Alisyn Camerota Is how you spell her name.
Her name as I said before is worth learning spelling it correctly.
I have been over at Fox News.com and as always I cannot find anything.

Where are these Youtubes or these segments found?

The show on Fox News is "Foxs and Friends" and it is on the weekend - segments???? don't know.

Cherry:
My son was never vacced for rotavirus and never got rotavirus. He never got diarreah either for that matter. He was very much a constipation kid.

Revise the label, get 10 more years of profits off a dangerous pharma product, meanwhile hope for a newer safer version to emerge from R&D, and when that doesn't happen a decade later, then ultimately pull the product off the shelves.

Leaving a trail of lots of twisted bowels...and damaged babes.

just.plain.wrong!

Theresa O;
Well I guess that answers my question!
what we need is a big stick!
What could we possibly use as a big stick?
Hmmmm
Maybe a sure enough court system instead of the vaccine court.
And more than 18 million will be coming out of thier pocket when a virus gets in their vaccines??? Maybe???
Speaking of vaccine court and all ----
Alysn Camrotoa (oh shoot forgot how to spell it and she is worth me remembering her) she is a news reporter on Fox News did another segment on the vaccine court again this morning. Can you believe that? She very much is trying to show the unfairness of this system.

She said this morning that the vaccine court was suppose to be an administration type of agency but instead they have turned into this sure enough federal court from hell.

Arrrgh! Typo alert - "To date, systemic, robust, scientifically-valid studies of this type have not been done for any vaccine." "Systemic" should be amended to "systematic".

I should know better than posting such a long-winded comment! Sorry.

“Pharmacodynamics is the study of the physiological effects of drugs on the body or on microorganisms or parasites within or on the body and the mechanisms of drug action and the relationship between drug concentration and effect.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmacodynamics

The world has an urgent need for formal pharmacodynamic study of the physiological effects of vaccines on the body. These studies must be performed because there is likely to be more than one mechanism of vaccine toxicity, operating in parallel and synergistically. The kinetics with which these mechanisms of vaccine toxicity take place is different, depending on which vaccine is being considered. For example, the rate at which PCV-2 ends up in the lymph glands and thymus of the lab mice is likely to be VERY different than the rate at which blood clots form, both silent clots and symptomatic, after Gardasil and Anthrax inoculations.

While we are ALL vulnerable to vaccine-induced diseases, we probably ALL have a variable degree of pre-existing environmental risk, based on how much mercury amalgam dentistry, fluoridated water, and dietary aluminum we have been exposed to. To circumvent such potentially confounding variables as pre-existing toxic environmental exposures, we need a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blinded comparison of fully vaccinated versus unvaccinated human subjects. It is unethical to force the vaccine schedules on the public without conducting these studies. Our government could conduct these studies if they were truly serving the public. Either government should conduct these studies or government should “get the hell out” of healthcare, altogether.

http://www.naturalnews.com/z029641_vaccines_junk_science.html

To date, systemic, robust, scientifically-valid studies of this type have not been done for any vaccine. The FDA does not require studies of this type as conditions for “approval”. Political and financial expediency for their client - pharma - has really become the only prerequisite for “expedited” market approvals of new vaccines. The currently marketed vaccines are grandfathered-in, thus new studies validating their safety are unlikely to ever be performed. The approval process for any new vaccine is virtually “jet-propelled” by FDA for their pharma clients. Quite often, there is not a true placebo arm. Under the “non-inferiority” threshold for safety, as long as a new biological is no more acutely toxic than currently marketed biologicals in the same class, it gets “approval”. Antibody titers are often used as surrogate markers of alleged efficacy. Quite often, another marketed vaccine and aluminum adjuvants are “allowed” by FDA in the “placebo” arms of “placebo-controlled” pivotal studies upon which expedited market approvals are based. See the pivotal studies upon which the market “approval” of Gardasil was based. I strongly suspect that even these minimal hurdles for gaining market approvals of new biologicals will be circumvented by pharma and FDA. The sole threshold for market approvals by FDA in the future will be political expediency. There is now a 23 valent pneumococcal vaccine. Pharma wants to put vaccines into the food supply.

http://www.naturalnews.com/z026434_vaccines_vaccination_vaccinations.html

Whatever pharma wants, pharma gets. There will be no end to vaccine madness. Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!

This development kind of shoots the CDC's whole argument of "American kids should risk intussusception, because they will be helping to save kids in developing nations." Oops! Kids in developing nations are at risk for intussusception, too. I have to think it's easier (even in developing nations--heck, maybe more so there) to re-hydrate a child than to perform bowel surgery on him.

Regarding the pig viruses, I went to a Labor Day picnic and ran into my old classmate (I've mentioned him before) who works for Merck. I asked him whether Merck would be screening for PCV1 and PCV2, now that the technology is available. Now, he's not a decision-maker (I think he's a vial-filler), but he said that the company's attitude was basically, Should we really spend $18 million to screen for these viruses, or should we just say, the benefit outweighs the risk, and move on? (Benefit to whom? one is tempted to ask...)

You know it is the pig viruses that has caused this! Why have they just not recalled it and cleaned it up if it is such an important vaccine to save third world children. The viruses were right there, they were caught red handed this spring.

I now understand Tom Insel when he first spoke to Congress has it been a year now if not two?? He said the antigens in the vaccines were now were reduced to very small numbers. I mis-took that to mean then - all that was left was just enough protein for the immune system to react and the rest was adjuvants like aluminum or perservatives like mercury. So, if they decrease the antigens they must be having to increase the adjuvants to get the immune system to react.

No,, that was not what Tom Insel was saying what he was saying was "OH, we have reduced the number of antigens and thus possibly reduced the possibility of given the children a retrovirus that will give them cancer or some other God awful immune disfunction for the rest of these children's lives. Because really folks - given the population a virus is a real possibility. and what we have been doing is crossing our fingers for a very long time.

It has been viruses all along that was worring him. Oh, how silly of me to worry about the adjuvants.

So, now, what happens when you start stacking up generations of infected people with even more virus contaminated vaccines?

Why, Bill Gates gets to have all his money is a pristine world with just his family and friends around, would be my guess.

My son was lucky enough (not!) to get this wretched vaccine shortly before they took it off the market in 1999. Within days, he had GI bleeding and bowel obstruction, which was the beginning of the end for him. I hope their 'revised labeling' includes "illness, disability, and death" as possible outcomes. Science has proven that cranberry concentrate will effectively inhibit rotavirus. But I guess using cranberries, rather than a toxic vaccine, would be too cheap...and too safe.

I agree with the post by kerboblog on September 24. Wyeth's vaccine was finally pulled off the market in 1999 after the same situation developed. You'd think the FDA brainiacs would "get it." Maybe they're all working with Julie at Merck counting stock options instead of "doing no harm."

I second Autodad. Since when are IV fluids dangerous?
Offit, once again, is criminal in his money making 'experiments'.

Revise labeling? How about pulling it like they did the first time?

It never should have been allowed to be put back on the market.

Enough is enough.

Offit's Disease is fairly well documented whereever rotavirus vacine is dispensed.

You wonder if these people believe in vaccine fairies or something odd? They keep re-trying these shots, each time expecting different results.