Attorney and Former Autism Respite Worker On Hindsight
UK Newspaper Reports on Call to "Ban" Dara Berger's How to Prevent Autism from Skyhorse Publishing

AAP: Contrariwise on Vaccine Contraindications

Drink Me Adriana Gamondes
Credit: A. Gamondes


NOTE:  Can you make heads or tails of this missive on the AAP website about vaccine risks?   Thanks to our Nancy Hokkanen for sharing the info.   In short, AAP says, "Inject me," without regard for consequences.  Tweedledumb and dumber.

"Vaccination should not be delayed because of the presence of mild upper respiratory tract illness, gastroenteritis, otitis media or other mild illness with or without fever."

"Conditions that may occur following DTaP vaccine, such as temperature of 105 degrees Fahrenheit or higher, collapse or shock-like state, persistent crying, or convulsions with or without fever are not contraindications or precautions to administration of Tdap to an adolescent or adult."

"Vaccinations usually should be deferred when a precaution is present, unless the provider determines the benefit of protection from the vaccine outweighs the risk for an adverse reaction."

From the AAP site:

Understanding Vaccine Contraindications, Precautions

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines a contraindication as a condition in an intended vaccinee that increases the risk for a serious adverse reaction. A vaccine should not be administered when a contraindication is present.

A precaution indicates that a more severe reaction to the vaccine may occur than would have otherwise been expected, although the risk is less than that associated with a contraindication. Also, a condition classified as a precaution may compromise the vaccine’s ability to produce immunity. Vaccinations usually should be deferred when a precaution is present, unless the provider determines the benefit of protection from the vaccine outweighs the risk for an adverse reaction.

Which of the following are correct?

a) The majority of contraindications and precautions are temporary, so the vaccine generally can be administered later.

b) A severe acute illness is defined as a temperature greater than 39 degrees Celsius.

c) A history of thrombocytopenia is not a precaution for measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine administration.

d) Persistent, inconsolable crying lasting more than three hours within 48 hours after administration of a previous diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) or diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid and pertussis (DTP) vaccine is a contraindication to tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) administration.

e) Spina bifida or bladder exstrophy is a precaution for rotavirus vaccine administration.

f) Both live-virus and inactivated vaccines may be administered to a mother who is breastfeeding without concern for the safety of the infant or mother.

Answer: a, e and f are correct

Measles vaccine is associated with a mild decrease in platelet count within a few days after the vaccine is administered. Rare cases of idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) have been associated with administration of a measles-containing vaccine. One Vaccine Safety Datalink review reported an attributable risk of one case of ITP per 40,000 doses of MMR.

People with a history of ITP may be at increased risk for developing clinically significant thrombocytopenia after MMR vaccination. The decision to vaccinate such a child with MMR depends on the benefits of immunity to measles, mumps and rubella and the risks for recurrence or exacerbation of thrombocytopenia after vaccination. The benefits of immunization usually are greater than the potential risks, and administration of MMR vaccine is justified because of the even greater risk for thrombocytopenia after measles or rubella disease.

The presence of a moderate or severe acute illness with or without a fever is a precaution to administration of all vaccines. This precaution avoids causing diagnostic confusion between manifestations of the underlying illness and possible adverse effects of vaccination or superimposing adverse effects of the vaccine on the underlying illness. No specific temperature defines a child with a severe acute illness. People with moderate or severe acute illness should be vaccinated as soon as the illness has resolved.

Vaccination should not be delayed because of the presence of mild upper respiratory tract illness, gastroenteritis, otitis media or other mild illness with or without fever.

Contraindications to DTaP administration include a history of Guillain-Barré syndrome occurring within six weeks after a previous dose of tetanus toxoid containing vaccine, a progressive or stable neurologic disorder, uncontrolled seizures or progressive encephalopathy. Tdap may be administered to a child with a history of persistent, inconsolable crying lasting more than three hours within 48 hours after administration of a previous DTaP or DTP vaccine.

Conditions that may occur following DTaP vaccine, such as temperature of 105 degrees Fahrenheit or higher, collapse or shock-like state, persistent crying, or convulsions with or without fever are not contraindications or precautions to administration of Tdap to an adolescent or adult. A history of extensive limb swelling following prior DTaP or a stable neurologic disorder (such as controlled seizures or cerebral palsy) are not contraindications or precautions to administration of Tdap.

Latex rubber is contained in the RV1 (Rotarix) oral applicator, whereas the RV5 (RotaTeq) dosing tube is latex free. Therefore, some experts prefer that infants with spina bifida or bladder exstrophy, who are at high risk for acquiring latex allergy, receive RV5 instead of RV1 to minimize latex exposure. However, if RV1 is the only rotavirus vaccine available, it should be administered because the benefit of vaccination is considered to be greater than the risk for sensitization.

Neither inactivated nor live attenuated virus vaccines administered to lactating women affect the safety of women or their infants. The attenuated live virus vaccine strain replicates in a vaccinated mother, but most live viruses in vaccines are not excreted in breast milk. Rubella virus vaccine may be excreted in human milk, but the virus usually does not infect the infant. If infection does occur, it is well-tolerated because the virus is attenuated.

Inactivated, recombinant, subunit, polysaccharide and conjugated vaccines, as well as toxoids, pose no risk for mothers who are breastfeeding or for their infants. Breastfeeding is a contraindication for smallpox vaccination of the mother because of the theoretical risk for contact transmission. Yellow fever vaccine should be avoided in breastfeeding women, unless a nursing mother cannot avoid or postpone travel to an endemic area.

There are no data to suggest that passive transfer of antibodies in human milk can affect the efficacy of a live virus vaccine administered to an infant. Breastfed infants should be vaccinated according to the recommended immunization schedule.

Dr. Meissner is professor of pediatrics at Floating Hospital for Children, Tufts Medical Center. He also is an ex officio member of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases and associate editor of the AAP Visual Red Book.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Hans Litten

http://vaxxter.com/ohio-sues-5-pharma-companies-fueling-opioid-epidemic/

The state of Ohio has sued five major pharmaceutical companies, essentially claiming they have been ‘fueling’ the state’s ‘opioid epidemic.’

State Attorney General Mike DeWine alleges these five companies “helped unleash a health care crisis that has had far-reaching financial, social, and deadly consequences in the State of Ohio.”

Mississipi is the only other state to have filed a similar lawsuit.

Named in the suit are:
◾Purdue Pharma
◾Endo Health Solutions
◾Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and subsidiary Cephalon
◾Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary Janssen Pharmaceuticals
◾Allergan

Han Litten

3xmommo | June 01, 2017 at 04:46 PM

The good news is the Sackler family \ Purdue pharmaceuticals have made into Forbes rich list on the back of Opoids and hardly a word about it incredible .

Their slow release opoids (oxycontin) can simply be crushed up and its legalised heroin.

3xmommo

Same thing was done to justify selling more opioids. One letter written, referenced by many afterward. Sell as many as possible- don't worry about any risks folks. And the doctors didn't. http://www.businessinsider.com/1980-letter-that-helped-launch-the-opioid-crisis-2017-6

annie

man-made global warming
man-made autism

It's not that their explanations
DON'T EXIST

It's that
THEY'RE NOT ACCEPTED

No one understands this better than
Vladimir Putin

Laura Hayes

First off, if anyone can read this "advice" and still trust this doctor or any doctor dumb/corrupt enough to follow it, then beware of the consequences you will forever endure.

Second, we must counter and correct the erroneous and dangerous paradigm that "the provider" determines the risk/benefit and then gets to make the decision for the patient/parent, as he states here:

"Vaccinations usually should be deferred when a precaution is present, unless the provider determines the benefit of protection from the vaccine outweighs the risk for an adverse reaction."

WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!!! It is the PATIENT/PARENT who ALWAYS has the responsibility and power to make any and all medical decisions for oneself or one's children. I continue to read utter nonsense, including by those fighting for the return of full parental rights and unfettered medical choice freedom, that "it is up to the doctor and patient/parent to decide". NO, IT'S NOT! It is SOLELY up to the patient/parent to decide. We need to REMOVE the provider from that statement. Doctors and other providers are simply consultants prior to making any medical decisions, nothing more. A patient/parent can take or leave their "advice", and if it's "advice" like that which is contained in this article, you had best leave it!

Third, for but one example, from the Varivax varicella vaccine package insert, under Contraindications: "any febrile illness or active infection." I think that when a doctor is making the dangerous recommendations as he does in this article, including in the paragraph below, he should have his medical license revoked, unable to be reinstated or used in any of the 50 states!

"Vaccination should not be delayed because of the presence of mild upper respiratory tract illness, gastroenteritis, otitis media or other mild illness with or without fever."

Fourth, to make the following statements should also be reason enough to immediately revoke one's medical license: "Neither inactivated nor live attenuated virus vaccines administered to lactating women affect the safety of women or their infants. " and "Inactivated, recombinant, subunit, polysaccharide and conjugated vaccines, as well as toxoids, pose no risk for mothers who are breastfeeding or for their infants." REALLY? Common sense ALONE is enough to KNOW these statements are false. There is no factual basis for either statement, absolutely none, and much evidence to disprove both.

Fifth, will this doctor's statements now be used to revoke medical exemptions already on file, and to deny future ones? My prediction is yes.

Sixth, regarding what Bob Moffit posted re. ITP, when I was a young child (I was born in 1965), I remember having to have my nose cauterized due to frequent nosebleeds. I wonder if those frequent nosebleeds were related to vaccine-induced low platelet count?

Such "advice" as by the doctor in this article should result in immediate condemnation from his medical colleagues and from all medical licensing boards. "Should", however, is the operative word here. In today's corrupt world of medicine, please don't hold your breath for that to happen.

This doctor's dangerous statements and recommendations are right up there with those of Dr. (!) Richard Pan, CA's imbecilic senator who made the claim that water is the most dangerous ingredient in vaccines. Read the full transcript in this article of mine:

"SB277 Sponsor Says Water More Toxic Than Mercury" by Laura Hayes

http://www.ageofautism.com/2015/11/sb277-sponsor-dr-richard-pan-says-water-more-toxic-than-mercury.html#comments

John Stone

This is an article I wrote somewhile back based on a CDC MMR study from 2006.

Some noteworthy features:

1) Nearly a quarter of the toddlers were definably unwell when routinely vaccinated (with fever, diarrhea or rash).
2) 6 in 100 developed a temperature of 39.5C or higher.
3) There was no monitoring of outcomes beyond 3.5 weeks.

http://www.ageofautism.com/2014/07/best-of-aofa-naked-cdc-truth-about-mmr.html

John Stone

Bill

Yes, the name was changed but basically historically it is the same institution.

Jeannette Bishop

I read this and see no guarantee (among all the confusion...is this a strategy for avoiding liability from one direction or other? stay vague and explain what you "really" meant afterwards if some fallout reaches your door?) that any true consideration of risk FOR THE PATIENT or benefits FOR THE PATIENT is actually operating here, especially being acutely aware that adequate data for determining either does not exist and there's no awareness demonstrated here of that paucity either. It seems not likely further, since there is no indication of awareness that the risks/benefits decision actually RESTS WITH THE PATIENT/PARENT and the job of informing patient/parent goes unacknowledged with the rest.

Bill

In the video linked above, posted by Hans Litten, it mentions the "Federal Communicable Disease Center".... wtf? Is that the same as the CDC we have now?

annie

This article is one big contraindication.
It would seem that this is corporate media's way of trying to own the message. It knows that the
conversation about vaccines can no longer be held at yes or no and thus begins the disinformation
infowar.

angusfiles

Were all meant to be more tolerant and switched off - just put your hopes and dreams in a syringe holding vaccines and watch them all being pumped away.

They all will get a warm welcome where they are going ..

Pharma for Prison
MMR RIP

Bob Moffit

"Measles vaccine is associated with a mild decrease in platelet count within a few days after the vaccine is administered. Rare cases of idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) have been associated with administration of a measles-containing vaccine"

Fifty-three years ago .. 1965 .. as young .. in our middle-twenties ... first-time parents .. our 4 year old suffered a nose-bleed that we could not stop .. admitted to hospital .. our daughter was diagnosed with ITP .. which required the surgical removal of her spleen .. which had inexplicably had begun attacking and destroying her platelets .. necessary for clotting to stem the loss of blood. We took her to the best doctors in Manhattan that we could find .. all used the word "bizarre" to describe her condition.

35 years ago .. 1999 .. now middle-aged grandparents .. our third grandson at 2 years of age .. "regressed" and was diagnose "autistic" .. just as ITP decades prior .. a disease/disorder we .. and .. our grandson's pediatrician could not diagnose him autistic because autism had been so rare that pediatricians had absolutely no information upon which to make a diagnosis.

While seeking info on what autism was .. and .. more importantly .. what caused it and how to treat it .. we learned for the first time our daughter's ITP had been caused by a VACCINE .. and .. that VACCINES are suspected of "causing autism" as well.

THEY KNEW IN 1965 THAT MY DAUGHTER'S ITP WAS NOT "BIZARRE" .. THEY KNEW IT WAS CAUSED BY A VACCINE. HOW DO I KNOW THAT ... BECAUSE .. A FEW YEARS AFTER MY DAUGHTHER LOST HER SPLEEN .. A NEW VACCINE WAS INTRODUCED .. SPECIFICALLY FOR CHILDREN WITH COMPROMISED IMMUNE SYSTEMS .. AND .. WE IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED HER PEDIATRICIAN TO SCHEDULE A DAY TO RECEIVE THE NEW VACCINE .. HER PEDIATRICAIN ADAMANTLY STATED OUR DAUGHTER WOULD NEVER RECEIVE ANOTHER VACCINE .. BUT .. ODDLY .. NOW THINKING BACK ON IT ... HE DIDN'T BOTHER TO EXPLAIN WHY HE SAID THAT.

I find it insane to read the CORRECT answer to questions regarding "precautions" .. that pediatricians are recommending .. "vaccinations usually should be deferred when a precaution is present, unless the provider determines the benefit of protection from the vaccine outweighs the risk for an adverse reaction".

c) A history of thrombocytopenia is not a precaution for measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine administration."

REALLY? Please .. tell me it is not so.

Hans Litten

Did you know the 3rd of june is

International Vaccine Injury Awareness Day

apparently .

Cant believe this ! Why don't I know this ?

michael

This article just reinforces that doctors and maybe more specifically pediatricians are dangerously stupid. The more indoctrinated;the more dangerous. There should be warning sign on their office doors--Danger ahead;do not proceed beyond this point if you value your health.

Benedetta

My biggest regret is taking my kids to a pediatrician group and not just to a plain old family physician.
All of my friends that did, it has been story after story that the family doctor actually listened to them about any problems with vaccines.

My kids' pediatricians came off with some real zingers in the 17 years we stayed with them. Not jus the vaccine, but the newest (stupid research). For example; babies are not really smiling they are passing gas. Well guess what, I am as human observer as the rest of the psychologist that did this study and my daughter smiled three times on day three of her life. She smiled as the nurse juggled her up and down. She was their little darling of the nursery. Not only smiled but laughed out loud. She smiled a the sky she saw for the first time and laughed out loud, She smiled at the color yellow, and stared and stared at it.

When the ped came up with that zinger I told him; his studies were full of it.

I think that the AAP and the whole ped society is kind of like the Nazis. Stay with me. It is the attitude that certain human beings are not really human.

nhokkanen

AAP’s advice about vaccinating a child with fever fever fails to consider concomitant administration of drugs that advertisements convince parents are necessary for treatment.

First, look at this from the physician’s perspective regarding vaccine efficacy. If you Google “vaccine fever acetaminophen,” first up is a WebMD blurb titled “Tylenol May Weaken Infant Vaccines.”

But AAP’s most reckless advice is to ignore encephalitic crying, or “the DTaP scream.” In April 2009 a person claiming to be pediatric nurse posted at BabyCenter said her daughter’s 2-month-old infant was “inconsolable” after getting 9 vaccines:
“…blood curdling screams, tremors, fever, crossing of the eyes, she had severe redness and swelling by the pentacel injection site, bright green runny stools, severe gas...  It was so frustrating because the tylenol didn't help at all!”
https://community.babycenter.com/post/a9945625/trigger_2month_vaccine_nightmare

And of course AAP dismisses reports such as this as merely anecdotal… unless perhaps you’re in the doctor’s office and have handed over your co-pay. And then they say "he'll grow out of it."

Hans Litten

genocide:

http://www.healthnutnews.com/pediatrician-warns-parents-toxin-vaccines-given-babies/

And doctors don’t tell you what’s in that vaccine: 250 micro-grams (mcg) of aluminum.2
“There is between 225 and 850 mcg of aluminum in Hep B pediatric dose vaccinations: from the lowest of 225 mcg in COMVAX, to the largest amount of 850 mcg in PEDIARIX.
This amount is 5-17 times bigger than the adult recommended limit, and it is given to infants who are much smaller in weight.
The 2012 published study showed that this amount of aluminum will reduce the child’s developmental scores. Giving 4-5 mcg of aluminum per kilogram of body weight a day, made a baby lose one point on the Bailey Developmental Score according to the study.”3

Hans Litten

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/a-1971-news-broadcast-admits-flu-vaccine-ineffective-even-harmful-yet-still-government-recommended/

A 1971 NEWS BROADCAST ADMITS FLU VACCINE INEFFECTIVE, EVEN HARMFUL, YET STILL GOVERNMENT RECOMMENDED

While this headline and video below address the subject of vaccinations, it can be extended to help understand the “Control Goals” of the 1% Global Elite when it comes to their plan to “cull the herd” with population control. Vaccinations (with the collusion of Big Pharma) is just one phase. Other Control/Cull phases include: GMO foods, Water Fluoridation, GeoEngineering the air above with toxins, Unchecked Radiation from Cellular Communications, as well as the dangers of “The Smart Grid.” There are more (mercury amalgams , aspartame & other sweeteners , aluminium in food etc)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)