Paul Offit’s 10,000 Vaccine Doctrine and Deception on Every Child By Two
The Big Gamble

Dachel Wake Up: New America Reviews Vaxxed

Dachel Morning Wake UoBy Anne Dachel

The news site, The New American reviewed the film we’re all familiar with, “Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe," and unlike every mainstream media outlet, The New American actually told the the story of corruption, fraud, and cover-up surrounding our vaccine program, which is the essence of “Vaxxed.”

That's not how the every other news source has treated this film.

In 7 things about vaccines and autism that the movie ‘Vaxxed’ won’t tell you,   The Washington Post called “Vaxxed” “an anti-vaccination documentary,” and reminded readers that studies show no link, while devoting most of the story to trashing Andrew Wakefield. That was in May, 2016.

Last March, The New York Times covered “Vaxxed” in Pulled From Festival, Anti-Vaccination Film Will Run in TheaterThe Times omitted the real story of “Vaxxed,” and cited William Thompson as a “former center employee” and Andrew Wakefield as “Mr. Wakefield.” Reporter Melena  Ryzik said “Vaxxed” was wrong because “the C.D.C. has already stated unequivocally that ‘vaccines do not cause autism.’”—Clearly The Times published what they were told, which was to cover up the real story of “Vaxxed.”

Now look at The New American. Here’s a refreshing example of honest and thorough reporting on the REAL STORY of “Vaxxed.”

Mar 9, 2017, The New American: New Film Suggests Link Between Vaccines and Autism

By Alex Newman

After watching the new documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe, it is easy to see why the establishment is trying so hard to make sure you never watch it. At the very least, the movie raises some extremely troubling questions that absolutely must be answered, as quickly as possible. If the experts, doctors, parents, and others interviewed in the 91-minute film are even partially correct, millions of lives are being needlessly destroyed, and the cost to taxpayers will likely reach into the trillions of dollars.

But the movie does more than just raise troubling questions. It exposes a conspiracy — and yes, that is the correct term — involving top officials at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to deliberately conceal data showing a causal link between vaccines and autism. If proven in a court of law, America and humanity have been victims of a crime of monumental proportions that must be dealt with as harshly as possible.

...the film introduces Dr. William Thompson, senior scientist at CDC. He became a whistleblower after finding out that the CDC was omitting important data on vaccines. “We lied about the scientific findings,” Thompson can be heard saying in a recording played in the film. “The CDC can no longer be trusted to do vaccine safety work.”

The saga began in 2004, when Thompson led a CDC study on the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine and its potential link to autism. The CDC “omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics,” Thompson admitted in a 2014 letter. Essentially, the data that was concealed from the public revealed a causal relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism. Documents were later destroyed, too.

Government scientists are also exposed in e-mails seemingly discussing covering up the data showing the links between vaccines and autism. In fact, according to whistleblower Thompson, CDC officials destroyed the documents showing the links. “That's what I keep seeing again and again and again, where these senior people do completely unethical, vile things and no one holds them accountable,” Thompson says in a voice recording. Unsurprisingly, none of the CDC officials implicated in the scandal were willing to be interviewed for Vaxxed....

Newman actually reported on who’s who in “Vaxxed,” from naming William Thompson, Brian Hooker, and Andrew Wakefield, to Stephanie Seneff, Bill Posey, and Dave Weldon. The details Newman included are stunning, especially when compared to the pathetic coverage of “Vaxxed” by mainstream news outlets.

The contrast between the authentic and phony news on “Vaxxed” shows the truly shameful reporting that passes for journalism in America today.

I congratulate Alex Newman on rising above media propaganda. My only criticism is about the title, New Film Suggests Link Between Vaccines and Autism. To really capture the message of "Vaxxed," the title should say something like, New Film Reveals Government Cover-up of Vaccines/Autism Link. It isn't just that there's a link, but that officials knew about it years ago, destroyed the evidence, and have been lying about it ever since.

Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

david m burd

@ Rachel, Here is quoted The New American's self description of its purpose - clearly not like the typical and totally corrupted daily-published NY Times & Washington Post who rubber stamp and endorse the Vaccine Industry & CDC lies (and have also slandered Dr. Andrew Wakefield for the last five years).

"The New American magazine, published twice a month in print and daily online, is the essential news source for freedom-loving Americans.

Our editorial point of view is guided by our support of the U.S. Constitution and the principles upon which our Constitution is based. Specifically, we want to restore and retain the values and vision that made America great — limited government under the Constitution, the freedoms our Constitution guarantees, and the personal responsibility a free people must exercise to stay free. In the area of foreign policy, our editorial point of view is based on avoiding foreign entanglements and going to war only when necessary to defend our country and citizens. Our purpose is encapsulated by the slogan appearing on the cover of The New American “That freedom shall not perish.”

What you do, Rachel, is to ignore the massive CDC corruption that the movie Vaxxed is all about, just like the NY Times & Washington Post, et al. did, and you misdirect potential interest by belittling The New American. It seems your great scorn for anybody pro-American and informed vaccine choice has priority over honest vaccine-damage revelations.

Rachel

It's a bit of a stretch to call the New American a "news" site.

Gary Ogden

How refreshing for a journalist to actually review the film! And he got it all right. Thank you Alex Newman.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)