I saw the smug self satisfied smirk throughout the press conference.
Gee Evan no one likes to a spoilt brat.

Statements by Moody and Wakefield to the effect that Michael Rutter was paid by vaccine manufacturers for expert testimony are FALSE. Even the complaint names only the LAB and the US government as approaching him for testimony. Rutter has been advised to SUE if these allegations are not openly admitted to be false.

Thank you Mr. Moody for your fantastic job and continued fight for our children and Dr Wakefield, Dr Walker-Smith and Dr Murch.
Is it ok that I would like to smack the guy in the back ground? I know who it is and the eye rolling is extremely mature. This is who some of the people in the UK look up to as an MP? Eeee Gadsssss. Yes, the muturity level is astounding. Truly.

Yesterday I was talking w/a neighbor who had vaccinated her (now 9 year old) son according to the CDC "rites" and her son is OK...I was expecting her to defend her decision but instead she said she knew she was just lucky, knew about the 1 in 60 rate, etc. The truth is out there and people know it. The Big Liars will be found out.

Nice Speech! Awesome job. One of the signs in the background really summed it up nicely.

"Guilty of helping our damaged kids".

That's it in a nutshell.

Jim Moody absolutely RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRROCKS !!!!!

Jim Moody does a fantastic job in explaining the facts about false testimony and the complaint being presented by many autism organizations both here and in the UK.

The man with the wild eyes and inappropriate smile is no innocent bystander. He is Dr. Evan Harris MP who has an interesting connection. I am sure we will hear more about that but here is a link to a blog that he started that has some questionable accusations.

This is a part of a post from that blog. It is well written and I think shows a strategy that Evan and so many others use. She is directing her comment to Evan:

Dr Andrew Wakefield and the MMR Scare – Evan on C4 News
http://drevanharrismp.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/dr-andrew-wakefield-and-the-mmr-scare-evan-on-c4-news/#comment-204

"We have asked if we can have the single vaccines on the NHS but have been told that we cannot even though our doctor said that he could not rule out the possibility that the MMR had contributed to our daughter’s autism.

I therefore watched the Channel 4 News item with interest. I am well aware of your stance on this issue which I respect. You are entitled to your view. Your conduct though I do not find acceptable. Frankly I do not understand where you are coming from on this. You are prefectly entitled to attack the science, to express your view that the MMR is safe but I think your are wrong, and in fact do yourself no favours, when you start attacking the integrity of Andrew Wakefield and others who share Wakefield’s concerns about the safety of the MMR. You have stopped playing the ball and are now playing the man.

I personally have no doubt at all that Andrew Wakefield is a decent, honest man who has genuine concerns about the safety of the MMR and is committed to finding out what has caused the autism and bowel disorders in children like our daughter. The most serious finding against him by the GMC is essentially that he treated the children in the study like guinnea pigs. It is therefore extraordinary, is it not, that not one parent of those children has complained about him? Your comments about the parents being in distress and that he took advantage of them is the sort of patronising nonsense that I am afraid is rather typical of the medical profession, and certainly is something we got in spades from our GP when our daughter was disgnosed.

But more serious. I felt, were your comments about the individual (I don’t know his name) who appeared on the show alongside you. You accused him, without showing any evidence to back up your claims, of seeking to make a profit at the expense of public health by advocating, and offering single vaccines. In effect you accused him of being motivated purely by money. This is clearly defamatory. How on earth can you be so sure that money is his primary motive to make such a serious allegation as that on live TV? And you appear to be proud of it too judging from this website! I would like to give our son single vaccines but cannot. If I wanted to vaccinate my son against measles I would have to go to a private clinic. Can you not see the absurdity of accusing an individual of profiteering in this way, when, if he and Wakefield and others had their way, the single vaccines would be available on the NHS? The individual on the wshow came across as a more reasonable and plasuible person than you.

I have lodged an official complaint about this with your party."