Dachel Wake Up: What To Do About Autism?
The Age of Polio. Explosion. Part 13.

Battle for California - Stopping the Pharma Juggernaut

Goodbye CA
By Kent Heckenlively, Esq.

Let me tell you what I believe to be the long-term strategy of the pharmaceutical industry in regards to vaccinations.  First, they want to establish by law the precedent that a parent cannot refuse a vaccination for their child, or they will face the draconian penalty of that child being forced out of the public school system.  It's the dry run for what they want to try next, the forced vaccination of adults as a precondition of employment.

It really is that simple and that horrible, which is why what's happening in California should both terrify people, as well as have them sitting on the edge of their seat as to what will happen next.

As for the horror, I'm sure that most readers are aware of California Senate Bill 277, which was passed last year and signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown which provides that this academic school year, 2016-2017, starting in the lower grades, children in kindergarten and the seventh grade will need to have a certain number of vaccinations in order to attend school.  All religious and philosophical exemptions are gone and only medical exemptions will remain, but you can be sure they'll try to bully physicians into not granting them.  It is REALLY bad.

But what should have you sitting on the edge of your seat is a lawsuit filed by some real legal heavyweights, including a former member of Nader's Raiders, which seeks to stop SB 277.  As an attorney I have to say I am impressed by the filing and believe it has a good chance of success.  During the years I have been in this struggle I've been frustrated as to how little reason has been deployed in the debate.  I credit much of that to the terrible 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which removed vaccines from the traditional civil justice system.  But the pharma minions were not content with that victory and wanted to go even further.  Tyrants usually set themselves up for failure when they try to do too much.  The reason pharma has tried to weasel out of the traditional civil justice system is they don't want to argue the merits of what they are proposing.

Here are some of the arguments our side is making that pharma and which pharma will be forced to respond:

Violation of the California Constitution - Access to public education is a fundamental right under the California constitution, which means that any abridgement of that right must be viewed with great suspicion.  The defendants must show there was an overwhelming need for the abridgment of this right and that the abridgment is narrowly tailored.  Furthermore, this proposed law discriminates on the basis of wealth, as more affluent parents are more able to homeschool their children.  It also discriminates on the basis of English language fluency as California law states that any parent who wants to homeschool their child must be fluent in English.

Violation of Freedom of Religion - Many parents are against abortion and many of the vaccines are made using aborted fetal cells, a clear violation of their religious liberty.  Even allowing children to go to religious schools which are consistent with this belief offers no relief, as religious schools are also bound by SB 277.

Violation of the Right to Freedom of Assembly - By locking the schoolhouse doors to children whose parents alter the vaccine schedule, this law is depriving children of their right to attend a secular or religious school of their choosing.

Violation of Parental Rights - Parents have the right to control the upbringing and education of their minor children and determine what medicines they will and will not take.

Violation of Equal Protection - 14th Amendment - The 14th Amendment prohibits the state from treating people differently and SB 277 does this in many ways, such as depriving children of their fundamental right to an education, depriving children with religious objections to the use of aborted fetal tissue in their medical products, and institutionalizing a prejudice against a politically unpopular group.

Violation of Due Process, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment - This law impinges on fundamental liberties by denying certain children the right to enter school and subjects them to indignity and humiliation.

Violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act - As a number of the parents with concerns about vaccines came to this belief after they watched their children apparently suffer a vaccine injury, this law will impact those children currently receiving services under current law.

Violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - Federal law provides funds to the state of California and these funds will not go to many of their intended beneficiaries if this law is enacted.

Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act - In California children are supposed to receive a "free and appropriate public education" and this law will prevent that from happening for a class of students.

Violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Because this law will disproportionately impact non-native English speakers who may not be able to qualify as competent to homeschool their children, this law violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which bars discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin.

Violation of Article IX, Sections 1 and 5 of the California Constitution - These constitutional provisions impose on the state a duty to educate all the children.  These duties are non-delegable.

Violation of the Equal Protection Clauses of the California Constitution, Article I, Section 7(a) and Article IV, Section 16 (a)) - This law prevents the state from denying basic educational opportunities to a certain class of students and SB 277 would violate that provision.

Violation of the Due Process Clauses of the California Constitution, Article 1, Sections 7(a) and 15 - Students have a protected property interest in their education and the state is depriving them of that right without due process of law.

Violation of California Education Code section 51004 - This section provides that students have a right to obtain an education, regardless of race, color, national origin, or economic status.

Violation of California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act - There has been an attempt to gather information on medical exemptions provided by doctors, a clear violation of the California law.

Violation of California Information Practices Act  - Personal information about students must be protected.

Violation of Health and Safety Code Section 120440 - California law allows a parent to limit the sharing of information about their student.

Violation of Federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act - A similar federal law which deals with the privacy of student information.

Violation of California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 526a  - Prevents the state of California from spending any money on activities which are in conflict with the law.

The lawsuit asks for a temporary and permanent injunction of the law based on these arguments.  The motion for a temporary injunction will be heard on August 12, 2016, and a decision will hopefully be handed down a few days later.

Keep your fingers crossed.  The pharma industry has created our autism disaster only by forcing the legal system out of the discussion.  With this complaint, I am hopeful that the legal system will begin to take back that power and get us to the truth.

 Kent Heckenlively is a Contributing Editor to Age of Autism and co-author of PLAGUE: One Scientist's Intrepid Search for the Truth About Human Retroviruses, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Autism and Other Diseases, which can be ordered on Amazon.  It is the most popular virus book of the last twenty years, eclipsed only by Richard Preston's, The Hot Zone.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

dan

Just a quick heads up, this is not just a USA problem. Most of these companies have global subsidiaries and the same push is occurring in Australia and Europe. This proposition unfortunately has overwhelming public support, due to the power of the one sided narrative and belief in 'experts'. It bears pointing out that doctors literally know nothing about the internals of vaccine components: Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry are not part of the Medical Degree, but the public is generally uneducated on this point. So when you see doctors repeatedly saying vaccines are safe it is because they truly do not know any better.

Peggy Rose

Something else occurred to me in regards to discrimination of this law. According to Sb277 children infected with HepB are allowed to attend school, supposedly putting an immune compromised child that cannot be vaccinated at risk because it would discrimination to refuse he/she a right to an education.

shannon epstein

I'm also interested in where one could flee to. I wonder about places like Belize, Cancun or places south of Cancun that have first world amenities but are also somewhat less developed. Ecuador also might be a safe place, and of all the states, I think Texas would fold last to the vaccine tyrants.

Grace Green

Ronald Kostoff & Linda 1. But Tony's point about the attitude to human rights and criminals is also true. Here in the UK I have been told by a human rights lawyer that I don't have a human rights case because I haven't been charged with any crime!

Linda1

Dr. Kostoff,

"...the most vulnerable beings on this planet were being used for many, if not the vast majority, of these experiments/clinical trials. Starting with the 1) small captive animals, progressing to the 2) larger captive animals, progressing to the 3) non-human primates, progressing to 4) those people who are poor, defenseless in other ways, and institutionalized, this constitutes the full spectrum of defenseless beings who undergo these experiments without giving anything resembling 'informed consent'.

I have known people who volunteered for clinical trials; they were invariably poor, and were attracted by the meager compensation provided for participating. Isn't that what much of modern medical research is all about: using the poor, captive, and defenseless (at all levels of the animal kingdom, not only humans) to place their health and life at risk so that people who are more well off can benefit from the suffering of the vulnerable?"

Such an important statement. The tragic truth.

Ronald Kostoff

Tony,

"Imagine if these vaccines were given to convicted criminals and they had some of the same side effects as children - there would be an outcry of cruel and unusual punishment, no doubt."

That's not borne out by history. I did a brief examination of 'unethical research' about a year ago. From the few studies I examined when identifying the 'unethical research' books and papers, and the studies I examined when assessing the ethics of off-shoring clinical trials, it seemed to me the most vulnerable beings on this planet were being used for many, if not the vast majority, of these experiments/clinical trials. Starting with the 1) small captive animals, progressing to the 2) larger captive animals, progressing to the 3) non-human primates, progressing to 4) those people who are poor, defenseless in other ways, and institutionalized, this constitutes the full spectrum of defenseless beings who undergo these experiments without giving anything resembling 'informed consent'.

I have known people who volunteered for clinical trials; they were invariably poor, and were attracted by the meager compensation provided for participating. Isn't that what much of modern medical research is all about: using the poor, captive, and defenseless (at all levels of the animal kingdom, not only humans) to place their health and life at risk so that people who are more well off can benefit from the suffering of the vulnerable?

Tony

Imagine if these vaccines were given to convicted criminals and they had some of the same side effects as children - there would be an outcry of cruel and unusual punishment, no doubt. But since kids who are totally innocent aren't being punished for anything, I guess it's OK to treat them cruelly and unusually. Maybe they need to go out and start committing crimes so they can then use the eighth amendment to avoid vaccines. Seriously, it seems like we're treating our criminals better than our kids.

It amazes me the U.S. accuses other countries of human rights violations, and then does the same - and to innocent children. And no liability. I hope people wake-up soon!

Linda1

Isn't assault already against the law? Even assault by someone in a white coat?

Eating a healthy diet will also surely prevent all kinds of diseases. But no one can force you to buy and eat food that will prevent infectious or other diseases.

Laura Hayes

Thank you, Kent, for your great summary. And thank you to all who have commented...excellent comments rolling in!

I must say that I was disappointed when I read the extremely narrow scope, as in citing only 1 violation, when it comes to how SB277 violates Religious Freedom.

The violations are many, perhaps uncountable, when it comes to how CA's fascist and Nazi-like law violates citizens' Religious Freedom. I wish the attorneys had been more thorough in listing numerous specific violations.

My guess is they decided to hone in on the violation they felt was a sure winner. However, there are many powerful arguments as to why this law violates Religious Freedom, the freedom upon which our country was founded I might add, and I don't think limiting to just one was the wisest or right decision.

With the vaccination of all being a global agenda, I don't know that there is a safe place to which to flee. Therefore, we need to fight this evil anywhere and everywhere it rears its evil head, and pray that God will help us to overthrow and eliminate our oppressors.

Ronald Kostoff

Joe,

"We're behind the 8-ball BIG-time."

Your posts are very astute, and your quoted statement applies not only to vaccines, but to wireless radiation and the myriad other assaults on our soma and psyche, and on the planet as well.

Is there also a positive feedback mechanism operating here? As more and more people become damaged physically and cognitively, are they less and less able to resist the vaccine, wireless, and other 'pushers'? Wouldn't this lead to more aggressive assaults by the 'pushers', and accelerating damage? This seems to be a vicious cycle in the making (or perhaps it's arrived already)!

Linda1

Joe,
I knew about Silicon Valley parents sheltering their children from technology.

But Madonna sheltering her children from people like her?

Priceless.

Joe

To answer everyone about "Where to go? if we have the leave the US, I really only have 2 answers.

One, you can try to get a MEDICAL excuse - the way to do this is to get a chromosome analysis and an MTHFR genetic test to prove genetic-immuno susceptability to vaccines. Coupled with a history of adverse vaccines reactions, (who hasn't heard of people getting sick after the flu shot?), this could help you get a bonafide medical exemption. Find a truly scientific doctor to do this for you, not a brain-washed pharma doc who doesn't think she's brainwashed (most med school graduates are women nowadays, don't ya know).

Two, move to another country that less digital and more analog. That means second-world or third-world. Woody Harrelson and Wilie Nelson spend a lot of their time on a remote Hawaiian island and Woody and Willie DO NOT USE CELL PHONES.

Madonna does not let her children watch television (oh ironies of ironies, hypocrisies of hypocrisis!).

Silicon Valley elite families (you know, the ones who sell you computers and smartphones), send their own children to Waldorf schools (no computers allowed!)

Check the link: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/technology/at-waldorf-school-in-silicon-valley-technology-can-wait.html?_r=0

Good luck, folks.

We're behind the 8-ball BIG-time.

Two, you might consider moving out of the

Sophie Scholl

Joe - I liked your post but where are you going to run to thats safe ?
California is their blueprint for the entire western world .
The fight against sb277 has to happen TODAY in California for the sake of us all

Linda1

Dorie,
Ironically, it is the vaccinated who endanger the unvaccinated as well as themselves. If vaccination alters the human genome, it is altered for all, and as with GM food and other organisms, once done there is no turning back. That's why I'm not so sure that people should be able to choose to vaccinate. The government is now restricting the use of antibiotics because these drugs have caused an irreversible shift in microbial species to the detriment of all other life forms. Vaccine use is no wiser and no less destructive. We have no right to jeopardize the future even if there are short term benefits.

Joe,
But where can we go?

HealthFreedom

The Holocaust revisited! We are left with the survival of the fittest...Even if an injunction against SB 277 happens there will be so many sheeple who will line up in blind faith which will continue to inflict generations of harm, along with the damage control that follows.

Thank you for the lawsuit and your profound efforts to protect our human rights which reinforces informed consent and freedom of choice as outlined in the Nuremberg Code.

HealthFreedom

The Holocaust revisited! We are left with the survival of the fittest...Even if an injunction against SB 277 happens there will be so many sheeple who will line up in blind faith which will continue to inflict generations of harm, along with the damage control that follows.

Than you for the lawsuit and your profound efforts to protect our human rights which reinforces informed consent and freedom of choice as outlined in the Nuremberg Code.

Dorie Southern

The infringement on religious belief in huge. My family always got exemption because we believed God could both heal us and keep us safe. Vaccines are not needed if you have an all powerful God taking care of you. Granted God sometimes did not heal people. But that was due to lack of understanding on the part of the human. Quarantine can be used and is used when a person is sick, not all the time.

It is not just the use of aborted fetuses that is the problem. It is infringing on religious belief with NO proof that anyone is safer as a result. Those who wish to vaccinate their children are not being endangered by me not doing it to mine.

susan

Kent: thank you so much for posting a positive article today.

Much needed.

Twyla

Thank you so much for this summary!

Joe

Here the Martha Stewart link, describing her view of Millenials: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1436480/millennials-are-lazy-self-indulgent-and-lack-the-initiative-to-be-successful-warns-lifestyle-guru-martha-stewart/

Joe


Kent, I like your optimism, but the zeitgeist points to bigger trouble. In our increasingly narcissistic culture (it's getting bad, as in REALLY bad out there), people just aren't that interested in the suffering of other people. They will only stand up and take notice when they themselves are injured.

We've all been there. We can foam at the mouth about vaccines to our own family, friends, and neighbors, but they will NOT listen to us until vaccine injury comes knocking at their own door. THEN and only then does the questioning start. Don't expect them to say you were right all along. It won't happen. But they'll start to have cognitive dissonance between their pro-pharma, pro-vaccine conditioning and what they're seeing right before their eyes.

It's the story of all of us here. We were true believers in the Temple of Vaccines. We were theologians. We just didn't know it. Until the axe fell and killed our children (in my case my brother, killed by a flu shot given on Friday, March 6, 2009, then collapsing dead on the kitchen floor four days later on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 at 7 am).

When family members of the Millenial Generation drop dead right before their eyes, they MIGHT start to think something is wrong. But I doubt it. That's not the "spirit of the times."

Millenials are losing the digital invasion badly and now relate better to gadgets than people. The wireless assault has made the younger generation LESS human at the very time we need more humanity from them.

Martha Stewart, love her or hate her, knew how to make a home comfy and human.
Today's millennials are lost in their digital world and can't turn a screwdriver without a YouTube video showing them how to do it.

Resist the coming Pharma-tyranny? C'mon, Kent, they're too busy updating their Facebook page on their latest smartphone (computers are so passe....) and playing Pokémon Go!

My view is straightforward. If you live in California, MOVE out now. When the adult mandates come, and they're coming all right, you and I will have to LEAVE the United States.

Sorry. That's the way it is.

Tim Lundeen

You can get the documents filed with the court from http://bolenreport.com/sb-277-court-documents/ -- well worth reading in full. The original Jul 1 filing was good, but the amendment filed Jul 14 is awesome.

An attorney friend of mine says that suits are always a crap shoot, even when you go into court with all the law and all the facts on your side, you still have only a 70% chance of winning. Even so, I am optimistic -- SB 277 violates so much existing law, it is hard to see how it could stand. If we get an injunction in Aug, that will be an excellent sign and will generate lots of publicity, which is helpful in its own right.

Hans Litten

Rheumatoid Arthritis/JRA (another vaccination-abomination)

"The Arthritis Foundation reports the number of Americans with arthritis or chronic joint symptoms has risen from 35 million to 66 million (nearly 1 in 3 adults) in 2005. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation of the lining, or synovium [the frictionless lining] of the joints. It is one of the most severe forms of arthritis and can lead to long-term joint damage, resulting in chronic pain, loss of function and disability. RA affects 1 percent of the U.S. population or 2.1 million Americans, mostly women. (24)"

http://www.naturalnews.com/052387_Gardasil_HPV_vaccine_harmful_effects.html


WE HAVE TO FIGHT SB277 TOOTH & NAIL

Benedetta

I just keep trying to figure out where the number 666 plays into all the vaccines they got coming our way -- by the time we go through life we will have 666 vaccines, ya think?

Juggernaut is an excellent description - they got West Virginia, and Mississippi and California - coming for the rest of the states soon.

Gary Ogden

Kent: Thank you for this. I am hopeful we will win this one. It will be a shot across the bow against the forces of medical fascism. Interesting that the complaint describes a conspiracy among state and county health officials and the medical board to intentionally and egregiously violate state and federal law regarding medical exemptions and medical privacy. Will they, including Pan (he and the CMA are surely involved), be indicted for this? I'm not a legal expert, but it sounds like racketeering to me.

Bob Moffit

Kent writes:

"Tyrants usually set themselves up for failure when they try to do too much".

Our country must never lose sight of the failure to protest against the insidious .. "incremental imposition of tyranny" .. whether that tyranny is imposed .. militarily, politically .. or .. through public health officials enforcing regulations as .. TYRANTS.

Using history as our guide .. please consider the following words written by Pastor Martin Niemoller about the cowardice of German intellectuals following the Nazis' rise to power and the subsequent purging of their chosen targets, group after group.

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist."

"Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist."

"Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew."

"Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."

THEY have already come for our toddlers .. then our teenagers ... and .. all signs indicate if WE do not speak out NOW .. there soon will be no one left to speak out for US.

THEIR VERY PUBICLY STATED GOAL .. IS TO HAVE ALL ADULTS BE VACCINATED .. WITH RECOMMENDED AND APPROVED VACCINES FOR ADULTS .. BY THE YEAR 2020.

We can't say THEY haven't warned us ...

Taximom5

The short version: this law creates a caste system, based on submission to an invasive medical procedure.

Ronald Kostoff

Kent Heckenlively,

"Let me tell you what I believe to be the long-term strategy of the pharmaceutical industry in regards to vaccinations. First, they want to establish by law the precedent that a parent cannot refuse a vaccination for their child, or they will face the draconian penalty of that child being forced out of the public school system. It's the dry run for what they want to try next, the forced vaccination of adults as a precondition of employment."

I believe your scenario is only part of the long-range strategy. Offit's suggestion of 10,000 or 100,000 vaccines is setting the stage for the long-term vaccine strategy of the pharmaceutical industry. There are two obvious applications for vaccines: biowarfare defense and defense against naturally transmitted zoonotic agents. Now, what is the potential market for biowarfare agent and other viral/bacterial vaccines?

There are three general classes of biowarfare agents: bacteria, viruses, toxins (http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/6/843.full). Let's focus on viruses. It has been estimated that there are at least 320,000 viruses that infect mammals (http://mbio.asm.org/content/4/5/e00598-13), with the potential of being transmitted from animals to humans (zoonoses, like the SARS pandemic).

Now, not all of these can be used as biowarfare agents; certain properties are required, such as transmissibility and pathogenicity. The problem is that we have not characterized these properties for most of the 320,000 viruses mentioned above, and therefore we don't know how many could be used as potential biowarfare agents. Additionally, we don't know how many viruses are serious threats from natural transmission. The CDC/USDA identifies about a hundred (https://extranet.fhcrc.org/EN/sections/ehs/hamm/chap5/section10.html).

To 'protect' against diseases from these agents, vaccines are being developed either for post-exposure or for pre-exposure administration. It takes years to develop and test a vaccine, and, whether for pre-or post-exposure administration, would require large amounts of vaccine to be available in case of a pandemic, however caused. In other words, large amounts of each vaccine would have to be stockpiled even for post-exposure administration, since the window for 'effectiveness' closes rapidly.

So, we are talking about a vaccine market of unimaginable proportions! It seems to me we are in the initial phases of a 'conditioning' program to accept the validity of vaccines, using childhood vaccinations as a testbed. The more we are led to believe vaccines are necessary and beneficial, with minimal harm, the more vaccines we will receive. As the 'brainwashing' becomes more effective, it may not even be necessary to require vaccination as a condition of employment, or through any other mandate! Even today, how many people get vaccinated voluntarily, even though they could opt out?

It is no different from our being 'conditioned' to accept myriad wireless devices. The more we are led to believe these devices are harmless, the more are being placed on the market (e.g., the Internet of Things).

With each additional vaccine, our resistance to acceptance decreases. Given the potential large number of viral threats, we could probably be persuaded to take THOUSANDS of vaccines for pre-exposure 'protection', or stockpile THOUSANDS of vaccines for post-exposure amelioration. So, statements in the Press about ten thousand vaccines being possible to administer, while being made to sound ludicrous, may in fact portend what we have in store for the future. I suspect that's the real game: once our 'conditioning' is complete, then the vaccine spigot can be fully opened, and we will be immunized against every virus that poses any sort of realistic threat.

Safety; forget it! There's no way the safety of this many potential combinations could ever be tested. We're not even testing for safety of the (relative to the above) modest number of vaccines administered today in the short-term (read the inserts that state no testing for carcinogenicity or mutagenicity, among other adverse events), and doing nothing for the long-term.

Linda1

"Violation of Parental Rights - Parents have the right to control the upbringing and education of their minor children and determine what medicines they will and will not take....

Violation of Health and Safety Code Section 120440 - California law allows a parent to limit the sharing of information about their student."

Interesting, in light of the existing law that allows the state to coerce children into secretly taking HBV and/or HPV vaccines without parental knowledge or consent, and with the added outrageous insult of the state barring parents from seeing or obtaining those medical records kept by the state on their children.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)