Dachel Wake Up: Autism Friendly Spaces at Chop
Kris Kristofferson's Lyme Disease Misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's

Introductory Comments for VaXxed Screening in Roseville, CA

VaxxedBy Laura Hayes

Thank you all for coming tonight! Please be warned that I am not going to mince words tonight as I welcome you. Perhaps if more people had not minced words in years past, my children would not have been injured by vaccines, one to the point of severe and permanent disability. I thank you all for coming tonight because it is going to have to be people like us…informed, principled, ethical, concerned American citizens…who are going to have to expose the horrendous truth about the always life-altering, often life-decimating, and sometimes life-ending vaccinations that are harming and prematurely killing our children every single day, not to mention, people of all ages.  It is WE who are going to have to work non-stop to put an end to this ever-increasing medical tyranny, this abominable Vaccine Holocaust, this present evil. 

For those who think “holocaust” is too strong a word, I assure you it is not.  “Holocaust” is defined as “destruction or slaughter on a mass scale”, and that is indeed what vaccinations are doing to those who receive them, which can often be observed in the short term, always in the long term, and for generations to come as you will learn as you study these issues more. There is an ominous agenda underway, named Healthy People 2020, with the goal being to vaccinate all people, from fetus to grave, worldwide, with scores of vaccines and a recommended list that is ever-increasing…and that goal is in serious danger of being achieved.  We must not let that happen!

I am going to assume that in our audience tonight we have people who are at all stages of understanding the lies and corruption that underlie our nation’s vaccine program, from manufacture to mandate, and beyond…lies and corruption that have gone on for many decades. Some of you here have dedicated your lives to this cause, like I have, after watching your child suffer catastrophic brain injury, permanent nervous, immune, and GI system damage, and be transformed into someone who will be dependent on others for the entirety of their lifetime, never reaching what would have been their full potential, never living independently…perhaps never even using the toilet throughout their entire lifetime, but forever being in diapers…often living with great pain and suffering…vulnerable to all types of abuse throughout their lifespan…ALL because their parents were lied to…parents who then allowed their children to be injected with “routine” vaccinations…vaccinations they were told were perfectly safe, near 100% effective, essential for good health and longevity. 

Many of us were duped and fell prey to the biggest lie of all times…that vaccines are safe, effective, necessary, and have saved millions of lives. 

When we began to put the puzzle pieces together, which wasn’t hard as so many of us had nearly-identical stories, we realized the horrible truth that no parent wants to learn…that we actually unknowingly allowed our precious children to be harmed, and in some cases, killed…by vaccine after vaccine…and in some cases, by just one vaccine…beginning on the day of birth (which is now actually beginning in utero), and continuing at regular and frighteningly-frequent intervals throughout infancy, toddlerhood, and early childhood…and which are now being recommended to be continued during every single year of a person’s life…with the annual influenza vaccine, booster shot after booster shot, and new vaccine after new vaccine. 

When we told our doctors what we had witnessed, and what we suspected was the cause of our children’s many health, development, behavioral, speaking, and learning issues…we were told, “Nope, it wasn’t the vaccines.”  According to medical “experts”, it is NEVER the vaccines.  They tell us the temporal association between the vaccinations and the onset of numerous problems was merely coincidental

You know what I say to that ignorance, arrogance, utter nonsense, and blatant stupidity:  Vaccines…the leading cause of coincidences in the world!

Tonight, we are about to watch a documentary which has forever altered the landscape in our country and beyond.  Sadly, and unbelievably, though, this is not the first “smoking gun” exposing the lies and corruption underlying our nation’s vaccine program.  It is but one of many “smoking guns” I have now witnessed over the past 20 years be exposed and then completely ignored, maligned, and summarily dismissed by doctors, legislators, government regulatory agencies, school district personnel, and our utterly-pathetic-and-corrupted media. 

In CA, due to our bought-and-paid for legislators who voted for SB277, and due to our poor excuse for a governor, Jerry Brown, who signed SB277 into law, our nation’s unsafe, ineffective, inappropriately-and-fraudulently-tested vaccine program, which is regulated by corrupt crooks, as you will see in tonight’s movie, is now being forced on CA school children, and on infants, toddlers, and pre-schoolers in daycare, with the only exception being a near-impossible-to-obtain and costly Medical Exemption.  Children in CA can no longer attend public or private school, or daycare, unless they submit to and comply with multitudinous vaccinations now required by the State of CA…each of which carries a list of risks too long to read right now…and each of which carries the very real risks of lifelong chronic illness, severe and permanent disability, and DEATH.

As you will learn tonight, the CDC has definitively known for nearly 15 years, and many of us here tonight know that they have known for longer than that, that VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM, including the MMR vaccine. 

Let that sink in for a minute.  The current figure for Autism in our country, which is outdated by the way due to using a birth cohort born many years ago, is 1 in 45 children!  And in some states, it is even more alarming than that!  1 in 45…that is more than 2% of the children in our country!  That is roughly 7,500 children per month, or 90,000 children per year, being diagnosed in our country with this debilitating, lifelong disorder!  Yet, we are instructed to PANIC about a few cases of MEASLES…a benign childhood illness that is characterized by a rash and a fever for a few days, which can be treated with vitamin A supplementation, and which has lifelong benefits if contracted during childhood?! 

Something stinks here in America…and the stench is emanating from vaccine-making pharmaceutical companies, the FDA (which approves vaccines), the CDC (which recommends vaccines), our elected officials (who are representing their corporate and trade industry donors, not their constituents), and “medical professionals”, a term which has become an oxymoron to me, who, in their willful ignorance and astounding arrogance, and sometimes in their inexcusable corruption, have forgotten their oath to “First, do no harm”, have refused to listen to the parents of vaccine-injured children, have turned a blind eye and a callous heart to the patients they themselves have harmed via vaccination, and have become robotic vaccine givers, with seemingly little to no regard or concern for the harm they are inflicting.

Let us now turn our attention to VaXxed, which chronicles the admissions of a senior vaccine research scientist at the CDC…a man who is now known as “The CDC Whistleblower”, Dr. William Thompson.  His admissions concern blatant fraud and massive obstruction of justice, in other words, serious and malicious criminal behavior, related to both the MMR vaccine, and to the mercury used in a number of other vaccines.  Dr. William Thompson is not the only whistleblower to come forward regarding the MMR vaccine.  There are 2 others, former virologists at Merck, who have a pending federal case against Merck for Merck’s fraud concerning the efficacy of the mumps portion of the MMR. 

If there is one message I hope you take home with you tonight, it is that vaccines are neither safe nor effective, as claimed.  As you learn more about health and immunology, you will also learn that vaccines are not needed, they are nothing more than a vicious assault to the immune system…to the entire body. 

Please join the fight to ban vaccine mandates.  It is the most basic and fundamental human right to decide that which one allows or doesn’t allow to enter one’s own body, or that of one’s child.  Having to procure and utilize exemptions to vaccinations is not acceptable, either.  We should not have to beg, plead, and pay in an attempt to avoid or refuse vaccinations, or any medical treatment or procedure for that matter, which is what is happening right now as our parental rights, self-autonomy, and freedoms have been wrongfully terminated. 

A simple “no thank you” should ALWAYS suffice when one wants to decline a medical treatment or procedure, including vaccinations, for oneself or one’s child. There can be NO MANDATED MEDICINE in a society that calls itself free!

Thank you again for coming tonight.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Dorie Southern

When someone is a member of a cult that person believes what their leader tells them. Questioning is not allowed. It is ridiculed. What a person sees with his or her eyes can be questioned and denied. Doing something stupid like vaccinating all infants against sexually transmitted disease consequences can be considered normal. Even the doctors must not question what they are doing. What we have is a cult of vaccines.

If you question you are labeled a crazy anti-vax er, because everyone knows that vaccines are safe and have saved millions of lives. Repeat that again.

There should be knowledge and exemptions for anyone who does not want to take the risks associated with vaccines. But that might harm the cult of vaccines, which is unaccptable.

Benedetta

Otto;

Speaking of scare - isn't vaccines just great for that too. H1N1 flu is coming we all are going to die took me back to my youth in 1977 to the swine flu is coming and we all are going to die. Except the mistake at that time was they did not have the "famous vaccine court" to protect them. Once they got that little problem taken care of - the scare was on .

H1N1, SARs, Ebola, Zika - no end - life if great - scare em good and role out those vaccines.

Benedetta

Otto, the climate change thingy- when all of our electric bills goes up, cause the electric company has to pay for making CO2 to another company - or most probably the government as in "Cap and Trade" and since ya believe -- Oh Faith my man, that CO2 holds heat - in the atmosphere which it don't -- I think it is only fair that you pay my part too since I think it is a scam just like the hole - holes - in the ozone - scare 20 years before the climate change scare.

david m burd

Ronald, Thanks for your perspective.

WHAT(?) do people not grasp that 25+ years, annually, of completely worthless flu vaccinations coerced on our parents and grandparents -- INJECTED shots that contained 25 micrograms of ethylmercury (i.e. Thimerosal)?

There is no way to make a study of DECADES of this insane poisoning. This flu vaccine hysteria is beyond irrational -- it exemplifies how our human race is so easily manipulated. - as today's Zika fabricated farce is front page news, thanks to our Health Leader whores at CDC and NIH.

It's not hard to sensibly understand, that such flu-shot Mercury poisoning (and the other toxic excipients in the vaccines) IS the most plausible MAJOR cause of Alzheimer's and related brain disfunction in our elderly.

Studies be damned, just stop such as poisonous Flu, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccine shots.

Jeannette Bishop

Thanks so much, Laura!

John Stone

Ronald

You rightly cite David Lewis but a word also for Martin Hewitt's detailed examination of the fraudulent Deer/BMJ claims, which appeared in Age of Autism, and like Lewis's analysis was denied publication by the BMJ. It is a three-parter but all the parts can be accessed through this link.

http://www.ageofautism.com/2015/03/how-brian-deer-and-the-bmj-fixed-the-record-over-wakefield-part-2.html

Ronald Kostoff

Shawn Otto,

"who do you trust: an outlier with a personal agenda, who has lost his medical license and whose major paper has been retracted as fraudulent by the journal that published it, whose film selectively presents confirming information and makes emotionally powerful arguments?"

I would strongly suggest you read the 2014 book by Dr. David L. Lewis entitled Science for Sale. He documents his history at EPA as a whistleblower on the adverse health impacts from biosludge, including his eventual firing. He shows the collusion among Federal government, local government, industry, academic institutions, and research performers to suppress knowledge of these adverse effects from the public.

In Chapters 7 and 8, he examines the accusations made against Wakefield in more detail than you, myself, and probably every reader of this blog combined has done. He shows the level to which people were willing to prostitute themselves to cast negative aspersions on Wakefield. Basically, he shows that the whole case against Wakefield was a fraud.

There are relatively few people in this world with the guts of a Snowden, Manning, Assange, Ellsberg, Marcus, Lewis. Wakefield et al, who are willing to risk their careers, finances, and perhaps even their lives to uncover the truth for the public. Unfortunately, on the other side of the coin, there is no lack of people who are willing to prostitute themselves for a few crumbs from the rich and powerful. It is the latter who frame the debates, and allow and enable the former to be discounted by the gullible public. Unless we reverse this trend, we will destroy this planet from climate change, and in parallel, will destroy our health from unnecessary drugs, vaccines, chemicals, wireless radiation, and the myriad other pervasive causes of disease I identified in my eBook.

Hans Litten

Mr Otto :

For all contributors to vaccine debates: the fact is that about 30% of published orthodox medical research actually links the observed illnesses and serious organ damage and deaths occurring after any and all vaccines to the administered vaccines.
There is no need for any new research, just for reading the existing research.
Posted by: Dr Viera Scheibner | July 24, 2015 at 11:32 PM

Zbigniew Brzezinski: It used to be so much easier to control a million people than to kill them, but today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control them. (top CFR man)

Poul Thoresen ?

Bernadine Healey

SimpsonWood ?

Dr Frank Engley (themiserol toxic at nanograms , known since 1948 , still in the flu vaccine)

Archie Kalokerinos: My final conclusion after forty years or more in this business is that the unofficial policy of the World Health Organisation and the unofficial policy of ‘Save the Children Fund’ and almost all those organisations is one of murder and genocide.
They want to make it appear as if they are saving these kids, but in actual fact they don’t. I am talking of those at the very top. Beneath that level is another level of doctors and health workers, like myself, who don’t really understand what they are doing. But I cannot see any other possible explanation: It is murder and it is genocide. And I tell you what: when the black races really wake up to what we have done to them they are not going to thank us very much. And if you want to see what harm vaccines do, don’t come to Australia or New Zealand or any place, go to Africa and you will see it there. (preface written by Linus Pauling - 2 times nobel prize winner , could have won a third )

Russell Blaylock

Professer Boyd Hayley

Gardakil ? D'Albergue , Harper , Hang Sin

Julie Gerberding's very own admission after the Hannah Pauling verdict on CNN

Gulf War syndrome , anthraz mf59

Maurice Hilleman recording (sv40 , cancer , tumours , bargain basement tech etc)

It just goes on and on . Nagalase , HCG , Estradiol , XMRV , Polysorbate 80

Mr Otto , will you be taking your annual flu vaccine ?
Have you had children of your own yet ? Will you be following the full vaccine schedule for them ?

John Stone

Ronald

Yes, I believe the omission is routine with vaccine products - after all it would take far too long and be far too expensive wouldn't it? And you don't know what you might find.

Ronald Kostoff

David M. Burd,

"I think it highly more probable Alzheimer's and dementia are not "diseases" but instead they are toxic damage from whatever toxic chemicals, with vaccines being the most culpable, and more specifically the flu vaccine that has been foisted up our parents, grandparents, seniors the last 30 years, strongly pushed by the medical system."

I have just completed the data-gathering phase of an Alzheimer's/Dementia study, and am ready to embark on the final analysis/write-up phase. There are hundreds of contributing factors to these diseases or illnesses, or whatever terminology you use to describe them. These contributing factors I identified are based on the published literature only; who knows which additional ones have been suppressed or distorted by the sponsors/performers/Editors and their handmaidens in government?

I would be careful about making strong statements to the effect that 'vaccines are the most culpable'. They may be, and they may not be. The long-term studies to evaluate their role in AD/Dementia have not been performed; we don't even have credible short-term studies showing the relationships of vaccines to other diseases.

The MMR vaccine, for example, was licensed in the USA in 1971. Thus, children who received it initially are on the order of fifty years old today. That's insufficient time to ascertain whether they are experiencing higher rates of AD due to the vaccine. The VAERS database, a passive surveillance system that under-reports vaccine adverse effects by at least an order of magnitude, is certainly not tracking cases of AD resulting from vaccination. Additionally, to de-conflate the effects of vaccines from the myriad other potential contributing factors to AD would require an elaborate long-term study of extraordinary detail and extremely high statistical power. I see nothing remotely connected to such a study being performed or even being proposed!

But that's the problem, and, again, that's how the media has framed the debate. The media frames it as the responsibility of the consuming public to show that the vaccine is harmful, rather than it should be the responsibility of the vendors/regulatory agencies to show that the vaccine is safe before licensing for public use.

Look in the mirror

For Shawn Otto:
"...For what a man had rather were true he more readily believes. Therefore he rejects difficult things from impatience of research; sober things, because they narrow hope; the deeper things of nature, from superstition; the light of experience, from arrogance and pride; . . . things not commonly believed, out of deference to the opinion of the vulgar. Numberless, in short, are the ways, and sometimes imperceptible, in which the affections color and infect the understanding."

Please carefully and slowly re-read this quote that you submitted, and then think very long and hard about what you yourself believe and promulgate.

This is essentially why vaccines are getting such a free pass--people WANT to believe that modern medicine can protect us from death and disease. Medical doctors WANT to believe that they are protecting the health and welfare of the children they are vaccinating. Lazy journalists WANT to believe that they can trust what the "experts" at the CDC, FDA, and AMA have to say and there is no need to pay any attention to any dissenting opinions or information. Vaccine researchers WANT to believe that they are saving lives and never hurting anyone. And no one WANTS to believe that modern medicine and government could be so corrupted as to allow or mandate that people be harmed to protect profits.

I'd wager that no parent here WANTS to believe that they made a decision to allow a medical intervention that led to their child losing skills, intellect, and good health. Most, if not all, have only reached this heart-breaking conclusion based on what they have seen with their own eyes and upon many, many hours of careful reading with an intense desire to know the truth and hopefully find some clues about how to undo the devastating damages their children have suffered.

You would do well to listen to, and read carefully, with an open and enquiring mind, the words and research of those whose opinions and conclusions differ from yours--those who question the efficacy and safety of vaccines. That is what anyone who really wants to discover truth must do--regardless of the topic or level of controversy.

Ronald Kostoff

John Stone,

One additional interesting (and very troubling) point about the Boxsero Insert. As stated in the Boxsero Insert and reproduced in my comment below, "There were no studies on genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, which is in line with applicable guidelines". The latter part of this statement ("which is in line with applicable guidelines") was included in other portions of the Insert that also mentioned studies not performed.

This is how the media frame the debate. They make it sound as though some thoughtful and credible consensus has been reached in the medical community as to what should be included in safety studies. Who in their right mind would set 'applicable guidelines' that would exclude testing of any product for carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, mutagenicity, etc, especially a product given to children at a very vulnerable period of their life? I am becoming convinced that the medical media in all its forms is no less biased and distorted than the mainstream political media that is barraging us with outright propaganda 24/7. The medical media may be far more subtle and sophisticated by hiding behind the sacred cloak of 'science', but both forms of media are tentacles of the same octopus, and need the same levels of scrutiny before being accepted.

david m burd

Ronald Kostoff,

I always appreciate your comments; I too have 50 years of accomplished science/engineering experience. That said, I would like to elaborate on your sentence "There are chronic diseases that tend to strike in the 60s and 70s, like Alzheimer's and dementia."

First, I think it highly more probable Alzheimer's and dementia are not "diseases" but instead they are toxic damage from whatever toxic chemicals, with vaccines being the most culpable, and more specifically the flu vaccine that has been foisted up our parents, grandparents, seniors the last 30 years, strongly pushed by the medical system. Many of these elderly DID progressively suffer "dementia" and "Alzheimer's", but in even older generations, Alzheimer's "disease" was very rare (to the best of my literature searching).

My mother and a great many of her friends lost their cognitive capabilities in tandem with 20 years of annual flu shots loaded with 25 micrograms of Hg (Thimerosal), Even today a "trace" of Hg (up to 1 microgram) still in some single-dose shots contains 3000 Trillion atoms of mercury.

I thank Judy Obradovic here on AoA for bringing up this "trace" topic a few years back in the forum.

John Stone

Ronald Kostoff

Just to note that I have written extensively about the Bexsero scam in these columns (as well as assisting Angus Files in giving evidence to Scottish Parliament):

http://www.ageofautism.com/2016/02/urgent-questions-men-b-vaccine-and-the-united-kingdom-joint-committee-on-vaccination-and-immunisatio.html#more

Nothing could be more indicative of a government machine failing to act in a disinterested way (from the same people who brought you the Wakefield affair).

Ronald Kostoff

Shawn Otto,

"Ronald, you seem like an intelligent guy. Do you really want to throw your lot in with people who argue that this is a supranational global conspiracy funded by the Gates? That the Council on Foreign Relations and GAVI are dictating to governments? It sounds like a conspiracy theory on the order of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, or of that offered by climate deniers who assert the UN is driving the hoax of climate change."

RNK: Guilt by association is a weak argument. If Mussolini made the trains run on time, and I like the trains running on time, am I 'throwing in my lot' with Mussolini? If you've read any of my past comments on the AoA blog, I don't get into Gates' motives, or CFR, or..... I focus on the science, or what passes for science in the vaccine world.

"But the way science works is: you don't get to pick which conclusions you agree with and which you don't. If you agree that humans are causing climate change, also saying that vaccines are poisons is by definition antiscience, because you are rejecting evidence that is created by the same exact method of examination of nature and review by others."

RNK: If we had a world in which those who sponsored and performed research and development did so based only on curiosity and the search for the truth, I would agree with your first sentence. Unfortunately, that's not the world we live in. The motives of the sponsors (be they government, industry, foundations, etc) are not always so pure, nor are those of the performers. Until the motives and agendas of all parts of the R&D chain, from sponsors to performers, are well understood, one would be both foolish and irresponsible to accept 'scientific' results at face value. I address this issue of research distortion and under-reporting in my eBook published last year (https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/53714). Chapter 9, especially sections 9B-9E, describes the reasons for these distortions, and contains many examples.

Based on the message from my eBook, your last sentence above ("evidence that is created by the same exact method of examination of nature and review by others") is incorrect. The methods being used by most of the climate science researchers are not the 'same exact method' being used by the vaccine researchers or the wireless radiation researchers. They are different because the sponsors are different and their motivations are different. The performers, if they want to continue receiving grants, will modify their methods to achieve the results desired by the sponsors. The reason I injected 'most' when referring to climate science researchers is, as Brulle (Drexel) showed so well (http://drexel.edu/now/archive/2013/December/Climate-Change/), the fossil energy companies and their handmaidens were willing to distort the science in order to benefit the companies.

"If you are unsure, I urge you to read The War on Science to understand my argument that science is the one force that underlies human and civil rights and bends the arc of the moral universe toward justice and freedom, by creating objective evidence. And if you are not a scientist, and even if you are, the best you can do is accept the peer-reviewed preponderance of the evidence as the most reliable source of knowledge we have in an uncertain world."

RNK: I am a scientist/engineer who spent over fifty years performing, evaluating, and sponsoring R&D, in many different disciplines, and have published over 200 peer-reviewed papers. I do not "accept the peer-reviewed preponderance of the evidence as the most reliable source of knowledge" without understanding the motivations, agendas, and conflicts of those who are sponsoring and performing the S&T. I question the validity of EVERY published paper that I read! Does that make my job more difficult; yes, by orders of magnitude.

You appear to have taken the easy road by blindly accepting the preponderance of 'evidence' (or, more accurately, the preponderance of the published literature) on the topics you describe. That is the approach of a non-scientist, and is exactly what the large pharmaceutical companies, the large telcoms, the large agrichems, etc, want to vast readership to do.

"And in this case, the preponderance, overwhelmingly, from many scientists in many countries over many decades, creating a very robust knowledge base, without any common vested interests, is that vaccines are humane lifesavers that have averted death and untold human misery since they have been invented. Are they imperfect? Yes. But have they averted horror? Undoubtedly, manyfold."

RNK: At best, your statement is only very partially true. As I have commented before on this blog, credible safety studies of vaccines have not been performed. In no other non-medical discipline would vaccine-type safety studies have any semblance of credibility. At the end of this comment, I have reproduced my previously posted comment on the Bexsero vaccine. These Bexsero comments are essentially applicable to all vaccines. Typically, only antibody titers are measured in the short term, and adverse effects MAY be tracked in the short-term. There is nothing resembling studies of long-term adverse impacts of the vaccine. For most, if not all vaccines, the Inserts state that the vaccines have not been tested for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, etc. Would you use toothpaste that contained such an Insert?

According to one variant of the Hygiene Hypothesis, suppression of the common childhood infectious diseases may predispose people to more serious diseases at a later time. But, since we don't do these long-term safety studies for vaccines, we can't identify these more serious effects presently.

"I understand that there are always credibility issues in any claim to knowledge, but then the issue is: who do you trust: an outlier with a personal agenda, who has lost his medical license and whose major paper has been retracted as fraudulent by the journal that published it, whose film selectively presents confirming information and makes emotionally powerful arguments? Or the vast preponderance of the evidence documented over decades by thousands of others who don't have that same axe to grind? The more it is replicated, the more reliable scientific knowledge becomes, and this is the case with vaccines. Are there outlier adverse reactions? Undoubtedly. Are they likely? No."

RNK: Interestingly, you made no mention of Dr. William Thompson, a CDC researcher who admitted that he and his research team deliberately omitted critical information that showed a link between the MMR vaccine and autism for particular sub-groups. He was senior author on two papers that had over 1000 citations, and senior author on other papers that had hundreds of citations. He was a hero when he supported studies that showed no links between vaccines and autism, and went quickly out of favor when he finally told the truth. But, I doubt that will dissuade you from parroting the results of those whose life ambition is to satisfy their Big Pharma sponsors or the Big Pharma surrogates in government.

"I wish you all the best on your intellectual journey grappling with this important issue."

RNK: I'm not 'grappling' with this issue. It is clear to me that the credible safety studies have not been performed. The Precautionary Principle would dictate that we would not move forward with such an untested new technology until safety has been demonstrated. Otherwise, we are playing Russian Roulette with our future!


BEXSERO VACCINE SAFETY
I searched the Web for clinical trials of Bexsero, and found a short list on the Meningitis Research Foundation site (http://www.meningitis.org/menb-vaccine). I checked these references in Medline. Most of the trials take the same approach. They will vary timing parameters, and check antibody levels after short periods of time. They may also check for side effects for relatively short periods, perhaps up to six-twelve months in length.

The EMA has a Web site listing reports of clinical trials (http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medicines/002333/human_med_001614.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124)

The earliest document, essentially the pre-approval report, can be found at:
http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/002333/WC500137883.pdf

From that report:
"There were no studies on genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, which is in line with applicable guidelines" (p.22).
"The primary endpoint of studies contained within this dossier is to determine the proportion of subjects with hSBA titers equal to or above the threshold of 1:4 against each of three reference meningococcal serogroup B strains."
"Although the immune responses measured by SBA are expected to be protective, no efficacy data are available. This does not preclude the granting of the marketing authorisation based on immunogenicity data."

There are no long-term safety studies reported in any of the references I examined. In my eBook, I identified some papers showing medium- moderately long-term impacts from vaccines. Since that time, when I have posted some comments on AoA, I have found studies that address the protective nature of childhood infectious diseases and more serious chronic diseases later in life, and that raise the concern that vaccines could remove this protection.

The latency period for lung cancer from smoking is on the order of two-three decades. The latency period for certain cancers from EMF radiation is from one to two decades. I have seen reports of other cancer latencies up to five decades. There are chronic diseases that tend to strike in the 60s and 70s, like Alzheimer's and dementia. To what extent have vaccines contributed to these diseases? Insufficient time has passed to identify 1) serious diseases resulting from most vaccines (assuming serious tracking is being done for these vaccine-disease relationships) and 2) the latency periods associated with these vaccine-disease combinations. This is truly Russian Roulette in its highest form!

Hans Litten

Shawn , I am definitely one of the moderate commenters in my opinion (lol) .
So could I get your take on William Thompson ?

Linda1

Shawn Otto,

What shoots down your argument are the millions of dead and critically injured children who would have been far better off to take their chances with measles, mumps, rubella, and even polio, diptheria, pertussis and tetanus without being poisoned by the vaccines that were supposed to protect them. You are trying to defend an ideology, a belief system, that is based on an unscientific, barbaric lie.

Andrew Wakefield is no outlier. What he is is a highly educated, ethical, brave man who will not back down from his moral duty to serve, despite all obstacles put in his way. He is a leader among men, and he is in good company, standing shoulder to shoulder with the likes of Laura Hayes and a growing army of warrior parents, honest intelligent journalists like Dan Olmsted, Kim Stagliano, Mark Blaxill and the entire AOA staff, Ben Swann, Sharyl Atkisson, and Del Bigtree who, once he examined the evidence, left his lucrative TV producer job to save lives by telling the public the truth, and many physicians and scientists, too numerous to list.

You're right that science doesn't lie. But the science doesn't say what you think it says. Take a close look. The science that is paraded around as proof is highly flawed and some is fraudulent. Here is a compilation of 126 studies linking vaccines to autism:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/126-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link

See also Suzanne Humphries, her book and/or many youtube video lectures.

John Stone

David Burd

Another good point. Otto also uses the "blame it on Wakefield" strategy. But in the immortal words of Jim Carrey "the problem is the problem", not Wakefield. Wakefield is not, of course, using Otto's scientistic language "an outlier" but a scapegoat and I have spent a good part of the last two decades demonstrating the lies that have been told about him. But even if Wakefield was not there the problem will still be the same. Most people in the US (or even in the UK) would have no idea who Wakefield was if he was not constantly used in the media like a latter day Emmanuel Goldstein, which is all that Otto is doing here again, substituting ad-hominem for real argument about the evidence.

david m burd

@ Shawn Otto,

You say about Dr. Andrew Wakefield: " who do you trust: an outlier with a personal agenda, who has lost his medical license and whose major paper has been retracted as fraudulent by the journal that published it --."

Mr. Otto, it is YOU that fraudulently slander Dr. Wakefield. His Lancet Paper (WITH 12 other esteemed medical professional signatories) has clearly been redeemed by a High Court in the UK that vindicated Wakefield's co-author Dr. Walker-Smith. Dr. Wakefield et al. were railroaded by the immense immoral power of the UK-Pharma Cabal -- if you don't know what being "railroaded" is, look it up.

I've got news for you: "Outlier(s)" have always been shunned because they go against embedded beliefs, but when they are finally shown to be correct, they are then lauded as heroes; all you have to do is learn about Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis, one of Medicine's true giants who was hounded out of practice because he showed that medical doctors/nurses attending birthing mothers should wash up and wear clean clothing when attending the births.

Bringing up YOUR belief in the validity of "climate change" and comparing it to the gigantic carnage being wrought by an utterly dishonest vaccination schedule that destroys helpless infants (and adults like seniors coerced into countless toxic flu shots year after year) is insulting and a classic trick, but that's what people like you do: Lie and manipulate and contort.

John Stone

Mr Otto

I don't want to preempt anything Ronald Kostoff has to say but I note the "quackbusting" strategy - compare something which may be a reasonable belief to something which is not "ie Protocols of the Elders of Zion" etc (also, of course, with racist connotations) and ridicule it as "conspiracy theory".

Agency capture has been with us a long time and it is both legitimate and rational to chronicle it. More than fifty years ago Eisenhower warned about getting the science that we pay for, and the lesson was not learnt.

http://www.ageofautism.com/2016/07/the-american-revolution-and-health-tyranny.html

In the end we are not dealing with anything like pure science but something which is being maintained by a government bureaucracy which has no interest in backing down, and which is stacked against ordinary citizens when the products go wrong. Nor is there any definitive body of science you can cite (beyond three crazy papers by Paul Offit) showing that there is anything inherently safe about vaccines.

PS You need to confront the historical fact that the results of the IOM review of MMR and thimerosal were pre-determined and that several of the contributory studies were fraudulent (Verstraeten, DeStefano, Madsen, Andrews etc.) People ought to be mad about this.

http://www.ageofautism.com/2014/08/cdc-frauds-connections-between-the-destefano-paper-and-the-thorsen-affair.html

Shawn Otto

@ Ronald, you seem like an intelligent guy. Do you really want to throw your lot in with people who argue that this is a supranational global conspiracy funded by the Gates? That the Council on Foreign Relations and GAVI are dictating to governments? It sounds like a conspiracy theory on the order of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, or of that offered by climate deniers who assert the UN is driving the hoax of climate change. You say you accept the scientific evidence on climate change but not on vaccines. You say "in some cases, like climate science, he is correct (from my perspective, and the overwhelming weight of the evidence). In other cases, like the vaccines and fluoridation, even though the preponderance of evidence (or, more correctly, preponderance of publications in the 'prestigious' journals) does not show adverse health effects, the literature may not reflect reality." But the way science works is: you don't get to pick which conclusions you agree with and which you don't. If you agree that humans are causing climate change, also saying that vaccines are poisons is by definition antiscience, because you are rejecting evidence that is created by the same exact method of examination of nature and review by others. If you are unsure, I urge you to read The War on Science to understand my argument that science is the one force that underlies human and civil rights and bends the arc of the moral universe toward justice and freedom, by creating objective evidence. And if you are not a scientist, and even if you are, the best you can do is accept the peer-reviewed preponderance of the evidence as the most reliable source of knowledge we have in an uncertain world. And in this case, the preponderance, overwhelmingly, from many scientists in many countries over many decades, creating a very robust knowledge base, without any common vested interests, is that vaccines are humane lifesavers that have averted death and untold human misery since they have been invented. Are they imperfect? Yes. But have they averted horror? Undoubtedly, manyfold. I understand that there are always credibility issues in any claim to knowledge, but then the issue is: who do you trust: an outlier with a personal agenda, who has lost his medical license and whose major paper has been retracted as fraudulent by the journal that published it, whose film selectively presents confirming information and makes emotionally powerful arguments? Or the vast preponderance of the evidence documented over decades by thousands of others who don't have that same axe to grind? The more it is replicated, the more reliable scientific knowledge becomes, and this is the case with vaccines. Are there outlier adverse reactions? Undoubtedly. Are they likely? No. But no knowledge is certain, as no life is certain. The problem is we crave certainty, and wanting it steers us away from science and into faith and authoritarianism. Consider the wise words of Francis Bacon in 1620: "The human understanding is no dry light, but receives an infusion from the will and affections; whence proceed sciences which may be called 'sciences as one would.' For what a man had rather were true he more readily believes. Therefore he rejects difficult things from impatience of research; sober things, because they narrow hope; the deeper things of nature, from superstition; the light of experience, from arrogance and pride; . . . things not commonly believed, out of deference to the opinion of the vulgar. Numberless, in short, are the ways, and sometimes imperceptible, in which the affections color and infect the understanding." An honest man or woman will always question him- or herself in this light. I wish you all the best on your intellectual journey grappling with this important issue.

Sylvia

You never cease to amaze me, Laura! You have that gift of being able to cut to the heart of the matter and put into words the magnitude of a situation that makes people take note. If most of the world fiddled while Rome burned, no one could ever accuse Laura Hayes of doing so!

Benedetta

Thank You Laura -- Well said - as you always seem to be able to do.

david m burd

Laura, Your valiant efforts are the definition of courage.

As for me, I am sickened every time a niece of mine (or a grand-niece) commits to a medical career.

Because: They are 'indoctrinated' (a term BayAreaMom used some years ago) to believe that "Vaccines are all good".

Other than Court cases that may uphold the basic right of parents to decide the horror of mandated vaccinations for their babies/kids, we will never give up.

Just know you have millions of allies - and we also speak up in many ways.

For instance I give out a color copy of the CDC Immunization Schedule for Ages 0 to 6 that dramatically displays the mammoth number of vaccines given, starting at birth, on and on. The people I meet and give this to are always astounded to see this - a REAL GRAPHIC.

Perhaps you might display this Immunization Schedule Graphic (maybe you do already? in your presentations?) - that the public never sees because it is NEVER shown by the Mainstream Media. "A picture is worth a thousand words!"

Cheers and woofs from me and my faithful, vaccination-renegade girl dog (healthy as she gets).

david m burd

Michael S.

Laura -

Thank you for putting together a concise, eloquent and forceful speech. It should be read verbatim to the public every chance we have so the message is loud and clear: Stop the mandates; Stop the vaccines; Stop the murder!

@ Joe - Your indictment of the CFR and Rockefeller agenda in general is spot on: This is a planned genocide of the children of the world to drastically reduce future population growth, and reduce the existing world's population to a mass of chronically ill humans who cannot fight back. All the evidence points to population reduction, as you have aptly noted by the mountains of evidence out there. It may also be a mass experiment to permanently alter our DNA, along with the every growing microwave radiation bombardment, chemical spraying, and high levels of immune system depressants in our food.

Let's build on this momentum that Vaxxed has created and become more visible, much louder, and more forceful - We cannot continue to be polite citizens accepting our demise.

Ronald Kostoff

Laura Hayes,

Great introduction! Unfortunately, with every straight-forward presentation of reality, there is usually more than one that cancels it out.

Case in point. I wanted to watch a BookTV presentation by Shawn Otto, on his book The War on Science. According to the introductory blurb (https://www.c-span.org/video/?411578-1/book-discussion-war-science), "he argues that scientific fact is devalued in favor of political and media interests". Sounds reasonable, does it not? Unfortunately, after a few minutes into his presentation, he gives the first example of anti-science. At about 5:45, he shows a video of Trump at the debate talking about potential damage from vaccines. Otto remarks how the statement is blatantly anti-science, and would have destroyed a politician's chances even twenty years ago. No discussion about Thompson's allegation of a CDC cover-up linking MMR vaccine with autism. At about 9:50, he ridicules a city's banning of fluoride in the water, stating it is again anti-science, and adding further that the CDC considers fluoridation a great public health advance. No discussion of the EPA firing Marcus for showing that the link between fluoridation and cancer had been fudged and covered up. One area where I do agree with him is his statement on how some politicians have debunked climate science.

I didn't go past the ten minute mark, since I saw where he was headed. It seems to me his approach is to examine, from his non-expert's perspective, what the bulk of the technical/biomedical literature presents on a topic, and then take the overwhelming consensus as 'science'. Opposing viewpoints, from his perspective, then get categorized as 'anti-science'.

Now, in some cases, like climate science, he is correct (from my perspective, and the overwhelming weight of the evidence). In other cases, like the vaccines and fluoridation, even though the preponderance of evidence (or, more correctly, preponderance of publications in the 'prestigious' journals) does not show adverse health effects, the literature may not reflect reality. In these cases, the literature may not reflect objective independent science, but rather the agenda of the sponsors of the research. Each topic has to be considered on its own merit, rather than 'one-size-fits-all.

Unfortunately, I find climate change advocates many times debunk adverse effects of vaccines, wireless radiation, etc, anti-vax advocates many times debunk climate change, and anti-wireless radiation advocates many times debunk climate change and anti-vax. It seems to me that 'divide and conquer' is alive and well, and is preventing these fragmented groups from providing a united front!

Joe

More on the CFR and its plans for all of us. They are the driving force behind mass vaccination.

******CFR and the New World Order******

According to State Department Publication 2349, submitted by secretary of State and CFR member Edward Stettinius, a committee on "post-war problems" was set up before the end of 1939 at the suggestion of the CFR. In other words, two years before the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, the CFR was planning how to order the world after the war ended.

In 1946, the Rockefeller Foundation spent almost $140,000 to produce a history of how the United States entered World War II. This history was intended to counter "revisionist" historians who argued that the U.S. was "tricked" into the war by the Roosevelt Administration. The Rockefeller family has always taken a lead role in the CFR.

In the 1960s, while American men and women were dying in the jungles of Vietnam and while the military/industrial complex was sucking trillions of dollars out of American taxpayers' wallets, the Rockefeller dynasty was financing Vietnamese oil refineries and aluminum plants. If there had ever been a formal declaration of war, the Rockefellers could be tried for treason. Instead, they reaped dividends.

These are just a few of the abuses of power which demonstrate the results of the power elite's manipulations of our destiny as a society. If you've ever wondered why you don't hear about this network of power, just take a look at the CFR's membership roster (posted online in ParaScope). Many of the chief executives and newspeople at CBS, NBC/RCA, ABC, the Public Broadcast Service, the Associated Press, the New York Times, Time magazine, Newsweek, the Washington Post, and many other key media outlets are CFR members.

Even if these members of the media's elite had the inclination to report on what they saw and heard at CFR meetings, they are prevented from doing so by the Non-Attribution Rule. To put this in perspective: many of the people who are trusted to provide information about national and world politics are deliberately withholding crucial information from the public because of membership in a secretive globalist organization.

This organization has taken it upon itself to participate in the manufacturing of a new vision for humanity, and dissidence will not be tolerated. If you believe the words of Carroll Quigley, all resistance is futile and doomed to failure. If you believe the rhetoric of internationalists in our own government, the current "trend towards isolationism" will result in a loss of American hegemony in the New World Order, leaving the United States a wrecked Third World wasteland.

World government can come in time, piece by piece, arrived at through the full participation and consensus of the human beings who will be affected by the negotiations. But the idea of the world's elite determining what path that the common herd should follow is repulsive to the human spirit. The story of the CFR goes far deeper than this brief report, and is interlocked with several other international power groups.

International power orgs depend on the masses remaining ignorant for their plans to come to fruition. It's up to you to do your own research and draw your own conclusion. But remember: there's a hell of a lot more to the story than Dan Rather will ever tell you. Educate yourself, or remain a passive consumer. The choice is entirely yours.

Tony Bateson

What a remarkable woman - Laura Hayes - we need many, many more like you Laura - carry on your amazing work and help us to find them. For my part I have been arguing this corner for many years becoming increasingly certain like you Laura that the civil authorities know all of this and their reply is 'So What ??'. I support the plan to urge for better information and knowledge - I have posted a website www.ReadTheInsert.com towards this end. We need more and more vaccine makers to come clean and list all the contra-indicators and we need all prospective parents to read them. I would be surprised if most continue to vaccinate having read the inserts. We know the makers know and the more obvious this becomes the fewer parents will succumb. But it is a one sided battle because they can always invent another scare to sell their poison, if enough people can see this for themselves the clamour from those being damaged by it will become unstoppable.

Joe

Thank you Laura Hayes for such a well-written summary of the vaccine disaster and slaughter. Millions of young people are now scheduled for chronic disability and death due to these forced school vaccine obligations.

The only suggestion I might make is that our opponent is not really Washington bureaucrats, nor SB277, nor the CDC, nor the FDA, nor The New York Times.

The enemy is much more sinister. It is the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and GAVI. These are the INTERNATIONAL players that have a very sober, business-style approach to vaccinating everyone on the planet. They are answerable to no one, and make no mistake. They give the orders. Check the links:

http://www.cfr.org/pharmaceuticals-and-vaccines/vaccine-ignorance----deadly-contagious/p33672

http://www.gavi.org/

Gavi's pledging conference recently had Angela Merkel, PM of Germany, as their keynote speaker. And Germany didn't dictate the terms. GAVI did!

So it's clear governments are really the junior partner. They're taking orders from higher up. This is a worldwide agenda. Bill and Melinda Gates bankroll GAVI.

The elite billionaires want it that way.

Check the membership list in the CFR - you might recognize a few names:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Members_of_the_Council_on_Foreign_Relations

Yes, it all needs to start with a true, grassroots resistance. But know your opponent well.

Laura Hayes

Maureen, Tracy, and Ted...thank you for your kind words :)

Ted, I could not agree with you more. As I have stated publicly before, like you, I support not only banning vaccine mandates, but also vaccines themselves. They have no business being on the market since not one has ever been proven to be safe, effective, or needed. What they have been proven to be is harmful, sometimes fatal, and ineffective, impacting not only the recipients, but future generations.

Ted is correct...vaccines are the largest mass poisoning in human history, and they must be stopped immediately.

Ted Kuntz

Laura, thank you for your courage and conviction to speak clearly and assertively about the destructiveness of vaccines. I agree with you completely. In order to undo this vicious assault on the human condition we need to be unwavering in our statements of the harm vaccines are doing to our children and to us.

I believe we need to go even further. Rather than fight to ban vaccine mandates, we need to fight to ban vaccines. It is clear to me this well organized and well funded assault by the "medical industry" is destructive and needs to end. This is the largest mass poisoning in human history. As currently designed, there are no safe vaccines and allowing anyone to produce and sell an unsafe and dangerous product is irresponsible and should be illegal.

Tracy Ligtenberg

Hi Laura, thank you for writing this so important message! I couldn't agree more. I am a fellow parent with the same outcome which, inevitably and importantly, has become the guiding purpose of my life. We have to work together to make the change we know is necessary for the future of our children, society, and planet. I'm in Davis, CA; but we're everywhere, and it doesn't take too much random observing to see that there are new parents being brought into this arena every day. I just read a notice in our local paper about getting the vaccines for preparation of school and the information provided explained how the personal belief reason is no longer acceptable and then went on to state what the new law (SB277) requires. Never once did it say that a medical exemption is still an option or to discuss with your health provider any concerns, etc. The article ended with: "without proof of vaccinations before Aug 17, [students] will not be allowed to start school." (The article was written by the Yolo County Health Dept.) So, limited information is still the preferred option for our government agencies--to ENSURE people behave as they want.

Maureen McDonnell,RN

Laura- What a powerful & truthful speech you gave to an audience who I am sure had their minds blown by the facts & statistics, lies & corruption depicted in Vaxxed!
In recent years the crusade (which began with Dr Rimland bringing parents, doctors & researchers together to unravel the mystery as to why more & more kids were being diagnosed with autism) diminished to individuals or small groups fighting this battle alone.
My hope is that this movie unites us once again into a mighty force that generates the type of societal uproar that results in parents in every state having the right to protect their own children's health & freedom.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)