The Vaccine Hard Sell at Pediatrics
Managing Editor's Note: Mike Wagnitz submitted this letter to Pediatrics. They declined to run it, as it their right. We decided to run it. As is our right. Dr. Offit is pushing harder than a mother delivering triplets to convince moms and dads that anyone who speaks in favor of vaccine safety is wrong. Including Dr. Bob Sears, a pediatric voice of reason whom we have been happy to welcome to Age of Autism. You can read his post, Smart Vaccine Decisions for Families with Autism (HERE). Sorry, Dr. Offit. No sale.
A Shot of Reality
By Michael Wagnitz, B.S.
As a chemist with 27 years of experience evaluating material for heavy metals, I find it unfortunate that the journal Pediatrics has allowed Dr. Paul Offit to repeat misinformation regarding the use of neurotoxic metals in vaccines. He scolds Dr. Bob Sears for not giving the proper scientific credit to the paper, "Weight of Evidence Against Thimerosal Causing Neuropsychological Deficits" (1), published in the NEJM. Let's take a look at the quality of this paper starting with the impartiality of the authors:
Dr. Thompson - the lead investigator - is a former employee of Merck.
Dr. Marcy has received consulting fees from Merck, Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, and MedImmune.
Dr. Jackson received grant money from Wyeth, Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. He received lecture fees from Sanofi Pasteur and consulting fees from Wyeth and Abbott. Currently, he is a consultant to the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.
Dr. Lieu is a consultant to the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
Dr. Black receives consulting fees from MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Merck, and grant support from MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis, Merck, and Novartis.
Dr. Davis receives consulting fees from Merck and grant support from Merck and GlaxoSmithKline.
(The above information was included in the fine print of the published article)
The article states that any child with a preexisting neurological condition was eliminated from the study. Isn't this what the study was supposed to examine, whether thimerosal causes neurological damage? These preexisting conditions included encephalitis and meningitis. The possibility that thimerosal might cause these conditions was eliminated from consideration.
Children were eliminated for other reasons from the study. One group excluded was children whose birth weight was under 2,500 grams, or 5.5 pounds. The number of babies eliminated because of this was not reported. Babies of this weight are not rare and they are not excluded from any vaccine. In fact, in a study published last year in Pediatrics, it was shown that low weight babies had a much higher rate of autism (2). In the end, only about 30% of the original study participants remained. The authors seemed to weed out anyone who didn't fit their desired conclusion. Offit says (and I quote), "It is hard to imagine a better conceived, better designed study on the subtle effects of mercury poisoning". No Offit, it's hard to imagine a better conceived and better designed study to obfuscate the issue concerning the safety of thimerosal.
Offit tells us how aluminum in babies formula and breast milk dwarfs the amount in vaccines. What he doesn't explain is that aluminum is only dangerous once it's in the bloodstream. Aluminum is not absorbed through the gut. It is 100% absorbed through vaccination. He ignores the paper published in 2007 linking aluminum in vaccines to Gulf War Syndrome (3) . If it can harm healthy, adult, combat ready soldiers, at a lower dose per body weight, what is it doing to newborns?
Here is one subject Offit never touches; multi-dose vaccine vials, including current versions of the flu, tetanus and meningococcal vaccines, contain 50,000 ug/l of Hg, a level 250 times higher than what the EPA classifies as hazardous waste (4). All these vaccines are recommended for children. Primates exposed to injected ethylmercury from vaccines, as opposed to equal doses of ingested methylmercury, end up with twice as much Hg++ deposited in the brain (5). This form remains permanently trapped and has been identified as the primary toxic agent in degenerative brain diseases (6). State of the art research has shown us that autism is a degenerative brain disease (7).
Parents understand the difference between truthful information from honest, caring professionals like Dr. Bob Sears and the aggressive, bullying tactics that Offit and others are trying to sell them. The cat is out of the bag and it's not going back in.
(1) Thompson WW, Price C, Goodson B, et al. Early thimerosal exposure and neuropsychological outcomes at 7 to 10 years. N Engl J Med. 2007;357 (13):1281 –1292
(2) Limperopoulos C, Bassan H, Sullivan NR, et al. Positive Screening for Autism in Ex-preterm Infants: Prevalence and Risk Factors Pediatrics 2008; 121: 758-765
(3) Petrik MS, Wong MC, Tabata RC, Garry RF, Shaw CA. Aluminum [vaccine] adjuvant linked to gulf war illness induces motor neuron death in mice. Neuromolecular Med. 2007;9(1):83-100.
(4)http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/mercury/regs.htm
(5) Burbacher T, Shen D, Liberato N, Grant K, Cernichiari E, Clarkson T. 2005. Comparison of blood and brain mercury levels in infant monkeys exposed to methylmercury or vaccines containing thimerosal. Environmental Health Perspectives. 113:1015-1021
(6) Charleston J, Body R, Bolender R, Mottet N, Vahter M, Burbacher T 1996. Changes in the number of astrocytes and microglia in the thalamus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical methylmercury exposure. Neurotoxicology 17:127-138
(7) Vargus DL, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, Zimmerman AW, Pardo Ca. 2005 Neuroglial activation and neuroinflamation in the brain of patients with autism. Annals of Neurology 57:67-81.
Conflict of Interest: Father of a vaccine injured child
As a mum of yet another vaccine damaged child, I am still fighting the system to get heard. Great letter. We need more parents to stand up for their beliefs and stop this now!
Posted by: KerryH | August 31, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Kudos!
Why should there be equality in journalism? (sarcasm)
Posted by: Kevin | January 07, 2009 at 01:10 PM
Thanks, Mike, for everything you!!!
Posted by: Lin | January 07, 2009 at 10:56 AM
PEDIATRICS
Is this a comic or a journal?
Is it propaganda or truth?
Is it independent or bound in slavery?
Is it alone in this kind of activity?
Pediatrics for me implies that the GOOD of the child is your aim?
Is it good to allow children to suffer?
Pediatrics is not DAMNED by refusing to publish articles that are helpful to the next generation of our children.
They are TOTALLY AND ETERNALLY DAMNED.
J'ACCUSE
PEDIATRICS - NEVER ADMIT HARM?
THE NEJM seems to be in the same category?
Merck weren't they the people that thought thimerosal was a phenyl mercury when it is actually an ALKYL MERCURY. A small point but alkyl mercury is the most dangerous form of an element that is one of the most toxic elements and Merck were COMFORTED that it was phenyl and NOT alkyl mercury.
YOUR LIFE IN THEIR HANDS?
Thanks but no thanks.
Posted by: John Fryer | January 07, 2009 at 06:47 AM
The conflicts of interest are clear. So when will someone of importance listen and better yet ACT?
Posted by: Lisa | January 07, 2009 at 12:51 AM
Love it! "Pediatrics" has gotta be a little nervous with the likes of that letter. Even though they didn't print it they have to be worried that people who are actually educated on the subject are on to them.
Posted by: jen | January 07, 2009 at 12:50 AM
Unfortunately, I don't know which is worse:
Pediatrics willingness to publish Offit's untruths as though true
or
Pediatrics unwillingness to publish your excellent response.
In any event, we can take comfort in knowing...no matter how hard they try to declare this debate over...it continues to fester and grow....because...common sense will prevail over scientific nonsense every time.
Posted by: Bob Moffitt | January 06, 2009 at 03:15 PM
I haven't even read the piece yet and I'm rolling at that picture!!! Crap. If she sticks that nose up any farther, it'll bleed for sure due to high altitude.
Classic...hands on hips, nose in air...and I'll bet she's stomping her foot too (just for the added *so there!* effect)??
Hey, I think I'll incorporate *all of it* the next time some guy tries to give me a load of crap. Think it'll work?? Any bidders?
Posted by: Kelli Ann Davis -- To Miss Kim -- LOVE THE PIC | January 06, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Great letter. It would be interesting to see a study that graded doctors adherence to manufactures recommendations in administering shots. If the vax and thimerosal study selection criteria follows those strict recommendations, but in practice those criteria aren't followed, and you could establish that pharma companies and the CDC know those criteria aren't followed per recommendations and as studied yet do little to correct the problem, then there is a lot that could be said about their responsibility for any problems that occur in real life and their honesty in making public safety assurances.
Posted by: Ben's Dad | January 06, 2009 at 10:56 AM
Way to go Mike, great letter. I can see why they didn't publish it. There's too much real science quoted for them to grapple with.
Harry
Posted by: Harry Hofherr | January 06, 2009 at 09:44 AM
Outstanding!! Thanks for writing this letter.
Posted by: CM | January 06, 2009 at 09:44 AM
Outstanding letter. All parents should keep a copy for their reluctant pediatricians and other parents.
Posted by: David Taylor | January 06, 2009 at 08:27 AM
BRAVO, Mike!!!
Posted by: AnneS | January 06, 2009 at 08:06 AM