Jenny McCarthy's Dunking on Ellen!
Jenny McCarthy went into Ellen's dunk tank! Hurry! Ellen's "video of the day" won't stay up long. How great is Jenny McCarthy? Click HERE.
Jenny McCarthy went into Ellen's dunk tank! Hurry! Ellen's "video of the day" won't stay up long. How great is Jenny McCarthy? Click HERE.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
To jypsy -
"I had some further thoughts on whether perhaps "remission" might be a more accurate description (or at least "my word" for what you are talking about), in the way Relapsing Remitting MS can have relapses "triggered", and an analogy of alcoholics being "in recovery" or "recovering" but never "recovered", just a trigger (drink) away from alcoholic..."
Jypsy, I am going to wager a guess here and say that no, its not the same thing as being in remission. Because while some have seen that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, the rest of us are still trudging towards it. I have personally emailed some parents of recovered kids just to find out where their kids are at. Most say their kids are on a few supplements (few means literally a few probably under 10 a day and things like CLO, multivitamin and B-12, some probiotics). They eat better food, organic, and they keep their homes green. All these families live better, they have seen the light and moved on. After this there is no going back to "the way things were." Its well nigh impossible I would think. Some do need to be gfcf, or SCD. There are families that allow their kids the occasional pizza with enzymes.
That said, one or two families have said that their "recovered" kids regress on exposure to toxins, say chemicals at school BUT these families are not done yet. They are still doing treatments and they have not stopped. The decision to stop is again a personal one, these treatments cost an arm and a leg and this is mostly not covered by insurance. That might help explain why parents are on here and on other blogs to spread the word (because come to think of it, there's really nothing in this for us) that prevention of vaccine injury is the best cure of all.
Posted by: Autism mom | October 06, 2008 at 06:07 PM
jypsy,
"Comparing autism rates that predate autism entry into the DSM with ASD rates today is comparing apples to sheep. I will indeed spare you further comment :)"
But you didn't... This is the same old tired argument. The changes in DSM-IV do not come close to accounting for any significant portion of what people are seeing. e.g., I ran into an old school teacher of mine and told her about my son. She asked me: "what's going on with this autism? I don't remember there being hardly any kids with issues like this -- and now they're all over the place". Open your eyes.
Under the old criteria my son would have been autistic. Under the new criteria he is also autistic. Most of the kids that I know in the local autism community here are in the same boat -- and there's lots of them. Jeez, I was a park yesterday and another couple was there with their three kids -- one of whom was autistic. There are just waaaaay too many kids for this to be better diagnosis as you implied.
Posted by: ObjectiveAutismDad | October 06, 2008 at 03:55 PM
rileysmom
"You're too busy being sarcastic to understand what I'm trying to say."
No, I'm not being at all sarcastic. I'm sorry you're reading me that way.
"Why is it people like you come here and feel free to cut those of us that have hope in their child down?"
Where have I done that?
"But why would you say such things?"
What things??
"What is your personal gain in sqealching the dreams of parents for their children? "
How am I doing that?
"If you don't believe what Jenny McCarthy has to say and you truly believe your child was "born" autistic than this may not be the group for you to come to."
I never said anything about not believing Ms. McCarthy.
If we go back to my last message, and the religious analogy, should a Jew never talk to a Christian? Are we enemies because of our beliefs?
I never said anything about your son or anyone else's. I said *my* children were born autistic. How is that statement any less valid than your statement "I know my son was vaccine injured"?
I would ask you to please read what I wrote, not read *into* what I wrote, or just totally ignore me. Your accusations are unjustified & unnecessary.
As I just said "For now, thank you for the time you've taken in your attempts to answer my questions."
I don't need to be personally attacked or accused of things I never said or did. I'm sorry we couldn't just discuss.
Posted by: jypsy | October 06, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Jypsy, you're fine and welcome here. I'm just telling you our goals and how we operate. The religious analogy is just that, an analogy. That said, when readers come in and are very clear that they do not believe in an environmental link or vaccine injury and recovery and yet they ask many questions and respond many times, that's a pattern we see quite frequently. Thanks. KIM
Posted by: Managing Editor | October 06, 2008 at 03:23 PM
ObjectiveAutismDad
"No one said "...myelin is being repaired...", except you."
Quite right. I'm sorry, my mistake. What was said was that demyelination was stopped. I think I was thinking that with demyelination in a child's brain that child would be affected, as I am and others with MS are. Therefor "recovery" would mean healing those spots. No one said that kids with loss of myelin can "recover" (or that "all kids" can recover). I apologize again for putting words in anyone's mouth.
Managing Editor
I was referring more to the posters/commenters than the readers. Obviously I am a reader. I don't understand your religious analogy. I would say that I am happy in my beliefs and have no interest in converting you (all) or in being converted. We have very different beliefs. As I have stated, I came here seaking to understand the words and meanings being used by those who share your beliefs. It seems we share the same words ("cure", "recovering", "recovered", "neurotypical") but they don't have the same meanings. I don't think anyone would (should?) condemn a Jew asking for understanding of Christianity's lingo or visa versa. I don't think having different beliefs makes people enemies.
"If you like us and can learn from what you read and have positive comments to add, you're welcome here."
I don't dislike you (all), if I gain the understanding I came looking for I will have learned, if I'm at all out of line, please don't hesitate to take it up with me directly. Have I been negative or baiting? I don't believe I have.
ObjectiveAutismDad
Comparing autism rates that predate autism entry into the DSM with ASD rates today is comparing apples to sheep. I will indeed spare you further comment :)
Autism mom
If I stop the meds, I have more seizures. I take seizure meds to try to prevent seizures.
"Whether you would like to call it cure or recovery is immaterial" -- I think this is getting to the heart of why I'm here. You seem to be saying the words are not important. As I've stated, I came seeking to understand the words and the meaning you folks have given them.
"What is pertinent is the quality of life of the individual - physically, mentally, emotionally." Absolutely! So, what you may call "cured" or "recovered" I might call "happy, healthy, well adjusted, autistic"
Again, I'm not interested in *judging* words, I'm here to *understand* them and their use.
I'm also well aware of the prevalence of MS in the Northern Hemisphere (I'm on PEI, not in NS) and the various theories, treatments etc etc. Thank you. I have lived with MS for almost 30 years. There's also a proportionally large number of teachers with MS, as compared to other professions and it affects far more women than men (just a couple of factoids...I'm a woman but not, professionally, a teacher)
I had some further thoughts on whether perhaps "remission" might be a more accurate description (or at least "my word" for what you are talking about), in the way Relapsing Remitting MS can have relapses "triggered", and an analogy of alcoholics being "in recovery" or "recovering" but never "recovered", just a trigger (drink) away from alcoholic... but I'm not quite articulate enough at the moment to flesh out these thoughts. If I ever do, and you are interested, I'll share them.
For now, thank you for the time you've taken in your attempts to answer my questions.
Posted by: jypsy | October 06, 2008 at 03:18 PM
jypsy
You're too busy being sarcastic to understand what I'm trying to say. Like Kim said I can not and will not speak for the readers or parents that come and leave comments here but I will say that my child was NOT born autistic. I do not buy into the whole born autistic/genetic thing because I watched my son develope normally and meet more than all his milestones. One day he had a seizure and was never the same. It just so happens that he had 11 viruses in one day 14 hrs before that seizure. I lost him and he hasn't come back yet. But I strongly believe that I can reverse the damage caused by one stupid doctor and recover him.
Why is it people like you come here and feel free to cut those of us that have hope in their child down? I can see the reason why Paul Offit would say the things he does...he makes a lot of money from poisoning children. But why would you say such things? What is your personal gain in sqealching the dreams of parents for their children?
If you don't believe what Jenny McCarthy has to say and you truly believe your child was "born" autistic than this may not be the group for you to come to.
I know my son was vaccine injured and guess what? I stay away from the groups that don't support my views...and that's ok because I feel like fighting about it is a waste of my time. Instead of having a "go no where" conversation with you (or on some stupid blog that doesn't support me or try to convince some one in what I believe to be true) I could have been doing something for Riley. See what I mean about wasting time? So now I'm done wasting my time and I'm going to go cook Riley a good dinner because THAT is helping to recover my child from vaccine injuries.
Posted by: rileysmom | October 06, 2008 at 02:12 PM
To jypsy -
"....a subject I'm rather intimate with having had MS more than half my life..."
On the topic of MS and living in Nova Scotia, you may or may not have come across this:
http://www.industryinet.com/~ruby/light_full_spectrum.html
"Research by Reuven Sandyk, MD, who practises medicine in Connecticut, shows that long-term deprivation from sunlight exposure increases the risk of multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease through depressed secretion of the hormone melatonin by the brain's pineal gland. This appears to explain the south-north gradient in the incidence of MS: the farther from the equator, the more common it is. [99] All the MS patients he tested had extremely low melatonin levels and their pineal glands were calcified, or hardened."
If you read the site you will find a reference to melatonin reduction that relates to zinc deficiency, both of which nearly all kids on the autism spectrum need. Sometimes the line between genetics and the environment becomes blurred but that's no excuse for not trying to treat, or at the very least, to make it better to see where it takes you.
Posted by: Autism mom | October 06, 2008 at 01:38 PM
To jypsy -
"I take seizure meds for seizures. They don't cure my seizure disorder nor do they qualify as "recovered" from it. I don't understand what you're trying to say."
Let me ask you this: if you were to stop taking the seizure medication, what is likely to happen to you? You take the meds to prevent a decline in your general state of health and well being don't you? Same thing here. Whether you would like to call it cure or recovery is immaterial. What is pertinent is the quality of life of the individual - physically, mentally, emotionally. How we choose to achieve those goals is upto each individual. Its not anyone's place to judge the words people might use to define their arrival at a place of well being. I also don't think its worth the time unless you are trying to prove a point regarding some previously thought out agenda.
We have personally not reached the place whereby we are actively repairing myelin but I have seen the use of glutathione, EFAs, phospholipids, ora placenta, cold lasers, homeopathic remedies on autism lists. If you look at Amy Yasko's website she talks about chronic disease and is not limiting herself to autism. As per Yasko, there are 3 steps to treating chronic disease - support, detox, repair. You may want to look at Step 3 for supplements for myelin repair.
Finally no one is disputing the genetic predisposition. Someone ought to examine it before they stick our kids with 50-60 shots (I have lost count) of vaccine contaminated with neurotoxins and pathogens.
Posted by: Autism mom | October 06, 2008 at 12:29 PM
jypsy,
I obviously can't speak for everyone here -- and neither can anyone else. But I don't think there are very many people here, and not in the scientific community either that would think that autism is a strictly genetic connection. You can't go from an incidence on the order of 2-3 in 10,000 to less than 1 in 150 in a generation and expect that it's genetics only. That's not rational. And for those who would raise the better diagnosis response to that statement: spare me, that argument has been so debunked as to be ridiculous.
I think the same is true of the vaccines vs environment as a whole. There is certainly more than one way to get exposed to heavy metals: airborne mercury, dental fillings, too much of the wrong fish at the wrong time, etc.
Posted by: ObjectiveAutismDad | October 06, 2008 at 12:29 PM
Jypsy, if would be difficult to answer for the thousands of people come read A of A every day. There are those who read to learn how to help their own kids. Just as there are those who read to provide fodder for their own blogs because they disagree with our charter.
But overall, if Born Again Christian who seeks convert is frequenting a Jewish blog, chances are it's not for wholly informational or positive purposes. There may be an agenda. We're wary of that here. I hope you understand.
If you like us and can learn from what you read and have positive comments to add, you're welcome here. If you disagree with our charter and want to add only negative or baiting comments (you or anyone else, I'm not singling you out per se) then we will moderate your comments out.
The Autism Hub has plenty of genetics only blogs to frequent. As you know. It's a big world and there's room for all of us.
Best,
Kim
Posted by: Managing Editor | October 06, 2008 at 12:23 PM
jypsy,
No one said "...myelin is being repaired...", except you. I think the point that was being made is that the when the damage is no longer being done, the brain can "recover" by establishing other pathways (as has been established by brain research). It's well established that heavy metals damage myelin. If you can remove the heavy metals (and whatever else might be damaging the myelin) then the damage won't continue to expand.
That said, some stem cell research seems to indicate that myelin can be "repaired" in effect by allowing the development of new healthy brain cells.
Posted by: ObjectiveAutismDad | October 06, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Thank you. So the short answer is "No, not exactly"? Environmental but not necessarily 100% vaccine related?
Does this
"How can we trust the mainstream media to cover the autism epidemic when they themselves censor important information and skew the discussion toward the tired old genetic argument?"
mean that no one here believes in a strictly genetic connection?
Posted by: jypsy | October 06, 2008 at 12:05 PM
Jyspy, here's our charter at Age of Autism. You can read the full piece at "From our Editor" (Dan Olmsted) on the left sidebar.
Welcome to The Age of Autism, the the nation's first daily Web newspaper for the environmental-biomedical community – those who believe autism is an environmentally induced illness, that it is treatable, and that children can recover...
Posted by: Managing Editor for Jypsy | October 06, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Autism mom -
"Let me ask you this jypsy. Did your children get the Hep B shot at birth?"
No, they weren't.
"Also, have you been vaccinated in your lifetime? Were you autistic from birth as well?"
Yes and I assume so.
"Were your parent/s autistic from birth?"
My father is no longer living nor is anyone in his family who could tell me that.
It sounds like you may be able to answer my earlier question: "Since you mentioned myelin, a subject I'm rather intimate with having had MS more than half my life, can you tell me how myelin is being repaired in "autistic" or "vaccine injured" children?"
"Oh and on recovery vs cure, some people take seizure meds for seizures. Half of America is on Rx medication for chronic disease. Well our supplements and our special diets are our "meds," if you will."
I take seizure meds for seizures. They don't cure my seizure disorder nor do they qualify as "recovered" from it. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
Is it the belief of everyone here that *all* autism is vaccine injury?
Posted by: jypsy | October 06, 2008 at 10:38 AM
@ jypsy -
"My children are not vaccine injured. My children are autistic and have been autistic from birth. I am not, and never said I was "interested in recovery". If only those "interested in recovery" are welcome here, I will take my leave."
Let me ask you this jypsy. Did your children get the Hep B shot at birth? If they did then being "autistic from birth" holds no water. You really have no way to tell whether they were autistic at birth or not.
Also, have you been vaccinated in your lifetime? Were you autistic from birth as well?
Were your parent/s autistic from birth?
There are tipping points to defects in methylation, sulphation, immune problems, gut issues. Someone, somewhere, somehow, tipped over. What the parents on here have found that the vaccine explosion has had a huge role to play in triggering the disorder. We can see before/ after scenarios as clearly as day and night, well most of us. Others have found their kids slipping away after each round of shots. I remember clear reaction after the shots in my son too. Others don't recall clear declines. It varies.
The only point to be made here is that you can recover the brain, nervous system, immune system, gut issues or at least make the kids better (there are a few tough nuts that have not seen any gains as well) if you have the stomach for it. As Deb in IL suggested, you can go to an Autism conference. The DAN! conference has a free webcast that you can register for and watch past presentations if you like. There is really nothing to hide and there is no big secret.
And the other place to learn would be Amy Yasko's group www.ch3nutrigenomics.com, its what helped me wrap my brain around my son's disorder. Before that I didn't know what the heck was happening with my son. It might be a good idea to run some SNPs to see what you find by way of your and your kids' genetics. See what's going on with your methylation perhaps. We got important clues at our end that made a huge difference for us.
Oh and on recovery vs cure, some people take seizure meds for seizures. Half of America is on Rx medication for chronic disease. Well our supplements and our special diets are our "meds," if you will. We, at our end, don't quite understand what the hullabaloo is about. That you can alter the diet and take supplements instead somehow seems to be a bad thing, that Jenny McCarthy ought to be bashed for being "dangerous." Now that's just weird to us :).
Posted by: Autism mom | October 06, 2008 at 08:52 AM
I am absolutely not forcing anyone to answer my questions. Please, if your time is that precious, do not reply to my questions. As I stated, folks here seem to understand what Ms. McCarthy is saying and appear to "speak the same language". That is why I am asking *here*.
My children are not vaccine injured. My children are autistic and have been autistic from birth. I am not, and never said I was "interested in recovery". If only those "interested in recovery" are welcome here, I will take my leave.
I don't like Ms. McCarthy speaking for me but as to what she says - again, that is why I am here; to understand her words and the meaning behind them.
Where did I post about "Jenny's intentions for her child" aside from quoting media reports (ie that she is homeschooling)?
I'm sorry, I thought I had asked very simple, basic questions. It appears I haven't.
Posted by: jypsy | October 05, 2008 at 10:09 PM
Jypsy,
Point taken. However, I'd like to point out to you that the people on this site that post on a regular basis are GOOD people and deserve to know if they are wasting their PRECIOUS time answering questions from you, when they could be RECOVERING their child. If you're not serious about recovery or helping you or your children than don't waste anyones time.
When I see someone posting on a hate site about Jenny's intentions for her child what do you expect people to think of you? Jenny doesn't always speak for me but God knows I take it with a grain of salt because at the least she has the balls to go on TV and speak for EVERY vaccine injured child...that includes yours. If you don't like what she has to say then turn the channel. WOW that would be soooo simple now wouldn't it?
Posted by: rileysmom | October 05, 2008 at 09:12 PM
I made 2 comments on that post at Autism Vox:
"Her germ-free retreat, (and the reason he can’t go to school because it’s “too dangerous”) is because germs cause seizures.
Ok, as someone with a seizure disorder this is certainly news to me."
That is what was said on Access Hollywood about why Evan is Homeschooled and can't, as Ms. McCarthy wished, go to school.
My comment, and I stand by it, was that as someone with a seizure disorder this is news to me.
How is this "disgusting"?
"Jenny speaks *FOR US* on CNN “You ask any mother in the autism community, we’ll take the flu, the measles over autism any friggin’ day of the week”
groan…"
Ms. McCarthy absolutely does not speak for me.
I am "any mother in the autism community" and I'm sure if I made such a statement, inserting my beliefs after "ask any mother in the autism community" you'de be unhappy and perhaps even groan.
How is this "disgusting "?
I came here asking for clarification on Ms. McCarthy's words & meanings and nothing more. I've been absolutely on the level with you. I have said *nothing* about Ms. Walters or Jenny's dispute with or apology to her. If you want to attack me, attack me for *my own words*, not anyone else's.
If the moderators want me to leave, all they need to do is ask or tell me to.
Posted by: jypsy | October 05, 2008 at 08:36 PM
Janet Norman-Bain aka: jypsy
http://www.autismvox.com/mccarthys-er-autism-pole/
You come to this site dripping with your sarcastic mouth and then plead that you're just your average "Janet" looking for answers. Then run over to the autsimvox site and spew disgusting things. Check out the dates on the site too. Or was that your son that made those comments about Jenny on that site? Talking about how Jenny excepted Babs apology? Yep, that washed up pus bag hag should apologize to Jenny and millions of other parents because of her self centered rudeness. She's a "has been" and she knows Jenny is in her prime so she took out her anger at not spending the "money" she's earned to help her own sister. She knows she should have done right by her sister and failed miserably so she took it out on Jenny and millions of other parents that are doing their best for their child. She owes more than Jenny an apology.
Now go back to your hate blog and stay there.
Posted by: rileysmom | October 05, 2008 at 06:08 PM
@jypsy - I recommend attending an Autism One conference to become properly educated by doctors and scientists. Although many parents here are well-learned, some as much or even more than the experts, the conference would satisfy your inquiries.
Treating many conditions through the approach taken with autism seems to be mostly successful. One lady-scientist spoke about going organically vegan and she's rid of a few of her chronic ailments (chronic fatigue syndrome was one).
I've been on the GFCF diet for one year and I've lost 60+ pounds. I'm working to clear my own body through Bioset and it's no surprise I have a problem metabolizing sugar. Had I remained on the path I was, I would have developed diabetes.
I encourage you to look into this further and hope you find a successful path to recovery for you and your family.
Posted by: Deb in IL | October 05, 2008 at 01:48 PM
Jypsy, thanks very much for clarifying. We have many ND readers from the Autism Hub who go to great lengths to discredit us on their own blogs. It's my job as Managing Editor to look out for my readers. We are happy to answer honest questions. Autism is treatable. Children are recovering. Welcome to Age of Autism as a reader.
Best,
Kim Stagliano
Posted by: Stagmom for Jypsy | October 05, 2008 at 08:25 AM
"Our commenter jypsy is a member of the neurodiversity blogging group called "Autism Hub." He included his link to his blog for us to click through."
Just to clarify.... I linked to my son's blog. I am a "she". I always put my son's blog URL in the "URL" line (I do post there as well but very rarely ever on autism) I'm easily Googleable, (add "autism" to jypsy and/or my name), was not trying to hide and do not at all feel "outed". My legal name is janet norman-bain, I live on Prince Edward Island on Canada's east coast. You would call me a member of Neurodiversity. I have an AS Dx and 2 of my 4 children have ASD Dxes (one Autistic, one Aspergers). My questions are honest ones and I thank you for addressing them. I am only trying to gain understanding of Ms. McCarthy's words and her meanings of them, words and meanings you here seem to share.
Mark, you seem to be saying that "neurotypical" is a description of behaviour, not a description of the brain. Is this perhaps the way Ms. McCarthy used the word? I'm sorry I can't answer your question Mark, I don't know and have no opinion on it.
"Recovered Vs Cure", you said "They no longer were heavy metal toxic, they did not have viruses and bacteria from vaccines swimming in their veins, they no longer had an auto-immune reaction in their bodies i.e., their own cells were not attacking their bodies eating away at the myelin in their brains". Is this meant to define "recovered"?
And this "You still need to provide support to sustain this once healthy immune system, you still need to keep a keen eye on the GI tract in order that it does not get compromised and thereby have these infections gain an upper hand on the child once again." is why it is not a "cure"?
I'm sorry you find my comments "frivolous". As I said they were honest questions asked in a place and to people who seem to understand Ms. McCarthy's words and use of them. I am not sorry for asking questions but I am sorry if I offended you. It is NEVER my intention to offend anyone. If I have misunderstood your answers I hope you will correct me.
Since you mentioned myelin, a subject I'm rather intimate with having had MS more than half my life, can you tell me how myelin is being repaired in "autistic" or "vaccine injured" children?
Thank you all again.
Posted by: jypsy | October 05, 2008 at 08:06 AM
"So...
he was autistic?
He is no longer autistic?
He is not cured of autism?
What is the difference (in reality, not analogy) between "recovered from autism" and "cured of autism"?"
You are exactly right. This mother went online and researched and found other families with children like her own. She found out what they were doing to save their children, what they were doing so that their children no longer were considered "autistic." They no longer were heavy metal toxic, they did not have viruses and bacteria from vaccines swimming in their veins, they no longer had an auto-immune reaction in their bodies i.e., their own cells were not attacking their bodies eating away at the myelin in their brains. What this mother did after listening to these families and getting in to see DAN! doctors was to strip away and remove the heavy metals (even though she did not actively chelate, you can remove heavy metals naturally by using anti-virals to detox viruses and heavy metals that are bound together - exactly as they come in those vaccine vials that parents want so desperately to be cleaned up), remove the viruses and bacteria that were suppressing the immune system and preventing it from shedding its toxic load. And treating the GI tract of its share of toxins by virtue of all that vile vaccine filth that had passed through it.
Please recognize that when mercury and other neurotoxins such as aluminum enter the blood stream they create an environment whereby latent infections in the DNA are triggered. Or these vaccines contain pathogens because they are unclean, nobody but nobody has looked at a vaccine such as the MMR to see what vile filth is floating in it along with the viruses it is supposed to contain. Standard medical tests are incapable of finding, identifying, and treating a child of these infections. If you can't see it, you can't treat it, and hence the child is left in a state beleaguered by these unknown pathogens. You still need to provide support to sustain this once healthy immune system, you still need to keep a keen eye on the GI tract in order that it does not get compromised and thereby have these infections gain an upper hand on the child once again. Do you understand this?
Have you begun to get an appreciation of what is meant by recovery vs cure. These are kids that have been irrevocably damaged by mainstream medicine, and are left to the parents to take care of because there is no way mainstream medicine can even begin to recognize the extent of the damage it has done. All of its practitioners need to hang their heads in shame for damaging 2-3 generations of children and in the face of all that, refusing to recognize the damage they have done. And then to come on here and to let loose frivolous statements of the kind you have done does not behove very well or sit well with parents. I think you owe us an apology, but don't bother if you truly are not in the least bit apologetic. Not everyone understands this and not everyone can be expected to understand this either.
Posted by: Recovered vs Cured | October 04, 2008 at 06:58 PM
Jypsy
I could by adding milk or soya to my childs diet change my child's behaviour from close to "Neurotypical" to "autistic" in a couple of weeks if I wanted to (I have done this accidentally so know it works)
his autistic behaviours are a symptom of his medical condition and not a condition in itself.
Can you explain why we are all having this shared experience with our kids recovering ?
are we all desperate.
brainwashed.
deluded.
seduced by snake oil sales men.
neurologically atypical?
Posted by: Mark | October 04, 2008 at 06:11 PM
Our commenter jypsy is a member of the neurodiversity blogging group called "Autism Hub." He included his link to his blog for us to click through. No one is outing him. He is well aware of what neurotypical means and is attempting to draw readers into a conversation. Feel free to answer him, just as he is free to comment here. But be aware of where he is coming from. And remain polite. Thank you.
Kim
Posted by: Managing Editor about jypsy | October 04, 2008 at 04:54 PM
""neurotypical" is a buzz word being used to define the the brain and actions of someone not on the Autism spectrum."
Neurotypical means "neurologically typical" - I understand he still has epilepsy; that would make for an atypical neurology yes?
So...
he was autistic?
He is no longer autistic?
He is not cured of autism?
What is the difference (in reality, not analogy) between "recovered from autism" and "cured of autism"?
Posted by: jypsy | October 04, 2008 at 04:28 PM
"Can anyone explain what she meant when she said her son is not "cured" of autism and is "neurotypical"?"
He presents as neurotypical but needs to remain on a special diet and supplements (unsure how many) to support his body. So recovered - but not cured.
There have been a few cures though. With classical homeopathy. See www.impossiblecure.com
Posted by: And then there was autism | October 04, 2008 at 03:53 PM
Hi Jypsy
as you probably already know Jenny believes her sons autism was cause by a severe reaction to vaccination.
she likens the damage caused in a car accident, where recovery is possible but evidence of the accident still remains.
for my own child I think of it as a reliance on diet and other biomed, without which my son would be unable to attend regular school, would self harm, tantrum and suffer severe gastric problems.
Mark
Posted by: mark | October 04, 2008 at 03:43 PM
@ jypsy (Can anyone explain what she meant when she said her son is not "cured" of autism and is "neurotypical"?)-
Cure is the wrong verbage to use, recover is a better choice because you can recover from an injury. Cure is focusing on a disease, condition, cancer, etc. Recover is healing an injury or trauma.
Neurotypical means there are no unusual neurological problems (speaks appropriately, no spinning, no toe-walking, etc).
Posted by: Deb in IL | October 04, 2008 at 03:33 PM
Ipsy
Evan is does not have the "Label" of Autism anymore because he is recovered. Jenny uses the example of being hit by a bus and having massive injuries. You will always feel the effects and know you are not back to what you could do before the accident. So to say someone is cured means that have no residual effects. Our children will always have some quirks and we will never know the lost potential.
"neurotypical" is a buzz word being used to define the the brain and actions of someone not on the Autism spectrum. Basically if you met Evan today you would not be able to say that boy was/is on the Spectrum of Autism.
In my mind, Jenny through the grace of God has been witness to a miracle. The Medical community is so baffled by his progress now they throw out that he was never on the spectrum of Autism. They are grasping for straws. Even if we have to fight for one soul at a time...we will do it. Thank you Jenny And Age of Autism.
Posted by: Tanners Dad | October 04, 2008 at 03:28 PM
Can anyone explain what she meant when she said her son is not "cured" of autism and is "neurotypical"?
Thank You.
Posted by: jypsy | October 04, 2008 at 01:05 PM
Jenny McCarthy... YOU ROCK! Your caring nature is an inspiration to us all.
Posted by: Jeanne | October 04, 2008 at 11:09 AM
This article might be interesting, regarding environmental contribution to Autism.
Posted by: Jeffrey Donaldson | October 03, 2008 at 10:50 PM
Susan G Komen is to Cancer what Autism Speaks is to us. It was fun to watch her at work... I just wish that 10K could have gone to help fund some biomedical treatments. I have become very cynical and selfish of late. I am not sure why? Maybe it is the last couple of bills that insurance did not cover...
Posted by: Tanner's Dad | October 03, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Ha Ha Ha!!! I wonder if they used warm water? I did that years ago to raise money for a homeless shelter in our area and trust me THE WATER WAS FREEZING!!!
I'm so glad that Jenny did this. It shows that she does care about everyone, not just autsim. It shows she has a huge heart. I can probably bet she gave from her own pocket for the breast cancer awareness because that's the kind of person I believe her to be.
Posted by: rileysmom | October 03, 2008 at 09:17 PM