totally impressed by this. my son still has two vaccines to get... we're waiting, (and hoping he'll GET chickenpox) and school keeps asking, but something always comes up when he needs another vaccine... oh he had a fever last time he went to the dr, oh he had a cold last time he went to the dr (because that's more easily acceptable than "we're spacing them out" or "we're waiting for merck to start making the components available separately".... i learned quick).

rileysmom,

Using the example of the 15 month old baby, try these in the VIC:

1: Pediarix (under DTaP) and ENGERIX-B (HepB)

or

Any vaccine you see in the drop-downs that have red text, which means the person is too old or too young. For example,

2: FluMist

With the local Walgreens "flu shot campaign signs" & gift certificates out all over here...

is there a simple PDF list/link to all the current vaccine insert lables ?

The countries where some of the vaccine components are made would also be nice. I would suppose some are made from a "low bid" internationl mix, and are then transported by bicycle...

Let's keep an open mind here. The entire premise of the post seems two-fold: informed consent and taking a nuanced approach to vaccine safety. I strongly believe in informed consent. I have serious reservations as to taking a nuanced approach on vaccine safety.

In drug safety, adverse drug reactions can be considered drug specific or class specific. Similarly, in vaccine safety, adverse vaccine reactions might be considered vaccine specific or class specific. However, this is where the analogy between drug safety and vaccine safety diverges: there are multiple mechanisms of vaccine toxicity acting simultaneously, because of the number of ingredients, both known ingredients and unknown ingredients.

If you cannot be certain as to the safety of the unknown ingredients, how can you assume that any vaccine is safe? There are some "ingredients" of the current vaccine schedules that cannot even be tested for, because the technology does not presently exist to test for them. The serendipitous discovery of PCV-1 and PCV-2 in the rotavirus vaccines is a case in point. Simian Virus 40 in FDA-approved vaccines is another case in point.

http://www.sv40foundation.org/CPV-link.html

There is an important distinction between an ingredient and a contaminant. There is an important distinction between an adventitious biologic recombinant and a contaminant. In principle, many contaminants are "filterable", associated with the manufacturing process. Consider Dr Royal Rife's filterable BX cancer virus.

Some "adventitious" biologic recombinations could take place during the manufacturing process. Some adventitious biologic recombinations could theoretically take place after injection into a human host, according to the portal provided by the vaccine schedules, e.g. if retroviruses, non-human DNA, and reverse transcriptases are present.

How about trying to find out how PCV2 viruses ended up in the lymph glands and thymus of the lab mice?

"A mouse model to study infection against porcine circovirus type 2: viral distribution and lesions in mouse"

http://www.virologyj.com/content/7/1/158/abstract

Is there any PCV2 virus in the lymph glands of the 256 million children who have been vaccinated? Is there any risk of these children developing a multi-systemic wasting disease?

I went in and made up a fictional 18 month old to see how it worked.

It is still a work in progress though isn't it.

My little fictional girl came up with too much aluminum.

So the way this works is they think of every ingredient that goes into a vaccube, or just the obvious heavy metals. I did not get that at the website???