Age of Autism Now On Alltop


Challenger_2By Tim Kasemodel

Another National Tragedy:  Self Protection at the CDC
A Unique Viewpoint

On February 22, 2006, a bi-partisan letter was sent by Congressional leaders in the House and Senate to David Schwartz, Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.  The letter from Senator Joseph Lieberman and others informed Mr. Schwartz of pending legislation that would order a new look at the connection between mercury containing vaccines and autism.

In 2004, the Institute of Medicine released a report rejecting a connection between the ethyl mercury in thimerosal containing vaccines and autism.  The letter to the NIEHS mentioned that for many others, the issue remains unresolved.  The NIEHS has since responded with a report stating it disagrees with the IOM report.  So why do so many legislators, parents, physicians and researchers disagree?  Consider this comparison between two large government agencies: the Centers for Disease Control and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

The CDC and NASA have much in common.  Both are large multi layered bureaucratic agencies.  They are strong symbols of national pride, and both are well funded by the U.S. taxpayer.  The directors of each program are appointed, not elected.  They also once shared the enviable position of the oversight of their own safety programs.  Both have since been stripped of this self oversight.

For a more detailed similarity, let us start with NASA.  In the wee hours of darkness the morning of January 28, 1986, NASA officials lobbied hard for the launch of the Space Shuttle Challenger.  There had already been several delays of the launch and NASA was concerned public confidence and support for the program was waning.  Another delay in the launch would damage public opinion.  Other factors included economic considerations, political pressures, and scheduling backlogs.  President Reagan also wanted to be able to mention the successful launch of the shuttle in his State of the Union Address that evening.  For several hours, engineers at the firm that had designed the o-rings for the solid rocket boosters refused to sign off on the OK to launch, because tests of the boosters had never been performed below 40°F. They believed strongly that the o-rings would crack and fail at the 27°F temperature forecast for lift off, however, they could not prove that it was unsafe to launch at lower temperatures.

Rather than being concerned about the proof of safety, NASA officials pressed the upper management of the engineering firm.  The data presented to them showed no correlation between temperature and the blow-by gases which had eroded the O-rings in previous missions. According to testimony, the firm’s senior executive finally turned to the Engineering Vice President and said, "Take off your engineering hat and put on your management hat."   The upper management of the engineering firm by-passed the engineers and decided to approve the boosters for launch despite the fact that the predicted launch temperature was outside of their operational specifications.

We all know that NASA’s disregard for safety and the engineers’ decision to change hats ended in explosive disaster that day.  When causes for this tragedy were looked at, NASA initially tried to hide the fact that the o-rings were a concern.  After a lengthy investigation NASA finally came clean, putting the protection of their astronauts first, and protection of their pride last.  They were able to take care of the problem and resume further shuttle missions.

The CDC has a very similar story to tell.  In 1999, the FDA finally added up the mercury burden from the ethyl mercury based preservative thimerosal in the childhood vaccine schedule.  They were concerned enough to ask, along with the American Academy of Pediatrics, that the CDC recommend the removal of thimerosal from vaccines as soon as possible.  Parents were shocked to find that there was mercury in children’s vaccines, with totals averaging 250 micrograms by age two.  Soon parents, physicians and researchers began to raise the reasonable concern that the mercury in vaccines may have been responsible for the meteoric rise in the rate of autism and other neurological disorders.  The CDC has continued to deny any possible link and declared that there is no proof.  The fact is, just as with the o-rings on the space shuttle, proper safety testing was never done on the ethyl mercury in thimerosal.  There have been over a thousand studies and reports in the last seventy years indicating the problems with thimerosal, though none were done to determine a safe dose level if injected.

Just as with NASA, the CDC was careful not to disclose all that they knew.  In June of 2000,  CDC researcher Thomas Verstraeten reported on a Vaccine Safety Datalink analysis of thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes.  He initially showed statistically significant relationships between the mercury exposures and outcomes for autism, along with the entire category of neurodevelopmental delays and a number of other disorders.

With a high rate of relative risk of autism staring him in the face, Dr Verstraeten altered data criteria many times but found “it just won’t go away”.  Dr. Walter Orenstein, the acting director of the CDC’s National Immunization program, had gone so far as to declare discussions on this early data to be confidential and embargoed.  Keeping public faith in the national vaccine program was paramount.  There was great concern that vaccination rates would drop if people believed the mercury in vaccines could cause autism and other disorders.  The study data was finally manipulated until it showed no plausible link to autism.

In 2004, the CDC asked the Institute of Medicine to review the available studies to determine if a link between Thimerosal and neurological disorders was plausible.  Like NASA, the IOM listened to many researchers explain how ethyl mercury could be causing an epidemic of autism and other disorders among children.  The review committee critiqued and discounted nearly all of those biological studies, saying none of them proved thimerosal caused autism or other developmental disorders.  The committee based the bulk of its conclusions on five epidemiological studies conducted by the CDC and European counterparts.  Epidemiological studies cannot be used to prove or disprove a link, only to suggest plausibility.  Regardless, the IOM made with a statement that vaccines were not linked to the rise in autism, and stated that research into the link should be discontinued.

As a result of this action, the CDC has convinced the public to ignore its own explosive disaster.  By the time thimerosal use was reduced, (never eliminated) the national rate of autism skyrocketed from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 150.  The rate of children using special education services with the diagnosis of autism in Minnesota in 2008 is now around 1 in 80.  NASA’s mistake took a millisecond; the CDC’s mistake lasted over a decade.  NASA lost 7 brave astronauts.  The CDC has lost half a million children.

In these examples the two agencies shared common traits.  Concern over the image of their programs seems to have priority over common sense.  Testing that considered the actual conditions of use were not done, so assumptions were made about the safety of what turned out to be critical components of their programs.  Authority figures had ignored the pleas of researchers or engineers reporting on the consequences of those assumptions.  In the end, it appears that decisions made by a few people had affected the entire nation in ways they could not have imagined.

Since the 2004 IOM report, several important publicly and privately funded studies have been published which show a strong link between ethyl mercury exposure and neurological disorders like autism.  These studies continue to be ignored by those who defend the use of mercury in vaccines.  Independent researchers now report and educational statistics show a decline in new cases of autism and speech disorders in direct correlation with the removal of thimerosal.

Most recently, CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding was forced to admit that the five epidemiology studies used in the IOM report were limited for use in predicting the outcomes intended, essentially worthless.  Many parents, doctors and researchers have been shouting their concerns about the IOM report for years.  After all this time it is troubling to see Dr. Gerberding write "CDC acknowledges this concern and recognizes this limitation", a statement which contradicts a decade of denial.  To save lives, NASA officials swallowed their pride and made swift changes.  To save face, Dr. Gerberding and others hid behind a group of now worthless studies that encouraged the status quo and ingnored obvious harm to countless children.

Ironically, the CDC still recommends flu vaccine, ninety percent of which contains mercury, be given annually to children 5 and under.  It makes no preference for mercury free vaccines for pregnant women, adolescents or adults.  It is time for CDC officials to take off their management hats, put on their common sense and science hats, and take a long, hard look at the newest information.  It is time to come clean, put the protection of the public first, and put the protection of their pride last.

The CDC should be recommending mercury free vaccines for everyone, at every age.  It is possible in almost every situation, and it is common sense.

Tim Kasemodel is husband of Laura, a stay at home dad of two boys affected by mercury from vaccines, and a member of the Minnesota Natural Health Legal Reform Project, a group dedicated to the pursuit of health freedom for all.


Robin Nemeth

Imagine how ridiculously absurd it would have been if, when Challenger exploded and fell out of the sky, the government had tried to pretend that nothing bad had happened. If the media, after having shown the live video of the disaster, then reported nothing at all other than “nothing bad happened here, folks, move along now.” (Were the same thing to happen now, I think they might try to stop it from airing if they thought they could get away with it.)

This is, in essence, what’s happened with the vaccine damage. Despite truckloads of evidence that’s as blatantly clear as the nose on your face, they deny.

It would be sort of funny, if it weren’t so terrifying in what it says about our system of government and our news media.


How about the Turkish Airlines Flight 981 disaster (1974), in which all 341 people on board were killed.

2 years prior to flight 981, the same airplane defect (cargo door latch) caused a "near miss" in Windsor, Ontario. The door blew out, but the pilots managed to get the plane back on the ground with no casualties.

For 2 years the defect was overlooked because of a "gentleman's agreement" between McDonnell Douglass and the FAA - they didn't want to officially ground any other DC10's (the FAA had the authority to order this) as it would be costly and would impact consumer confidence in the airline (Paul Eddy details this in the book Destination Disaster).

Thousands of people flew in these ticking time bombs for 2 more years while McDonnell Douglas management sat on the problem, with the FAA essentially sitting on their thumbs.

How could this happen - McDonnell Douglas engineers weren't idiots, the contractor that built the door wasn't incompetent, and the FAA surely had many people of integrity on staff. Thousands of people were involved in building, maintaining, flying, inspecting these planes. So how could something like this happen?

How could children be harmed by vaccines? Pharma scientists aren't idiots, the "contractors" who manufacture their wares aren't incompetent, and the CDC surely has many people of integrity on staff. Thousands of people are involved. So how could this happen?

The most prolific argument against the "anti-vaccine conspiracy theories" is that it's just too surreal, that this kind of complacency and complicit behavior, on such a large scale, just can't be possible. We can't fathom how it could happen, so we should just accept that it can't.

In spite of Challenger, and Flight 981, and and a host of other (Pharma) incidents over the years, where people die, we don't seem to question how some business interests and the bureaucracies that they hide behind operate, or what they really think about writing off a few of us for the sake of $$$ (or to avoid accountability after the fact), or how a simple mistake in an environment where accountability is optional can quickly grow into an ugly out of control monster, one that seems to defy any logical explanation for it's own existence.

Thanks Tim for a great post.



Spot-on analogy, Tim, and great writing as usual. I didn't know that NASA scientists were ordered to take off their engineering hats -- forced to abandon their very raison d'etre. That's absolute insanity.

But many of us have attended meetings where the loudest person is often the wrong-est person, but somehow manages to bully others into compliance.

The doomed shuttle astronauts were cheated out of making a truly informed choice. They knew most of the risks, but they didn't realize their lives meant less to the "deciders" than preserving the bureaucracy.

Bob Moffitt

Yes, the analogies are indeed striking.

However, there may be a more troubling reason to explain why the CDC continues to resist far and beyond where NASA "came clean".

NASA's leadership made a decision that cost the lives of seven courageous astronaughts. CDC leadership, on the other hand, has made decisions that may have affected the quality of life for thousands of innocent children, their families and communities.

I sure as heck would not want to put my head on my pillow every night with that heavy burden on my mind.


Many years ago I had read Richard Feynman's books; one of them goes into a lot of detail about his role as independent investigator in the space shuttle tragedy. I think NASA intended this retired eccentric physicist to be purely a functionary to read their summary at a press conference one day but he shocked them with his brillant and common sense approach. He bypassed the people he was supposed to talk to and frequently broke security to talk to the workers on the factory floors of the sites he visited. He found many horribly dumb safety issues (he moved the goalposts) before reaching the conculsion it was the o-rings, which he artfully demonstrated at a press-conference by showing the size difference of an o-ring soaked in ice water.

His books are mainly humorous anecdotes about his life experiences (also worked on the Manhattan Project). But I always thought there was something profound about his belief that incredibly stupid things can be decided by committees of people. His views and the NASA experience are very fitting in the vaccine debate.

This was a great piece of historical perspective, thanks, Tim.

This debate needs a Richard Feynman. Of course, we actually have lots of them but if the government assigned someone and then they acted with intelligence and courage and common sense like Richard Feynman did that would be nice.


Trudy, I agree with you about the aluminum. It is used as an adjuvent to "rev up" the immune response. What about kids who have an over-aggressive immune response? What does the aluminum in all these vaccines do? Send the immune system into hyper-drive?

Doesn't seem as though the aluminum is a better trade off...


I am relatively new to this scene, have been rather confused, because some articles say that mercury has been removed from all vaccines. Others say that mercury has been removed from all but the flu vaccine. And still other articles say that mercury is still present in Hep B. I knew for a fact it's in the flu vaccine, but I wasn't sure about Hep B, which is given in the first 24 hours of birth for still-entirely unexplained reasons (Hep B is a sexually transmitted disease that poses virtually no risk to newborn babies, or indeed young children of any age, unless the mom is positive for Hep B, which can be easily checked). Sure enough, according to the Rx website's list of ingredients, Hep B still contains mercury, in the whopping amount of 50 mcg/ml. That is far and above would is considered a safe daily dose of mercury for anyone -- let alone for a fragile newborn. When will the lies stop? No wonder the incidence of autism, ADD, ADHD, tics, and learning disabilities is not declining!

Harry Hofherr

Excellent job, Tim.

I love the analogy. It's a great piece.


Robin Nemeth

This is very good.

The similarities are striking. But I’d like to point out one very important difference between the CDC and NASA.

You can turn on the nightly news to just about any channel, cable or broadcast, and not hear and see countless commercials for the makers of O-rings. You don’t see commercial after commercial for the makers of any of the shuttle parts, or any companies directly involved with NASA, in the same way that you do ads for pharmaceutical products. Ok, on the Sunday programs I often see ads for GE or for the aerospace companies or for other large corporations, which I suppose might be involved with NASA in some way. But it’s not like with the pharmaceutical companies, which seem to own the broadcast news media lock stock and barrel.

Riley's mom

Thanks Tim,
This is a wonderful side by side comparision. I'm still concerned can autism rates be declining when there is still an overload of aluminum in vaccines? I'm not being rude, I really want to know. I've been doing research on line about aluminum and it's just as dangerous. Babies get sometimes 4x's more than what they should have in one sitting. While everyone is busy arguing about mercury in vaccines...what about the aluminum?
Good article, keep 'em coming!!! You know how much I love to read your work!!!



The whole time I was reading your article the phrase "Atlanta we have a problem" was repeating in my head.

Great article.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)