Janice said: "fear there is a bigger agenda in place to reduce the population, and that this vaccine, as well as many other questionable vaccines, is the vehicle to create infertility or otherwise reduce the population of the planet."

I use to think the depopulationist agenda was just some wild, fringe conspiracy theory...now sometimes I wonder. We live in strange times. Up is down, black is white
good is bad.

Like Alice going through the looking glass, once you go to the other side you see how truly distorted things are.

We don't know if the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines being tested in India are identical to those in other countries if it is true that they are testing the efficacy of only two doses versus three in India. Is the antigen content used in the two dose testing the same as a regular Gardasil shot, or has it been altered to add more antigen or more adjuvant? Are they doing this testing to see if the cost of the vaccine can be reduced to make it more affordable in India? Why is this testing being done now, in India? We do not know the answer to these questions as no article provides the answers. If dosage is indeed being tested as the articles from India indicate, it would have to be a clinical trial, would it not?

quote from the link provided by not an MD:
The HPV Vaccines: Evidence for Impact project is meant to generate evidence to help policymakers
and planners worldwide make informed decisions regarding regional and national vaccine
introduction efforts and international financing plans. It is not a clinical trial of a new vaccine.
The vaccines being used are already licensed in more than 100 countries, including India.
This report shares findings from the formative research in India, which was carried out by
PATH and the National AIDS Research Institute (NARI) of the Indian Council for Medical
Research (ICMR) in two states—Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat—to explore approaches to
vaccine introduction. The results from India provide insight into the complexities of vaccine
introduction in a country with a population of more than one billion people. In general, we found
that policymakers, health care providers, parents, and adolescents in both states would accept
vaccination against cancer of the cervix, as long as it is safe, effective, affordable, and accessible.

actually we don't know if only 120 girls were in the vaccine program or if the number was much greater and 120 had bad side effects including death. Still, 4 deaths and epilepsy among even thousands is terrible. What would make a parent be willing to chance that their child could be one of 4 in a several thousand? No doubt they'll blame it on the pill...

I feel so sad. I know of the guilt these moms must be feeling right now for allowing their girls to get this shot. It is the same guilt we all feel every day. The guilt is of course misplaced: it is not our fault, but knowing this intellectually doesn't stop the feeling.

Only 120 girls in the study and 4 of them died? OMG! That's worse than anything I've heard before about this horrible vaccine! What's going on here? Does anyone know the real scoop?

I wonder what the latest news from America is?

It's amazing that these vaccines are on "real" trial around the world, yet under the noses of American authorities everything is peachy keen.

Half the people working at Merck probably don't even consider the fact that they are working for what is essentially a foreign drug company.

Merck spends billions on "education".

Merck also produces an allopathic bible of sorts and assorted library materials which chronically infest the medical profession in America.

Merck's track record in America is very poor. So poor that it requires constant investigation which often leads to civil trials with lots of punitive damage awards and fraud recovery.

America gained an interest in Merck after it was won as a spoil during world war. When political pressure was applied the Berlin Wall fell and American entered a new era of assault.

http://xrl.in/50hh

If parents wonder why for example the Med waivers system is dysfunctional it might have something to do with the fact that Merck failed to pay proper rebates to Medicaid and other health care programs and paid illegal remuneration (bribery) to health care providers.

According to reports, On February 7, 2008 Merck agreed to pay more than $650 million to settle charges that it routinely over billed Medicaid for its most popular medicines.

Merck made the settlement without an admission of liability or wrongdoing. One whistle-blower received a $68 million reward.

And you wonder where this is coming from?

http://www.youtube.com/user/kerbob1#p/u/0/qzNsOSstII8

Dig for yourselves.

"With Gardasil, only one trial has been carried out with a small sample of 110 girls, which has followed up with them for a month after completion of vaccination and that too only to look at the immune response post-vaccination, Karat said."

This is pretty much par for the course on all vaccines isn't it? Small sample groups in studies and the only post-vaccine studies done look at whether or not the person developed antibodies to the vaccine antigen. Lame for sure, but business as usual for vaccines, or as they are often called "the most carefully and thoroughly studied" biological products on the market.

That is yet another big, hungry lie.

It sounds to me like Merck is trying to fast-track "safety studies" at the expense of these girls, so they can try again to "mandate" this vaccine here and elsewhere. I'm feeling very queasy.