Autism’s Super Heroes
How Autistics Could Help Their Tribe

Dachel Wake Up: Media Notices Sorry State of Health

Dachel Morning Wake UoBy Anne Dachel

Recent medical news is getting lots of attention across the mainstream media. It seems that more young adults are being diagnosed with colon cancer. While the numbers remain small, there is an increase that has the attention of scientists. News reports use words like “very shocking,” “alarming,” and “startling” describe the situation.

Experts are baffled by the findings. Explanations include “obesity,” “poor diet,” and“lack of exercise.” Rather than advocating for an immediate focus on finding the cause, doctors are merely calling for earlier screening, perhaps in people in their forties.

(My favorite response was the doctor at NPR who thinks it’s just better screening that’s responsible.)

Feb. 28, 2017, CBS New York: Health Experts Alarmed By Spike In Colon, Rectal Cancer Rates   

The 33-year-old mother of three is one of a growing number of young people diagnosed with colorectal cancer, according to a new American Cancer Society study.

It shows people born in 1990 have twice the risk of colon cancer and four times the risk of rectal cancer as people born in 1950 faced at the same age, but the question is why?

“That’s the million dollar question, we don’t know,” Dr. Andrea Cercek said. ...

Feb 28, 2017, NPR: Why Are More Young Americans Getting Colon Cancer?

More than a decade ago, scientists noticed an odd quirk in the data: While overall rates of colorectal cancer have been falling dramatically since the mid-1980s, there's been a steady uptick of this disease among people younger than 50....

Siegel tells Shots, "It appears that under the surface, the underlying risk for this disease is actually increasing in the population."

What's driving that is hard to say. Obesity is more common among younger than it used to be, so perhaps it's partly to blame.

Or it may not be obesity itself; it could be that poor diet and lack of exercise, which contribute to obesity, are also influencing colon cancer rates.

One study found that people from Africa who were suddenly switched to an American diet had signs of inflammation in their colons within just two weeks, Siegel notes, "so this change can happen fairly rapidly."...

Dr. H. Gilbert Welch, a professor of medicine at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, says what look like additional cancers in people under 50 may simply be cases that are being diagnosed earlier than they would have been. Some people are getting colonoscopies for reasons other than cancer screening these days, and doctors are surely coming upon early cases of colon cancer they might not have turned up so soon.

Feb 28, 2017, Washington Post: Colorectal cancer rates rising sharply among Gen X and millennials

Rates of colon and rectal cancer are rising sharply among young and middle-aged Americans, at the same time that they continue to decline for adults 55 and older, according to a startling new study that is sparking questions about whether screening should start earlier. ...

American Cancer Society researcher Rebecca Siegel, who led the study, said that earlier work had signaled a growing incidence of colorectal cancer among the groups known as Gen X and millennials. But the magnitude of the increase identified “was just very shocking,” she said. ...

Azad stressed that the incidence of colorectal cancer in young people, while on the rise, remains very low. The disease will be diagnosed in just 1 in 100,000 people in their 20s compared with about 50 in 100,000 people in their early 60s, according to data used in the study. ...

Two weeks later, her doctor got the results, which indicated there might be a problem. At that point, she readily underwent a colonoscopy and was diagnosed with Stage 1 colon cancer. She has now changed her mind: “I really think that everyone should get screened in their 40s.”

Feb 28, 2017, USA Today: Colon and rectal cancers surge among Millennials and Generation X

 Colon and rectal cancers have increased dramatically and steadily in young and middle-age adults in the United States over the past four decades, a study confirmed Tuesday. While scientists have not pinpointed an exact cause, prime suspects include obesity, inactivity and poor diets, said researchers from the American Cancer Society, reporting in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

For parents surviving in the midst of the autism epidemic, we’ve heard it all before. Modern medicine doesn’t want to find the cause or prevent anything (unless of course they can come up with a vaccine). Earlier screening is familiar to us too, sounding a lot like“better diagnosing, early intervention.”

Notice the vague references to “poor diet,” which sounds very similar to the “possible environmental factors” that experts talk about with autism.

The truth is, our diet is filled with toxic garbage. Over ten years ago I began to study the food we eat and switch my family to a healthy organic diet. We grow an organic seed garden, can our own vegetables, buy from local Amish and organic farmers. When I told my husband’s doctor that I cured his chronic respiratory problems by switching him to a gluten-free diet, he looked at me like I was speaking Martian.

Anytime the ingredients on a package include “artificial” ANYTHING, it’s a chemical they’ve added. No wonder we’re all getting sick. Aspartame, high fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated oil, and GMOs mean that our diet isn’t real food.

Our food should sustain our health, not compromise it. It should be produced in the most natural ways possible. Toxic food compounded with toxic vaccines adds both live viruses and toxic metals to our bodies. It’s amazing we’re able to function at all.

The same doctors who don’t know what’s in the vaccines they’re injecting into our children, have no idea what’s in the food we’re eating.  They’re watching in wide-eyed amazement as more and more Americans end up with chronic illness and disease.

Add these statistics to the two percent of American children who have autism.

More than half of U.S. children have a chronic health problem today.

One in 3 Americans dies with Alzheimer’s or other form of dementia.  

One in 8 U.S. women will develop invasive breast cancer in their lifetime.  

When will someone say something is really wrong with how we’re living? Just how sick do we have to get?

Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

kapoore

I might have written this before, but oh well. I happened a while back to look at some photos of Woodstock, and I was struck by how thin everyone was. I know we smoked a lot of cigarettes instead of eating, but still... Where are the thin people today among American young people.

They are not there because aluminum in vaccines tampers with the mitochondria and can set off metabolic disease. This is a well documented fact based on studies of aluminum infected cells and the way the RNA reacts by turning on certain genes. How fair is it that a child is burdened with a weight problem for life because of medical incompetence.

Also, I have thought about the "snowflakes." In the last election cycle a large group of college age women required psychiatric care when Hillary lost the election. These women were scoffed at as over-protected, but it didn't occur to anyone apparently that there might be some sort of syndrome going on. The "snowflakes" are part of the most over-vaccinated group of children in history--up to 60 vaccines before they reach college age. Anyone who has had a child with chronic illness due to vaccine injury knows about tsunami crying fits, and how sometimes they relate to metabolic disorders like low blood sugar or even celiac disease. Could the snowflakes phenomena be less the result of over protection and more the result over vaccination?

go Trump

At present, the United States has the most expensive medical system in the world with a world ranking of about number 33.

We have billionaire health insurance executives where about 30% of the money disappears before anything even starts. Most health insurance ”does not cover cancer” unless you purchase an add-on policy. Thank goodness “the investor class” can make money each and every year with health care.

Not quite sure when the President might address the nation on Autism issues but I would hope it comes before they light up all the damn blue lights again. What has been intentionally done to the nation’s children the past 30 years is just as bad, if not worse than slavery in the United States 170 years ago.

In some ways the slaves may have been treated even better.

Linda1

If it's true, GMOs (known to cause tumors in animal experiments) and electronic and RFR devices held close to the abdomen, compounded with 24/7 background wi-fi and smart meter radiation, would be the most likely primary causes.

But would they tell us about an increase in colon cancer if there wasn't some financial incentive? (They aren't telling us about the increase in brain cancer - or autism for that matter.) Or have their masters given the order to drive the masses at younger ages into lucrative colonoscopy screening? No doubt, if they could get away with somehow justifying yearly mammograms from birth, they would.

I notice that they forgot to report that pesky little detail about unintended fecal transplantation and resulting deaths from the widespread use of dirty scopes that the FDA has been aware of and not solving for years. Apparently, the standard has not been to sterilize instruments in between patients. That would impair assembly line productivity. Making sure that their instruments aren't disease vectors just wouldn't be cost effective. Has this little problem put a dent in business so that they need a little fear mongering media blitz to drive the sheep through their doors?

"How to Mitigate Cross-Contamination During Colonoscopies, Final FDA Guidance Explains
Posted 29 November 2016
By Zachary Brennan

During a colonoscopy or esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), clinicians often use an irrigation system but typically do not clean and sterilize all components of the system after each procedure, so the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Tuesday issued guidance highlighting the risks of cross-contamination posed by specific practices and types of irrigation valves and accessories.

The 12-page guidance, first proposed in January 2015, notes that the risk of cross-contamination between patients can be heightened during such procedures because the water bottle and associated tubing and connectors can become contaminated with patient fluids and materials (e.g., blood, stool) that travel back through the irrigation system channels and tubing during the procedure, FDA says.

“FDA has received reports of backflow from irrigation channels into the water bottle and tubing when the irrigation channel did not have a backflow-prevention mechanism in place,” the guidance says. “Although FDA has not yet received reports of infection that can be attributed to backflow, the risk of cross-contamination should be mitigated by following the measures recommended.”

FDA recommends that at least one device component within the irrigation system have a backflow-prevention valve or other feature to prevent the backflow of fluids contaminated with microorganisms into the system.

The agency also recommends this backflow-prevention valve or other feature be tested with quantitative chemical and/or microbiological assays to demonstrate prevention of the backward flow of fluids under simulated use conditions.

The recommendations regarding the device design are limited to irrigation systems for flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy because, FDA says, irrigation systems for other devices, such as arthroscopes, may require different risk mitigation strategies due to the need to aseptically handle those irrigation systems.

FDA also clarifies terminology used to describe irrigation system components and outlines recommended mitigation strategies (e.g., device design, labeling) that aim to reduce the risk of cross-contamination between patients from the use of irrigation system tubing, valves and accessories."

http://www.raps.org/Regulatory-Focus/News/2016/11/29/26265/How-to-Mitigate-Cross-Contamination-During-Colonoscopies-Final-FDA-Guidance-Explains/

A couple of other articles:

http://www.mayoclinic.org/medical-professionals/clinical-updates/digestive-diseases/hospitals-opt-for-gas-sterilization-surveillance-cultures-to-combat-duodenoscope-caused-infections

https://www.focusforhealth.org/dr-david-lewis-discusses-endoscope-safety/

 ciaparker

No, Hans, I continue to think Gardasil is a very dangerous vaccine. I wouldn't force anyone either to get or refuse it, but I would never get it for my daughter or recommend it for anyone. But I think it's HPV transmitted by anal sex which is causing the rise in colorectal cancer. I think people should either not do it or, if they must, use condoms and hope to prevent the transmission.

Shelley Tzorfas

Maybe its the air, perhaps it is the food, possibly obesity, might be the water, but it is AlwaysAnything Except the drugging of our children with Vaccines...

Hans Litten

http://www.blacklistednews.com/80_Students_Removed_From_Class_For_Being_Unvaccinated%3A_Crossing_the_Line_of_Coercion/57166/0/38/38/Y/M.html

80 Students Removed From Class For Being Unvaccinated: Crossing the Line of Coercion

annie

What's the ol' saying? No doubt I'll bungle it: Never expect a man to understand (I would add admit) something when his livelihood is dependent on him not understanding it. For me this sums up all of conventional "healthcare".

Gary Ogden

At least part of the answer is staring them right in the face: An unhealthy gut microbiome. And as you say, Anne, this is clearly impacted by the poor food choices subsidized and advocated by our Department of Agriculture, all the dangerous chemicals we are exposed to while the regulatory agencies turn a blind eye, and the madness of vaccination policy. They will do nothing of any value about any of this. There are some hopeful signs, though. Organic food sales continue to rise each year, the alternative press is having a greater impact as more people, especially young people, realize where the real fake news is coming from, and we have an occupant in the White House who sometimes tells the truth (a real novelty in D.C).

Thomas Petrie

You can tell we have an educated group when as you're thinking of making an "intelligent" response, other folks have also written the same thing!

Take Jeannette Bishop's comment: "We" don't know why, but "we" won't talk about the carcinogenic GMOs & glyphosate, nor carcinogenic EMFs from cellphones & laptops, etc...can't mention any corporate products! Not at least until there is a big enough ground-swelling of concern to warrant doubt-manufacturing research to publicize, etc, etc, etc..."

Well, thanks Jeannette for writing my comment for me. I appreciate it! By the way, glyphosate is a likely carcinogen, and it would be useful to see how those who are on Organic diets (free from GMO's and Glyphosate containing foods), compare to 'regular eaters,' who don't shun such foods AND their incidence of colon cancer. Funny, no one is looking here. Kind of reminds us about the CDC: The NEVER do a THOROUGH study comparing the health of the fully vaccinated to the fully unvaccinated. How self-serving of their objectives.

Hans Litten

Posted by: ciaparker | March 05, 2017 at 06:35 PM

So CIA , are you saying the Gardasil is a good vaccine now ?

Jeannette Bishop

"We" don't know why, but "we" won't talk about the carcinogenic GMOs & glyphosate, nor carcinogenic EMFs from cellphones & laptops, etc...can't mention any corporate products! Not at least until there is a big enough ground-swelling of concern to warrant doubt-manufacturing research to publicize, etc, etc, etc...

I wonder if the injection of some carcinogens could play a role in these cancers (or maybe the avoidance of some possibly-now-to-be-found-as-colon/rectal-cancer-preventing diseases)?

Also, does obesity "cause" cancer or is obesity more accurately linked to cancer risk and may simply signal exposure to carcinogenic substances, perhaps a signal of less detoxification due to sedentary lifestyle, or perhaps even a individualized difficulty in detoxification of carcinogenic exposures no matter the lifestyle?

Kws

I thought the same thing when I saw that article. Better diagnosing? Really ?
How about Monsanto corn, preservatives, and a gut wrecking MMR vaccine?

You see it, I see it, and a handful of my friends see it. The rest are too busy to try, IMHO..

I wonder how long it will go too. How far down do we go as a society, do we ever acknowledge it publicly, and can we ever recover ?

 ciaparker

Just found this. I'd say the increase is because anal sex has become a lot more common in the last ten years, and it can transmit the HPV virus. Farrah Fawcett said there was no routine screening for it when she got and died of it in '09.

"Some researchers have also suggested that anal sex could contribute to your colorectal cancer risk, but given that anal sex only became more popular in the last decade it’s unlikely that it’s a major factor in the observed rise in cancer incidence.
Human papillomavirus, or HPV, has also been linked to colorectal cancer risk, and is also the most common sexually transmitted infection in the U.S. We have an excellent vaccine for it, but less than half of teenage girls got the full three doses. Less than a third of teenage boys got the whole vaccine. Even so, the ties between colorectal cancer and diet and exercise are far more established and fall in line better with the rise in incidence than do patterns in HPV rates."
http://www.popsci.com/#page-4

"Some 80 to 90 percent of anal cancers are caused by the human papillomavirus, or HPV, the same kind of virus that causes cervical cancer. And decades earlier, when Ms. Crowther was in her 20s, she had been treated for cervical dysplasia, a condition that often precedes cervical cancer – and is also caused by an HPV infection."

https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/09/saving-lives-from-anal-cancer/?_r=0

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)