Vaccine Safety Feed

1,250 Deaths in Trials Considered Acceptable by Indian Drugs Controller General

image from safemedicinesindia.inFrom webindia123:

Drugs Controller to come out with vaccine specific regulatory policy

Hyderabad | Saturday, 2018 10:15:04 PM IST
 

The Drugs Controller General of India plans to come out with vaccine specific regulatory policy and a manual for regulatory requirements for commercialization of new drug and on how to conduct clinical trials in India, it was announced on Saturday.

 S. Eswara Reddy, Drugs Controller General of India, Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation said that since pneumococcal is one of the major priority vaccines, they would first come out a policy to facilitate introducing indigenously-produced vaccine.

Speaking at a symposium on 'research and development of vaccines: issues, challenges and opportunities' organized by PC2 Scientific Services, a strategic and technical consulting company in association with Federation of Asian Biotech Associations (FABA) and CR RAO AIMSCS at University of Hyderabad, he listed out the steps being taken by his organisation to promote innovation through transparent system and regulatory changes.

Reddy said they were also in process of making new regulations for conducting clinical trials and new drugs. "We will fix time lines. 30 days will be maximum timeline for giving response to their applications. If response is not received within 30 days, the application will be deemed approved," he said.

He also proposed to conduct symposiums across India and invite research institutions to know their regulatory challenges. The regulator will reach out to research and innovation centres by disseminating information about the regulatory requirements for commercialization of their products.

Reddy underlined the need to communicate to media the facts about the deaths due to clinical trials. He told the gathering that media gives a wrong projection about the number of deaths.

He said media reports that during last 7-8 years, 25,000 patients died during clinical trials in India while the fact is that only 5 percent of these deaths are actually due to clinical trials. "For example, during clinical trials related to cancer, patients who are already in terminal stage die. The death of such patients is not due to clinical trials," he said...(continue reading)


DoJ Summons Aquino Over Dengvaxia Mess

DengvaxiaNote: While we're glad to see repercussions, the fact that children were injured and died means there is no joy in this post. Just an obligation to share with readers.

From the Manila Times:

The Department of Justice (DoJ) has summoned former President Benigno Aquino 3rd and two former Cabinet secretaries to respond to the criminal charges filed against them in connection with the series of deaths and serious illnesses of children inoculated with the controversial anti-dengue Dengvaxia vaccine.

A panel of investigating prosecutors issued a subpoena compelling Aquino and his former aides to appear today, May 15.

The DoJ will conduct its preliminary investigation on the complaint filed by two anti-crime advocacy groups and the families assisted by the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO).

Senior Assistant State Prosecutor Rossane Balauag heads the DoJ panel. The members are Senior Assistant State Prosecutor Hazel Decena Valdez and Assistant State Prosecutors Consuelo Corazon Pazziuagan and Gino Paolo Santiago.

The complaint was filed by Philippine Anti-Corruption Commission Commissioner and Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption (VACC) lawyer Manuelito Luna, and Eligio Mallari of the Vanguard of the Philippine Constitution Inc. Read more here.


Does this Individualism-hierarchy Worldview Make My Yeti Look Fat?

Kim  Dryer bonnetNote: The headline isn't as kooky as this report below. Thanks Nancy H for sending it us to share.   This study says that the push to "educate" us into believing vaccines are as magical as fairy dust, as safe as a mother's hug and as necessary as air via "intervention programs" is a failure.  Well, lah de dah. Imagine that. Bullying fails. We believe what we see with our own two eyes. The study says that we tend to believe "conspiracy theories."  You can't color me and most of my colleagues with this broad "conspiracy nut" brush.    The more injured kids, teens and adults, the more the bubble is bursting on the Vaccines Are God industry.   Do I like this? Not really. It would be very nice if vaccines could safely protect from disease with ZERO harm. So would finding the Giant Pink Sea Snail with Dr. Dolittle.  For the record:

I believe the earth is a sphere. I believe we landed on the moon. I believe that 26 beautiful children and adults were slaughtered 15 miles up the street from me in Sandy Hook, CT. I believe that Mike Nesmith's mother created White Out. OK?  KR

###

The 'Attitude Roots' Underlying Antivaccination Beliefs

"Many intervention programs work from a deficit model of science communication, presuming that vaccination skeptics lack the ability to access or understand evidence," as explained in a new study published in Health Psychology.3 "However, interventions focusing on evidence and the debunking of vaccine-related myths have proven to be either nonproductive or counterproductive."

Emerging evidence suggests that targeting the underlying bases, the "attitude roots," of these beliefs may prove more effective than information-based strategies.4,5 To that end, the current authors aimed to determine links between antivaccination attitudes and 4 specific attitude roots:

  • Willingness to endorse conspiratorial beliefs
  • Disgust sensitivity toward blood and needles
  • Reactance (in response to perceived threats to one's autonomy or freedom)
  • Individualism-hierarchy worldviews (in contrast to communitarianism/egalitarianism)

The researchers used a data collection company to survey 5323 people (49.9% women) in 24 countries, using various scales to assess these measures.

Analyses revealed that the strongest antivaccination attitudes were found among participants with higher levels of conspiratorial beliefs (correlation coefficient [r], 0.334; P <.001), reactance (r, 0.235; P <.001), and disgust sensitivity (r, 0.201; P <.001). Although individualistic/hierarchical worldview was also associated with stronger antivaccination beliefs, the effect size was small (r, 0.186, P <.001). In addition, education and sex were not significantly linked to vaccination attitudes, whereas younger participants and more conservative participants had stronger antivaccination attitudes.

From a motivated reasoning perspective, the "goal of science communication is to align with people's underlying fears, ideologies and identities, thus reducing people's motivation to reject the science," the authors wrote. "If the motivation to reject the science is reduced, then people should become more willing to embrace the evidence on its merits."

Continue reading "Does this Individualism-hierarchy Worldview Make My Yeti Look Fat?" »


Large Spanish study finds higher rate of pneumonia in vaccinated group (Pfizer's Prevnar 13)

image from www.pharmandorraonline.comThis  study is based on data from middle aged and elderly people echoes the finding of Mawson et al in their pilot study of health outcomes in children (vaccinated vs. unvaccinated) which found "The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDD".

Evaluating clinical effectiveness of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination against pneumonia among middle-aged and older adults in Catalonia: results from the EPIVAC cohort study

 
  • Angel Vila-Corcoles
  • Olga Ochoa-Gondar
  • Cinta de Diego,
  • Eva Satue,
  • María Aragón,
  • Angel Vila-Rovira,
  • Frederic Gomez-Bertomeu,
  • Ramon Magarolas,
  • Enric Figuerola-Massana,
  • Xavier Raga,
  • Mar O. Perez and
  • Frederic Ballester
BMC Infectious Diseases201818:196

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3096-7

Received: 18 December 2017

Accepted: 16 April 2018

Published: 27 April 2018

Abstract

Background

Benefits using the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in adults are controversial. This study investigated clinical effectiveness of PCV13 vaccination in preventing hospitalisation from pneumonia among middle-aged and older adults.

Methods

Population-based cohort study involving 2,025,730 individuals ≥50 years in Catalonia, Spain, who were prospectively followed from 01/01/2015 to 31/12/2015. Primary outcomes were hospitalisation for pneumococcal or all-cause pneumonia and death from any cause. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between PCV13 vaccination and the risk of each outcome, adjusting for age, sex and major comorbidities/underlying risk conditions.

Results

Cohort members were observed for a total of 1,990,701 person-years, of which 6912 person-years were PCV13 vaccinated. Overall, crude incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) were 82.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.7–88.1) for pneumococcal pneumonia, 637.9 (95% CI: 599.0–678.7) for all-cause pneumonia and 2367.2 (95% CI: 2222.8–2518.7) for all-cause death. After multivariable adjustments we found that the PCV13 vaccination did not alter significantly the risk of pneumococcal pneumonia (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [mHR]: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.75–1.83; p = 0.493) and all-cause death (mHR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.97–1.18; p = 0.190), although it remained significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause pneumonia (mHR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.48–1.94; p < 0.001). In stratified analyses focused on middle-aged or elderly persons and immunocompromised or immunocompetent subjects, PCV13 vaccination did not appear effective either.

Conclusion

Our data does not support clinical benefits of PCV13 vaccination against pneumonia among adults in Catalonia. It must be closely monitored in future studies involving more vaccinated person-time at-observation.

THE FULL STUDY CAN BE READ HERE

 


15 Deliberately Wasted Years - Revisiting "Autism in the United States: a Perspective"

image from vaccinechoicecanada.comBy F Edward Yazbak

Following the release by the Centers for Disease Control figures for autism in schools Age of Autism returns with the permission of Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons to an article Ed Yazbak  wrote in 2003. Last week the CDC published a rate of 1 in 59, which has suspiciously only been updated to 2014 and which contrasts with figure of 1 in 36 for 2016 published in a different survey last December, while a figure of 1 in 45 had already published for 2014. Back in 2003 Yazbak reporting against the steeply rising trend of that time excoriated the CDC for specious arguments, negligence and unaccountability. Nothing has changed except today the scale of the problem has become many times worse. Otherwise, the excuses and obfuscations remain the same. We might ask if there were problems of measuring the data then, why are they if anything even more inept and vague now?

 

Autism in the United States: a Perspective

F. Edward Yazbak,M.D., F.A.A.P.

ABSTRACT 

Once rare, autism has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. The increase cannot be attributed to changes in diagnostic criteria, which have actually become more restrictive. Already a heavy burden on educational facilities, the increasing number of patients afflicted with this serious disability will have an enormous effect on the economy as the affected children reach adulthood. Studies of all possible causes of the epidemic are urgently needed. To date, studies of a potential relationship to childhood vaccines have been limited and flawed. 
 
The important historical observation about autism is that it was unknown in ancient cultures, or even in medieval times, and that it just “appeared” some 60 years ago. 
 
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
 
Leo Kanner, while at Johns Hopkins, was first to describe autism in 1943. His article described 11 children who had an apparently rare syndrome of “extreme autistic aloneness.” Because these children’s symptoms started early, Kanner’s Syndrome was also known as “infantile autism.” In 1944, HansAsperger also described a group of children with similar symptoms who were “highly recognizable.” In the same year, Bruno Bettelheim theorized that children developed autism because their “refrigerator mothers” raised them in a non-stimulating environment, with resulting damage to their social, language and general development. Bettelheim’s credentials were questionable, and his theory has been discredited. 
 
Bernard Rimland, Ph.D., founder of the Autism Society of America and founding president of the Autism Research Institute (ARI), has thoroughly analyzed the ARI database of more than 30,000 entries and reported two clear trends: 
 
First, the incidence of autism has increased remarkably, becoming “an explosion” in recent years and second, a distinct shift in the time of onset of autistic symptoms has become evident. “Late onset autism (starting in the second year) was almost unheard of in the 1950s, ’60s, and ’70s; today such cases outnumber early onset cases five to one.” 
 
Parents in increasing numbers are reporting similar stories. A child, most often a boy who is developmentally, socially, and verbally on par for his age, suddenly stops acquiring new words Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact and skills in the second year of life and then regresses, losing speech, cognitive abilities, and social dexterity. Children in this group are said to have regressive autism. Further, overwhelmed parents may drift apart, and siblings’ stress may be manifested as behavior problems. 
 
Suggesting that a sudden and exponential increase in autistic disorders is not real, and results only from better diagnosis, amounts to denial. Similarly, though some affected children have Fragile-X Syndrome or a family history of autism, it does not seem reasonable to insist that the present autism outbreak is solely caused by hereditary factors. Genetic disorders have never presented as epidemics, and investing the scant available resources solely in genetic research diverts them from the scientific exploration of more plausible environmental etiological factors.
 

 

 

 


Medwatcher Japan "Joint Statement 2018 for the Victims of HPV Vaccines"

 
image from www.mers.jpJoint Statement 2018 for the Victims of HPV Vaccines 

On behalf of the victims of HPV vaccine damage in the UK, Spain, Ireland, Colombia and Japan, an international symposium; "The Current Status of Worldwide Injuries from the HPV Vaccine" was held in Tokyo on the 24th March, 2018. 

The meeting was convened to clarify the actual conditions of HPV vaccine damage, explore ways to relieve symptoms and promote recovery and discuss measures to support the daily activity of victims. 

When first noted, the symptomatology of HPV vaccine damage was variously described as Complex Regional Pain syndrome (CRPS), Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), but clinical symptoms and the course of damage were soon found to be more complex. One of the main clinical features of the Adverse Events (AE’s), reported after HPV vaccination, is the diversity of symptoms and symptom-development in a multi-layered manner, over an extended period of time. AE’s include complex, multi-system symptoms such as; 

-Systemic pain, including headache, myalgia and arthralgia

-Motor dysfunction, such as paralysis, muscular weakness, involuntary movement and seizures 

-Numbness and sensory disturbance 

-Autonomic symptoms, including dizziness, hypotension, tachycardia and diarrhea 

-Respiratory dysfunction 

-Endocrine disorders, such as menstrual disorders and hypermenorrhea 

-Hypersensitivity to light and sound 

-Psychological symptoms, such as anxiety, hallucinations and suicidal tendencies 

-Sleep disorders, including hypersomnia and narcolepsy 

In many cases, these symptoms impair learning and result in extreme fatigue and decreased motivation, having a negative impact on daily life and routines. 

Continue reading "Medwatcher Japan "Joint Statement 2018 for the Victims of HPV Vaccines" " »


The World Stealth Organization, the Gates Foundation and the Tetanus Vaccine Spiked with a Birth Control Drug in Kenya

image from www.rescuepost.com'The days when health officials could issue advice, based on the very best medical and scientific data, and expect populations to comply, may be fading.' Margaret Chan, WHO Director-General, Report to the 126th Executive Board, 2010.

Age of Autism publishes the abstract of the recent paper by Oller et al reviewing the evidence that the WHO spiked tetanus vaccines in Kenya with a birth control drug it developed, HCG. Predictably the controversy was laid at the door of  "anti-vaxxers"  but it is apparent that this has nothing to do with original context: the Catholic church is not "anti-vaccine" and it seems highly implausible that the testing laboratory signed its own death warrant by detecting something which was not there. The problem would seem to lie with the untrustworthy behavior of  the World Health Organization, its not so hidden agendas, the Gates Foundation and the Kenyan government.

HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World

John W. Oller, Christopher A Shaw, Lucija Tomljenovic, Stephen K. Karanja, Wahome Ngare, Felicia M. Clement, Jamie Ryan Pillette

ABSTRACT

In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”. Published research shows that by 1976 WHO researchers had conjugated tetanus toxoid (TT) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) producing a “birth-control” vaccine. Conjugating TT with hCG causes pregnancy hormones to be attacked by the immune system. Expected results are abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated. Repeated inoculations prolong infertility. Currently WHO researchers are working on more potent anti-fertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO publications show a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries”. By November 1993 Catholic publications appeared saying an abortifacient vaccine was being used as a tetanus prophylactic. In November 2014, the Catholic Church asserted that such a program was underway in Kenya. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories tested samples from vials of the WHO tetanus vaccine being used in March 2014 and found hCG where none should be present. In October 2014, 6 additional vials were obtained by Catholic doctors and were tested in 6 accredited laboratories. Again, hCG was found in half the samples. Subsequently, Nairobi’s AgriQ Quest laboratory, in two sets of analyses, again found hCG in the same vaccine vials that tested positive earlier but found no hCG in 52 samples alleged by the WHO to be vials of the vaccine used in the Kenya campaign 40 with the same identifying batch numbers as the vials that tested positive for hCG. Given that hCG was found in at least half the WHO vaccine samples known by the doctors involved in administering the vaccines to have been used in Kenya, our opinion is that the Kenya “anti-tetanus” campaign was reasonably called into question by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association as a front for population growth reduction. 
 
 
A FURTHER DISCUSSION BY THE AUTHORS OF ATTACKS ON THIS PUBLICATION CAN BE FOUND HERE

New Paper Challenges HHS on their Vaccine Aluminum Dosing Safety Numbers

AluminumBy Ginger Taylor

Remember a lifetime ago when we figured out that not only did the US Childhood vaccine schedule dramatically exceeded the Federal government's recommended daily limit for mercury, but that the limit that they had set was likely many times what it should have been in the first place? For those of you who are new to the issue, a review of the matter from my chapter in Vaccine Epidemic:

"In July of 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) issued a joint statement through the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on mercury and vaccines. They stated that in the U.S. vaccine program at the time, “some children could be exposed to a cumulative level of mercury over the first six months of life that exceeds one of the federal guidelines.”

The truth was that the amount of mercury in the childhood vaccine schedule grossly exceeded the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) maximum daily adult exposure for methylmercury, the form of mercury most closely related to thimerosal for which the government had established a guideline. The EPA sets the daily limit at 0.1 microgram per kilogram of weight. Based on that guideline, a baby weighing approximately five kilograms (eleven pounds) at two months of age should not receive more than 0.5 micrograms of mercury on the day of a doctor’s visit. At the time the AAP and USPHS joint statement was issued, infants at their two-month visit routinely received 62.5 micrograms of mercury, or 125 times the EPA’s limit. Studies have suggested that, for thimerosal (ethylmercury), “the accepted reference dose should be lowered to between 0.025 and 0.06 micrograms per kilogram per day,” meaning that the exposure at the two-month visit could be as high as 500—rather than 125—times the safe level."

In fact in 1995, Gilbert and Grant-Webster had recommended that the limit be at least cut in half.

Neurobehavioral Effects of Developmental Methylmercury Exposure

Environmental Health Perspectives 103 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):135-42 · October 1995 with 60 Reads

Steven G Gilbert

34.22University of Washington Seattle

Kimberly S. Grant-Webster

Abstract

Methylmercury (MeHg) is a global environmental problem and is listed by the International Program of Chemical Safety as one of the six most dangerous chemicals in the world's environment. Human exposure to MeHg primarily occurs through the consumption of contaminated food such as fish, although catastrophic exposures due to industrial pollution have occurred. The fetus is particularly sensitive to MeHg exposure and adverse effects on infant development have been associated with levels of exposure that result in few, if any, signs of maternal clinical illness or toxicity. High levels of prenatal exposure in humans result in neurobehavioral effects such as cerebral palsy and severe mental retardation. Prenatal exposure to MeHg in communities with chronic low-level exposure is related to decreased birthweight and early sensorimotor dysfunction such as delayed onset of walking. Neurobehavioral alterations have also been documented in studies with nonhuman primates and rodents. Available information on the developmental neurotoxic effects of MeHg, particularly the neurobehavioral effects, indicates that the fetus and infant are more sensitive to adverse effects of MeHg. It is therefore recommended that pregnant women and women of childbearing age be strongly advised to limit their exposure to potential sources of MeHg. Based on results from human and animal studies on the developmental neurotoxic effects of methylmercury, the accepted reference dose should be lowered to 0.025 to 0.06 MeHg microgram/kg/day. Continued research on the neurotoxic effects associated with low level developmental exposure is needed.

HHS never undertook any review, or made any adjustments.

Well everything old is new again. Drs. Lyons-Weiler and Ricketson have reviewed the dosing of aluminum in the US vaccine program, to find that not only is there a lot of it, and not only does it exceed daily limits, but yet again, the daily limits are not based on sound safety data.

Reconsideration of the immunotherapeutic pediatric safe dose levels of aluminum 

Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology Toxicology

Volume 48, July 2018, Pages 67-73
Authors James Lyons-Weiler, Robert Ricketson


Highlights
• Aluminum levels in vaccine is based on immune efficacy and ignore body weight for safety.

• Several critical mistakes have been made in the consideration of pediatric dosing of aluminum in vaccines.

• Safety inferences of vaccine doses of aluminum have relied solely on dietary exposure studies of adult mice and rats.

• On Day 1 of life, infants receive 17 times more aluminum than would be allowed if doses were adjusted per body weight.

Continue reading "New Paper Challenges HHS on their Vaccine Aluminum Dosing Safety Numbers" »


Our Brave New World: Pharma's Political Straw Men, Lies and Censorship

image from buzznews.it by John Stone

We are reaching a critical point (and historic moment) which resembles in some ways both WMD and the banking crisis of 2008: the burden of scientific evidence and personal testimony weighs heavily against the industry (everyone has been lied to and the products have been over-sold) and what we are seeing is a pre-emptive strike to stop people talking – to stop them  at all cost. The evidence is that the industry and governments are afraid of exposure and are going for broke. This was the message of the industry spokeswoman Heidi Larson on 1 January 2018 in her column ‘Let Freedom Ring’. It was a very odd kind of freedom – Larson who works closely with the World Health Organization and Bill and Melinda Gates, as well as Merck and GSK – seemed to be trying to trade vaccine compulsion (distancing herself and the Vaccine Confidence Project from moves around the world towards draconian mandates) for silence on vaccine safety.

“The growing challenge in the vaccine landscape is that it is no longer isolated individuals who are thinking twice or refusing vaccination, but that there are growing groups of people who are not only expressing their individual right to question and to choose, but are increasingly connected with others and demanding the right to choose as part of a larger movement.  These movements are about principles of freedom and rights, not about specific vaccines, or specific safety concerns.”

Larson is not wrong about rights but she is about people not having “specific safety concerns”: only a few months before she had declared on a Johnson and Johnson website:

 “Yes, there are potential risks—there will always be potential risks with any medical treatment. And we don’t talk enough about that.” 

Anybody might reasonably be worried about safety of something over which they are being threatened with censorship. And, of course, now there are many people writing and speaking on the web, who want to talk about the risks both from personal experience and published science who are not poorly informed, malicious or engaging in irresponsible talk. Of course, there are clickbait sites that put out deliberately false information but it does not seem likely that they are the ones that industry or government are really scared about.

When the European Parliament balances the bald assertion that vaccines are “safe” with condemning “ the spread of unreliable, misleading and unscientific information on vaccination aggravated by media controversies” and calling “on Member States and the Commission to take effective steps against the spread of such misinformation and to further develop awareness and information campaigns, especially for parents…” they are themselves being misleading, naive or worse – and they are trying to forestall public examination of what the industry and surrogate government bureaucracies are doing, and suppress the ever growing body of evidence that vaccines are not safe. They are declaring falsehoods, engaging in innuendo and calling for socially repressive measures. This sadly is all too likely to dovetail with French President Macron’s proposed legislation on Fake News, following on his extension vaccine mandates.

Simultaneously, we have the alarming spectacle of Senator Pan who having notoriously piloted the notorious SB277 school vaccine mandates bill through the Californian legislature has now filed SB1424 to censor social media with the appointment of state “fact checkers” to decide which facts are true.

This bill would require any person who operates a social media, as defined, Internet Web site with a physical presence in California to develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Web site. The bill would require the plan to include, among other things, a plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories, the utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories, providing outreach to social media users, and placing a warning on a news story containing false information.

 (a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet Web site.

 (b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:

 (1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.

 (2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.

 (3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.

 (4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.

 (c) As used in this section, “social media” means an electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.

Not surprisingly there is already a fine article about this by John Rappoport. The bill does not of course specify vaccine related stories but obviously we can see where this going – of course it is altogether terrifying to envisage the scale and cost of this new bureaucracy, not to mention its potential for arbitrariness, incompetence and vindictiveness: perhaps above all to stop people talking about their own experiences. Is this so mad, grandiose, so Un-American that even California’s legislature might back off? In this brave new world no one could be confident.

These are not of course random events. Our new rulers are the pharmaceutical industry hiding behind men of straw.

John Stone is UK and European Editor of Age of Autism


FluMist, HPV Vaccine, and State School Boards: All Politics is Local

Maryland

By Joshua Mazer

In October 2016, my then 11 year old daughter came home with a notice that FluMist- a live attenuated inhalable vaccine containing four strains of live influenza virus- would be distributed in her school. I took my case against this policy directly to my local school board at the next meeting. During the public comments section, I simply read the “non-serious side effects” to the board. I also e-mailed to each board member the same information. The meeting is live steamed and widely viewed by thousands of residents of my county, and other interested citizens as well. The next day, by sheer luck, our local paper printed my letter describing the same data- here is the letter: http://www.capitalgazette.com/opinion/letters/ph-ac-ce-letters1012-20151011-story.html

I am told that our county superintendent called a meeting with the Department of Health officials. He was not pleased about being publicly blindsided at the public meeting. The following week, an awkwardly worded letter came home, again with my daughter, saying there was a shortage of FluMist and it would not be available in county schools. Other counties nearby immediately followed suit. The shortage story was clearly a lie, as there were boxes of the product stacked up at our local fire house, and it was  widely available for purchase in pharmacies. No matter. It was out of our schools. The coup de grace came a month later, when CIDRAP announced that FluMist was virtually worthless and had no effectiveness at all against influenza for the past four years.

My actions back then bought me credibility with my county school and health officials. I was right about FluMist being inappropriate for distribution in county schools. The key to my efforts was to be polite, well informed, and to come from a place of cooperation in the spirit of public health. I am now using that goodwill to initiate a statewide public advocacy campaign against the secret marketing of HPV vaccine in state school classrooms.

Fast forward to January 2018. I attended a seminar on the HPV vaccine at Anne Arundel Medical Center with my now 12 year old daughter. We were not persuaded to purchase the shot, and the Annapolis Capital published my op-ed describing my concerns:

Continue reading "FluMist, HPV Vaccine, and State School Boards: All Politics is Local" »


How A Vaccination Can Cause Polio: Mechanism of Injury-Provoked Poliomyelitis

Polioby Bernadette Pajer

Polio is an enterovirus, and it's not the only enterovirus capable of causing paralysis. Enteroviruses are fairly common, most people who become infected have no or few symptoms. If symptoms develop, they are like a cold or mild flu. One enterovirus that has been in the news lately is called "EV-D68" which can cause polio-like paralysis they call "acute flaccid myelitis (AFM)". CDC acknowledges this.

What turns an asymptomatic or low-symptom harmless enterovirus infection into an ER visit and hospitalization? In 1995, researchers figured out that with the polio enterovirus, it was intramuscular injections within 30 days of being given a live polio vaccine. They were studying cases of "provocation" poliomyelitis following receipt of live polio vaccine.

Like other enteroviruses, 95% of polio infections are asymptomatic or very mild. Polio only very rarely leads to paralysis. Researchers in 1998 stated: "Muscle injury due to injection of vaccines or therapeutic agents is common in medical practice. It has been observed that, if concurrent with PV infection, such injury may increase the risk of neurological complications."

PV is polio virus, but as noted above, other commonly circulated enteroviruses can lead to paralysis.

With children today being given so many intramuscular injections so often throughout childhood, odds are a seemingly well child will actually be infected with (and successfully fighting) an enterovirus when given a round of vaccines.

And with the ACIP dangerously telling pediatricians it's OK to vaccinate mildly ill children, those who have earaches or are on antibiotics, the odds increase that a child infected with an enterovirus will be given a round of vaccines, possibly leading to AFM.

How can this be prevented?

Continue reading "How A Vaccination Can Cause Polio: Mechanism of Injury-Provoked Poliomyelitis" »


My Letter to the 73 British Members of European Parliament on "Vaccine Hesitancy"

image from www.eu-patient.euby John Stone

Two weeks ago AoA published an unsigned letter to  European Parliamentarians about a proposed resolution on "vaccine hesitancy" to Members of the European Parliament which could lead to the extension of vaccine mandates across the Union and a clamp down on free speech. The resolution in its present form asserts vaccines to be "safe" without any qualification. I have now sent my own letter individually to all of the 73 British member of the Parliament. A final vote on this could happen as early as the beginning next week - so we are close to the last opportunity to lobby the Parliament. European citizens can find the details of their representatives here.

 

Dear ____,

I am writing to all British members of the European Parliament with the deepest concern about the proposed “vaccine hesitancy” resolution. The Parliament is poised to further protect an industry from scrutiny which in itself urgently requires investigation. In its present form it will not lead to confidence.

The resolution comes before the Parliament amid mounting evidence of vaccine harm in published scientific literature. For too long politicians around the globe have depended on bureaucracies to wage war against infectious diseases without taking adequate steps to ensure the independence of the advice, and contenting themselves with bland assurances that everything they collectively sanction is safe and effective. By now infants are met not long after birth with a barrage of vaccines for diseases which in many cases are either not so dangerous or not so common, without any wider evidence that this is a safe thing to do - meanwhile each of the products have acknowledged risks and side-effects in the small print, even before we consider the problems of cumulative exposure, bad synergies, contamination in manufacture, toxic excipients etc. The bureaucracies choose whatever “facts” suit them, and they have created a pipeline for their products to be administered to children at public expense.

Absurdly, the EP Health Committee have complained about the relative expense of vaccinating children compared with the beginning of the millennium without considering all the expensive new products governments have willingly added to the schedule in the interim - nor the expense of all the new products the industry connected bureaucracy are likely to sanction in future. In the UK the director of Oxford Vaccine Group which develops vaccines is also chair of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation which recommends them to the schedule.

The invidiousness of the process was recently demonstrated in successive complaints by Nordic Cochrane against the European Medical Agency, first to the agency itself and then to European Ombudsman over its handling of reports about HPV vaccines. The complaints involved conflicts of interest, exclusion of contrary expert evidence, bias in selection of data, lack of evidence for the safety of aluminium adjuvants (which are contained in the majority of other vaccines as well). The fact that both the EMA and the EO rejected these representations out of hand does nothing to enhance the reputation or trustworthiness of those institutions, or of the programme. By now there is a large bibliography on the harmfulness of aluminium in scientific literature but our governments march on regardless.  Most disturbingly we now have the Italian parliamentary commission into military deaths written by senior scientists declaring the risk of multiple vaccines. There is nothing open and shut about vaccine safety.

All this might count for little if our child population in the UK (where we have a long schedule and high compliance) was bursting with good health, but actually we are drowning in disability and chronic disease, particularly neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism. While this escapes the main news (or is hidden in stories about lack of provision) the official schools data shows the problem to be completely out of control (not to mention completely unexplained). A BBC news report from SW London last year hinted at 300 new cases of autism per borough per year. Last year the number of diagnosed autism cases in Scottish schools leapt by 11.5% from 1 in 51 to 1 in 46 (but for younger children the rate will be much higher). In Northern Ireland the level was already reported at 1 in 40 in December 2016. Everywhere the trend is dynamically upwards. These are cases which will cost multiple millions each over a lifetime. Having scapegoated Dr Wakefield the Department of Health prefers to say nothing, but the situation is already catastrophic in population terms, and the costs increasingly unsustainable.

It is always possible to highlight this or that statistic which shows an infectious disease to be on the rise, nor is the death of any single child to be taken lightly, but we are getting into dangerous waters if we place the programme on a pedestal, unable to discuss its dangers while deliberately suppressing evidence of harm by waging hate campaigns against the people who report it. This is not privileging science, it is privileging the bureaucracy and pharmaceutical industry over ordinary citizens. Inevitably, such moves must lead to distortions of policy and harm to the community. Nor is it a proper way to conduct policy in a democratic, open society.

Sincerely,

John Stone (UK and European Editor, AgeofAutism.com)


Early April Fools Flawed Whooping Cough Vaccine Not Responsible for Resurgence of Disease

April Fool BlueDirect from the Tobacco Science playbook.... never miss a chance to blame the unvaccinated for disease rather than, " an imperfect vaccine that confers slowly waning immunity."

From MedPage Today:

The surprising resurgence of whooping cough in the United States in recent years cannot be blamed on shortcomings in the current vaccine, a new study finds.

Rather, incomplete coverage among children -- possibly fueled by the anti-vaccination movement -- is responsible for the pertussis increases, along with natural population turnover and slowly waning protection from the vaccine, researchers say.

In the study published online in Science Translational Medicinethe team found little evidence that the switch in the 1990s from the whole cell to the combined acellular pertussis vaccine contributed to the resurgence in whooping cough.

During the 1970s and 1980s, an average of 2,000 to 3,000 pertussis cases were reported annually, according to figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

In 2003, pertussis cases in the U.S. increased to more than 10,000 for the first time in almost 4 decades, and have not dropped below this number since. In 2012, there were 48,277 reported cases, followed by 28,639, 32,971, 20,772, and 17,972 cases in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively.

The CDC recommends a series of five pertussis shots to be given before age 7, combined with the diphtheria and tetanus vaccines (DTaP), with a booster dose (Tdap) recommended around the age of 11.

Continue reading "Early April Fools Flawed Whooping Cough Vaccine Not Responsible for Resurgence of Disease" »


HPV Vaccine Film makers scoop Special Jury Prize for second year at Queens World Film Festival, New York

Sacrificial VirginsMarch 26, 2018, NEW YORK, NY, US. Press Dispensary.

Fresh from recent film festival success in Australia, the documentary Sacrificial Virgins last night scooped the prestigious Special Jury Prize for World Social Impact at the Queens World Film Festival (QWFF) in Queens, New York. The trophy was presented on the final night of the festival by founders Don and Katha Cato to the film’s director Andi Reiss, together with Ollie Richards (camera/editor).

A special 30 minute edition of Sacrificial Virgins (which was originally produced last year as a film trilogy) was screened earlier in the day. It was followed by a lively Q&A that focused on how such an important issue has largely been swept under the carpet by the medical establishment and mainstream media.



Sacrificial Virgins
investigates widespread global concerns over the safety of the controversial vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix, which are prescribed to millions of girls (and now boys) in nationwide mass vaccination programmes across the world. The vaccines are coming under increasing fire for their association with widespread, severe neurological damage and the charge that they may not even be capable of preventing the cervical cancers for which they are usually prescribed.

Continue reading "HPV Vaccine Film makers scoop Special Jury Prize for second year at Queens World Film Festival, New York " »


New Study Shows Children Had Increased Hazard of Acute Respiratory Illness Post Influenza Vaccination

 

 
Dreamstime_s_18585707 2018 Apr 5;36(15):1958-1964. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.105. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29525279

Article history:
Received 26 November 2017
Received in revised form 24 February 2018
Accepted 26 February 2018
Available online 7 March 2018

Background: A barrier to influenza vaccination is the misperception that the inactivated vaccine can cause influenza. Previous studies have investigated the risk of acute respiratory illness (ARI) after influenza vaccination with conflicting results. We assessed whether there is an increased rate of laboratory confirmed ARI in post-influenza vaccination periods.

Methods: We conducted a cohort sub-analysis of children and adults in the MoSAIC community surveillance study from 2013 to 2016. Influenza vaccination was confirmed through city or hospital registries.

Cases of ARI were ascertained by twice-weekly text messages to household to identify members with ARI symptoms. Nasal swabs were obtained from ill participants and analyzed for respiratory pathogens using multiplex PCR. The primary outcome measure was the hazard ratio of laboratory-confirmed ARI in individuals post-vaccination compared to other time periods during three influenza seasons.

Results: Of the 999 participants, 68.8% were children, 30.2% were adults. Each study season, approximately half received influenza vaccine and one third experienced 1 ARI. The hazard of influenza in individuals during the 14-day post-vaccination period was similar to unvaccinated individuals during the same period (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.60, 1.52]). The hazard of non-influenza respiratory pathogens was higher during the same period (HR 1.65, 95% CI [1.14, 2.38]); when stratified by age the hazard remained higher for children (HR 171, 95% CI [1.16, 2.53]) but not for adults (HR 0.88, 95% CI [0.21, 3.69]).

Conclusion: Among children there was an increase in the hazard of ARI caused by non-influenza respiratory pathogens post-influenza vaccination compared to unvaccinated children during the same period.

Potential mechanisms for this association warrant further investigation. Future research could investigate whether medical decision-making surrounding influenza vaccination may be improved by acknowledging patient experiences, counseling regarding different types of ARI, and correcting the misperception that all ARI occurring after vaccination are caused by influenza.


Pentavalent Vaccine - Doctors Raise Red Flag

PV vaxBy Jacob Puliyel MD MRCP M Phil

New Delhi, India

14 March 2018.

Pentavalent vaccine (PV) that was introduced by India six years ago doubled the deaths of children soon after vaccination compared to DPT (Diphtheria-Pertussis- Tetanus) vaccine according to a new study that calls for a "rigorous review of the deaths following vaccination with PV."

Government records show that there were 10,612 deaths following vaccination in the last 10 years. The Health Ministry has promised to study the huge increase in 2017. The present analysis could be a starting point in the quest to reduce the numbers of such deaths.

The study by Dr Jacob Puliyel, Head of Pediatrics at St Stephens Hospital and Dr V. Sreenivas, Professor of Biostatistics at the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences, both in New Delhi, is published in the peer-reviewed Wolters Kluwer Health’s journal, Medical Journal of Dr D Y Patel University.

PV is a combination of DPT vaccine and two more vaccines against Haemophilus influenza type B (Hib) and hepatitis B.  Starting December 2011, PV was introduced into India's immunization programme to replace DPT vaccine in a staged manner with a view to adding protection against Hib and Hepatitis B without increasing the number of injections given to infants. 

But sporadic reports of unexplained deaths following immunization with PV had been a matter of concern.  Puliyel, Sreenivas, and their colleagues undertook the study to find out if these deaths were merely coincidental or vaccine induced.

The authors obtained data of all deaths reported from April 2012 to May 2016 under the Right to Information Act. Data on deaths within 72 hours of administering DPT and PV from different states were used. 

Continue reading "Pentavalent Vaccine - Doctors Raise Red Flag" »


IPAK Board Member Josh Mazer's Letter Regarding HPV Vaccination in Maryland

GardasilNote: Josh sent this letter to "...every member of the Maryland state house and senate, and every school board member, and every member of the governor’s staff in Maryland." You can read the full letter with attachments here. From IPAK. The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge is a not-for-profit organization* which exists to perform scientific research in the public interest. We use the principles and practices of scientific research to help individual researchers, research teams, consortia, and companies push their project through roadblocks, or map their way around them via evidence-based alternatives.

The following is a letter dated February 21, 2018, written by father and IPAK Advisory Board Member and concerned citizen Josh Mazer. It highlights, among other things, an obvious increase in death due to all causes in the studies on Gardisil™ safety, and an increase in the relative risk of suicide among patients in those studies. Josh has given permission for anyone who can use the information contained in this letter in any format they choose to inform their own school boards, Boards of Health, legislators etc. that the people will not tolerate the use of public schools as a place to advertise Gardasil™, a faulty and defective product.  These are the facts. Feel free to cut and paste them into your own letters and emails. The evidence of unacceptable levels of risk of injury is overwhelming. It is the considered opinion of this scientist that support for Gardasil™ use on any population must be dropped in the United States of America and its territories. -James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, on behalf of The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, its Advisory Board, and members of the Society for Pure and Applied Knowledge. 

Dear Maryland Senator,

I have great respect for Governor Hogan. I appreciate his empathetic desire to help reduce and prevent cancers that cause terrible suffering and death for Maryland residents and others.  A secretive campaign to market human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations in Maryland state schools is not a proper public health policy strategy to accomplish those goals.

A career registered nurse in Montgomery County schools gave me the two letters attached below (“HPV1” and “HPV2”). She told me that she felt she was being “forced” to market the vaccine to students, that she objected to the policy, and that she was scared to speak out for fear of losing her job.

The first letter  (HPV1 ) was authorized by  Dr. Ken Lin Tai , Director, Maryland Department of Health Center for Cancer Prevention and Control . Her office originated, wrote, and approved the letter.  Dr. Jinlene Chan MD, MPH , and  Dr. Dennis Schrader  signed off on it.  Per my conservation with Dr. Chan Thursday Feb 16 2018, 10:07am, it was sent to every school superintendent in the State of Maryland.

The second letter  (HPV2)   is from  Montgomery County Assistant Superintendent Dr. Johnathan T. Brice,  instructing all the principals in his district to comply with the DOH directive.  

Continue reading "IPAK Board Member Josh Mazer's Letter Regarding HPV Vaccination in Maryland" »


Stefano Montanari and Antonietta Gatti answer Questions about Their Research into Nanoparticle Contamination of Vaccines

Italian GestureNote: The temps are heating up in Italy as vaccine mandates have created havoc and agita for families. And most recently,  two scientists had their offices raided and data, computers, etc. confiscated. Here they are below talking about their research. Remember, ""To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." (Voltaire)  In 2018, pharmaceutical companies have strong control over governments. And here in America, they cower and hide behind the NRA while our bambini die - a double insult. Kim

English language interview with Senta Depuydt in Brussels, 9 February 2017



 

 


Computers and Records Seized of Dr Gatti and Dr Montanari

Montenari
By John Stone

The computers, records and data of Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari have been seized by the Italian "Guardia di Finanza". Sanevax comment:

BREAKING NEWS: This morning two scientists from Italy lost their computers, records, and data - all confiscated. Dr. Gatti and Dr. Montanari have been studying the potential effects of micro- and nanoparticles used in vaccines on the human body for years. One of them was scheduled to testify in court regarding an alleged vaccine injury. Several conference presentations were also scheduled over the next few months. Now, there is no data to present. Coincidence? Or, suppression of inconvenient scientific findings?

The website of vacciniinforma.it reproduces the facebook page of Dr Montanari with the comment "FINANCIAL GUARD VISIT THE LABORATORY OF DRS GATTI AND MONTANARI, MEDICINE IS OBSTRUCTED AS USUAL".

No one, of course, challenges the pharmaceutical industry in order to make money but the cozy relationship of the industry to the Italian government is well documented, and this will be a contentious event in the forthcoming Italian national election. 

A groundbreaking study "New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro and Nanocontamination"  by Gatti and Montenari was published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination early last year:

Abstract
Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can
cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation
method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of
solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope
equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show
the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic
elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and
whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part
of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices
and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The
evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that
are mentioned and briefly discussed.

John Stone is UK (and European) editor of Age of Autism.


Has James Lyons-Weiler Lost It?

Say whatNote: We excerpted James Lyons-Weiler' article last month, as is our norm. We try to bring you news and POV from across the vaccine and health freedom community. Below is a "rebuttal" to his article from documentary filmmaker Leslie Manookian  ("The Greater Good.") (PS) That's not Leslie in the photo!

By Leslie Manookian

In his recent article, “New York Times Has Lost It,” James Lyons-Weiler wrote that, “Mandates without exemptions create a situation where those who are destined to be injured by vaccines will be found, and injured, with mathematical certainty” – a line of reasoning he’s employed before.

So he’s advocating for mandates as long as there are exemptions? Really? What about freedom and bodily autonomy? What about first do no harm? I wonder how any educated reader can take him seriously when he espouses such dangerous ideas.

Vaccines injure all who receive them. ALL. There is no such thing as a safe dose of mercury or aluminum or many of the other toxins. There is no science proving what that level is. Any scientist who argues that only some individuals are susceptible to vaccine injury despite any science to substantiate this assertion is not a true scientist. Mercury, aluminum, and all the other poisons in vaccines don’t miraculously become health promoting when contained in a vaccine. Advocating for mandates with exemptions for those “susceptible few” sounds like a vaccine maker’s dream come true, doesn’t it? How’s that working out in California where there’s a veritable witch hunt for doctors who write medical exemptions?

Vaccine makers know their products cause harm and that unless they can buy off every single politician, suppress all the science, and control all the media and social media, then at some point, more and more people will deduce the truth of vaccine injury and death.  And when that happens, a point which is getting closer with each day, the next best thing for them will be to test everyone to see who’s genetically susceptible - they’ll just say, ok, some people are harmed but vaccines are still a benefit to society so let’s test who’s at risk and carry on as normal. And they’ll make buckets on those tests to make up for lost profits on vaccines. (Isn’t this what Lyons-Weiler has proposed?) Most importantly, they’ll still control the narrative and have a frightened populace under their thumb.

Remember that little piece of legislation called the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986? Remember how this landmark legislation was supposed to safeguard those “susceptible few” for their service to society and make it easy on their families to obtain compensation for that service? Yet since its implementation the vaccine injured can’t sue and the vaccine makers enjoy blanket immunity while the vaccine schedule has tripled and our freedoms have been removed. By most accounts the NCVIA has been an unmitigated disaster for Americans and a boon for vaccine makers.

The scenario I describe, what Lyons-Weiler promotes, is exactly the same play out of the same playbook. Moreover it’s the same tactic they’ve used to silence those who understand that vaccines cause autism. Hannah Poling anyone?

Think about it. If you were a vaccine maker and millions of folks were becoming educated all around the globe and demanding bodily autonomy, freedom, and genuine accountability and liability for the vaccine makers, you’d recognize the writing was on the wall, wouldn’t you? You’d realize the best course of action at this point is damage control, right?  So what would you do?

Your first goal would be to manage the conversation so that you could retain control of the market. And how would you do that? Simply concede that there are indeed a “few susceptible” individuals and recommend testing to determine who’s susceptible. Then you reap all the kudos of being the good guy while deflecting away from the true issue of poisonous, failing vaccines.

Continue reading "Has James Lyons-Weiler Lost It?" »


Atlanta 11 Alive NBC TV Asks if CDC Flu Death Facts are Accurate

True or falseNote: NBC 11 in Atlanta, Georgia, home of the Centers for Disease Control, reported:

It's flu season and that means the children, and adults, will be staying home from work and school to fight this debilitating virus.

But have you seen those reports that 85 percent of the 30 children who actually died from the flu this season lost their lives because they were not vaccinated?

11Alive is here to VERIFY whether or not that was true.

You can click here for the answer.  


It's interesting to see a TV station in Atlanta questioning the CDC's information regarding vaccines.


You Can’t Handle the Truth: A Review of Vaccines A Reappraisal by Dr. Richard Moskowitz

Vaccines Richard MoskowitzBy Dr. William H. Gaunt, NMD

Vaccines: A Reappraisal by Richard Moskowitz, MD is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.  People who are knowledgeable about the great harm being caused by vaccines will learn even more.  People who are staunchly pro-vaccine will ignore it.  They are the ones who can’t handle the truth. 

“A masterpiece and a must-read for anyone with concerns about the safety and efficacy of vaccines”- Stephanie Seneff, PhD, senior research scientist, MIT.  From the foreword: “Dr. Moskowitz sees our present vaccine policy as a vast, costly, and dangerous experiment that is out of control, obscenely profitable, and badly in need of independent regulation.”

Much of the CDC sponsored vaccine science is outright fraud.  The studies are either carefully designed to exonerate vaccines or the data is heavily manipulated or disappeared to arrive at a predetermined conclusion.  See the documentary “Vaxxed”(available from Netflix) for a detailed analysis of one of these fraudulent studies.

People should be able to trust our government, the CDC, the vaccine companies, and their pediatrician but all we get from these sources is a steady stream of lies about vaccines and denial when obvious vaccine injuries or deaths occur.  Our mainstream media are complicit.  A sizable portion of their ad revenues come from pharmaceutical companies, so they headline the fraudulent studies and ignore the mountains of solid evidence of serious problems caused by vaccines.


Let’s be clear.  Vaccines are the main cause of autism and a host of other neurodevelopmental conditions.  Vaccines are the main cause of sudden infant deaths.  It is cause and effect that the U.S. gives more vaccines in the first year of life and has the highest incidence of infant mortality of all developed countries.  We also have a drastic increase of autoimmune diseases caused by vaccines.  Pregnant women are now being given vaccines and this is causing an increase in fetal death and miscarriage.

Most of the public is unaware of the truth about vaccines.   It is up to all of us who are aware of this ongoing tragedy to keep pushing the truth and share it aggressively.

Dr. Gaunt is a retired doctor of naturopathic medicine.  He has also taught chemistry and anatomy at the high school and college levels.  Google “articles by Dr. William H. Gaunt on ageofautism.com” to see his other articles.


HHS establishes a new Conscience and Religious Freedom (CRF) Division within its Office for Civil Rights, holds livestream today, Jan 18th at 10:30am EST.

by Ginger Taylor

Screen-shot-2017-07-06-at-9-08-46-pm4HHS establishes a new Conscience and Religious Freedom (CRF) Division within its Office for Civil Rights, holds livestream today, Jan 18th at 10:30am EST. The religious rights of families in Mississippi, California and West Virginia, along with health care workers and military members, have been violated by demands that they be vaccinated against the conscience of those who hold a pro-life view, and do not want to receive vaccines made from aborted fetal cell lines.

Today HHS gives us an official channel to protest this violation of the 1st Amendment.

"HHS establishes a new Conscience and Religious Freedom (CRF) Division within its Office for Civil Rights (OCR) specializing in enforcement of and compliance with laws that protect conscience and the free exercise of religion, and that prohibit coercion and religious discrimination."

https://www.hhs.gov/conscience

WATCH LIVE 10:30 am EST: The #HHS Office of Civil Rights announces new Conscience and Religious Freedom Division to address religious discrimination

https://www.hhs.gov/live/live-1/

"Filing a Conscience or Religious Freedom Complaint If you believe that a covered entity discriminated against you (or someone else) on the basis of conscience or religious freedom, coerced you to violate your conscience or religious beliefs, or burdened your free exercise of religion, you may file a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). You may file a complaint for yourself, your organization, or for someone else."

https://www.hhs.gov/conscience/complaints/filing-a-complaint/index.html

It is time to organize a formal complaint process for those who have both been forced into injecting these products, and for those who have been tricked into receiving these products, because they were not given informed consent.


Hep B Vaccination at Birth May Not be Necessary in India, Says Study

Indian clinicBy Jacob Puliyel MD MRCP M Phil

A large multi-centre study done in North India shows that many newborns are protected at birth by natural antibodies to Hepatitis-B and so Hep-B vaccination at birth is not necessary.

The study funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) lends support to the government's pragmatic approach to vaccinate babies born at home starting at six weeks instead of at birth.

The study, whose findings have been published in the Indian Journal of Pediatrics, was done to look at whether Hepatitis-B vaccination at birth was crucial for India.

"We found birth dose was not needed as infection rates were the same regardless of birth dose," says Jacob Puliyel the study's primary author and a pediatrician at St. Stephens Hospital in Delhi.

Hepatitis-B virus (HBV) can cause chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and lead to hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) in susceptible persons.

Most babies are naturally immune to Hepatitis-B infection due to passive transfer of antibodies from the mother.

India started vaccinating children against Hepatitis-B in 2011. It is given at birth to babies born in hospitals. However, because many babies are delivered at home, outside of healthcare settings, the government introduced the pragmatic programme schedule of HBV vaccination, wherein the vaccine is given starting at six weeks to children born outside such health-care settings.

Continue reading "Hep B Vaccination at Birth May Not be Necessary in India, Says Study" »


Josh Mazer: Ironclad case for HPV vaccination isn't there yet

GardasilNote: Thank you to DC area AofA friend and supporter Josh Mazer for writing this op-ed about HPV vaccine. Please take a moment to click into the newspaper so that the clicks register your interest in the topic and leave a comment as well. This is one way we can boost coverage of the vaccine safety issues we all face.  Newspapers like clicks. From this we know! :) Thanks.

Cancers caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) are devastating and affect men and women alike. Because the disease is sexually transmitted, and the preventive HPV vaccine is recommended for boys and girls starting as young as age nine, parents might have concerns.

I attended with my 12-year-old daughter the Anne Arundel Medical Center Smart Women Lecture Series Thursday at Belcher Pavilion on the HPV vaccine. We left with more questions than answers.

The panel consensus is that virtually all youngsters receive the HPV vaccine. The CDC and American Cancer Society say that there will be 12,000 cervical cancers diagnosed in the United States each year, among a population of 170 million women. The chances of my daughter being diagnosed in any given year are 12,000 out of 170 million, which works out to .007 percent. The odds of her not being diagnosed in any given year, by the same math, is 99.9929 percent.

Given the relatively high cost of each shot, either two or three are required, and the extremely low probability of the diagnosis, I question whether a mass vaccination program to prevent these cancers, as horrible as they are, is the wisest and best use of limited resources. Would the same money spent countering opioid addiction, or drunken driving in Anne Arundel county perhaps save more lives? Read more at Capital Gazette here.


Wall Street Journal Joins Mother Jones in Attacking Oprah Winfrey for 11 Year Old Show on Vaccines

SPEAK TRUTHMother Jones and The Wall Street Journal don't cross paths often. But when it comes to the Pharma/Government media noose as regards the vaccine autism topic, they are comfy, cozy bedfellows following orders from.... somewhere.   The American public heard Oprah talk about "Speaking your truth" as it relates to sexual assault and the "me too" message that women do not have to put up with shaming, violence, or any sort of influence of in order to have success. And so, the pharma media juggernaut has gone into full discredit mode.  Why on earth would these two publications dredge up an ELEVEN year old TV episode of Oprah's talk show? 

Can the average American see the immediate reaction to anything that "threatens" free thought regarding vaccination safety? Pharma is like Kim Jung Un in North Korea.  Deny, lie, shut down any perceived opposition. Except their button is millions of syringes going into our kids. The world applauded Winfrey's message. And so do we. I, as a woman, as a woman who teaches self defense to others, as a woman who has vaccine injured children, I applaud her message. SPEAK THE TRUTH EVEN IF YOUR VOICE SHAKES.  The WSJ calls Winfrey's message "bromides," the definition of which is a trite and unoriginal idea or remark, typically intended to soothe or placate.  

Lord, I need a Bromo Seltzer after reading even the snip of the article that you can see from the WSJ online. We do not and will not pay for a prescription (oops, I mean subscription) to this paper.  I hope Winfrey gets very, very angry and speaks more truth.  Kim

Oprah’s ‘Truth’ and Its Potentially Deadly Consequences
She gave Jenny McCarthy a platform to promote the discredited idea that vaccines cause autism.
By Julie Gunlock
Jan. 10, 2018 6:47 p.m. ET

Former daytime television superstar and rumored Democratic presidential candidate Oprah Winfrey won the Cecil B. DeMille Award at Sunday night’s Golden Globes. In the “complicated times” we live in, she said during her acceptance speech, “speaking your truth is the most powerful tool we all have.”

While such bromides may play well with an audience of entertainers, Ms. Winfrey’s applause lines should be a warning to those who take her political ambitions seriously. She built.....


Dr. Jacob Puliyel on The "Dubious" HPV Vaccine

HPV adNote: Thank you to Dr. Puliyel for sharing this editorial he wrote in the Tribune India.  At the end of his editorial posted here is an article that also ran on 12/25 in the Tribune India titled Prevention is Better Than Cure that extols the use of HPV vaccines and claims ZERO adverse effects. ZERO.  You are able to comment on both articles at their links. ZERO adverse effects. I noted that Dr. Puliyel's article has ten times the social media shares as the second article. Interesting.

By Jacob Puliyel

The writer, a doctor, is the Head of Pediatrics, St Stephen's Hospital, Delhi, and a member of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation.  The views expressed are personal. 

Dubious Vaccine for Cervical Cancer

Before a new vaccine is introduced it is first studied in a randomised controlled trial where some are given the drug and others are given an inert substance to check the effects and adverse effects among those given the new drug. Last week, Slate published a cover story on the investigation of the randomised trials of human papillomavirus (HPV ) vaccines before approval.  The science editor conducted an eight-month long investigation, interviewed study participants and studied  2,300 pages of documents obtained through freedom-of-information requests from hospitals and health authorities.

Flawed Trial

Slate found that during the year-long study data on potential side effects were collected for only two weeks.  The rest of the time individual trial investigators used their personal judgment to decide whether or not to report medical problems as adverse events. An oxymoronic instruction to investigators was to list new problems as ‘new medical history’. There is no evidence the confidential study protocol was submitted to regulators for approval. The worksheet investigators used allotted just one line per entry for new medical history, with no measurement of symptom severity, duration, outcome, or overall seriousness. Trial participants complained to Slate that repeated complaints of debilitating symptoms were not even registered in the study as potential side effects. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the regulator in Europe.  In an internal 2014 EMA report about Gardasil 9 – a leading HPV vaccination - obtained through a freedom-of-information request, senior experts called the company’s approach “unconventional and suboptimal” and said it left some “uncertainty” about the safety results. In the EMA’s public assessment Gardasil 9, all mention of the safety concerns had been scrubbed.

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Not all recipients of the vaccine developed serious adverse effects. But there are numerous reports of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS ) otherwise known as myalgic encephalomyelitis which is characterized by long-term fatigue that limits a person’s ability to carry out ordinary daily activities. Dr Jose Montoya, a professor of medicine at Stanford University explains that the condition usually starts with an insult to the immune system—a severe infection, a car crash, a pregnancy. The first symptoms are flu-like, but months go by and the patient realizes she isn’t getting better.’ In a few genetically predisposed individuals, Montoya told the Slate editor, it is “biologically plausible” that the vaccine, which mimics a natural infection, could also trigger an immune response powerful enough to lead to CFS. To find out if that is the case, trial investigators would need to carefully track participants’ symptoms “for at least one year.” CFS is not the only serious adverse effect reported. The American College of Pediatrics has suggested one of the HPV vaccines could possibly be associated with the very rare but serious condition of premature ovarian failure (POF), also known as premature menopause.  In Japan, use of the vaccine in adolescents has been associated with such serious adverse events that it has been withdrawn from the immunisation programme.

Usefulness of Vaccine

HPV spreads only through sexual contact and therefore is not communicable in a casual manner. There are about 100 strains of HPV, and the vaccine only protects against 2, 4, or 9 of them, depending on the brand and 95% of HPV infections heal by themselves – potentially granting the individual lifetime immunity against the particular strain. Perhaps to improve uptake of the vaccine the manufacturers promote it as an anticancer vaccine rather than a vaccine against sexually transmitted disease.  But while there is evidence that the vaccine reduces infection with the vaccine strains of the virus, non-vaccine strains have been known to replace the vaccine strain and these could produce cancer. There is currently no scientific study that shows the vaccine reduces cervical cancer in the women who are vaccinated.  The efficacy of the vaccine against cancer is unknown

Cost-effectiveness READ MORE HERE.

Also published, 12/25 in the Tribune India was the following:

Prevention is Better Than Cure.


CN Purandare, Alka Kriplani & Neerja Bhatla IN India, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, accounting for nearly one-fourth of the global burden of cervical cancer, with an estimated 122,800 new cases and 67,500 deaths annually, which is more than the number of deaths due to maternal mortality. Since these women are usually in their 40s and 50s, it is estimated that the years of life lost are greater in cervical cancer. Globally, cervical cancer accounts for 528,000 cases including 445,000 cases in low and middle income countries (LMICs). 

Epidemiology

The age-standardised incidence rate of cervical cancer varies between 5.6 and 24.3 per 100,000 women in different regions of India. Although a gradually declining trend in the cervical cancer incidence has been observed in different regions of India over the last two decades, the rates still remain significantly higher than in other Asian countries. In fact, the absolute numbers of both cervical cancer cases and deaths are on the increase due to population growth. In the West, repeated testing by Pap smear and consequent treatment of precancerous lesions led to a substantial decline in the numbers of cervical cancer cases. In India, with very limited resources to introduce and sustain effective population-based cervical cancer screening programs, there was not much progress in preventing this very preventable cancer.  The discovery by Nobel laureate Harald zur Hausen that persistent infection with one of the oncogenic, high-risk types of human papillomaviruses (HPV) is the 'necessary' cause of cervical cancer; enabled the development of primary prevention using HPV vaccination. Presently available vaccines target the two types that are responsible for 70 per cent of cervical cancers worldwide. HPV 16 and HPV 18 and can prevent over 90 per cent of high-grade precancerous lesions caused by these types. In India, there is a greater proportion of these types, making it likely that the impact of vaccination will be better than has been observed already in research studies and in countries that have implemented the vaccine program.

Efficacy of doses

Fewer than three doses of HPV vaccine would substantially reduce costs, improve compliance, ease logistics and facilitate scale up in national immunization programs.  Data to support this has emerged from trials. WHO, after reviewing the available evidence on less than 3-doses, has recommended a two-dose schedule for girls (at an interval of 6 months, which may be extended to 12 months to facilitate vaccination) if vaccination is initiated prior to 15 years of age and a three-dose schedule (at 0, 1-2, and 6 months) if vaccination is initiated after the 15th birthday and for immunocompromised individuals, including those infected with HIV.

Countries implementing Immunisation

More than 80 countries have introduced HPV vaccine in the national immunisation programs (NIPs), of which 33 are LMICs; in addition, 25 LMICs have introduced HPV vaccination in pilot demonstration programs as a prelude to national scaling up in NIPs.  In most programs a school-based approach is predominantly used to deliver the vaccine to the targeted adolescents with additional efforts using field clinics, and primary health centres to cover girls who missed vaccination and do not attend schools. Gavi The Vaccine Alliance has been able to markedly reduce the procurement price of both vaccines to Rs $5.   While Australia, Denmark, USA and Canada were the first high-income countries to introduce HPV vaccination in NIPs in 2007, Panama (2008) in Latin America, Bhutan (2009) in Asia and Rwanda (2010) in Africa were the first LMICs that introduced HPV vaccination. Early reports of protection offered by the vaccine at the population level against vaccine targeted HPV infections, genital warts and cervical premalignant lesions have already started coming from countries that introduced the vaccine between 2007 and 2010.

HPV vaccine safety

Extensive data on the safety of HPV vaccines are now available from clinical trials and the population programs. Globally more than 270 million doses have been administered with no serious adverse events linked to the HPV vaccine and with an excellent safety profile. A meta-analysis of vaccine trials concluded that the frequency of serious adverse events (OR 0.99; 95%CI 0.87-1.14) and death (OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.39-2.14) were similar in the vaccinated and control groups. The majority of deaths reported were accidental in nature, and none was attributable to the vaccines. Various rare syndromes have also been studied and none found to be related to the vaccine. A recently published study from India reported no serious adverse event attributable to the vaccine after administering 34,856 doses of the quadrivalent vaccine to 10-18 year old girls and following them over four years. Read more and comment here.


Slate On Gardasil Inadequate Safety Testing (No It's Not April 1st)

Vioxx now gardasilWhen I was a 28 year old sales exec, my boss, mentor and dear friend taught me a phrase that I've used in all areas of my life, especially with my girls. "Don't punish progress,"  When there's a positive, don't poop on it with a qualification or indication that the progress isn't enough or worse with a negative.  So when I read this opening from Slate.com, I had to pull back a bit. (Thanks Ginger Taylor for the heads up on this article.)

There’s no evidence that the HPV vaccine causes serious harm, but an investigation shows the trials weren’t designed to properly assess safety.

Oh, the heck with it. So, if the studies were not designed to properly assess safety OF COURSE THERE'S NO EVIDENCE THAT THE HPV VACCINE CAUSES SERIOUS HARM!  This is exactly what happened at Simpsonwood regarding autism and vaccines. It's why Poul Thorsen is having tea with a mermaid in Denmark.  No harm? Sure, except for the plethora of severely paralyzed, injured and deceased victims.

Read Mark Blaxill's series on the CDC/Merck partnership that created Gardasil titled, "License to Kill."

###

On a sunny autumn day three years ago, when Kesia Lyng was 30, she had a visit from her youngest sister, Eva. The two were close, and as they sat at the kitchen table in Lyng’s apartment, Eva confronted her chronically ill sibling with a painful fact: “You almost can’t take care of your own kids,” she told her. “You can’t keep pushing yourself so hard.”

Lyng, who was living with her husband and their two children in a lusterless part of Copenhagen, Denmark, had been struggling for years with inexplicable health problems: joint and muscle pains that came and left, powerful headaches, and a crushing exhaustion that even copious amounts of sleep could not cure. She was working part-time in the kitchen of her daughter’s kindergarten, the latest in a string of odd jobs. But her sick days had begun to multiply again. Often she would call her husband at work, sobbing from weariness, and ask to be picked up. At home, she was drained, with no energy to clean or cook or tuck the kids in bed. In her medical records, which she shared with me, her doctor noted that she was “having a very difficult time” and that she worried about losing her job if she asked for a sick leave.

Continue reading "Slate On Gardasil Inadequate Safety Testing (No It's Not April 1st)" »


A Review of The Pharmacy Article on Shoulder Injury Resulting from Vaccine Administration

QualificationInfoGraphicBy Wayne Rohde

On November 18, 2017, an article was published in The Pharmacy Times by Ned Milenkovich, PharmMD, JD outlining possible liabilities of pharmacists as they administer vaccines. The writer correctly points out that “pharmacists who improperly administer a vaccine or fail to conform to industry-accepted norms could be found liable. These allegations would be directed to the pharmacist’s administration of the vaccine and not to the product itself”.

Let’s examine in greater detail what the writer is telling us. SIRVA or Shoulder Injury Resulting from Vaccine Administration is the leading injury for all petitions filed in the NVICP since 2015. It is the result of improper administration of a vaccine generally too high in the arm, in the shoulder joint or bursting of the bursa sac, causing severe pain and in many cases, surgery to correct the damage. 

Most of these injuries occur in retail pharmacy or pop up vaccine shops in grocery stores or shopping malls. HHS and CDC acknowledge back in 2015 that the main reason is the poor training or in some cases, the lack of training. Lou Conte and I wrote about this very issue in AoA a couple of years ago.

Pharmacists and those who administer vaccines in retail pharmacies or pop up shops lack medical training to ask patient for contraindications or other medical conditions that should be discussed with doctor and patient. Lack of true informed consent and failure of duty to warn are two areas that are missing from most discussions.

A duty to warn is a legal concept indicating that a party will be held liable for injuries caused to another, where the party had the opportunity to warn the other of a hazard and failed to do so. In this example, did the pharmacist offer the VIS prior to the administration of the vaccine, allowed the customer to read and ask questions, and did the pharmacist ask the proper medical background questions prior? Highly doubtful since this practice is not followed by the “highly trained” doctors and nurses in a clinic or hospital setting.

Can someone who suffered a SIRVA injury file a civil law suit directly against the pharmacist and the pharmacy? You could. However, the best course of action for compensation of the injury probably resides inside the NVICP. Why?

SIRVA injuries are now considered an ON-Table injury within the NVICP and would be fast-tracked for adjudication and compensation if the proper medical records are in order.  It would be faster and less adversarial than a traditional civil lawsuit.  The petitioner will not pay for attorney fees and costs unlike a plaintiff in the civil suit.  The Program allows for lost wages and future earnings compensation.

And there is still the legal possibility for those who filed compensation in the NVICP even after receiving payment for their injuries, to file a civil suit if that person believes the injury warrants further compensation.  That has not been tested.  But it could.

For all my writings and criticisms of the NVICP over the last seven years, this might be the first time that I state the Program is the best choice for those who have suffered a SIRVA injury.

The Vaccine Court Wayne RohdeWayne Rohde, author of The Vaccine Court – The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program


Vaccines and Pregnancy

Vax PregnantNote: I'm at an age where my friends kids are beginning to get married and have their own children. While, the girls' Dad and I will never have grandchildren thanks to autism, such is not the case for most AofA readers.  Today's young women experience fully medicalized pregnancy from conception, often assisted, through delivery. When I had my first baby in 1994, I was to ingest nothing resembling medicine. No aspirin. No allergy medication.  No prescriptions outside of those horsepill vitamins. No over the counter anything. I was told not to eat tuna, not to drink coffee or alcohol. Cigarettes were long off the table as an option. Rightly so.  Today? Young woman are shamed  encouraged to get a flu vaccine at the very least. World Mercury Project takes on pregnancy vaccination and safety in this blog piece below. If you have your own story to share, comment here at AofA and on the WMP blog too. Thank you to Robert Kennedy Jr. and his team for their work.  Kim

###

In recent years the CDC has made recommendations that women receive flu vaccines and TDaP vaccines during their pregnancy even though the package inserts state there are no long term safety studies to justify this practice. Mothers are reporting miscarriage, pre-term labor and health issues for themselves and their children following these vaccines. A recent CDC study found that pregnant women vaccinated with the influenza vaccine had 2 times greater odds of miscarrying their babies compared to women who did not receive flu vaccine. Here’s one mother’s story of her twins after a flu vaccine in pregnancy. Share your story and hashtag it #restorechildhealth #worldmercuryproject.   Read more at World Mercury Project.


Letter by Veteran Vaccine Researchers Warns of Multiple Vaccine Risks

Risk choice"So far the results have been consistent in indicating that it is better to receive a live vaccine after a non-live vaccine than a non-live after a live vaccine ... Hence, it could have major effects on mortality and morbidity and health care costs if immunisation programmes implemented a “live-vaccine-last” policy."

A letter in BMJ Rapid Responses yesterday co-authored by veteran Danish vaccine researchers Christine Benn, Peter Aaby and their colleague Signe Sorup warns of the risk to morbidity and mortality if non-live vaccines are administered after live virus vaccines, rather than in the opposite sequence. The authors are writing about the non-specific effects of vaccines on health. The flagging up of adverse consequences after decades of administration indicates the chaotic, and unrecorded effects of vaccine programs across the globe. The letter talks about the sequence of administration when of course live and and non-live vaccines are often administered together.

While the authors talk about modifying practice, what continues to be troubling is the random recklessness and negligence with which programs are assembled and the failure to monitor the long term consequences for health of vaccination. For all those who have had to bear the consequences looking at it decades later is of course only slightly better than nothing. 

 

 


"Vaccines: What is there to be "Pro" About?" Laura Hayes to Weston A. Price Foundation Conference

Laura HayesLaura Hayes speaking at the Weston A Price Foundation a year ago

Dear AoA Readers,

I recently had the privilege and pleasure of attending and speaking at Weston A. Price Foundation's 17th Annual Wise Traditions Conference in Alabama (Nov. 10th-14th, 2016).  

Topics covered at this year's conference ran the gamut from Characteristics of Healthy Diets, to Teaming with Nature for Chemical-Free Yards and Nutrient-Dense Vegetables, to Our Seniors: Dumping Ground for Drugs?, to Mercury Amalgam Detoxification, to Restoring the Family Farm, to...an all-day Vaccination Track with 4 speakers! 

In addition to amazing, information-packed lectures about health and nutrition...and we are not talking about the FDA/CDC/AAP/AMA's means of achieving health (!), or the FDA/USDA's recommendations for nutrition (!)...there were numerous exhibitors selling everything from kombucha to supplements to alpaca blankets. And the food was incredible...all WAPF-style...at a hotel, no less!  Numerous farmers and companies donated organic, nutrient-dense foods, which WAPF members helped hotel chefs and kitchen staff to prepare the WAPF way.  Let me just say, we ate well!  

I spoke on Sunday morning from 9:00-10:20 am. The title of my presentation was Vaccines: What Is Weston A PriceThere to Be 'Pro' About? Thanks to WAPF filming it, and to Josh Coleman for making a YouTube link for me, I am now able to share my presentation with others. 

Below are the video link for and the transcript of my presentation.  My hope is that for anyone who watches and/or reads my presentation, it will be the end of vaccinations for them and their children. For any doctors, nurses, or pharmacists who watch and/or read my presentation, I hope it will mark the end of their recommending and/or administering vaccines ever again. For any legislators who watch and/or read my presentation, I hope it will be the impetus which compels them to initiate legislation to ban vaccine mandates in their states, or at the federal level, and to initiate legislation for an immediate moratorium on all vaccinations for all people since not one should ever have been approved or marketed.

I hope you will share my presentation with others. You might just save a child, and his/her family, from a lifetime of suffering and premature death.

Laura Hayes

Mother of Vaccine-Injured Children

On a mission to end the Vaccine Holocaust

WAPF Conference, 11-13-16

Good morning, my name is Laura Hayes, I am from N CA, and I want to thank you all for making the choice to come to the Vaccination track this morning! The title of my talk is “Vaccines: What Is There to Be ‘Pro’ About?”, of which you will receive a copy after my presentation. I am excited for the opportunity to talk to you about the dangers, inefficacies, and lack of need for vaccines; about the corruption that underlies them from manufacture to mandate, and beyond; and about the urgent need to put an immediate end to this vaccine insanity that has swept our nation resulting in an unprecedented loss of our most basic fundamental human right…the right to determine that which we allow, or don’t allow, into our own bodies, and those of our children.

Think about that…if we don’t have the most basic of rights, those of self-autonomy and bodily integrity, and the right to protect our children from known harm, what meaningful rights do we have?

And let us not forget that the hallmark of ethical medicine is that of prior, completely voluntary, and fully informed consent. The U.S. has agreed to uphold and abide by this standard of ethical medicine on numerous occasions, beginning in 1947 with the signing of The Nuremberg Code. This international code of ethics was the result of the world becoming aware of atrocious medical experiments performed on human beings during WWII without their consent, and often without their knowledge. To ensure that such crimes against humanity would never occur again, the Nuremberg Code was written and it states that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” Additional, similar codes of ethics have been signed since then by the U.S., most recently including The Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights at the UNESCO Convention in 2005, which states in Article 6 under the section titled Consent:  

Any preventive (which by definition includes vaccines), diagnostic, and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free, and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

In Article 3 of this same Declaration it states:

The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.  

Vaccine mandates, in and of themselves, with or without exemptions, are in complete violation of the Nuremberg Code and other international codes of ethics, as is any form of mandated medicine.

For those of us in CA, MS, and WV, this hallmark of ethical medicine is no longer being heeded at any level and the aforementioned agreements to which the U.S is a signer are currently being violated.  Your state could be next.

Today, I would like to begin by reassuring you that you do not need to be a PhD chemist or biologist, or a medical doctor, or some type of genius to understand that what is going on with vaccines is not scientific, is not proven, is not safe, is not working as claimed, is not ethical, and is not wise.  All that is truly needed is a basic level of common sense, parental instincts that have not been demeaned, grossly manipulated, and obliterated by doctors and others, and the willingness and ears to hear the truth. 

Part of that truth involves challenging the notion that it is desirable for humans to be infection-free. The immune system, like our muscles and our brains, needs to be challenged to become stronger and more efficient. However, the challenges must occur via natural means, not via artificial and damaging means. The current and unnatural goal of eliminating temporary, acute, immune-system-building infections has led to the development of permanent, chronic, immune-system-destroying diseases. So we must ask ourselves, do we want the former or the latter?

We must also ask ourselves, what benefits are we forever forfeiting when we interfere via vaccination in an attempt to try to avoid contracting infections naturally? To list but a few, one is forfeiting: permanent lifetime immunity; the future ability for females to pass on immunity to their baby both in the womb and via breastfeeding; contracting these illnesses during childhood, when they are mostly benign, and instead contracting them during adulthood, when they are far more serious; protection against and avoidance of many types of cancer, both during childhood and later on in adulthood; and, perhaps most importantly, the purity of one’s immune system, which can never be restored. Wow, that is quite a list of health benefits one forfeits when one chooses to vaccinate.

We must be aware that we have been taught to fear infections for which there is a vaccine. Due to this erroneous teaching, one might call it brainwashing, the majority of Americans is now suffering from lifelong, debilitating diseases which manifest as chronic illnesses, developmental disabilities, and premature deaths.

I also want to challenge the notion that vaccinations equal immunization. Not true at all, and that is why you will never hear me call vaccinations “immunizations”, because they are not. Vaccine “efficacy” is allowed to be determined by the presence of titers post-vaccination in small numbers of study subjects. Titers are concentrations of antibodies. However, the presence of elevated vaccine-induced titers does not mean a person is now immune from that which he was vaccinated against, it simply means his blood has been purposefully and artificially tainted by a vaccine. In reality, people with low to zero titers for a certain infection can remain uninfected when exposed to that illness, and conversely, people with extremely high titers for a certain infection can contract the illness when exposed. Therefore, the presence of vaccine-induced titers offers no proof of vaccine efficacy…yet, it continues to be used as proof of efficacy…and vaccine recipients continue to be duped…and poisoned.

Furthermore, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no research comparing vaccine-induced titers to titers acquired via natural means, such as through breastmilk and/or through exposure to natural infection. Such a comparison study is required before claims of any kind can be made about vaccine-induced titers.

If any of you sitting here today is still comfortable with the notion of vaccines and with the practice of vaccinating, I anticipate that you will be very uncomfortable with both by the end of my presentation…at least, that is my hope!

Here are a few questions I’d like to begin with in an effort to dispel the myths that vaccines are safe, effective, properly licensed, and properly monitored post-marketing:

  1. How can vaccines be both safe, as touted by doctors, government regulators, and the media, and unavoidably unsafe, meaning inherently dangerous, as declared by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011? Both statements cannot be true.
  2. If vaccines are safe, why then do we have the1986 National Childhood Vaccine InjuryAct, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the Vaccine Injury Table, and lengthy sections on each and every vaccine package insert detailing adverse events, including death, that have resulted from those very vaccines? If vaccines are safe, then why do this Act of Congress, this reporting system, this compensation program, and these warning lists exist?
  3. If the FDA and CDC readily admit that only 1-10% of adverse drug reactions, including those for vaccines, is ever reported, yet over $3.5 billion has been paid out to date for vaccine injuries and vaccine fatalities, from a program that the vast majority of our doctors and citizenry is unaware of, and from a program in which less than 1/3 of vaccine injury and vaccine fatality cases is actually compensated, then how can it be said that vaccines are safe? In other words, with 90+ percent of vaccine-induced injuries and deaths going unreported, with most people completely unaware of being able to file a claim with the VICP, or finding out about the VICP after the brief 3-year statute of limitations for filing a claim has passed, and with the VICP being a government-run-and-rigged kangaroo court in which discovery is not allowed, the more than $3.5 billion in payouts is but the tip of the proverbial iceberg when it comes to what should have been paid out to date for vaccine-induced injuries and deaths!
  4. If vaccines are safe, why are parents worldwide using every alternative media source possible to tell their tragic stories of what happened to their children, and/or themselves, post-vaccination? Mainstream media refuses to cover these extremely prevalent stories, but that has not stopped parents, and others, from getting the word out. The stories are endless, they are tragic, and they did not need to happen. My guess is that Del Bigtree will be sharing some stories from being on the road with the VaXxed Team when he speaks this afternoon, and I will share my son’s story later in my presentation.
  5. If vaccines are safe, why did the U.S. Congress remove liability from those who make and administer vaccines in 1986? For those who are not familiar with the 1986 NCVIA passed by Congress, it came about as a result of vaccine-making pharmaceutical companies being sued time and again for their dangerous and deadly vaccine products.  Losing costly lawsuits for their vaccine products was not good for PR or for the bottom line. As a result, they and their well-paid lobbyists whined to and pleaded with Congress to shield them from liability for their vaccine products, claiming vaccines were needed to ensure public health. Unbelievably, at the very time when Congress should have ordered an immediate moratorium on all vaccines to get to the bottom of why so many children, and people of all ages, were being injured and killed by vaccines, they instead indemnified those who were making and administering the dangerous and deadly vaccines. Insane! Unethical! So very wrong! Not surprisingly, with no liability to worry about, leaving them with zero incentive and zero accountability to make safe vaccine products, vaccine makers began churning out new vaccines, and within just a few short years, our nation’s vaccine schedule for children nearly tripled!  Tragically, my 3 children were born just after this tripling occurred, in 1992, 1994, and 1996.
  6. If vaccines work, why are those who choose to vaccinate concerned about and fearful of those who choose not to vaccinate? Those who vaccinate should feel oh so protected, and if they don’t, then at some level, they know they have been duped into allowing faulty products to be injected into their children and/or themselves. Here’s another way to look at it: how is my taking a medicine going to make your medicine more effective? Answer: it isn’t.
  7. If vaccines work, why in nearly every “outbreak” of pertussis, measles, and mumps in our country has the majority, if not a full 100%, of those infected been vaccinated? That should not be the case if vaccines work as claimed, and it makes null and void the theory of vaccine-induced herd immunity.
  8. If vaccines work, why are booster shots needed, and continually added to the CDC’s recommended schedule? Booster shots are proof of vaccine failure. They are proof that vaccines don’t provide lifetime, or even lengthy, immunity. They are proof that vaccines are not effective for all, if any, or for any known or proven amount of time. And once again, the ridiculous yet oft-touted claim of vaccine-induced herd immunity is blown to bits by the continual addition of and need for booster shots.
  9. If vaccines work, why are 5 DTaP vaccines needed by age 5, with another TDaP at age 12, and additional TDaPs every 10 years? And why do those following that intense vaccination schedule still contract, harbor, and spread pertussis? That is proof that vaccines don’t work, and that the powers that be know it.
  10. If vaccines are safe and effective, why do those who have received live-virus vaccines, such as the chicken pox, measles, mumps, rubella, shingles, nasal flu, rotavirus, yellow fever, and possibly other vaccines, shed and spread the diseases for which they were vaccinated to others, for up to 6 weeks, perhaps for much longer? And since viral shedding by vaccine recipients of live-virus vaccines is a known and documented fact, why then are recipients of live-virus vaccines not required to self-quarantine, at home, until blood, saliva, and urine tests conclusively confirm that they are no longer capable of shedding and spreading the diseases for which they were vaccinated?
  11. If vaccines are safe and effective, why do the vaccinated often contract the diseases for which they were vaccinated? One of my favorite examples of this is to read the list of adverse reactions on the flu vaccine package insert. Virtually ALL the symptoms of the flu are listed right there, in plain print, under adverse reactions!
  12. If vaccines are safe and effective, why are those who have received the DTaP and TDaP vaccines able to harbor pertussis in their throats after encountering pertussis post-vaccination, enabling them to infect others while remaining asymptomatic…which is extremely dangerous as neither they nor those with whom they come in contact are aware that they are contagious? This fact blows the vaccine profiteers’ theory of “cocooning a newborn” right out of the water. In actuality, those vaccinated with pertussis-containing vaccines pose a real threat to infants, the immune-compromised, and the elderly. To make matters worse, those vaccinated with pertussis-containing vaccines are more susceptible to the rarer and more virulent strains of pertussis against which vaccines offer no protection…and those more virulent and dangerous strains are the very ones they might be spreading to unsuspecting others.
  13. If vaccines are safe and effective, why the refusal to do a comparison study between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated to determine which group fares better both health- and development-wise, in both the short- and long-term?  Without such a comparison study, absolutely no safety, efficacy, or necessity claims about vaccines can be made.
  14. If vaccines are supposed to be monitored post-licensure and post-marketing, why are multivalent vaccines allowed? A multivalent vaccine is a vaccine that contains more than 1 vaccine, up to 6, given via a single shot. And why is more than one vaccine, be it monovalent or multivalent, allowed to be given at a time? With such careless and reckless practices the norm, how can it ever be determined which vaccine might be problematic for a recipient if more than one is administered at once?  Answer: It can’t be, and that is why it is allowed. Such practices are an excellent way to muddy the waters and keep inconvenient and horrendous truths that the vaccine profiteers don’t want you to know from being exposed. Additionally, the average parent’s warning bells sound more and more loudly with each subsequent painful jab to their precious child.  Thus, the idea was hatched to cram as many vaccines into one syringe as possible to make the barbaric practice of vaccination less repugnant for the parent, and to make unpleasant and tragic results more difficult to pinpoint back to a particular vaccine.
  15. If vaccines are supposed to be monitored post-licensure and post-marketing, why are batch lots of vaccines allowed to be separated when shipped, unlike any other drug?  If lots are separated, how can it be quickly determined when there is a problematic “hot lot” so that an immediate warning and recall can be issued? A “hot lot” refers to a lot that is causing more adverse events and deaths than usual. Answer: With lots separated, hot lots can’t be quickly identified and recalled, and that is done on purpose. In the late 1970s, vaccine maker Wyeth appears to have developed a plan to evade hot-lot accusations. Why? Because in 1979, 11 babies died within 8 days of a DPT shot. Nine of them had been vaccinated with the same lot of pertussis vaccine, Wyeth #64201. Five died within 24 hours, 4 from the same lot. The following is from a Wyeth Internal Correspondence dated 8-27-79: “After the reporting of SIDS cases in TN, we discussed the merits of limiting distribution of a large number of vials from a single lot to a single state, county, or city health department and obtained agreement from senior management staff to proceed with such a plan.” I have a friend and colleague who for years worked in the pharmacy at a hospital. She confirmed that the only drug that is shipped in separated lots is vaccines. That is unconscionable, not to mention highly dangerous.
  16. If vaccines are safe and effective, why the special status for them? Not only are they the only drug for which the makers and those who administer them shielded from liability, not only are they the only drug shipped in separated lots, but they are the only drug for which it is not required that the package insert be given. Why would that be, unless the vaccine profiteers don’t want people seeing the horrific truths contained within those vaccine package inserts? Today, all that is required to be given is a CDC-produced, very brief Vaccine Information Sheet, known as a VIS. VISs are not at all an accurate reflection of the many and real, known and unknown, risks of the drugs about to be administered.
  17. If vaccines are supposed to be monitored post-licensure and post-marketing, why aren’t there billboards everywhere, and posters in every doctor’s office, hospital, and pharmacy, with information about VAERS and the VICP? Surely our government regulatory agencies, so concerned about our health, would want us to know how and where to alert them about problems with vaccines, right? Why does the majority of doctors not know about VAERS or the VICP?  Why are they not required to report any and all adverse events, including death, after administering vaccinations?  Why are they not required to inform parents and all vaccine recipients about VAERS and the VICP?  Why are they loathe to properly inform about, recognize, acknowledge, admit, report, and treat vaccine-induced injuries and deaths?  Why after someone is vaccine injured or vaccine killed is there absolutely no follow up from any government agency to determine what happened so that it can be prevented in the future? Answer: The complete and utter lack of monitoring vaccines post-licensure and post-marketing is purposeful. It is intentional. Our government regulatory agencies, in tight cahoots with pharmaceutical companies and their paid lobbyists, and with the willing compliance of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and their associated trade industry groups, choose to turn a blind eye to vaccine-induced injuries and deaths. They choose to keep well hidden the vaccine adverse events reporting system and the vaccine injury and death compensation program. These various entities, groups, and individuals are complicit in refusing to seek out, become informed about, acknowledge, admit, or allow anything that will undermine the public’s trust in vaccines and jeopardize the vaccine profits from which they all profit handsomely, to the tune of billions of dollars per year.

Hopefully, I have your wheels spinning by now, deeply questioning what is repeated over and over again, day in and day out, by the ever-growing list of those profiting from vaccines…that vaccines are safe and effective…so safe and effective, as a matter of fact, that they are now being recommended for pregnant women…for newborns within hours of taking their first breath, even if born prematurely…for a total of 70 times between birth and age 18…74 times if the mother allowed herself to be vaccinated while pregnant…and 90 more times after age 18 if the person lives to be 80 and complies with the CDC recommended vaccine schedule for adults…with those numbers sure to increase with every passing year as the pharmaceutical companies wield their money, power, and influence over our government regulators and elected officials to ensure that they approve, recommend, and mandate more and more billion-dollar-blockbuster vaccines, for which all of these vaccine profiteers will be liability free.

To assist in ensuring the public’s compliance with ever-increasing vaccine recommendations and mandates, the vaccine profiteers will create one “outbreak”, and/or one “pandemic”, after another…be it the swine flu, the H1N1 flu, Ebola, measles, Zika, or whatever name they want the disease to be called for which they want to contrive and instill great fear in the public. And mainstream media, which benefits exceptionally well from all of Pharma’s advertising dollars, to the tune of 70% of their entire advertising income in non-election years, will be all too happy to get the word out via newscasts, commercials, magazine ads, billboards, etc.  Pharmacies and grocery stores, now part of the vaccine profiteers club, will jump on the fear-of-contagion bandwagon, too, and assault you with endless posters inside and outside their establishments, encouraging all customers to roll up their sleeves for the latest vaccine or latest booster recommendation, perhaps even offering an enticing 20% off your bill at checkout if you succumb.  From personal experience, I can tell you that 20% off your shopping bill that day will in no way compensate for the tens, more likely hundreds, of thousands of dollars you will be left paying, out of pocket, when vaccine injuries begin to manifest themselves. And that whopping out of pocket dollar amount does not take into account the personal and emotional costs of the life-altering impacts that occur post vaccine-induced injury and death, nor the incalculable individual and family suffering that often ensue.

As I mentioned earlier, only a basic level of common sense is needed to see through the blatant lies told in the endless vaccine propaganda. There are scores of different vaccines used day in and day out, on the healthy and the sick, on those too young to have a known health status, and on those being admitted to and discharged from hospitals, with no difference in doses, no assessment for need, and without proper and ample consideration of timing and risks based on weight, age, health history, family health history, and current health status. These scores of vaccines are given in countless combinations, to every age group from fetuses to the very elderly…and we are supposed to believe that all of these vaccines are safe for all people in endless combinations at all times?!  That is what we are told, that is what we are expected to trust in and believe, without questioning, complaint, or refusal. Vaccine recipients are treated as identical in all aspects, entered into a one-size-fits-all lifetime medical procedures program. To what other medicine do we ascribe such ridiculous logic? None!

I recently wrote an article titled Vaccines: Elimination Mandatory!, and I wanted to talk to you today about why I contend that the complete elimination of vaccines at this point in time is the only sufficient and ethical course of action based on the facts which I am now going to share with you.

Vaccines are medical procedures that never should have been approved. Here’s why:

  • Not one vaccine has ever been tested according to the scientific gold standard, that of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Yes, you heard that correctly, not one.
  • The myriad combinations in which vaccines are administered have never been tested, either. For an infant at a “catch up” appointment, meaning they missed a “well-baby” appointment at which vaccines would have been administered, that can mean receiving up to 13 vaccines containing 13 different viral and bacterial infections, at once, injected via 8 separate needles. That is the equivalent of taking up to 13 medications at once whose interactions have never been studied. To make matters even more serious, the number 13 does not include the many other ingredients that accompany and worsen the effects of being injected with 13 viral and bacterial infections, ingredients such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, anti-freeze, phenol, MSG, polysorbate 80, Triton X-100 detergent, food proteins, animal viruses and retroviruses, fetal tissue from aborted human babies, and more. The number 13 also does not include ingredients that are not required to be listed on the label, but which are permitted under the cover of “trade secrets”. Undisclosed ingredients being injected into our children? Unacceptable, unethical, and terribly dangerous. Ask yourself, would you want your baby contracting multiple illnesses, up to 13, at once? Would you want your baby contracting multiple illnesses at once while also being poisoned at the same time? If you are following the CDC’s recommended schedule, you are allowing that.
  • Many vaccines contain mercury in the form of thimerosal. Thimerosal was patented in 1928, and has been used ever since, despite it being tested on humans only once, in 1929…a test in which all 22 subjects died within 2 days of receiving the thimerosalMercury is a known toxin and neurotoxin, with no safe amount for a human. It can kill when applied externally. With vaccines, it is injected internally. Claims that mercury has been removed from vaccines given to children are false.
  • Many vaccines contain ingredients that have never been clinically approved by the FDA. Defying common sense and violating basic safety and ethics standards, the FDA approves vaccines that contain never-proven-safe and known-to-be-dangerous ingredients. For example, there are two forms of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines, aluminum hydroxyphosphate salt and aluminum oxyhydroxide salt. Neither has been clinically approved by the FDA, both are known toxins and neurotoxins, yet both are in vaccines approved by the FDA. These are but two examples, there are more.
  • Aluminum, used in the majority of today’s vaccines, is an undisputed toxin and neurotoxin. Its toxicity has been known for some 90 years. The two aluminum adjuvants mentioned above are used in vaccines for the express purpose of inducing toxicity. Permitting the use of aluminum in vaccines is akin to permitting lead paint in government approved toys and teething rings. Aluminum, like mercury, is also a known teratogen, an agent or factor that causes malformation of an embryo. Permitting its use in vaccines for pregnant women is akin to permitting that which causes spontaneous abortion and/or deformity of the fetus…thalidomide comes to mind. Yesterday, Dr. Stephanie Seneff discussed the possible role of TDaP and DTP vaccines, both of which contain aluminum, and both of which were recently recommended to be given to pregnant women in Brazil, as possible causes for the rise in cases of microcephaly there. Microcephaly is abnormal smallness of the head, a congenital condition, associated with incomplete brain development.
  • Aluminum adjuvants (not clinically approved and used to induce toxicity), monovalent and/or multivalent vaccines (improperly approved and containing unapproved ingredients, including those used to induce toxicity, and containing ingredients known to be toxic and neurotoxic), or a combination thereof are used as the controls in vaccine safety trials. A control is supposed to be a placebo, an inert substance which doesn’t cause harm or therapeutic effect. Neither an aluminum adjuvant nor a vaccine, nor a combination thereof, qualifies as a placebo, therefore, no valid safety claims can be made for any vaccine.
  • Vaccine making pharmaceutical companies are permitted by the FDA to do their own safety testing, with no oversight and no verification from a financially independent entity. As mentioned in the point above, they do not use placebos for controls. Nevertheless, when they say that the trial vaccine proved to be no more dangerous or deadly than the aluminum adjuvant, or other vaccine, or combination thereof, against which it was tested, they declare it safe. Is that how you want medical procedures for your children being declared safe? The FDA and CDC accept this current method of testing. They also accept that vaccines are not tested for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or impairment of fertility.
  • And the real kicker, as I mentioned earlier, which bears repeating…there has never been a comparison study of the unvaccinated versus the vaccinated. That is because the vaccine profiteers know that the health, development, fertility, and longevity of the completely unvaccinated are far superior to that of the vaccinated. As a result of that knowledge, they have managed to keep that study from being done for more than seven decades. Without such a comparison study, absolutely no safety, efficacy, or necessity claims about vaccines can be made.

Let all that sink in for a minute if you will.  Our nation’s vaccine program is built on a deceptive and fraudulent house of cards that has nothing to do with scientifically valid truths or the health and well being of our children. 

Furthermore, whistleblowers have come forth from both industry and government agencies confessing that vaccine safety and efficacy data are fraudulent…that inconvenient and undeniable truths are suppressed, omitted, and destroyed…lest public confidence in vaccines, billions in profits, and trillions that would need to be paid out in compensation, be threatened. Notes from secretly-held meetings reveal similar illegal and unethical behavior by doctors, government regulators, and pharmaceutical company executives.

Yet, these medical procedures, not properly tested, improperly declared safe, known to contain toxic and neurotoxic ingredients, and barbaric as they are, have not only been approved, they have been mandated. That is corruption and insanity at its worst. It is evil, and it is destroying the majority of our citizenry.

Since our government regulators have failed to require or ensure vaccine safety, it must be assumed, and can be shown, that not one single vaccine is safe or advisable.  Therefore:

What is required is an immediate moratorium on all vaccinations, for all people. 

That is what should have happened in 1986, versus Congress passing an Act indemnifying all who make and administer vaccines, at a point in time when vaccines were maiming and killing thousands.

Not demanding an immediate moratorium on vaccinations is no different than accepting any of the following scenarios:

  • We know that a particular brand of car has a history of blowing up, harming and killing people, but government regulators say it can stay on the market…and our Congress will indemnify the makers and sellers of that car so victims cannot sue.
  • We know that a particular brand of crib is causing thousands of babies to become trapped between the bars, leading to serious injuries and death, but government regulators say it can stay on the market…and our Congress will indemnify the makers and sellers of that crib so parents cannot sue.
  • We know that a particular brand of canola oil is making people violently ill, causing permanent brain damage, causing immune and nervous system damage, causing severe GI issues, and in some cases killing people, but government regulators say it can stay on the market…and our Congress will indemnify the makers and sellers of that canola oil so that those who consume it cannot sue.
  • We know that a particular medication has a history of inducing heart attacks, strokes, and aneurysms, resulting in disability, mental incapacitation, paralysis, and death, but government regulators say it can stay on the the market…and our Congress will indemnify those who make and administer that medication so that its recipients cannot sue.

Do you see a pattern of absurdity here? Well, that same pattern applies to vaccines.  Government regulators, who regulate many industries including the pharmaceutical industry, should not permit the continued use of vaccine products which they openly admit cause brain damage, immune system damage, nervous system damage, seizures, anaphylaxis, blood disorders, gastrointestinal system damage, paralysis, and death…to name but a few of the health disasters and fatalities that are known and admitted. Yet, these products are approved, recommended, and increasingly mandated for…newborns, within hours of taking their first breath, including those born prematurely…infants…toddlers…young children…teenagers…college students…daycare workers…parent volunteers…hospital workers and those whose business takes them into hospitals…those admitted to the hospital for any reason, including grave illness and/or surgery…the elderly…everyone…including recommendations for pregnant women. No one now escapes the recommendation of, and for many, the mandate of, these dangerous, potentially-fatal medical procedures.

To review, we have now disproven the endless claims that vaccines are safe and effective; we have exposed the complete lack of proper vaccine testing and post-marketing surveillance; and we have covered many reasons why vaccines should never have come to market, and therefore, should be eliminated immediately.

I now want to take some time to review vaccine ingredients. I will start by saying that if I were to put the ingredients I am about to describe in a baby bottle and then feed them to your baby, you would have me arrested, or you might consider taking me out yourself!  Furthermore, if I were to inject one or more vaccines into an orange, I am betting that you would refuse to eat it. Yet, when someone in a white coat enters the exam room, parents allow these heinous ingredients, made in heinous ways and in heinous conditions, to be injected into their babies and children!  And to make this happen, babies and children must be manhandled, physically restrained, and held down while they are painfully stabbed with up to 8 needles.This is barbaric! That is why I mentioned at the beginning of my talk that in addition to common sense, what is needed to see this barbaric, dangerous, and dare I say insane practice for what it is are parental instincts that have not been demeaned, grossly manipulated, and obliterated by doctors, nurses, and others.

It is important to mention that even though you wouldn’t allow me to put vaccines or vaccine ingredients into your baby’s bottle, your baby would actually have a much better chance of clearing the toxic and inflammatory ingredients in vaccines if they ingested them, versus having them injected directly into their muscle tissue and subcutaneous fat. But due to the fact that vaccines are injected, the first parts of our incredible, God-given immune system are completely bypassed, specifically, our respiratory and digestive tracts.  As a result, vaccine ingredients are deposited into a closed system where they find their way into the brain, organs, bones, tissues, and bloodstream, where they will do nothing but poison, inflame, and cause harm. To make matters worse, vaccination is a one-way street…once you allow vaccines in, you can’t get them back out…or deactivate them.

Now, to review vaccine ingredients, I am going to pose some more questions to you.

  1. Would you allow lead to be injected into your child? Of course not, you know that would cause brain damage, not to mention other problems. However, millions of mothers across America are allowing doctors to inject mercury and aluminum into their children, both of which are severely neurotoxic (mercury many more times so than lead…and yes, mercury is still in vaccines given to infants and children, in addition to those given to pregnant women). To make matters worse, mercury and aluminum are synergistically neurotoxic, meaning that when they are given together, as is often done during vaccination, their individual toxicity is made far worse by the presence of the other, many times worse. Interestingly, we are seeing record numbers of children in our country with brain damage, which manifests as: speech and language disorders, including complete lack of speech; attention, learning, and behavior disorders;  social skills deficits; seizure disorders; OCD; extreme anxiety disorders; sensory processing disorders; tics; and of course, Autism.  Coincidence? 
  2. Would you allow something that could cause cancer, say asbestos, to be injected into your child? Of course not, you know that cancer is often akin to a death sentence, if not the first go-round, then the times that often follow. However, millions of mothers across America are allowing doctors to inject formaldehyde, phenol, and MSG into their children, all of which are known carcinogens. To boot, recent tests have revealed the presence of glyphosate, one of the active and toxic ingredients in Round Up and other herbicides, in a number of vaccines, including very high levels of glyphosate in the MMR vaccine. Glyphosate is a highly-suspected carcinogen, shown to cause massive tumors in rats fed food laced with it. It is synergistically toxic when paired with aluminum, an ingredient found in the majority of today’s vaccines. It’s no wonder pharmaceutical companies don’t test to see whether or not their vaccine products cause cancer, they already know the answer. Instead, they simply write “not tested for carcinogenicity” on their package inserts, and our unethical government regulators let them get away with that.  Interestingly, we are seeing record numbers of children in our country with leukemia, lymphoma, and other cancers. Coincidence?
  3. Would you allow something that could cause life-threatening auto-immune diseases, something like aluminum, to be injected into your child? Of course not. You know that auto-immune diseases are progressive and lead to premature death. However, millions of mothers across America are allowing doctors to inject not only aluminum, but also mercury, polysorbate 80, retroviruses from pigs, mice, monkeys, and other animals, DNA fragments from other humans, specifically from aborted fetuses, and from various animals, and laboratory-created live and killed viruses and retroviruses from both humans and animals, all of which are known to cause auto-immune diseases.  Interestingly, we are seeing record numbers of children in our country with Type 1 diabetes, asthma, Crohn’s disease, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, demyelination, ulcerative colitis, and many more auto-immune diseases.  Coincidence?
  4. Would you allow something that could cause life-altering and life-threatening asthma and allergies to be injected into your child? Of course not. You know that both asthma and allergies severely restrict a child’s life in many ways and that both can result in death. However, millions of mothers across America are allowing doctors to inject food proteins (which the blood is incapable of breaking down into amino acids, resulting in inflammation), antibiotics such as neomycin, polymyxin B, gentamicin, and streptomycin, and toxic chemicals at the same time as adjuvants (e.g. aluminum), which are designed to artificially overstimulate the immune system, resulting in the chronic and sometimes fatal conditions of asthma and allergies. Additionally, new studies regarding what is called “molecular mimicry” continue to emerge, demonstrating that when protein fragments in vaccine antigens match protein fragments of proteins in the body, it sets the stage for allergies and other autoimmune problems. Interestingly, we are seeing record numbers of children in our country with asthma, life-threatening peanut allergies, numerous types of food allergies and food intolerances, and numerous types of environmental allergies. Coincidence?
  5. Would you allow something that could cause infertility, such as nonstick chemicals and solvents, to be injected into your child? Of course not. You know that you would never want to destroy your child’s future reproductive capabilities. However, millions of mothers across America are allowing doctors to inject their children with polysorbate 80, known to adversely affect fertility. And who knows what propylene glycol (antifreeze), Triton X100 (detergent), aluminum, mercury, foreign DNA fragments, and the myriad other vaccine ingredients do to one’s future reproductive ability, especially when injected in conjunction with polysorbate 80.  We know that the HPV vaccine has caused Primary Ovarian Failure (which is premature menopause) and amenorrhea (the prolonged cessation of a female’s menstrual cycle) in girls and young women, rendering them infertile, and possibly sterile for life. We know that tetanus vaccines given to girls and women in Kenya were laced with Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), rendering them sterile. How? Administering HCG via vaccination stimulates the production of antibodies to HCG, and these antibodies then cause the woman’s body to reject embryos, effectively sterilizing her. Such an HCG-laced tetanus vaccine is in actuality a contraception vaccine. Do you think any of these Kenyan women was told that prior to vaccination? To add to the evilness and deception, the Kenyan women were given a 5-dose tetanus program spread over a number of years, versus the 2-3 dose norm. Clearly, those vaccines were being used for induced sterility and birth control without the girls’ and women’s knowledge or consent.  Does any parent or vaccine recipient really know what is in the vaccines being injected into their child or themselves? It’s no wonder pharmaceutical companies don’t test to see whether or not their vaccine products cause infertility, they already know the answer.  Instead, they simply write “not tested for impairment of fertility” on their package inserts, and our unethical government regulators let them get away with that.  Interestingly, we are seeing record numbers of couples struggling with infertility issues.  Coincidence?
  6. Would you allow something that could kill your baby to be injected into your otherwise healthy child? Of course not! Mothers would lay down their lives for their children, they don’t purposefully put them in harm’s way. However, millions of mothers across America are allowing doctors to inject their children with more and more vaccines, not knowing that each and every one carries the risk of death, even more so when combined, as they most often are.  Interestingly, we are seeing record numbers of babies who are dying before their 1st birthday in the U.S., including many of  “SIDS” and “SBS” (the labels that unethical doctors and unethical medical examiners use for vaccine-induced deaths instead of calling them what they are…i.e. vaccine-induced deaths). Coincidence?

Now that we have discussed what is actually in vaccines, let’s talk once more about how parental instincts have been demeaned, grossly manipulated, and obliterated, specifically, about how parents have been grievously lied to and misled, to the point where parents are now allowing things that simply do not make sense. Imagine looking from the outside in, and seeing a tiny newborn, small infant, or trusting toddler, being held down, painfully stuck with a needle multiple times, screaming so that its face is beet red with tears, all while the child’s parents not only watch, but due to being lied to and coerced, they participate in this atrocity! What must this do to the psyche and stress hormones of a child to have this happen, time and again, while the person he trusts most is not only allowing it, but participating in it? 

What would you say if you walked by the window to my house, peered in, and saw my husband and me holding down our tiny baby on the dining room table, then roughly jabbing and injecting it multiple times with toxic cocktails and true witches’ brews of ingredients…all while our baby, or child of any age, screamed bloody murder, trying to escape our grip and savagery?  I imagine you would whip out your cell phone, call the police, then try to barge into our home to stop the abuse!  How is what I just described any different than what goes on every minute of every day in doctors’ offices and hospitals in our country and across the world?  To be very clear, it isn’t.

To state it very plainly, vaccination is child abuse in the form of medical assault and battery. With regard to adults, when vaccination is carried out against one’s will or wishes, say for school admittance, job requirements, elder care and housing, or military admission, or when carried out with one who is hesitant, or with one who is unsuccessful in resisting and refusing, it also meets the legal definition for assault and battery. We must begin to label these vaccine atrocities for what they are: blatant and inexcusable child abuse; medical assault and battery; and when death is the result for the vaccine recipient, involuntary manslaughter. These vaccine-induced injuries, illnesses, and deaths are iatrogenic in naturemeaning they are caused by doctors and nurses. Vaccinations are crimes against humanity, and there is no time to mince words about this fact.

Let’s now move on to vaccine package inserts, which are rarely, if ever, read by doctors, nurses, pharmacists, parents, or vaccine recipients. In the packet you will receive after my presentation, you will find a link that will take you to all vaccine package inserts. I am going to read portions of just one package insert for you, but I do hope you will make the time to read at least a few vaccine package inserts for yourself. A few is all it will take to make you realize that these products should never have been licensed, much less be mandated.

I am going to focus on Merck’s Recombivax HB, a vaccine for hepatitis B. The hepatitis B vaccine is recommended to be given to all newborns in the U.S. within hours of being born. In the state of NY, it is mandated to be given to newborns whose mothers test positive for Hepatitis B, unless the mother knows she can utilize a religious exemption to refuse it. It is only advised against for premature babies weighing less than 4.4 lbs. Hepatitis B is a disease that is contracted sexually and via the sharing of needles by drug users. If a mother has hepatitis B, she can pass it on to her baby. Despite the fact that the vast majority of newborns in the U.S. is at zero risk for contracting hepatitis B, the vaccine is recommended and/or mandated for all. Right there, you know something very wrong is transpiring…and that something is others’ wealth being prioritized over your baby’s health.

When you look at the pre-licensure trials for this vaccine for infants and children, you will notice that there were no controls, only vaccinated subjects. A mere 147 subjects were studied, which included only healthy infants and children, from infants up to age 10. I have to wonder how many of those were of an age group that couldn’t talk and were unable to describe their symptoms? The insert does not say. You will notice that study subjects were followed for a mere 5 days post-vaccination. Does that sound like a reasonable, safe, or sufficient amount of time to you? Such a severely-limited timeframe doesn’t even correspond with the Vaccine Injury Table used by the VICP, in which it is acknowledged that many vaccine injuries, including death, may take up to a week, a month, and up to 6 months post-vaccination to manifest. And of course some vaccine injuries, such as what doctors choose to call “Autism” versus the catastrophic vaccine injury that it is, may take even longer to fully manifest and be diagnosed. Thus, the 5-day time period used to monitor and assess study subjects is in no way sufficient or ethical…and it shouldn’t be allowed by government regulators.

Here are symptoms reported during the clinical trial, i.e. within the first 5 days post-vaccination: irritability, fever, diarrhea, fatigue/weakness, diminished appetite, and rhinitis (irritation and swelling of the mucous membrane of the nose). Would you wish even one of those on a newborn?

Perhaps much more importantly, however, are the adverse reactions that have been reported post-marketing, meaning after the vaccine was licensed and in use. I will be redefining some of the medical terms in layperson’s terms so you will have a better understanding of the horrors being reported after being vaccinated with Merck’s hepatitis B vaccine.

Immune System Disorders: hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions (severe, potentially life-threatening, allergic reactions that can occur within seconds or minutes of exposure to something you’re allergic to), bronchospasm (spasm of bronchial smooth muscle producing narrowing of the bronchi, causing difficulty in breathing which can be mild to severe), and urticaria (a rash of round, red welts on the skin that itch intensely, sometimes with dangerous swelling, caused by an allergic reaction) within first few hours after vaccination; an apparent hypersensitivity syndrome (serum-like-sickness) of delayed onset, days to weeks after vaccination, including arthralgia/arthritis (joint pain/joint inflammation), fever, and dermatologic reactions such as urticaria, erythema multiforme (a type of hypersensitivity skin condition), ecchymoses (a discoloration of the skin caused by bleeding underneath), and erythema nodosum (skin inflammation in the fatty layer of skin which results in reddish, painful, tender lumps); autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus (a chronic inflammatory disease that occurs when your body’s immune system attacks your own tissues and organs; inflammation caused by lupus can affect many different body systems, including your joints, skin, kidneys, blood cells, brain, heart, and lungs), erythematous (redness of the skin or mucous membranes caused by dilation and congestion of the capillaries), lupus-like syndrome, vasculitis (inflammation of blood vessels), and polyarteritis nodosa (a serious blood vessel disease in which the small and medium-sized arteries become swollen and damaged).

Gastrointestinal Disorders:  Elevation of liver enzymes (indicating damage to the cells of or inflammation in your liver); constipation (which can result in inability to clear toxins and pain).

Nervous System Disorders:  Guillain Barre syndrome (a condition in which the immune system attacks the nerves, considered a medical emergency, and can result in paralysis); multiple sclerosis (a demyelinating disease; it is an unpredictable, often disabling disease of the central nervous system that disrupts the flow of information within the brain, and between the brain and body); exacerbation of MS; myelitis including transverse myelitis (inflammation of the spinal cord which can result in permanent paralysis); seizure; febrile seizure; peripheral neuropathy (damage to the peripheral nerves which causes weakness, numbness, and pain in hands and feet) including Bell’s Palsy (damage to the facial nerve that causes one side of the face to droop); radiculopathy (a condition due to a compressed nerve in the spine that can cause pain, numbness, tingling, or weakness along the course of the nerve); herpes zoster (shingles); migraine, muscle weakness; hypesthesia (a diminished capacity for physical sensation, especially the skin); encephalitis (brain inflammation).

Skin and Subcutaneous Disorders: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (a life-threatening skin condition); alopecia (hair loss); petechiae (red and purple spots caused by bleeding into the skin); eczema (itchy, red, and dry skin caused by inflammation).

By the way, the two worst things for a developing infant are toxicity and inflammation, both of which vaccines are expert at causing.

Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders: arthritis; pain in extremity.

Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders:  increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate (results from inflammation in the body); thrombocytopenia (a deficiency of platelets in the blood, causing bleeding into the tissues, bruising, and slow blood clotting after injury).

Psychiatric Disorders:  Irritability, agitation, somnolence (extreme sleepiness).

Eye Disorders:  Optic neuritis (inflammation of the optic nerve); tinnitus (ringing or buzzing in the ears, often with hearing loss); conjunctivitis (inflammation or infection of the outer membrane of the eyeball and the inner eyelid, also known as pink eye); visual disturbances; uveitis (inflammation of middle layer of the eye).

In other words, problems that can impact your baby’s ability to see and hear well, thus impacting and obstructing their proper development.

Cardiac Disorders:  Syncope (fainting); tachycardia (abnormal rapid heart rate unrelated to level of activity).

What is missing from this list is the Death category.  How many of the aforementioned vaccine-induced injuries resulted in death? Not surprisingly, that category is noticeably and wrongfully absent.

For any of you here today who allowed this vaccine for your child, were you told about all of these potential side effects your child might experience, and possibly have to live with for the rest of their life?  Were you told that there was no control group used when studying its effects in those aged 0 up to 10 years? Were you told that only 147 subjects in this age group were studied during clinical trials? Were you told the post-vaccination surveillance time period was only 5 days? Were you even told how your child could contract hepatitis B, and the extreme unlikelihood that that would happen during their infancy, toddlerhood, and childhood? If not, was your doctor practicing ethical medicine? Should he be liability-free when administering this vaccine to his patients? If he weren’t liability-free, would he be administering it?

I am going to close by telling you the story of our middle child, Ryan, now 22 years old.  Ryan was born a healthy baby with an Apgar score of 9. I had a natural childbirth with him, receiving no medications during labor or delivery. Immediately after birth, he was given a vitamin K shot, which might have contained aluminum. I do not know if the particular brand he received contained aluminum, as some do, because I was not told, and I did not know to ask…or to refuse the procedure…for which there was no evidence he needed. He was also given antibiotic eye drops, which I have since come to find out used to be given only to babies whose mothers had gonorrhea. Now they are given to all newborns in the hospital, whether or not the mother has gonorrhea…which I did not.  Again, another needless medical intervention for my newborn son. Both the vitamin K shot and the antibiotic eye drops were given as “routine standard of care”, as though they came with no risk, without any assessment for need, and without asking permission of me or my husband. To the best of my knowledge, he did not receive the hepatitis B vaccine in the hospital.

When he was 2 months old, I dutifully took him in for his 2-month “well baby” appointment. Looking back, with hindsight being 20/20, he would never be well again after that first of many vaccine poisonings. Up until that 2-month appointment, Ryan was a typical and normally-developing baby.  He nursed well, slept often, and cried when hungry, tired, upon awakening, or needing to be changed.  After that appointment, at which he received the whole cell DPT vaccine, the oral polio vaccine, and the Hib vaccine, together containing a total of 50 mcg of mercury, Ryan stopped crying…and I mean completely.  I still remember the very next day thinking, my, this is odd, Ryan hasn’t cried at all today…and the lack of crying continued…the next time I remember him crying was when he accidentally crashed his head into a table when a toddler.

I should mention that I received absolutely no information at that appointment about the vaccines Ryan was given. There was absolutely no informed consent given to me, or received by the doctor from me. There was no thorough discussion, or discussion of any kind, regarding the adverse reactions that could very well occur from the vaccines given, which included polio itself since he was given the live-virus polio vaccine, seizures, brain swelling, brain damage, SIDS, to name but a very few of the many possible adverse reactions. Also absent was a thorough discussion of family medical history, which would have included many contraindications to vaccination for our children. Rather, when I walked in the exam room, a silver tray held the vaccines Ryan was to receive that day.  Without so much as telling me which vaccines Ryan was getting, the nurse weighed him, measured him, gave him a total of 5 vaccines, wrote down on his brand new “record of immunizations” card the vaccines she had given him, handed it to me, and left the room. I did not receive the vaccine package inserts, as I would have for any other drug Ryan would receive. I did not receive a vaccine booklet detailing all of the childhood vaccines as federal law required at the time, nor even a sheet of paper about the vaccines Ryan had just been given. Approximately 15 minutes later is when the doctor actually came in, without so much as a word about the vaccines Ryan had just received.  This scene would repeat itself at every one of Ryan’s “well-baby” appointments for the next 2 years of his life…from which Ryan would leave sicker, more delayed, and developing more odd behaviors every single time.

At 4 months old, Ryan received the DPT, oral polio, and Hib vaccines, again, which meant another 50 mcg of mercury.  After this appointment, looking back at video footage, he was getting harder, instead of easier, to engage. Ryan was still not crying to get his needs met at this time, and would lie silently in his crib when put down, even if not tired, and when awake after a nap, until someone came to get him.  He was an exceedingly quiet baby.  And I just thought, oh, he’s so good!

At 6 months old, Ryan received the DPT and Hib vaccines, another 50 mcg of mercury. After this appointment, 2 very strange things began to happen. Ryan’s breath began to smell odd, a chemical smell of sorts…alcohol? ammonia?…which I now know was indicative of a serious yeast overgrowth problem in his gut. He also began to laugh hysterically in the middle of the night in his crib for no apparent reason.  My husband and I would hustle into his room when we heard this, and there he would lie, staring up at the ceiling, with nothing on it, laughing hysterically, not even acknowledging that we had come into the room. Not knowing what to make of it, we told ourselves that he was just a very happy baby.

At 9 months old, Ryan received a hepatitis B vaccine containing another 12.5 mcg of mercury.  When I mentioned to the doctor at this appointment that Ryan’s breath had a strange odor to it, which I could only compare to an alcohol-like smell at the time, she asked me, and I quote, “Is he getting into your alcohol supply?” Ryan was only crawling at the time, would not have been able to open a wine bottle or beer can, of which we rarely had any around, and which would have been kept in the refrigerator or behind a closed door in our pantry. I remember being astounded at such an inane question. She did not even bend over to smell Ryan’s breath.  Instead of taking my concerns seriously, she attacked my mothering.  This would not be the last time that happened.

At 12 months old, Ryan received a TB test and another hepatitis B vaccine, adding another 12.5 mcg of mercury to his load. After this appointment, Ryan stopped responding to his name, and his eye contact began to disappear. He began to stop looking up when his dad came home from work, and instead preferred to watch Wee Sing videos, mesmerized by them…as he still is today at age 22. He never did point or follow a point, both skills that occur naturally by age one…and the lack of such innately-wired skills was to become a red flag trademark of what was to become the Autism Epidemic.

At 15 months old, Ryan received his first MMR vaccine and another Hib vaccine, adding another 25 mcg of mercury to his small body, along with 3 live viruses that would later be discovered to wreak immense havoc in the young children receiving them in unison. After this appointment, Ryan’s babbling, which wasn’t that frequent to begin with, began to disappear, and he was losing the ability to imitate sounds we’d make for him to repeat. It was around this time that Ryan began to open and close doors, drawers, and cabinets repetitively, and play with the same hammer and ball toy over and over again. He also began spinning in circles at times, unresponsive to his name, and to requests to stop, or to come here…obliviously spinning in his own little world.

At 18 months old, Ryan received another DPT, another oral polio, and another Hep B vaccine, for a total of 37.5 more mcg of mercury, and for a grand total of 237.5 mcg of mercury in an 18-month timeframe for a tiny baby. This round of vaccines nearly killed him.  We went home, and he became lethargic, feverish, and completely out of it. I put him in his crib, and for the next 10-plus days, he was like a limp, lifeless rag doll…uninterested in eating, drinking, waking up, or doing anything.  His lethargy continued, and he slept many, many hours per day.

I called the doctor that same day, very worried about my baby. I did not get past the receptionist.  She told me that his reaction was perfectly normal, and not to worry. I called every business day for 10 consecutive days, and never got past the receptionist.  On the 10th day, the receptionist literally yelled at me and said, “Mrs. Hayes, please stop calling this office.  Anything that happens in the first 2 weeks after a vaccination is considered a normal vaccine reaction.  Do not call this office again until day 15!” Again, I was not put through to the doctor, nor did I receive a call back from the doctor despite calling so many days in a row. 

Looking back, Ryan was no doubt suffering from vaccine-induced encephalitis which led to vaccine-induced encephalopathy, i.e. brain inflammation leading to permanent brain damage.  When one reads the Vaccine Injury Table for vaccine-induced encephalopathy, it perfectly mirrors the symptoms of what doctors like to call “Autism”, purposefully misnamed to cast blame away from themselves and from vaccines.  Vaccine-induced encephalopathy and “autism” are one and the same in Ryan’s case, and in many other cases with which I am familiar, too.

After this set of vaccinations at 18 months, Ryan’s vocalizations became near nil, with his only remaining verbal imitation being “ba ba ba”, and only after numerous requests to imitate us. His obsession with videos increased, and he learned how to hit the eject button endlessly, putting the same video in and out until stopped. His visual and depth perceptions were not normal.  He would often watch his videos from an upside down or bent sideways position.  At the park, I could not get to him quickly enough after helping him down the slide before he would walk smack into a metal bridge that led back to the slide. He did not learn from this painful experience, as he would walk right back into the same metal bridge again the next time, resulting in a huge lump on his forehead, from which he never cried. Additionally, we had to hold Ryan’s hand when walking until he was 4 years old because he would trip and fall when making transitions from one surface to another, such as grass to cement…and he would not break his fall…but would instead land on his forehead.

Mercury poisoning affects both visual and depth perception, and Ryan was experiencing that in spades…we just didn’t know it at the time.  No one had ever mentioned that there was mercury in the vaccines he had received…not to mention levels of mercury that at just his 2-month “well-baby” appointment alone were 125 times in excess of the EPA-declared “safe” amount…not that there is a “safe” amount of mercury for any human, much less for one in the prime of their brain, nervous, and immune system development.  Furthermore, that EPA-declared “safe” amount is for ingested methylmercury, not for the injected ethylmercury used in vaccines, for which studies have suggested the “safe” amount should be much lower than for methylmercury…meaning that Ryan, and millions of other children at their 2-month appointments, received 500 times the supposed “safe” level of mercury!  500 times!  That is CRIMINAL!  No wonder he went silent after his first set of vaccines at 2 months…he had been gravely poisoned, and the poisoning would continue at regular intervals throughout the first 2 years of his life, without my husband or me having a clue.

I have since looked at his medical records from that time period.  There is no record of my calling multiple times over the course of 10 consecutive days to report how my child was non-responsive and suffering post-vaccination, nor is there a record of their telling me not to worry and that anything that happens in the first 2 weeks after vaccination is considered normal.

“Speech delay”, however, was written on the record at Ryan’s 18-month appointment.  I expressed concern to the doctor at that appointment that Ryan wasn’t speaking any words, and compared to his older sister at that age, there was a huge difference.  She looked at me and asked me, a stay-at-home mother whose precocious and extremely verbal 3 year-old daughter was sitting right next to me, “Do you ever sit on the ground and play with him?”  Yet again, instead of listening to my concerns, she chose to attack my mothering. I replied that, yes, I played with him, read to him, talked to him, sang to him, and interacted with him all day long, as did his sister and his father, yet he was not talking. 

She did some type of receptive test with him that day, too…things like asking him to walk across the room, walk on his tiptoes, and a couple other things I can’t remember.  He was unable to do anything she asked, including acknowledging that he was being spoken to by her. She looked at me, and this time asked, “Is he always this naughty?”  Instead of realizing that we had a toddler who had no receptive language and no understanding that he was even being addressed, she attacked him this time, and indirectly, my mothering again.  I replied, “Ryan is never naughty. If anything, we are concerned that he is too good.”  She had no response to that, and apparently, only thought to write “speech delay” on his chart that day.

At 24 months of age, Ryan received the new Varivax vaccine, for chicken pox. This was despite the fact that he was taking the antibiotic Septra at the time for an ear infection, and his records show that he was prescribed another round of Septra shortly thereafter, for either the same, or yet another, ear infection. Vaccines are not to be given when a child is sick, yet, Ryan’s doctor gave him a live-virus vaccine! The package insert for Varivax clearly states under “Contraindications” for vaccination “any febrile illness or active infection”. I still was not connecting the dots between Ryan’s vaccines and his subsequent regression and development of odd behaviors after every set of vaccines.  However, by that time, without any help from her, I had figured out that Ryan had what was being called “autism”.  Perhaps internally, I was beginning to suspect vaccines had something to do with his diagnosis and problems.  Remember, this was still before vaccines were the huge public controversy they are today, and before the internet. I remember telling her I didn’t think I wanted the chicken pox vaccine for him, and she said, after I had told her my suspicion that Ryan had autism (he had not been formally diagnosed yet, we were waiting to see a pediatric neurologist), “Well, if he has autism, you don’t want him getting chicken pox.”  I succumbed to that lousy argument of hers, and once again, without informed consent, and against the contraindications warning on the package insert which I was not told about, I allowed him to get that vaccine, too. Total silence from Ryan was the result. There was no more babbling or repeating any sounds whatsoever. Just complete and utter silence.

That would be his last vaccine. However, the regression would continue, in earnest, thanks to the 237.5 mcg of mercury he received, not to mention aluminum, for which I do not know the amounts…in addition to formaldehyde, other known allergens and carcinogens, cells and DNA fragments from both humans and animals, viruses and retroviruses of both human and animal origin, and who really knows what all he was shot up with. To this day, he tests toxic for a number of heavy metals, and the mercury is so deeply embedded in his brain, bones, tissues, and organs, it can’t be properly measured.  He tests positive for antibodies to myelin basic protein, meaning his body attacks the sheaths that are supposed to cover every nerve cell in his body, rendering them unable to communicate properly.  He tests allergic to many foods and is on a restricted diet. I could go on.

I have spent the last 2 decades of my life running an ABA program for Ryan, who requires a most-precise method of teaching for even the most basic of concepts, and then thousands of trials to learn something, and thousands more trials to retain and generalize it. He also sees a doctor who treats the vaccine-injured, for which we must fly to another state. That is despite my husband and I being co-founders of the MIND Institute at UC Davis, which is 30 minutes from our house. MIND has been a huge disappointment and has chosen to ignore and deny the unmistakable role that vaccines have played in the vaccine-induced autism epidemic that has been plaguing our country for more than 25 years.

At 6’4” tall and 180 lbs., Ryan is a boy in a man’s body, with a functioning level of a 4 or 5 year old. He is fully dependent on others and must be supervised and cared for around the clock, without pause. He did not complete high school or go to college. He does not have a driver’s license, and never will. He is not capable of living independently, or earning a living, or even holding down a menial, part-time job. He will not get married or have children. As a matter of fact, he will never even go out on a first date. He was robbed of ever living a typical and independent life because he was poisoned and disabled by vaccines beginning in 1994 and continuing through 1996. 

To date, there has been no admittance by his pediatrician or government officials about what was done to him.  No government agent has followed up on his vaccine injuries so the same thing won’t happen to other children. Rather, he is one of the unacknowledged, uncounted, uncompensated, ignored, discounted, and publicly-denied victims who make up the ever-increasing epidemic of vaccine-injured persons. 

There is indeed an urgent public health crisis sweeping our country and it is not measles, mumps, or chicken pox. It is Vaccine Injury. That is the raging public health crisis facing us today. Vaccine injury is real, and it isn’t rare. Due to an across-the-board denial of this public health crisis, vaccines are now the leading cause of coincidences in the world.

However, hopefully you have now figured out that the chronic illnesses and devastating disabilities facing our children, many of whom are young adults now, are not coincidences.  Neither are the lives that have been lost to SIDS, SBS, and other vaccine injuries that resulted in premature deaths. They were caused by vaccines, and this vaccine devastation and carnage must be stopped immediately. We cannot in good conscience allow there to be even one more vaccine victim.

Please join me in spreading the truth about the dangers, inefficacies, and lack of need for vaccines, and the truth about the vast corruption and deception that underlie vaccines from manufacture to mandate, and beyond. Please join me in working to not only ban vaccine mandates, but to ban vaccines themselves, as they never should have come to market.  Please join me in working to repeal the 1986 NCVIA, which wrongfully removed liability from its rightful owners, and please join me to overturn the 1905 Jacobson vs. MA decision, which is often cited as justification for vaccine mandates, even though the 1947 Nuremberg Code should have made that decision null and void, forever.  Your voice and your activism matter.  Together, we must reach the tipping point to end this vaccine madness in order to protect the health of our children, people of all ages, and the future of our country. 

Remember, when it comes to vaccines, there is nothing to be “pro” about.

Thank you.

Helpful links and resources:

  1. Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights at the UNESCO Convention in 2005 : http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
  2. The vaccinated can harbor and spread pertussis: http://www.pnas.org/content/111/2/787 and http://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2015/09/14/the-ugly-untold-truth-about-the-pertussis-vaccine/ and http://vaxtruth.org/2015/01/pertussis/
  3. The vaccinated can shed and spread the diseases for which they were vaccinated: http://www.cnbc.com/2015/03/03/globe-newswire-public-health-officials-know-recently-vaccinated-individuals-spread-disease.html
  4. Vaccine ingredients for each vaccine: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf
  5. Papers regarding the toxic, neurotoxic, and teratogenic effects of aluminum: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep31578 and http://ispub.com/IJTO/3/1/10966and http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/vaccine_papers_brochure_8.5x11.pdf
  6. 3 historical accounts of thimerosal: http://www.aapsonline.org/vaccines/mercinmed.pdfhttp://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2005/08/beginning-at-beginning.html, and http://traceamounts.com/ten-lies-told-about-mercury-in-vaccines/
  7. FDA document which attempts to justify vaccine ingredients, and which admits that vaccines include ingredients have not been clinically approved: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/ucm187810.htm
  8. Wyeth Internal Correspondence regarding separating vaccine lots: http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/08/by-dan-olmsted.html
  9. Merck Whistleblowers: https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/05/06/two-more-mmr-vaccine-whistleblowers-theyre-suing/
  10. CDC Whistleblower: https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Whistleblower-Exposing-Autism-Research/dp/1634509951 and http://vaxxedthemovie.com/about/
  11. Transcript of the Simpsonwood meeting in June, 2000, at which thimerosal in vaccines was discussed: http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/chapter2.html
  12. Three weeks before Simpsonwood, another secret meeting was held at which aluminum in vaccines was discussed: http://www.thinktwice.com/aluminum.pdf
  13. Glyphosate: suspected carcinogen, causes tumors in rats, and present in vaccines: http://www.ecowatch.com/glyphosate-vaccines-1999343362.html
  14. Legal definitions of assault and battery: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Assault+and+Battery
  15. Vaccine Package Inserts here: http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/package_inserts.htm
  16. HRSA’s VICP Vaccine Injury Table (http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/vaccineinjurytable.pdf) lists “encephalopathy” as an outcome for the MMR (or any of the individual vaccines for measles, mumps, and rubella) and for the DTaP (or any pertussis-containing vaccines). The symptoms of this encephalopathy in a child who is 18 months or older include a “significantly decreased level of consciousness” which HRSA describes as follows: 1. Decreased or absent response to environment (responds, if at all, only to loud voice or painful stimuli); 2. Decreased or absent eye contact (does not fix gaze upon family members or other individuals); or 3. Inconsistent or absent responses to external stimuli (does not recognize familiar people or things). How many children diagnosed with “autism” should have been correctly diagnosed with “vaccine-induced encephalopathy”? In addition, one of the signs of encephalopathy is seizure activity. Estimates suggest that 1/4 - 1/3 of those diagnosed with “autism” also suffer from seizures. (Taken from Ginger Taylor’s chapter in the excellent book Vaccine Epidemic).
  17. CDC recommended vaccine schedule for children, adults, and pregnant women can be found here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent-compliant.html (for children 0-18); http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/adult.html (adults);  http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy/hcp/guidelines.html (for pregnant women)
  18. Vaccines: Elimination Mandatory! by Laura Hayes can be found at http://www.ageofautism.com/2016/09/vaccines-elimination-mandatory.html#more. Other articles, speeches, and interviews by Laura Hayes can be found at ageofautism.com under “Special Reports” at the top of Age of Autism’s home page.

HPV Vaccine inventor Ian Frazer Backs UK’s “Jabs for the Boys” Lobbyist Group – Conflict of Interest?

Dr. Ian FrazerBy Eileen Iorio

After Peter Doshi’s recent exposé article in the British Medical Journal on how government agencies and vaccine manufacturers use grass roots organizations to push their vaccine agenda, I took a closer look at an upcoming decision about to be made in the UK by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization on whether boys should be vaccinated with the HPV vaccine. A decision is expected next week after the same Committee voted against such an extension to the program in July. Currently the vaccine is given in schools to all 12 year old girls with a high uptake rate of 90%. It is also offered free in certain clinics to men who have sex with men under a special National Health Service pilot program.

 Lobbyist group HPVAction.org has been the most vocal in recent years, using its 48-member strong network to push the government to adopt a “gender-neutral” policy for this vaccine by making it available to all boys. A statement from the group recently, outlined the many reasons that the JCVI should add boys to the schedule in a comprehensive policy statement, submitted to the department of health ahead of next week’s decision. They argue, with a slightly threatening undertone, that the current policy “may be in breach” of sexual equality laws.

 According to the website “whois”, the person behind HPVAction is Jamie Rae, a Scottish businessman and philanthropist. Rae has a long history in Scottish politics as a former member of the Scottish National Party. Rae was convicted of fraud in the late 90s and served 15 months in prison on various charges relating to mortgage and benefits fraud. After serving his time, Rae turned his luck around and started up many successful businesses. After developing and overcoming throat cancer in 2010, Rae set up the Throat Cancer Foundation in 2012, to raise awareness for this rare condition and to campaign for the inclusion of males in the HPV vaccination program.  

 The Throat Cancer Foundation (TCF) is a charity but also acts as a lobbying group  and by extension, supports the position of HPVAction as owner of the site and also as TCF is a member. The story begins to get more complicated when two of TCF’s advisory board members have direct conflicts of interest with the vaccine – Co-inventor of the HPV vaccine Ian Frazer, and MERCK/GSK consultant and JCVI advisor Dr. Margaret Stanley, OBE.

 Ian Frazer, a Scottish virologist now an Australian citizen, along with co-inventor, the late Jian Zhou and others, owns rights to the sale of both HPV vaccines in Australia and New Zealand. They also own exclusive rights over the vaccine technology used by Merck and GSK. Expanding the vaccine program to boys would bolster the credibility of his own country’s program and promote this “gender neutral” policy worldwide as so few countries have adopted such an expensive public health measure thus far. In the US, uptake among boys is hovering around 20%. Improving uptake in boys will also offset the dramatic reduction in sales as a result of reducing the dose from three to two in recent years.

 Professor Margaret Stanley, OBE is a British virologist at the University of Cambridge who has been intimately involved in the development of both vaccines with Merck and GSK and served on the special HPV advisory group to the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization, which recommended that the vaccine program go ahead for girls in 2008. Dr. Stanley has a vested interest in ensuring that boys are included in the program, one which she has invested her entire career in propagating, both with the WHO, the IARC and various other institutions around the world. She has benefited financially from her relationship with both manufacturers as a consultant and as a speaker on behalf of the vaccines.

 The Throat Cancer Foundation states in its policy on ethics that it be transparent in its dealings with partners and sponsors, both public and private, “ensuring that the Throat Cancer Foundation remains independent and autonomous so that there can be no influence – either actual or perceived…” So how does the TCF ensure that their charity is independent and autonomous when two of the HPV vaccine’s heaviest hitters are on its advisory board? At what point is the TCF working for Frazer and Stanley to further their interests?

Rae himself has another company, Nugensis, which has accepted business solution contracts from the NHS and was embroiled in an accusation of cronyism from government ministers in 2015, after Rae made donations to the Scottish National Party before the million pound contract was awarded. The SNP denied all charges of cronyism and no action was taken.

It is difficult to say if the JCVI will be sufficiently influenced by HPVAction.org and by extension the Throat Cancer Foundation, backed by direct profiteers of the vaccine and key stakeholders with influence on policy. However, what is clear is that the public is unaware that such an influence – either actual or perceived - exists. It is this semi-transparency which results in public loss of confidence once such conflicts are revealed, causing more damage to the vaccine program.

Eileen Iorio is a Holistic Health Coach based in Westchester, NY. Eileen is a guest blogger for The Thinking Moms Revolution. She has a background in accounting and finance but now occupies her time with vaccine safety advocacy, research and writing. She is married and has three children.

 


Levi Quackenboss: How to Win Any Vaccine Debate

SmartNote: Share this post by Levi Quackenboss far and wide.  We look forward to Part Duh, er Deux...  :)  Levi never fails to hit the nail on the head!

By Levi Quackenboss

We’ve all heard the most common talking points of pharma-sponsored vaccine propaganda in the mainstream media, but sometimes it’s hard to conjure up the right response when the same unfounded soundbites come at you in real life.

Save this blog. And the next and the next. I’ve got your answers for you.

#1 When they say, “Scientific studies have proven that vaccines don’t cause autism!”

Then you say, “Despite what you’ve heard in the media, only one shot and one ingredient have ever been studied for their role in causing autism.”

In the following two CDC (Centers for Disease Control) studies, just one shot– out of the ten single and combination shots on the infant vaccination schedule– and one ingredient– out of more than three dozen– have ever been studied in relation to autism. And both studies reek of scientific fraud.

The MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) study

Dr. William Thompson, a scientist on the CDC’s 2004 MMR-doesn’t-cause-autism study, was granted whistleblower protection by President Obama in 2014. Why would a scientist need that protection? Because recordings were released of him admitting that their study originally showed that the MMR does cause autism –most notably a 240% increase in African American boys– and that his co-authors at the CDC conspired to hide that finding.

Other studies that claim to prove the MMR’s innocence are based on this fraudulent study, or they are retroactive cohort studies (not case controlled like the CDC’s MMR study) which are rife with selection bias, unexplained parameters, and creative definitions of what it means to be “unvaccinated.” There is an often-cited 2015 “MMR doesn’t cause autism” retroactive cohort study of over 95,000 kids that Dr. Paul Thomas does an excellent job of dissecting if you’d like to learn more.

The mercury study

Dr. Thomas Verstraeten, the lead author of the CDC’s 2003 mercury-doesn’t-cause-autism study, sounded the alarm when he found that mercury-based thimerosal preservative was causing a 760% increase in autism prevalence. Thimerosal was used in the Hep B vaccines and DTaP vaccines up until 2003, and is continued to be used in flu shots today. But, according to the World Mercury Project, Verstraeten was pushed aside while others reworked his study to bury the damaging discovery. Verstraeten then resigned from the CDC, returned to his homeland, and took a job with GlaxoSmithKline before his CDC study was even published, which Congress found to be a violation of ethics. The nail in the coffin came during a 2004 Institute of Medicine Review of that study, when the CDC’s presentation slides revealed that they had “lost” the study’s raw data sets used from the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Voila! No one will ever be able check their findings. (Note: these CDC slides are now removed from the IOM website, too, but you can read more about them here.)

Does this sound like a comprehensive investigation into vaccination causing autism?

#2 When they say, “But today’s vaccines have less antigens than vaccines from decades ago, so they’re safer now.”

Then you say, “Who said that vaccines had too many antigens? That’s a straw man argument. We’ve been told hundreds of times that infants have the capacity to respond to an enormous number of antigens. Vaccine antigens were reduced to maximize manufacturer profits, not to improve safety.”

When parents say that today’s schedule is “too many too soon,” they mean too many vaccines, not too many antigens. There is a lot more to a vaccine vial than antigens. Heck, the hep B vaccine only has one little antigen. I still don’t want it injected into my kid.

Disease antigens are expensive to produce and vaccine makers want to minimize expenses. Decades ago, only the DTP (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis) vaccine used aluminum adjuvant. But today, vaccines for seven diseases on the bloated schedule have powerful neurotoxic aluminum adjuvants that cause a little bit of antigen to elicit a huge immune response.

I’ll sit here and wait while you research the safety of aluminum. It has no known use to the human body, it causes an IgE response and increases allergies, it’s a highly reactive and damaging neurotoxin, and rather than being excreted by the body, it accumulates in the brain.

Vaccines are no safer for it.

#3 When they say, “Mercury was taken out of vaccines in 2001 and autism rates rose anyway!”

Read the rest  of the article here.


The US Government Believes That Flu Shots In Babies Are Safe, But Flu Shots On The Ground Is Terrorism.

Flu shot halloween
By Ginger Taylor

Shelley Hendrix, formerly of Autism Speaks, and currently with Unlocking Autism, shares her story of asking for a permit to protest vaccine safety in front of the Department of Health and Human Services building, by squirting a mercury containing flu shot on the ground.

 




Win a Copy of Vaccines A Reappraisal By Dr. Richard Moskowitz, MD

Vaccines Richard Moskowitz“This book is a masterpiece and a must-read for anyone with concerns about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.”

—Stephanie Seneff, PhD, senior research scientist, MIT

Leave a comment and enter to win a copy. New from Skyhorse Publishing.  Buy now!

Richard Moskowitz, MD, is a family physician who received his BA from Harvard, Phi Beta Kappa, his MD from New York University, and a US Steel Fellowship in Philosophy at the University of Colorado. He has been in private practice since 1967. After studying herbs, Japanese acupuncture, and other holistic modalities, he has specialized in homeopathic medicine since 1974, and has written four previous books and over a hundred articles on homeopathy, midwifery, natural healing, and the philosophy of medicine. He resides in Boston, Massachusetts.

An experienced family doctor reexamines the risks and benefits of vaccines and our public health policy.

Dr. Richard Moskowitz, a Harvard-educated family doctor with more than forty-five years of clinical experience treating children, examines vaccines and our current policy regarding them. His book Vaccines (Skyhorse Publishing hardcover; September 19, 2017; $27.99) offers an ensemble of observed facts, clinical and basic science research, news reports from the media, and actual cases from his practice, Dr. Moskowitz provides an overview of the subject in a respectful and thoughtfully reasoned manner.

He shows how vaccines, by their very nature, have a major downside that has largely been ignored and is built into their design, and explores how it is reckless to continue mandating them until their dangers are taken seriously, understood in a broader context, and assessed in a more careful and systematic fashion.

He also presents evidence that the risks of vaccination are compounded by the concerted efforts of pharmaceutical companies, the CDC, and the doctors who speak for them to keep them hidden. Writing with a sense of urgency, Dr. Moskowitz advocates for making vaccines optional, while the country seems to be moving in the opposite direction. He believes that parents should be able to exercise their moral and legal right to choose which treatments are appropriate for their children, and which diseases, if any, to vaccinate their children against. Above all, he hopes to promote a healthy debate and to encourage more of the rigorous scientific work that still needs to be done.




As The Pharma Money Turns: World Mercury Project Looks at CDC Thorsen Schendel Love Affair

By the World Mercury Project Team

The Love Birds:

Poul Thorsen, CDC Grantee, Autism Author and Researcher

Diana Schendel, CDC Epidemiologist, Research Health Scientist, CDC, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (and supervisor to Poul Thorsen)

World Mercury Project (WMP) has reported that Centers for Disease Conrol (CDC) autism research scientist turned whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, disclosed fraud in CDC autism research. Since Thompson’s disclosures, even more CDC whistleblowers beyond the subject of autism have come forward describing ongoing research fraud and misuse of funds at CDC.

Now WMP wants to call your attention to a more recently uncovered scandal: the love notes between Poul Thorsen and Diana Schendel, obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

As World Mercury Project (WMP) discussed in our criminal conduct report of Poul Thorsen, Thorsen had an inappropriate relationship with his CDC supervisor, Diana Schendel beginning in 2002. These love notes are an important piece of the autism/vaccine link story. It is highly inappropriate for a CDC supervisor to be intimately involved with a grantee. When CDC managers learned of Schendel’s relationship with Thorsen, the disciplinary response from her supervisor, Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp, M.D., was equivalent to a hand slap.

Continue reading "As The Pharma Money Turns: World Mercury Project Looks at CDC Thorsen Schendel Love Affair" »


Pertussis Vax Speak: "Inability To Prevent Infections" aka FAILURE

Pertussis-vaccine-failureNote: Aye yi yi. Boston U School of Public Health has published the article below citing the resurgence of  Whooping Cough (pertussis) a result of the vaccine's "inability to prevent infection."

Why are you late to work, Mr. Jones? "My car had an inability to move forward."
Why is your homework late, Johnny? "My computer had an inability to turn on."
Why are you dead, Mrs. Magillicuddy? "My heart had an inability to keep pumping blood."

FAIL.

FAIL.

FAIL.

Say it out loud IF YOU DARE. THE VACCINE FAILS! IT DOESN'T WORK! SO STOP SELLING AND TAKING IT!

The startling global resurgence of pertussis, or whooping cough, in recent years can largely be attributed to the immunological failures of acellular vaccines, School of Public Health researchers argue in a new journal article.

The article, published in F1000 Research, points to the differences in mucosal immunity between whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines and the newer acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, first introduced in the 1990s, as playing a pivotal role in the resurgence of the disease.

“This disease is back because we didn’t really understand how our immune defenses against whooping cough worked, and did not understand how the vaccines needed to work to prevent it,” said Christopher J. Gill, associate professor of global health and lead author of the article. “Instead we layered assumptions upon assumptions, and now find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of admitting that we may made some crucial errors. This is definitely not where we thought we’d be in 2017.”

Up until the 1950s, there were millions of cases of whooping cough around the globe each year, with numerous fatal cases in infants. The introduction of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines led to a 99 percent reduction in cases. Later, as wP vaccines raised concerns of possible rare neurologic adverse events, aP vaccines were licensed and used in a number of countries starting in the early 1990s. Since then, cases of whooping cough have risen sharply. In 2014, there were more than 32,000 cases reported in the US.

“The resurgence of pertussis in the US to its highest levels since the 1940s emphasizes the need for answers to these questions,” the authors wrote.

The researchers examined mathematical models of pertussis transmission, data derived from the aP and wP vaccines responses in animals, and recent insight into the immunology of pertussis and pertussis vaccines. They found that, contrary to existing assumptions, although both vaccines blocked symptomatic disease, wP vaccines blocked also infections in animals while aP vaccines did not. Other differences included wP vaccines’ ability to induce a stronger herd immunity and robust TH17 responses, which confer mucosal immunity, while aP vaccines only induced TH2 responses.

Read more here.


The One Where Brian Deer Throws A Hissy Fit

Male Temper TantrumBy Ginger Taylor

I am realizing that I need to narrow that down.

The One Where Brian Deer Throws A Hissy Fit Threatening Miranda Baily For Saying That He Declined To Participate In Her Film, By Sending Her A Letter Wherein He References The Emails He Sent To Her Declining To Participate In Her Film.

These emails do not at all suggest or even hint that Deer is paranoid, unwell or of unsound mind in any way.

A small taste:

Deer

 

 


Debut Day For Vaccines: A Reappraisal by Dr. Richard Moskowitz from Skyhorse Publishing

Vaccines Richard MoskowitzCongratulations to Dr. Moskowitz on the debut of his new book Vaccine Reappraisal from Skyhorse Publishing at #1 in Vaccinations. Mary Holland wrote the foreword.   Order your hardcover or Kindle edition today and don't forget to leave a review at Amazon. Thank you.

From Amazon: Drawing on fifty years of experience caring for children and adults, Dr. Moskowitz examines vaccines and our current policy regarding them. Weaving together a tapestry of observed facts, clinical and basic science research, news reports from the media, and actual cases from his own practice, he offers a systematic review of the subject as a whole.

He provides scientific evidence for his clinical impression that the vaccination process, by its very nature, imposes substantial risks of disease, injury, and death that have been persistently denied and covered up by manufacturers, the CDC, and the coterie of doctors who speak for it.

With the aim of acknowledging these risks, taking them seriously, understanding them more holistically, and ultimately assessing them on a deeper level, he proposes a nationwide debate based on objective scientific research, including what we already know and what still needs to be investigated in the future.

He argues that with no serious public health emergency to justify them, requiring vaccines of everyone deprives us all of genuinely informed consent, and prevents parents from making health-care decisions for our children, basic human rights that we still profess to hold dear.

For the present, given the legitimate controversy surrounding the mandates, he proposes that most vaccines simply be made optional and that further research into their risks and benefits be conducted by an independent agency in the public interest, untainted by industry funding, CDC sponsorship, and the quasi-religious sanctimony that is widely invoked on their behalf.


Rep Dana Criswell on The Opioid Epidemic and Childhood Vaccinations

CriswellBelow is an article from Representative Dana Criswell of Mississippi.   Opioid addiction and death and vaccine injury do not care what side of the aisle you sit on, or what flag you wave or what flag you burn or whether your state is red or blue.   I love that Representative Criswell represents OLIVE BRANCH, MS district. We need an olive branch of peace to brush away the hatred and vitriole shown toward those who express concerns about vaccine safety.  Mississippi has only the medical exemption for vaccination. The state does not have a Religious or Philosophical exemption.

The Opioid Epidemic and Childhood Vaccinations

Today we are experiencing a crisis in the U.S. and especially in Mississippi. Deaths from heroin and prescription painkillers are increasing each year by a factor of 10. The number one killer of people under the age of 50 is opioid overdose. More people die from drug overdose than they do from gun violence or car wrecks.

Here are some facts about the opioid epidemic:

  • Prescription drug overdoses account for nearly 60% of all drug overdose deaths. Of those deaths, 73% came from opioids.
  • Mississippi doctors are a leading prescriber of opioid painkillers with the equivalent of approximately 70 opioid pills for every man, woman, and child in 2016.
  • The number of painkiller prescriptions in Mississippi makes us the fifth highest per capita in the nation, with 1.07 prescriptions per person.
  • In the state of Mississippi, there were 563 reported drug overdose deaths from 2013-2016 (MS Bureau of Narcotics). Of these, 481 deaths were related to opioid abuse

One of the most disturbing facts is the role pharmaceutical companies, government agencies and doctors played in this epidemic. Those we trusted to tell us the truth, to care for our well being and to protect us, have betrayed us. In the book, Dreamland: The True Tale of America’s Opiate Epidemic, Sam Quinones outlines how pharmaceutical companies, medical professionals and government health agencies contributed to this crisis.

Continue reading " Rep Dana Criswell on The Opioid Epidemic and Childhood Vaccinations" »


Flu Vaccine and Miscarriage

Miscarriage painNOTE: We're pleased to see this dose of vaccine reality in the mainstream media. If there is an indication that flu shots plus swine flu may cause miscarriage, the ACOG (OB union) should immediately issue a harsh warning and moratorium on vaccinating pregnant women. Certainly the risk is far worse than the sickness.  When there is an illness that is "vaccine preventable" the media goes into overdrive to make sure Americans get their dose - shouldn't the inverse be true when the result could be fetal death?

From ABC News. Study prompts call to examine flu vaccine and miscarriage

By Mike Stobbe

A puzzling study of U.S. pregnancies found that women who had miscarriages between 2010 and 2012 were more likely to have had back-to-back annual flu shots that included protection against swine flu.

Vaccine experts think the results may reflect the older age and other miscarriage risks for the women, and not the flu shots. Health officials say there is no reason to change the government recommendation that all pregnant women be vaccinated against the flu. They say the flu itself is a much greater danger to women and their fetuses.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reached out to a doctor's group, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, to warn them the study is coming out and help them prepare for a potential wave of worry from expectant moms, CDC officials said.

"I want the CDC and researchers to continue to investigate this," said Dr. Laura Riley, a Boston-based obstetrician who leads a committee on maternal immunization. "But as an advocate for pregnant women, what I hope doesn't happen is that people panic and stop getting vaccinated."

Past studies have found flu vaccines are safe during pregnancy, though there's been little research on impact of flu vaccinations given in the first three months of pregnancy.


CDC Issues a Gag Order on CDC Employees

Gag_Order_WideBy Ginger Taylor

Axios has obtained an internal message from the CDC's public affairs officer, Jeffrey Lancashire, dated August 31, to all CDC employees.  His directive to them was to stop talking to the media, “even for a simple data-related question.”

CDC cracks down on communications with reporters

The memo reads:

"Effective immediately and until further notice, any and all correspondence with any member of the news media, regardless of the nature of the inquiry, must be cleared through CDC's Atlanta Communications Office. This correspondence includes everything from formal interview requests to the most basic of data requests."

Axios tried to contact Mr. Lancashire to find out more about the policy; however, he has not responded.

Why is even basic data being treated like state secrets?

It's almost like the CDC has something to hide.

UPDATE:

BREAKING:

THIS JUST IN:

CDC HAS RELEASED A VIDEO EXPLAINING TO THE PUBLIC WHY THEIR NEW STANCE IS NECESSARY:

 


Bergen West Pediatrics Charges $20 If You Decline a Vaccine They Want To Sell You

Vax charge berger West Peds

UPDATE: We've heard that this  practice is denying the letter. It makes zero point zero sense that anyone would create a fake letter and post it to social media.  The photo is at an angle as if snapped from the side with a cell phone.  They are welcome to chime in to clarify if they so choose.

###

Pardon the Trump'ism, but I think we can say safely to this practice, "You're FIRED!"

Imaging charging $20 to a family because they say "no" to a vaccine? Bergen West Pediatric Center is doing just that. How much money do they lose when they don't sell the vaccines that Merck and Insurance companies demand? The rationale is nonsense. Records are already pulled and ready. Verify vaccine? What does that mean? They have the lineup ready for each visit. Voila. Verified. Put them away.  Assess the patient? Isn't that the point of the visit ANYWAY? Patient needs clearly do not come first. There are reasons whereby a parent says "no" to a vaccine including that day's health status, bona fide exemption rights and that basic America tenet called FREEDOM.

From their website, "we are currently accepting new patients."  Indeed.

CONGRATULATIONS to Drs. Douglas Fenkart & Cynthia Triggs who have been named "NJ's Favorite Kids' Docs". We are pleased to mentioned that they are both highlighted in the New Jersey Family's magazine December, 2016 issue or online at njfamily.com/thelist.
Care Philosophy:

If you would like experienced and friendly doctors to treat your children, Bergen West Pediatric Center in Wyckoff is the place for you. Conveniently located off Route 208 in Wyckoff, NJ, call to schedule your complimentary consult to meet our staff and see our facilities.

Bergen West Pediatric Center offers medical care for families with infants, children, adolescents and young adults; ages birth to 26 years of age. We provide services to families from Wyckoff, Allendale, Fair Lawn, Franklin Lakes, Glen Rock, Haledon, Hawthorne, Mahwah, North Haledon, Oakland, Paramus, Pompton Lakes, Ramsey, Ridgewood, Wanaque, Wayne and many other surrounding towns. Learn more about our specialized approach, talented staff and the benefits of turning to us for the wellbeing of your children. We are currently accepting new patients.

To make sure you receive the latest updates about our flu vaccine status this year (and future years), be sure to Join Our e-Mailing List if you haven't done so already.


Report Alleges Cover up of Infant Deaths Post Vaccination

InfanrixTwo doctors in New Delhi have exposed an attempt by a multinational drug manufacturer to conceal sudden deaths in infants following the administration of its vaccine.  

Jacob Puliyel, a pediatrician at the St. Stephen's hospital and C. Sathyamala, an epidemiologist, have reported their finding in the peer reviewed  Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.   

The vaccine in question, "Infanrix hexa," -- that combines diphtheria, tetanus,  pertussis, hepatitis B,   polio   and   influenza type B vaccines -- is manufactured by  GlaxoSmithKline   (GSK) and was introduced in Europe in October 2000. 

Puliyel and Sathyamala discovered the cover-up by analyzing data in the   Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSUR) about the vaccine that its manufacturer GSK  is required to regularly provide  to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). 

These confidential   safety reports on this vaccine were received by Puliyel from Italian Dr. Loretta Bolgan who obtained them from EMA under the   Freedom of Information Act – the Italian version of the Right to Information Act in India.  

On analysis, the doctors   found that the latest 19th safety report on 'Infanrix hexa' vaccine submitted by GSK   (2015)    has deleted deaths that were reported previously by the manufacturer in its 16th report (2012). They, however, note that it is not clear from the report how these deaths were deleted. 

The authors Puliyel and Sathyamala note that ten years after the publication of a Center for Disease Control paper examining a relationship between MMR and autism, one of the authors William Thompson admitted that he and his co-authors had omitted statistically significant information - that African American males given the MMR vaccine before the age of 36 months, were at increased risk of autism. After the Thompson and his colleagues found evidence of this increased risk, they deleted data of children without Georgia birth certificates (and so disqualified a disproportionate number of black children) and they presented their data saying there was no increased risk of autism.   It is not clear whether the authors of the PSUR 19 performed some similar retroactive disqualification of children documented to have died in the PSUR 16. 

Continue reading "Report Alleges Cover up of Infant Deaths Post Vaccination" »


Doctors Assumptions: Humiston, Boonstra, and Savoy Train Physicians on How To Fail

by Ginger Taylor

Webinar

On Friday, August 25th, a webinar was held, sponsored by Pfizer, called "Getting Parents to Yes! Vaccine Conversations That Work for Providers & Parents".

"With parents consuming so much conflicting health information about their babies and children, providing an effective vaccination recommendation can be harder than ever. Fortunately, there are strategies for discussing immunization with parents that can help them feel comfortable protecting their babies and children with on time immunization.

During this session, pediatrician Dr. Sharon Humiston will moderate a panel with pediatrician Dr. Nathan Boonstra and family physician Dr. Margot Savoy, who will share their top tips for having positive and productive vaccine conversations with parents. Join us on Friday, August 25 at 12 p.m. Eastern to gain insights and tips that you can begin implementing in your practice immediately."

I listened in to see if they were going to recommend anything egregious to the physicians. Surprisingly, it was not horrible. Well it was pretty much the arrogant garbage we already know and experience. Be the expert, be aggressive, blah, blah, blah. To their credit, they did stop short of recommending the full on bulldozing of parents, they didn't recommend dismissing non vaccinating parents from practices, and they did (for a split second) admit they had biases.

To one of the women's discredit (I could not be sure of who was talking at the time) she expressed her strong umbrage at being told by parents that they were declining vaccines because they had, "done their research on the internet," then burst out laughing at the incredulous and outrageous nature of such a statement.  (Ahem... ma'am... you do realize you are teaching on the internet right now, yes???) #Irony

Actually the presentation was pretty weak. They don't really have a solution to getting parents refusals. Because, of course, they have not correctly diagnosed the reasons that they are refusing. And when you have the wrong dx, the tx ain't gonna work.

So there was not a lot of me loosing my mind listening to them, just a bit of eye rolling. And a bit of compassion, actually.

THEY ARE SO LOST. They are wandering around lost in the woods, pretending to know where they are going, that they are experts on the terrain, and teaching other lost doctors how to find their way out... of they woods they are lost in.  (But to be fair, they are being paid by Pfizer to wander around lost in the woods, so perhaps they are happy there.)

So I wrote to them. I coulda sent a buncha stuff, but this is what I thought might be the most helpful to them. Tried to back them up at least to the right starting point. I figure maybe if I can convince them to get to the trail head, they might be able to see where they have gone wrong from that vantage point, and perhaps move in the right direction.

No answer as of yet. I will update if they do. But they won't. They never do. Because they don't have to.




Subject: Impact of liability protection on physician trust
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:11:09 -0400
From: Ginger Taylor <ginger@mainevaxchoice.org>
To: niamwebinars@porternovelli.com


Dr. Humiston, Dr. Boonstra, and Dr. Savoy,

I am the mother of a vaccine injured child, and no longer participate in the National Immunization Program.  I listened to your webinar today.

Continue reading "Doctors Assumptions: Humiston, Boonstra, and Savoy Train Physicians on How To Fail" »


High-Risk HPV Type Replacement Follows HPV Vaccination

WMPNOTE: Thanks to our friends at World Mercury Project for this excerpt. Please bookmark their site.

By James Lyons-Weiler

The number of studies that show that partial immunization via available HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines is not only insufficient at reducing overall HPV infection rates; the vaccines actually cause rarer, more lethal types of HPV to sweep in and the net effect could be devastating increases in HPV-related cancers.

Here I review the biomedical research studies that show that type replacement is real, and that vaccination against the more common types may be, sadly and ironically, expected to cause INCREASES in HPV-related cancer.

The first study is Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) own study, in which they show no net change in HPV infection rate (considering all types) after HPV vaccines were introduced into medical practice:

High-Risk-HPV-chart-800x479

Markowitz LE et al., 2016 Prevalence of HPV After Introduction of the Vaccination Program in the United States. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb 22. pii: peds.2015-1968.

That study concluded that type replacement did not occur because their univariate analysis of individual types showed no individual type with a significant increase.  However, because the vaccines do clear the vaccine-targeted types, the lack of change in overall infection rate shows that type replacement must be occurring.

The second study is by Fisher et al. (2016), which specifically found that high-risk HPV types replaced the vaccine-targeted types.  They wrote “the percentage of non-vaccine HR-HPV types was higher than expected, considering that eight HPV types formerly classified as ‘low-risk’ or ‘probably high-risk’ are in fact HR-HPV types.”

Fischer et al 2016: Shift in prevalence of HPV types in cervical cytology specimens in the era of HPV vaccination. Oncol Lett. 12(1):601-610.

A third study is that by Guo et al., (2015) that also clearly found evidence of type replacement occurring as a result of HPV vaccination:


Not Published In The British Medical Journal: 'Lies, Damn Lies And Statistics'

British-Medical-Journal_0By Jackie Fletcher
 
In the controversy over compulsory vaccination this letter by Jackie Fletcher, director of JABS, remains unpublished. Given the British mainstream media's craven failure to report any of the issues over the vaccine lobby's moves to make vaccination compulsory in the UK, the BMJ must be given some credit for allowing comments in their Rapid Responses, but they do not allow all. In 2010 her son Robert's vaccine injury was finally acknowledged, after a  legal appeal. It should be noted further in response to the outrageous, conscienceless lies of the Italian Health Minister, Beatrice Lorenzin, that according to official sources - and irrespective of any alleged influence of Andrew Wakefield - only three people have died in the United Kingdom from contracting measles since 1992 (out of about 13m deaths all told). Even the official record admits that the main cause for the last of these deaths was medical negligence.
 
Lies, damned lies, and statistics
 
Further to Dr Anand's earlier post about accurate information I would like to add that Public Health (PH) spokespersons, even after almost 28 years of the MMR controversy, still refer to MMR vaccines as 'perfectly safe'.

Continue reading "Not Published In The British Medical Journal: 'Lies, Damn Lies And Statistics'" »


Offit And His Critics: Part Six

 

Offit_blogNOTE: We're bringing you this series, re-crafted for 2017,  by Richard P. Milner of Public Affairs Media. Dr. Paul Offit has led the charge against any and all in our community, doctors, scientists, parents, educators, film makers, who question vaccine safety.  

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

OFFIT:
  Or maybe we’re just very influenced by what I think are these fringe scientists, frankly, who are perfectly willing to stand up and say, well, I think vaccines cause autism anyway.  Even though these data show this and make sort of vague allusions to the fact that people are in the pocket of the pharmaceutical industry, which clearly isn’t true.  So I don’t understand it.

HALEY:  The last I looked, my research showing autistic infants did not effectively excrete mercury as compared to normals has held up quite well and has been reproduced by others.  The oxidative stress with low glutathione levels observed by many others in autistics tells us why they cannot excrete mercury effectively.  The urinary Porphyrin profile shows most autistics to have mercury toxicity---and I could go on and on.  All of we “fringe” scientists have published scientific data that we present, not the fabricated epidemiology that Offit is wed to.

Continue reading "Offit And His Critics: Part Six" »


Bill Nemitz and the Portland Press Herald’s disregard for reality poses a threat for all of us

Bill MenitzBy Ginger Taylor

The Portland Press Herald has been an Offit Outlet since 2014 when their "health" writer wrote his first hit piece on vaccine injury families, then three weeks later shared the stage with Paul Offit at the National Press Club as an example of what a great vaccine writer looks like.  Again, he wrote ONE ARTICLE on vaccination.

Their propaganda campaign continues with a new op ed by a popular Maine writer, speaking arrogantly and from a place of profound ignorance about the vaccine program, who opens his article with, "A small but growing number of parents think inoculations carry risks, but the biggest risk for their kids – and the rest of us – is not getting vaccinated at all."

For the record, it's a growing number of parents, four federal agencies, The US Congress, The US Court of Federal Claims, The Supreme Court of the United States of America, and all vaccine makers, that think vaccines carry risk... the last of which lists hundreds of those risks on the package inserts, after agreeing with all listed above that all FDA approved vaccines are, "Unavoidably Unsafe."  

In this piece, Nemitz says parents are "self-centered" for believing all three branches of the US Government, and product manufactures because... and I am not kidding... when the writer was young there was a place called Polio Pond, where people were afraid of getting polio, even though no one ever contracted polio there.  This in an article where he exclaims that, "Anti-vaccine movement’s disregard for reality poses a threat for all of us."  (Also... MEASLES! PERTUSSIS! WAKEFIELD! SCIENCE!  Did you know that you don't wanna vaccinate, "Because a crusading quack made claims 20 years ago that have never, not once, been backed up by real science?"  Perhaps some day a piece of science will show vaccines are associated with autism.)

Mr Nemitz diversions from reality in this op ed are many.  I started writing a piece to combat all the fiction and fantasy here, but I gave up at eight pages and just sent him this email.   No response.  

Also for the record, Nemitz reports that, "Here in Maine, the first measles case in 20 years was reported last month in Farmington – a female who contracted the virus during overseas travel."  The case was reported internationally as a dangerous measles outbreak, caused by "anti-vaxxers", as if the black death had come to Maine.  In fact, no outbreak occurred, no transmission took place, and from what I understand, no Mainer has actually had the measles.  

Continue reading " Bill Nemitz and the Portland Press Herald’s disregard for reality poses a threat for all of us" »