reported cases represent only 10% of all cases, the true numbers would be over 15 thousands, but if only 1 or a few % of postvaccination adverse effects are reported (as a former FDA Commissioner dr. David Kessler stated), than the real death numbers in the US after DTP/DTaP vaccinations would be many tens of thousands during the past 20 years. These vaccine casualties are in the order of American losses from WWI or Vietnam war.

In western EU countries, where vaccinations are mostly voluntary, the vaccination rates are much lower than in the US (perhaps 1/3 of the population is fully immunized according to recommended vaccination schedules). The “side effects” of this are much lower mortality rates of infants and young children in the EU countries than in the US (2-3 in the EU, but about 7 in the US). The US has the most intensive, early and insane vaccination program in the whole world and also the most damaged population of children. The truth is that in developed countries mortality from “vaccine preventable diseases” is very low now, even though many people (mostly previously vaccinated) get sick from these diseases (this refers particularly to pertussis, measles, rubella, and mumps). The mortality may be somewhat higher in the US than in EU, because in the US millions of people are without medical help. Nonetheless, the casualties of these diseases are clearly much lower than the casualties of vaccinations.

The US future seems bleak with a whole generation physically and neurologically damaged children. The US program of coerced vaccinations with toxic, “unavoidably unsafe” vaccines, which kill and injure thousands of children, deprives Americans of their basic human rights and can be compared to the experiments on humans conducted by Nazis or Japanese during the WWII. The reason why the vaccine establishment refuses to conduct the study of vac-unvac children in the US or in other developed countries is that they know very well, that the results of such study would be devastating for their big money making vaccination programs. However, the results of such study can be easily inferred from the existing real life data.

Tedd Koren

The numbers may be far worse. One such study also in Guinea-Bissau using the MMR vaccine revealed that the vaccine was only given to the strongest, healthiest babies while the weakest, most sickly one's were not given the vaccine. Guess what - the one's given the vaccine had lower mortality. I wrote a letter the BMJ on-line discussing the "selection bias" of the study and how it invalidated the findings. My comments were even published and commented upon (favorably) by some MDs.

Why do I say the numbers may be far worse? The authors may have used the same selection bias.


Tedd Koren, DC

Tedd Koren

The numbers may be far worse. One such study also in Guinea-Bissau using the MMR vaccine revealed that the vaccine was only given to the strongest, healthiest babies while the weakest, most sickly one's were not given the vaccine. Guess what - the one's given the vaccine had lower mortality. I wrote a letter the BMJ on-line discussing the "selection bias" of the study and how it invalidated the findings. My comments were even published and commented upon (favorably) by some MDs.

Why do I saw the numbers may be far worse? The authors may have used the same selection bias.


Tedd Koren, DC


Why not begin doing our own preclinical studies defining the composite LD50 for the entire combination of "excipients" in the vaccine schedules? There was never a true-placebo controlled study looking a the composite or combination or cumulative or synergistic toxicity for each of the excipients in the vaccine schedules. We could start with lab rats who are dutifully complying with their "pediatrician’s" and the AAP/CDC "recommended" vaccine schedules. Prediction: we would likely be able to identify an animal model for SDS (sudden death syndrome) and biomarkers for vaccine toxicity. Example: is the combination of tween 80, triton 100, aluminum, mercury, and borate any more toxic than each one alone? Once sudden death occurs, perform immediate histopathologic analysis of brain, heart, gut, and kidneys.

Jeff C.

This appears to be the whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTP) as opposed to the acellular vaccine (DTaP) approved for use in the US in 1992 and phased in after that. DTP is still used in poor countries as it is much cheaper that DTaP. That being said, DTP was widely used in the US despite a known link to encephalitis. As usual, the justification was the standard “benefits far outweigh the risks” mantra.

The usual suspects will dismiss this as not relevant since the US no longer uses DTP. The fact that several generations of children did receive DTP from their pediatricians will be conveniently ignored. So will the fact that DTaP still contains an aluminum adjudavant.


i did this study thirty years ago and found vaccines were causing seizures, permanent neurological and immunological damage and death. I reported this to the powers that be and received the "wakefield treatment". There must be a way AoA and others like them can unite and show this FACT immediately or more like yesterday. This is more than a bad dream. For the people that have children harmed and murdered by vaccines/pediatricians it must be unbearable. ps. thank you God/Great Spirit for robert mendehlson, andy wakefield, barbara loe fischer, jb handley and everyone else with this level of courage and conviction.


Let's go ahead and interpret this for them:
"This, in no way, is comparable to the "findings" in the U.S. The mortality/morbities are NOT likely to be causal, or in any way directly associated with inoculation."

(sorry for being so pessimistic today.)


Bill Gates are you paying attention?


"Further epidemiological and immunological studies should clarify the impact of DTP and polio vaccinations. BCG stimulates a Th1 type immune response4 and is associated with reduced mortality.2,,8 However, DTP promotes a Th2 type immune response23 and we have found DTP vaccinated children to be more atopic [allergic].5 It may be important that the adjuvant of DTP vaccine, aluminium hydroxide, is a strong promoter of a Th2 type immune profile in mice and has enhanced susceptibility to tuberculosis rather than prevented infection in animal experiments.24 In animal studies of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and measles virus, live vaccine promotes a Th1 cytokine response and the animals have mild disease upon challenge. However, inactivated RSV or measles vaccine as well as pertussis toxin and DTP induce a Th2 cytokine profile and increase mortality after challenge with RSV or measles virus.25–27"

John Stone

I recall that when I was engaging with senior British health officials a few years ago about the about the WHO schedule they protested that mostly the children were not getting the mercury exposure I was complaining about (187.5 micrograms, birth to 14 weeks) because the mothers didn't bring them back to complete the course.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)