Paul Offit's Day Job: Teaching How to Counter Vaccine Safety Concerns
|
|
|
|
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
One of the true "devils' priests"
Posted by: bjgosborn | May 06, 2010 at 08:35 PM
Why is one considered anti-vaccine if you want to follow up on your child's vaccine reaction? Why is one considered anti-vaccine if you wonder why your doctor didn't report the reaction? Why is one considered anti-vaccine when you followed the recommended schedule? How is medicine supposed to advance if we aren't allowed to ask questions? Nobody studied my kid so how do they know there is no correlation with vaccines and his autism. They don't know. I followed the rules and something happened. I left the mainstream because there was no investigation. Autism a new problem that stumped my pediatricians. Since they don't know, why can we not turn over every stone even if it means we might find answers we don't want to face. Mommies don't just accept a child stopping talking. They want to find out what happened. Mommies search and can only breathe if their child is ok. I was told by one pediatrician in the 4th largest city in America "some things just don't have easy answers." I thought I was safe in America. When something happens a proper investigation should be conducted. I left the second pediatrician with my sick babies and recovered them at home. Not because I'm anti-vaccine, only because a mommy will look in all directions if it means her baby will look at her again. A mommy has to save her baby. She doesn't care where the information is coming from. She doesn't fear uncovering her own part in all of this. She just searches for answers.
What is most troubling to me is that gov't agencies have little to no involvement in my children's recovery. Rather a large and visible push is geared towards proving that I'm anti-vaccine. I would trust the "experts" and their "science" much more if I saw that they were actually investigating what was happening. We have the resources in this country to study the vaccinated vs non vaccinated populations.
While I believe that Paul Offit has good intentions for children, a huge red flag goes up for me when I'm considered anti-vaccine because I want to follow up on my childrens' high fevers, rashes, and immune problems. I'm supposed to turn off my brain and file into special ed with the rest of the population. Wait around for genetic testing?? If it's genes why didn't I develop autism or my husband? What in the enviornment combined with genetic expression is causing the tidal wave of neurological damage we see today.
When my pediatrician says things like it's toddeler diahrea and diet doesn't matter....we have a huge problem in this country. I'm supposed to trust a team of "experts" who don't even do a proper investigation when my son stops talking? No blood work....just go get speech and OT.
Posted by: Shannon Ruhe | May 04, 2010 at 07:27 PM
I believe Offits wife also benefits financially from working on vaccinations. Anyone have any info on her?
Posted by: Tedd Koren | May 04, 2010 at 11:05 AM
I came across this article. http://www.yakima-herald.com/stories/2010/04/30/medical-providers-urged-to-take-strong-stand-on-vaccine-safety
I guess he was making the rounds last week speaking at various conferences in the Northwest.
"Offit and Dr. Lance Rodevald, a pediatrician and director of the Immunization Services Division at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, stopped in Yakima after attending other national conferences in this part of the country. Invited by the Yakima Health District, their visit coincided with National Infant Immunization Week. Their talk was broadcast to 18 other locations in Washington and Oregon."
Check out the second picture with the article. It's Offit with a big sign behind him that reads, "Celebrate National Infant Immunization Week".
Posted by: Anonymous | May 03, 2010 at 06:38 PM
What a douche bag. That's actually offensive to douche-bags everywhere, sorry-- I can't think of a worse term.
Posted by: casey | May 03, 2010 at 08:38 AM
Kristina, your comments made me laugh so hard! I was all geared up to search for that photo of a topless Offit holding an innocent baby and then, you posted again that it was a clothed Offit! How creepy though! I hope I don't have nightmares about it tonight! ;) Hehehehehe!
Seriously, that man sickens me too....it's quite chilling how he talks and tries to look so sincere. My family comes from the former Soviet Union and they used to tell me horror stories of propaganda and all the corruption. I remember always feeling so lucky to be here in this honest country. We are "the good guys," I thought. This is still the best country in the world, but my comment just illustrates what we here at AoA know and the rest of the country doesn't get: there is a huge propaganda machine here as well and an abundance of corruption.
Posted by: mom2Dan | May 03, 2010 at 01:58 AM
Hint: Some organized indiviual might take the list of fund raising, pharma lovin, OFFITtutes on the CIC's advisory board and save their names- they are always likely to show up as some "expert" later. I wonder what kind of compensation they get for being fellow OFFITtutes?.
Curiously, from the CIC wensite- the California Immunization Coalition just got a $317,000 monetary award from the CDC. The money is specifically targeted for use to spend on MEDIA (ya know, TV, for instance~like Frontline/PBS?) and the internet to promote vaccines. Remember, this was just California. I wonder how much the other states got? Maybe they pooled their money to influence FRONTLINE? I mean, did anyone else see the cartoon of the "Sid the Kid gets a flu shot?". It came out the very same month the CIC got their CDC funds, and surprize- it's posted on the CDC's flu shot website:
http://www.flu.gov/news/blogs/blog20091117.html
Good grief- isn't it a little more than dishonest to use our own tax dollars to give awards to promote vaccines- and in turn deny compensation to families injured by the same? It almost feels like incest, doesn't it?
Just to be sure they get on record, here's those CIC names:
***CIC - Advisory Council****
Advisory Council members contribute to the development of the CIC's strategic plan, identify opportunities in outreach and program development, and assist with fund raising initiatives and CIC membership recruitment.
Sylvia Yeh, MD - Advisory Council Chair
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Habor-UCLA Medical Center, UCLA Center for Vaccine Research
Joel Adelson, MD-UCSF Integrating Medicine and Public Health
Carol Barney, RN, MPH=Madera County Public Health Department
Dean Blumberg, MD-Pediatric Infectious Diseases, UC Davis Medical Center
Mark Finch, MD=Senior Medical Director, Brown and Toland Medical Group
Marlene Lugg, Dr.P.H.-Chair, Immunization Coalition of Los Angeles County
James McCabe, PharmD-Pharmacy Care Manager - Norcal Division - Safeway
Patricia G. Porter, RN, MPH, CHES--Programs Director, California Asthma Public Health Initiative (CAPHI) Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco Chronic Disease and Injury Control Branch, California Department of Public Health
Norma Rosales, MD-Venice Family Clinic
Patricia Samuelson, MD-Mercy Clinic Norwood
Linda Scott, Director-Orange County Immunization Coalition
*****
Posted by: one of a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens... | May 03, 2010 at 01:28 AM
Oh, some of you might not remember but the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) gave $300,000 to fund a marketing and research campaign on public perceptions of vaccine safety. They gave the money to Banyan Communications, one of Don Holzworth's companies.
"When asked to give an example of where they would collect data and opinions, the lead marketing woman cited “Wired” magazine. "
http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/12/300k-to-banyan-communications-from-advisory-commission-on-childhood-vaccines/comments/page/3/#comments
Posted by: bensmyson | May 02, 2010 at 09:30 PM
There are billions of dollars of taxpayer money given to private entities to sway public opinion regarding NIH business. Donald Holzworth is just one of those businessmen who receive such funding. Im sure Offit gets his share for wagging the dog. Offit is small potatoes.
http://i49.tinypic.com/rjjg3d.jpg
http://www.southcap.com/content/don+holzworth/1548
In April 2007, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that the Constella Group, (Donald Holzworth's company) "hired by the federal government four years ago to update its list of carcinogens moved quickly to add a virus to the list while two of its clients," Merck and GlaxoSmithKline, "were developing vaccines to combat that same virus."
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Constella_Group
Posted by: bensmyson | May 02, 2010 at 09:21 PM
I just did a search for that Offit baby photo, and it turns out my memory made it worse than it was, lol. Offit is clothed in the photo. It's still gross though. Funny how memory works.
Posted by: Kristina | May 02, 2010 at 07:48 PM
Every time I see Offit, I think back to that picture of him topless holding a naked baby. Usually those photos are done of a loving father holding his baby. But this man cares nothing about babies, and it was a sickening sight. I think that's why I get so grossed out now when I see his photo. Could A of A please stop posting photos of him? lol.
Posted by: Kristina | May 02, 2010 at 07:29 PM
Not knowing where else to put this on a Sunday evening, here is some info from a meeting of the PAS -- the Pediatric Academic Societies.
The PAS consists of four separate pediatric organizations. Those are: the American Pediatric Society, the Society for Pediatric Research, the Academic Pediatric Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The information below is about a session at that meeting. The study was funded by "Autism Speaks":
[2320.7] GI Symptoms in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): An Autism Treatment Network Study
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of GI symptoms in children and adolescents with ASD is uncertain, with studies reporting conflicting results.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of GI symptoms as reported by parents in a large ASD registry, and to identify factors associated with GI symptoms in children with ASD.
RESULTS: GI symptom data were available for 1185 children.
Overall, 45% of children were reported to have GI symptoms at time of enrollment.
Of GI complaints that occurred within the 3 months prior to enrollment, abdominal pain was most common (59%) followed by constipation (51%), diarrhea (43%), other (40%), nausea (31%) and bloating (26%).
Reports of GI symptoms increased with age, ranging from 39% in those under 5 years to 51% in those 7 years and older (p
Date: Sunday, May 2, 2010
Poster Symposium Session: Autism
Posted by: InReTheAAP | May 02, 2010 at 07:09 PM
Here's something interesting from the Autism Science Foundation:
http://www.autismsciencefoundation.org/ApplyForaGrant.html
ASF'S "IMFAR STAKEHOLDER TRAVEL AWARDS" ANNOUNCED
(April 2, 2010) We’re pleased to announce that the Autism Science Foundation has awarded IMFAR stakeholder travel awards to the following individuals to support their attendance at this year’s International Meeting for Autism Research. Our thanks to everyone who applied. We hope to expand this program next year to better match the level of interest.
Recipients will each receive up to $1000 in expense reimbursement to support attendance at IMFAR.
2010 Recipients:
Christie Buchovecky - PhD Candidate, Baylor College of Medicine
Louise Capps - Parent
Kate & John Fox - Parents
Stephanie Millman - Sibling/Undergraduate, Columbia University
Judy Omidvaran - Parent
James S - Parent
Jessica Yablow - Special Education Teacher
Autism Science Foundation Offering Scholarships to IMFAR
(Februry 11, 2010---New York, NY) The Autism Science Foundation today announced that is offering a limited number of grants to parents of children with autism and other stakeholders to support attendance at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR), to be held in Philadelphia, May 20-22, 2010. Awards of up to $1000 can be used to cover registration, travel, accommodations, meals and other directly related expenses, including childcare. After the conference, grant recipients will be expected to share what they've learned with families in their local communities and/or online...
~~~~
I've seen at least one of these grantees on Huffpo making all of the usual arguements -- science has spoken, parents don't understand science, increase in autism may not be real, better diagnosis today than before, etc.
Posted by: Twyla | May 02, 2010 at 12:22 PM
We get it, Poul, good science, even if it's shit quality (Fombonne's, Thorsens etc.) is good because it exhonerates vaccines. Hewitson's, Wakefield's is bad simply because it really looks at vaccines. It's all so blessedly simple.
Honestly,Paul, how do you sleep at night, knowing that you are hurting hundreds of thousands of children/babies. Oh yeah, but they're just "percentages."
Posted by: jen | May 02, 2010 at 10:29 AM
freaking troll.
Posted by: Jenny W | May 02, 2010 at 10:28 AM
Ah well, all is clear now, that explains why he doesn't actually see sick children, his real job is propaganda and doctoring of the truth. As we say in French "On ne peut être à la fois au four et au moulin", you can't be at once at the mill and at the oven.
Posted by: GennyGC | May 02, 2010 at 10:17 AM
Why do they need Offit for this?
I thought they taught this in medical school and college?
Posted by: Benedetta | May 02, 2010 at 09:13 AM