ChangesBy Kent Heckenlively, Esq.

I am grateful that Theresa Cedillo e-mailed me a few days ago to inform me of the latest Autism Update for the Autism Omnibus Proceeding.

As we get ready for the next round of hearings, scheduled to begin on May 12, 2008 and proceed until May 30 I thought I’d recap what has happened up to this point and what is anticipated in the next few weeks.

Three different theories of causation are being presented by the Petitioners Steering Committee in regards to vaccines and autism.  The first theory is that the MMR vaccine in combination with thimerosal can cause autism.  The second is that thimerosal alone can cause autism.  The third theory is that the MMR vaccine alone can cause autism.

Each theory will be presented in the framework of three test cases, designed to establish general guidelines in the event it’s found that vaccines contribute to autism.  This makes for a total of nine test cases.

The first three test cases, Cedillo, Hazlehurst, and Snyder were presented from June to November of 2008.  No verdict has yet been rendered in any of these cases.

The Special Masters appear to be ready to issue rulings in these three cases, but are awaiting additional documents from England which were developed in the course of a planned proceeding to address the issue of whether the MMR vaccine causes autism.  That case never proceeded to a hearing.  It appears the Petitioners Steering Committee is having difficulty getting the experts who supported the petitioner’s theory to release their reports.

The second group of three cases (which was originally supposed to include Hannah Poling) was designated and they included, Mead, Krakow, and King. 

However, in light of the government’s concession that vaccines in combination with an underlying mitochondrial disorder caused Hannah’s autism, the Krakow case has been withdrawn as this child demonstrated many of the same abnormal metabolic markers.  This was covered in David Kirby's excellent article The Next Vaccine-Autism Newsmaker: Not Isolated, Not Unusual which appeared in the Huffington Post on April 27, 2008.  (This may mean a much quicker verdict for the Krakow family and we wish them the best.) 

As a result, the May hearings will include only Mead and King, with a third case to be designated later and presented.

The May hearing in Washington D.C. will be completely open to the public and held in the largest courtroom the parties could secure, Courtroom 402 of the National Courts Building.  The courtroom holds approximately 100 people and is located at 717 Madison Place, N.W., Washington D.C. 20005.

The third group of test cases have not been individually designated, but is currently scheduled to begin testimony on September 15, 2008.

Hannah Poling was the first victory, and it appears the Krakows may win round two.  If we get victories in Cedillo, Hazlehurst, and Snyder as well this rumble quickly becomes a knock-out.

Kent Heckenlively is Legal Editor for Age of Autism.



Hopefully, as this issue evolves, HHV-6 will also be explored as a trigger or major cofactor in autism. A number of possibilities come to mind.
1. Is HHV-6 the cause or main trigger in some or many cases of autism?
2. Do vaccines cause a major reactivation of HHV-6 in autism?
3. Does HHV-6 cause the mitochondrial dysfunction associated with some cases of autism?
4. Will medications directed at HHV-6 improve the lives of the autistic?

You have built an important, powerful movement and it would be great to see it evolve as new information about autism emerges. It seems to be your opponents who are inflexible and like to keep their heads in the sand.

Kent Heckenlively


I got this from the website for the Autism Omnibus Proceeding. I understand they're trying to resolve the problem and a conference was scheduled for this past Firday, May 2 to assess progress. However, at the time I wrote this article there was still no information posted about this conference.

All the best,
Kent Heckenlively

David Taylor

Hi, Kent:

Thank you for this entry and for your continued work. Our son Davey's case is part of the Autism Omnibus Proceeding, so we eat up any and all news about what is going on. Was wondering if you any more information you can share on this statement:

"It appears the Petitioners Steering Committee is having difficulty getting the experts who supported the petitioner’s theory to release their reports."

What is the source of the difficulty? Is a resolution being attempted and is there an expectation as to when the obstruction can be overcome and the reports released?

Thank you.


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)