Hans Asperger: Not the Good Doctor A Review of Edith Sheffer, Asperger’s Children: The Origins of Autism in Nazi Vienna
Speak Your Mind

Record Cases Of Scarlet Fever In The UK -- Is the Nasal Flu Vaccine Responsible Part IV

Scarlet-fever-quarantine

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

We’ve looked at media reports on SCARLET FEVER in the UK, the use of the nasal influenza vaccine in those locations, and research that shows there are biological mechanisms that could connect the two.  What may need to happen is laboratory research to look specifically at these connections in an honest and scientific manner.

In the United States, there are some considerations to this situation:

Firstly, the CDC does not track SCARLET FEVER:

Image found here  and our thanks.

Scarlet IV

Secondly, the use of FluMist was stopped for two years but is set to resume in Fall, 2018.

ACIP votes down use of LAIV for 2016-2017 flu season, June 22, 2016

CDC panel again advises against FluMist (2017-2018), Wed June 21, 2017

ACIP: LAIV OK to Use During 2018-19 Flu Season, February 26, 2018 03:59 pm

Thirdly, FluMist will NOT be the first and only choice but an option, and it was NEVER administered in schools as it is in the UK.

AAP: Give children IIV flu shot; use LAIV as last resort,  May 21, 2018 : The Academy recommends pediatricians give children inactivated influenza vaccine in the upcoming season and use live attenuated vaccine only as a last resort….Quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4, FluMist), which is given by intranasal spray to healthy patients ages 2 through 49 years, was a popular option for those reluctant to get a shot. While it performed relatively well against influenza B strains, there was modest effectiveness against A/H3N2 strains and no overall effectiveness against A/H1N1 strains. LAIV4 has not been recommended by the AAP and CDC for the past two influenza seasons.

However, FluMist manufacturer MedImmune has changed to a new H1N1 strain (A/Slovenia) that it suggests will produce better antibody responses than the previous H1N1 strain (A/Bolivia). In February, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices reviewed MedImmune data as well as a meta-analysis on vaccine effectiveness and voted to reintroduce LAIV4 as an option for the 2018-’19 season. However, the data on whether or not it will be effective are not definitive.

“There is potential that if we happen to have an H1N1 predominant year and the vaccine turns out to not perform as maybe some are anticipating ….

NPR - Shots, 2016   

CDC data consistently showed the live nasal vaccine to be very effective in children until 2013, when the vaccine went from including three strains (trivalent) to including four strains (quadrivalent).

And therein lies the rub: The new Canadian study used the trivalent vaccine, while ACIP analyzed data using the quadrivalent vaccine, and among U.S. children.

"Many of us felt very strongly that the [live attenuated influenza vaccine] was a better vaccine than the inactivated for children, and the data supported that," says Pedra Piedra, a professor of virology and microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine and one of the investigators involved in the nasal vaccine clinical trials in the late 1980s. "But something happened when it became a quadrivalent vaccine….."

And therein lies another interesting piece of information.  The live nasal flu vaccine is genetically modified:

Fluenz Tetra nasal spray suspension Influenza vaccine (live attenuated, nasal) https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/3296/smpc : ** produced in VERO cells by reverse genetic technology. This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Add that means both UK and US versions, as they are seemingly, the same: Only one LAIV vaccine is available, marketed as Fluenz Tetra for the UK and EU market, and FluMist Quadrivalent for the US market. Fluenz Tetra and FluMist Quadrivalent are the same product but in different packaging .

Researchers attempt to modify the problem.  Interestingly, TYPE A H1N1 virus can be a target of the bacteria that can cause SCARLET FEVER - Streptococcus  Pyogenes

Genetic Mutation Could, If Altered, Boost FluMist Vaccine’s Effectiveness, Research Suggests November 28, 2017

POPULAR VACCINE ON HIATUS SECOND FLU SEASON IN A ROW IN U.S. DUE TO DIMINISHED EFFECTIVENESS

Researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health have discovered a genetic mutation in the FluMist intranasal flu vaccine that has the potential to be altered to enhance the vaccine’s protective effect...“Only one component of FluMist – the one targeting the Type A H1N1 virus – has been failing in the U.S. recently,” says Andrew S. Pekosz, PhD, professor in the Bloomberg School’s Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology. “It’s not clear exactly why it has failed but this mutation we identified could be used to make that component of the vaccine a little stronger, thereby improving vaccine efficacy. We now see the possibility of altering this mutation and perhaps others in the vaccine to optimize the vaccine’s protective effect, perhaps for different age groups.”

Live nasal, quadrivalent flu vaccines are relatively new.  There seems to be issues.  Issues with the genetically modified organisms may be important.  

Use of Genetically Modified Viruses and Genetically Engineered Virus-vector Vaccines: Environmental Effects

Despite major therapeutic advances, infectious diseases remain highly problematic. Recent advancements in technology in producing DNA-based vaccines, together with the growing knowledge of the immune system, have provided new insights into the identification of the epitopes needed to target the development of highly targeted vaccines. Genetically modified (GM) viruses and genetically engineered virus-vector vaccines possess significant unpredictability and a number of inherent harmful potential hazards. For all these vaccines, safety assessment concerning unintended and unwanted side effects with regard to targeted vaccinees has always been the main focus. Important questions concerning effects on nontargeted individuals within the same species or other species remain unknown. Horizontal transfer of genes, though lacking supportive experimental or epidemiological investigations, is well established. New hybrid virus progenies resulting from genetic recombination between genetically engineered vaccine viruses and their naturally occurring relatives may possess totally unpredictable characteristics with regard to host preferences and disease-causing potentials. Furthermore, when genetically modified or engineered virus particles break down in the environment, their nuclei acids are released. Appropriate risk management is the key to minimizing any potential risks to humans and environment resulting from the use of these GM vaccines. There is inadequate knowledge to define either the probability of unintended events or the consequences of genetic modifications. The objective of this article is to highlight the limitations in environmental risk assessment and raise awareness of the potential risks involving the use of genetically modified viruses and genetically engineered virus-vector vaccines.

More research is desperately needed but there should be gratitude to those who have dared to study and write about the negative effects of a vaccine.  The importance of “effects on nontargeted individuals within the same species or other species” is becoming more obvious as more researchers dare to look.  Numerous studies have been done regarding serotype replacement and pneumococcal bacteria   but there may be more to come and with other vaccines.  For decades, INFLUENZA was solely blamed for the thousands of deaths around the world in 1918 but research has caught up to the actual science and it turns out it was a one, two punch.  Influenza coupled with bacteria was the culprit  :

The upper respiratory tract has been shown to host a diverse microbiota, within which a number of bacterial pathobionts may be found, i.e.,....Streptococcus pyogenes

........There are many published examples of co/secondary bacterial infections during the 1918 influenza pandemic...Further lung tissue from fatalities of this pandemic were re-examined in 1919; S. pyogenes longus was found in 36% of cases, S. pneumoniae in 29% of cases and H. influenzae in 25% . Additional post-mortems of lung tissue suggest that at least 90% of samples showed evidence of bacterial infection. Overall 95% of deaths were due to co/secondary bacterial pneumonia ……..

Knowing all of this may warrant an investigation of S. Pyogenes and the LAIV (Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine).  

Maybe the investigation could ask these questions:

  • Can LAIV solely cause a change in S. Pyogenes bacteria?
  • Could administration in schools fuel a bacterial change amongst pupils?
  • Could there be a secondary partner in crime, like timing of vaccine, age, or proximity to receiving another vaccine?
  • Could LAIV unintentionally cause a domino effect with non-vaccine targeted pathogens?
  • Could it be that being the only GMO vaccine used in the UK, the LAIV is at risk for  increasing prevalence and disease in an off-target pathogen (S. Pyogenes)?

These are unanswered questions for now but let’s hope they will be taken seriously.

---   “A bend in the road is not the end of the road…Unless you fail to make the turn.”   --                                                                                --------                                                           Helen Keller                                                               -------   

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Benedetta

"Diphtheria toxin is produced by C. diphtheriae only when infected with a bacteriophage that integrates the toxin-encoding genetic elements into the bacteria. "
This is accepted as a fact by all cause it is quoted from Wiki.
A bacteriophage is a virus.

Common knowledge until we all point out that injecting or even breathing in genetic codes from flu viruses might give some strep the genetic code to cause t produce the toxin that causes scarlet fever.


Benedetta

In "Vaccine 2" by Dan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill; stated that the bacteria that caused Diphtheria if infected with a virus made much, much more of the leathery type of stuff that choked children to death.


Going the opposite direction; up the ladder of bigger

Legionaire disease it has been proposed that an amoeba or protozoa was infected with the bacteria that eventually caused the pneumonia of those that became sick. So, those ill with legionnaire disease breathed in an amoeba that was infected with a bacteria? Could the amoeba offered protection of the bacteria that our immune system would have other wise taken care of in no time?

Not all strep bacteria have the toxin that makes our skin turn red - Scarlett fever.
Perhaps the toxin is given to the strep bacteria by a virus.

Angus Files

Great article there is certainly something going on and mutating thanks to the flu vaccine when you think about it if you change a building block in a wall it will affect all the other building blocks possibly not immediately but eventually.

JUST WHEN YOU THOUGH IT WAS GONE,ITS BACK! the old ones are the best they say!

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/this-strain-of-bird-flu-kills-one-third-of-patients#1

This Strain of Bird Flu Kills One-Third of Patients
A bird flu that started in China five years ago has slowly started to spread. Some experts worry it could be this year’s “Disease X.”

False scientists

It all seems a bit "playing God" with many intended and unintended consequences.

Barry

Record Cases Of Scarlet Fever In The UK -- Is the Nasal Flu Vaccine Responsible Part IV

***********

Without all due respect, what difference does it make?

These people have spent decades denying that their vaccines have injured children, by the millions! Do you really think they're going to admit to this?

They'll just hire a few academic PhD prostitutes, who will claim that the accusation is preposterous. The MSM will then announce that these 'top scientists' can 'find no evidence' to support the claim. And the majority of sheeple who populate this world, will refer to anyone who dare disagree as being crazy anti-vax conspiracy theorists.

will

Quarantine, hygiene, and pinicillin are responsible for a decrease in infection diseases not vaccines. Older vaccines were helpful in boosting immunity but not the current chemical laden ones. scarlet fever is related to strep throat so maybe if there was a vaccine bacteria called strep that it could be related not the flu vaccine.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)