"I was the director of a large inner city a pediatric emergency room. . . in Chicago, Michael Reese Hospital, and over time, I actually saw, it became very apparent to me that children who'd been in the vaccine clinic that day getting their routine vaccinations.and return that evening in the ER . . . Children would come back with febrile seizures, occasionally death from respiratory failure, . . . severe asthma attacks. And it became apparent to me that not all children respond well to vaccination.
". This was back when the schedule was much smaller.We were told, we don't vaccinate preemies, we don't vaccinate infants with neurological issues, we don't vaccinate infants who are sick. . . . We were told we never vaccinate women who are pregnant or thinking of becoming pregnant in the next sick months. That has changed. So much has changed. I used to write a medical exemption for children who had any kind of autoimmune issue, autoimmune issues in the family---and that has become all but impossible.
"This is the takeover by pharma. Legislators are clueless. They're either clueless or they're bought, or both.
"We have to take back our legislative process. We have industry controlling our legislators. This is terrible. We have industry controlling what goes on in our bodies. Through our legislators, we need to take back this process. And I mean it when I say they're either clueless, or bought, or both. Because when you're bought, you don't want to know the truth. They have to deal--they have to reconcile with their psyche or their conscience. They don't want to reckon with their conscience. . . . The doctors don't want to. Most doctors do not know they're giving you misinformation, they really don't. They believe what the CDC has told them. They don't know how corrupt the CDC is to its very core, how many investigations there has been around the CDC and the level of corruptness. Even with your own Kaiser Permanente, conducting experiments on African American and Hispanic children in your state of California without informing parents it was an experimental vaccine this was in the 90s; this was not the 1940s. . . . this was not Tuskegee.
We have so many issues. . . I can't even. become fully apprized of all the corruption stories, even all the stories that have been adjudicated. The CDC is in business with pharma . . . They're in business with pharma, like Merck and Glaxo and Sanofi and all these companies that have been found guilty numerous times on criminal charges . . . on criminal offenses. And they have no problem being in business with them. And Dr. Pan is a liar. He is not a doctor that is misinformed and is just blindly following the CDC, No, because he has written statements--and when you're a doctor and you put down statements as facts, you better cite your references, you better .do your research. Everything he says can e refuted If only the legislators bothered to do a Google search. How lazy are they? .how much do they get paid? They can't do a Google search? It's un(fucking)believable!
Even if we don't prevail today, even if we don't, we will have lawsuits, and the lawsuits will allow us to have discovery and we can subpoena people, they haven idea the shit storm that is coming. This is the same playbook as the GMO story.. And how stupid and smug of them ..because they will be victims of their own legislation, because the adult schedule is coming for you, it's coming for them . . .
And guess what? They will have gotten rid of exemptions, they'll have roll up their sleeve and take their shots. . . I wish Pan and Allen and all their colleagues room up their sleeves. and take all the 69 doses they want you to have. .
Today isn't the end of the battle, it's only the beginning. Thank you so much for showing up.
Dr. Bark is an incredible voice for us. I met her in 2013 at Autism One in Chicago. She talked during a luncheon and my single thought was: I need to get to know this woman who is a medical voice out there telling us the truth about autism and vaccine damage.
I have written about her three times.
January, 2015 Flu Shot Mandate
November, 2014 Pediatric Vaccination Status
August 2013 Autism
The heated debate over SB 277 has publicized some frightening aspects of vaccine oversight failure. On June 9, 2015, Tony Muhammed, from the Nation of Islam, spoke on vaccine choice in Sacramento. He was well-informed about the whistleblower scientist from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who has gone public about an agency cover-up of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism in African American boys.
Muhammed compared this to the notorious Tuskegee experiment, which was a forty year study of the progression of untreated syphilis in African American men in Alalbama conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service starting in 1932.
Dr. Bark brought up "experiments on African American and Hispanic children in your state of California."
She continued, "They don't know how corrupt the CDC is to its very core, how many investigations there has been around the CDC and the level of corruptness. Even with your own Kaiser Permanente, conducting experiments on African American and Hispanic children in your state of California without informing parents it was an experimental vaccine this was in the 90s; this was not the 1940s. . . . this was not Tuskegee."
This got my attention. Why is it that poor, marginalized people end up being used for scientific inquiry? Why was an "experimental vaccine" being tested on minority children? Why aren't the sons and daughters of state legislators who back the end of exemptions also the first test subjects for vaccines?
I asked Dr. Bark about what she meant by "experiments on African American and Hispanic children" in California. She referred me to the National Vaccine Information Center.
On NVIC there was disturbing information on vaccine testing.
National Vaccine Information Center and Washington Office on Haiti Call On FDA to Release All Records and Raw Data on Experiment
In an experiment to find out if they could give a high potency Edmonston Zagreb measles vaccine to babies as young as four months old in order to overwhelm their natural maternal antibodies and replace them with vaccine-induced antibodies, medical researchers at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Johns Hopkins University injected thousands of babies in the Third World with the experimental vaccine that reportedly caused chronic immune suppression and the deaths of an unknown number of babies.
With the help of Kaiser Permanente, more than 1500 six month old black and Hispanic babies in inner city Los Angeles were enrolled in the experiment starting in June 1990. The study was halted in October 1991 after repeated reports from vaccine trial sites in Africa that girl babies were dying in higher than expected numbers six months to three years after vaccination. . . .
BLACK CHILDREN IN MEMPHIS FORCED TO GET HEPATITIS A VACCINE - PARENTS PROTEST
In a classic example of how a drug company in search of a market for a new vaccine creates that market with the help of the CDC, black children in Memphis, Tennessee eligible for free vaccines under the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC) program are being targeted for mandatory vaccination with the newly licensed high potency pediatric hepatitis A vaccine. A group of Memphis parents, protesting the forced vaccination of black children without the informed consent of their parents, have filed a $500 million lawsuit against vaccine maker SmithKline Beecham, the county health department and school board citing civil and religious rights violations.
I found more.
June 10, 2013, NaturalNews.com: African children being used as lab rats in heinous vaccine medical experiments
Parents of dozens of African children severely injured by a combination meningitis vaccine known as MenAfriVac are demanding answers following a recent declaration by government officials that the vaccine was somehow not the culprit in the tragedy. According to an investigative report by VacTruth.com's Christina England, at least 500 children in the small village of Gouro in Chad were held hostage last December by so-called "humanitarian" groups, who forced them to receive the deadly MenAfriVac vaccine,, which in many of them caused severe convulsions, paralysis, or worse.
In early December 2012, the children were reportedly put on lockdown at their school and coerced into accepting the MenAfriVac vaccine for meningitis A as part of an aggressive initiative launched by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, PATH, and MVP (Meningitis Vaccine Project). The children's parents were not told about the vaccination efforts, nor were they sought for parental consent, and yet these children were threatened with being cut off from an education if they refused the shot.
It has now been officially confirmed that in December 2012, 38 children were hospitalized after receiving the meningitis vaccine, MenAfriVac, during a vaccination campaign arranged by the Chadian government. News program France 24 stated that Saleh Ahmat Bodoumi, a former Member of Parliament in Chad, confirmed that seven of the most seriously affected children have since been evacuated from hospitals in the capital city of Ndjamena to the Republic of Tunisia in northern Africa to undergo further investigation and specialized treatment.
From 1987 to 1989, scientists set up a research center near 30 remote villages in central Senegal. Their stated primary objective was to study the clinical efficacy of two high-titer measles vaccines: Edmonston-Zagreb (EZ-HT) and Schwartz (SW-HT).(17) However, researchers had already done several studies demonstrating that high-titer measles vaccines produce a better immunological response than standard vaccines when given to children younger than nine months and as early as four months.(13-16; 18-21) Therefore, scientists conducting the Senegal study might have had another agenda. In fact, an elaborate "mortality surveillance" was established to check safety, evaluate the vaccination strategy, and perform "independent checks on child deaths."(17)
Researchers might have suspected the vaccine was dangerous when the results of earlier studies began to filter in. But they were probably reluctant to abandon their high-titer shot without testing it at least one more time to be sure. Senegal must have seemed ideal; the region was extremely remote, and less than 4% of the mothers who "consented" to the study were literate.(17)
To begin the study, researchers randomly assigned comparable children to three vaccine groups: a) EZ-HT administered at five months; b) SW-HT given at five months; and c) placebo at five months, followed by a standard low-titer measles vaccine at 10 months. All of the children were followed for up to three years. When the results were tabulated (using eight statistical procedures) it became clear that children who received the high-titer measles vaccines had significantly higher mortality at 41 months than children in the standard low-titer measles vaccine group. But they were not dying from measles. Most of the deaths were from other common childhood diseases. Apparently, the high-titer measles vaccines lowered overall immunity making the children fatally susceptible to diarrhea, dysentery, malaria, malnutrition, acute respiratory ailments, and other infectious diseases.(17)
Children who received the Schwartz strain (SW-HT) died of other diseases at a rate 51% higher than children who received a standard vaccine. There were 48 excess deaths for every 1000 babies vaccinated. Children who received the Edmonston-Zagreb strain (EZ-HT) died of other diseases at a rate 80% higher than children who received a standard vaccine. There were 75 excess deaths for every 1000 babies vaccinated.(17) Mortality remained consistently high in the second and third year after the EZ-HT vaccine was administered, whereas it declined substantially in the control group. One of every six babies vaccinated with EZ-HT died within three years.(17) . . .
June 17, 1996 LA TIMES: CDC Says It Erred in Measles Study
A government-sponsored study of two measles vaccines, begun in 1989 during a major U.S. epidemic and conducted on nearly 1,500 minority infants in Los Angeles, failed to disclose to parents that one of the vaccines was experimental, federal health officials said Sunday.
"A mistake was made," said Dr. David Satcher, director of the Atlanta-based federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one of the study sponsors. "It shocked me."
Despite the lack of standards when it comes to vaccine safety testing, legislators around the country are pushing to end a parent's right to choice to vaccinate or not. Parents need to protect their rights. If the government can force you to vaccinate your children, what can't the government do to your children?
Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism and author of The Big Autism Cover-Up: How and Why the Media Is Lying to the American Public, which is on sale now from Skyhorse Publishing.