Weekly Wrap: Over the Top!
Dachel Q&A with Dr. Mitchell Fleisher on Integrative Medicine

Vaccine Side Effects: What Every Mom Should Know.

CDC side effects
By Cathy Jameson

For the last few weeks most of my posts here have been about vaccines and vaccine safety.   Some of you may be missing my usual hopefully-ever-after writing, but vaccines have been bugging me lately.  When that happens, I don’t feel very hopeful or very happy.  

No matter what I’m reading–a magazine, a mainstream newspaper, or a blog, I can’t escape mention of vaccines these days.  Sure, I subscribe to a few places that typically highlight only vaccine news, but I’m reading about them in other places, and the news isn’t looking good. 

I can’t shake the disappointment I feel after seeing these stories.  Most of what I’ve read lauds vaccines claiming that they are safe despite their side effects, and that they’ll work if we give them a chance, and what’s the big deal, anyway?  Oh, when they don’t work?  Well, we’re sorry, let’s move on.  I know I speak for many when I say that that kind of news reporting is depressing and unacceptable. 

Can you imagine if vaccine news stories across the mainstream channels would actually reveal all there is to know about the vaccine--including the bad stuff?  I’m talking about the side effects, the lingering pain and the secondary illnesses that turn into everyday struggles after receiving a vaccination.  That information should be discussed more openly in the exam room and in the news but hardly seems to be.  I know this because I’ve been there in that exam room before and never got that sort of information.  People I speak to today about their vaccine encounters say the same thing.  When I hear from them, as they reach out to me for help, it’s clear that the right things are still not being said: “When do I worry about this rash?  The doctor didn’t tell me anything!” “What? I never knew you can still get the chickenpox after getting the chickenpox vaccine!”  “What should I do about this fever?  It’s so high, and it won’t go down!”

Side effects aren’t being mentioned in the articles I’ve viewed lately, and the moms I run into are still unaware of them, so it’s time to expose them for what they are.  Side effects are dangerous.  Side effects happen.  They can, and will, a last long after a vaccine is administered. 

Now, some people may be aware of side effects if they’ve done any kind of basic research.  The CDC tells us that side effects can be mild, moderate or severe.  Basic information might also come from a medical provider who takes the time to have a conversation about them.  Information may also come from the VIS (Vaccine Information Sheet).  This handout, usually a two-sided piece of paper, is required by law to be given to someone receiving certain vaccines. 

Basic is good, but getting as much information as possible is better. 

With as many things that can go wrong with vaccines, you’d think reading each of the package inserts  would be required reading.  Maybe then people would understand more about them like who it’s been tested on (or not tested on), how long it was studied, what it’s made of and what it’s been known to do to the body.  But, since that document isn’t the one that is usually shared with patients, here’s a quick recap of the side effects that can happen post vaccination (note: this is not a complete list):

Swelling at injection site

Rash

Fatigue

Headache

Nausea

Chills

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Fever

Seizures

Autism

Guillaine-Barre Syndrome

Brain swelling

Shock

Anaphylaxis

Cardiac arrest

Ataxia

Drowsiness

Insomnia

Narcolepsy

Myalgia

Arthralgia

Urticarial

Edema

Upper respiratory tract infection

Diarrhea

Paralysis

Infertility

Death

Besides having to disclose that side effects happen, I wonder, though, if in listing them that those promoting vaccines believe that side effects could be viewed as a good thing.  Side effects mean that the body is reacting.  It shows that the body recognizes that something’s been injected or inhaled.  The body’s trying to figure out what to do with these toxins that make up the vaccine.  It may show that the immune system is responding.  As the body responds, some might say that the side effects are part of the vaccination process. 

A response from the immune system means that the immune system works, right?  We want our immune system to work.  What does that mean, though, when the vaccine kicks the immune system into overdrive which may lead to complications which then leads to death?  The vaccine did something.  It may not have guaranteed immunity or helped prevent a disease, but instead it elicited a different response:  death.  What’s at fault:  the vaccine?  the toxic ingredients? the body’s ill response? 

Many factors will surely need to be investigated.  Unfortunately, though, when side effects occur, that person’s family can’t find fault with the vaccine manufacturer or their doctor, which is why it’s important to understand fully not only what a vaccine can do and but what a vaccine will do.  When considering vaccines, there is much to consider. 

So, if this information about side effects is news for you, and it scares you, I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news.  If this information sounds old and like I’ve become the most annoying broken record ever to exist about vaccines and vaccine safety, it’s because this information needs to be said over and over again until more people are aware of it. 

Why do people like me feel the need to keep repeating this?  Because I care.  I care about what is being said about vaccines and what is not being said about vaccines.  Because the VIS barely scratches the surface.  Because two pages is hardly enough space to truly inform someone about the supposed benefits as well as reveal the countless documented side effects every vaccine on the market carries.  Because side effects and adverse events aren’t just a one-time thing.  Because vaccine injury is real.  Because it lasts longer than you can imagine.  Because it will rob you of your abilities, your health, your time and your money as you try to reverse the affects. 

Those who might be profiting from vaccinations may not being saying what needs to be said very clearly.  But if we who’ve witnessed the side effects can say it clearer, better and louder, then so be it.   

Know your rights.

Do your homework. 

Ask your questions.

Weigh the pros and cons.

Look things up on your own.

Read the package insert. 

Really read it.

Realize that side effects can be worse than the “disease-preventable” vaccine itself. 

Remember, too, that when you vaccinate you can never UNvaccinate. 

If more people knew about vaccine side effects and how devastating they can be, I’d expect we might see much less vaccine injury and death. I’d expect more people would do one of two things also:  really begin to question vaccines or start to decline them.  Neither of those are a bad thing. 

Cathy Jameson is a Contributing Editor for Age of Autism.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

john

"id rather have a dead kid than an autistic one"

-All of you

Terey

Shocking and horrific that are government cares so little about the citizens that vaccines that cause these kind of side effects, are still legal. WTF

Teresa

You should be ashamed of yourself.

saba

there is dictator ship in medicine .... the only way thay we can save our kids is to open our eyes.. and say no ..... and insist.. dont give up

Fièvre

Since a parallel has been drawn in the comments with GMO labelling, just read this : FCT requests the retraction of Prof Seralini'study http://www.criigen.org/SiteEn/

Carter's Daddy

It's all on the bottle or the insert so how do they deny it?

Linda

Cat, I wasn't kidding. Of course there's a fat chance that the CDC will ever put out an honest VIS because if they did, that would be the end of the vaccine program as we know it.

I was thinking though...remember the great Jim Carey movie where he played a lawyer that had to tell the truth for a day? Also, remember the great movie where Eddie Murphy played all his relatives? Well, wouldn't it be fun if Jim Carey did a sequel, this time playing all the shills at the CDC, IACC, NIH, Paul Offit, Tom Insel. He could play them all - and they would have to tell the truth for a day. In that time period, they could be assigned the task of rewriting the VMS's to make them VIS's. Imagine what the new revised VIS would look like for the Hep B vaccine. "Hep B is a disease transmitted mostly by sexual contact and by using dirty needles while engaging in IV drug abuse. Why is this vaccine recommended to be given to your innocent newborn in the first 24 hours of life? Only babies born to mothers who have the disease traditionally were given this vaccine, but because it is profitable and we are beholden to Pharma and Pharma needs to make their stockholders happy, we decided to give it to every baby! It is true that the immunity, if your child develops immunity to the virus as a result of having the vaccine, is not known to last until your child will become 15, and there are children who have died after receiving Hep B (we aren't sure how many because we make certain not to keep track, and if anyone does keep track, we are sure to deny any link so that we don't jeopardize our business), and at least one study

(Gallagher CM, Goodman MS. (2010). Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 73 (24):1665-77.)

has shown that "Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life".

And it could go on like that. Just imagine. I can't make it funny (I know it isn't really funny), but Jim Carey could get the point across and with his enormous talent, he could make it funny. And having him play Offit and Insel and the rest of them, including the Pharma reps. Maybe Eddie Murphy could play some of them. Oh, that would be a great movie.

Cat Jameson--for Carolyn and Linda

Great idea, Carolyn. We can certainly work on some Know the Signs posts here and also create some memes for social media--those seem to be read quicker and are very easy to share. I posted a meme last night (thank you for the inspiration!) that got shared quite a few times already. It's up on the AofA FB page if anyone wants to take a peek at it.

And, Linda, I laughed out loud when I read your comment, but I have to say that suggesting I rewrite the CDC's VIS pages was one of the nicest compliments I have ever gotten. Thank you!

If I'm ever taken up on that I'd also love to redesign the ridiculous cartoon images that are used on the recommended vaccine schedule page: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/downloads/parent-ver-sch-0-6yrs.pdf Happy, preggo mama wouldn't be smiling so big if they'd also include information about vaccine injury, SIDS, brain swelling, adverse events, side effects, Vaccine Court, etc.

Cat

Chris Hemmings

You know I've always thought there is a kind of "Russian roulette" element to the possibility of vaccine collateral damage occurring and that the powers that be use this to suggest each individual has a very low chance of injury.

But when there are so many different bullets in the barrel and when the kids are given so many shots the odds are reduced very substantially!

SarahW

Cathy,

Our kids are mere data points that get lost in the big picture. FDA does not look at individual cases of adverse reaction, they merely monitor for trends. They use the backdrop of the general population so you see in their view vaccines as "safe" so it's easy for them to obfuscate the damage.

I wanted to know more about the FDA's vaccine safety review process after I read about Chandler Webb case. I sent this email to the FDA division responsible for Vaccine Safety review and here is the response from one of their consumer dsafety people.


Dear Sir/Madam,

I recently viewed a webinar given by Dr. Andrea Sutherland about the FDA's vaccine safety review process. What I am not clear on is whether individual cases/reports of severe adverse reaction are investigated by the FDA. How do you respond to individual reports of serious vaccine adverse reaction? Do you investigate these specific cases? Has anyone at FDA investigated the Chandler Webb case? Has anyone talked to his mother? Chandler Webb is a young man who reportedly went into a coma 24 hours after recieving a flu shot. He died 28 days later. Any clarification and information you could provide is appreciated.

Thank you,


============================================================


Dear Ms. W---:


Thank you for your inquiry to the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) regarding vaccine adverse event reporting. CBER is one of seven centers within FDA, responsible for the regulation of biologically-derived products, including blood intended for transfusion, blood components and derivatives, vaccines, allergenic extracts, tissue, and cell and gene therapy products. We hope the following information will be helpful.


FDA regulates vaccines to ensure that they are safe and effective. Vaccines, like all biologic products regulated by FDA, undergo a rigorous review of the laboratory, clinical and manufacturing information submitted by the product sponsor to help ensure the safety, purity, and potency of these products. Ensuring the safety and effectiveness of vaccines is one of FDA's top priorities.


The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a valuable tool for post-marketing safety surveillance (monitoring after a product has been approved and is on the market). Although extensive studies are required for licensure of new vaccines, post-marketing research and surveillance are necessary to identify safety issues that may only be detected following vaccination of a much larger and more diverse population. Rare events may not come to light before licensure. Sometimes an event is noted, but the evidence may not be adequate to conclude that a noted event is due to the vaccine.


VAERS is a program created as an outgrowth of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) and is administered by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). VAERS accepts reports of adverse events that may be associated with U.S. licensed vaccines from health care providers, manufacturers, and the public. The FDA continually monitors VAERS reports for any unexpected patterns or changes in rates of adverse events.


The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not proof that a vaccine caused the event. More than ten million vaccinations per year are given to children less than one year old, usually between 2 months and 6 months of age. At this stage of development infants are at risk for a variety of medical events and serious childhood illnesses. These naturally occurring events include fevers, seizures, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), cancer, congenital heart disease, asthma, and other conditions. Some infants coincidentally experience an adverse event shortly after a vaccination. In such situations an infection, congenital abnormality, injury, or some other provocation may cause the event. Because of such coincidences, it is usually not possible from VAERS data alone to determine whether a particular adverse event resulted from a concurrent condition or from a vaccination - even when the event occurs soon after vaccination. Doctors and other vaccine providers are encouraged to report adverse events, whether or not they believe that the vaccination was the cause. If the VAERS data suggest a possible link between an adverse event and vaccination, the relationship may be further studied in a controlled fashion.


Analyzing VAERS reports is a complex task. Children are often administered more than one vaccine at a time, making it difficult to know which vaccine, if any, may have contributed to any subsequent adverse events. While about 85% of adverse events reported to VAERS are minor (such as mild fevers or redness and swelling at the injection site), the remaining 15% describe more serious events. The more serious events include hospitalizations, life-threatening events, and deaths. As part of the VAERS program, FDA reviews the deaths and serious reports weekly, and conducts follow up. In some cases, certain vaccines and potentially associated symptoms will receive more intense follow up.


In addition to analyzing individual VAERS reports, the FDA also analyzes patterns of reporting associated with vaccine lots. Many complex factors must be considered in comparing reports between different vaccine lots. More reports may be received for a large lot than for a small one simply because more doses of vaccine from the large lot will be given to more children. Some lots contain as many as 700,000 doses, while others as few as 20,000 doses. Similarly, more reports will be received for a lot that has been in use for a long time than for a lot that has been in use for a short time. Even among lots of similar size and time in use, some lots will receive more reports than others will simply due to chance. The FDA continually looks for lots that have received more death reports than would be expected on the basis of such factors as time in use and chance variation as well as any unusual patterns in other serious reports within a lot. If such a lot is detected, further review is conducted to determine if the lot continues to be safe for use, or if additional FDA actions are needed.


FDA routinely notifies the public about safety concerns from VAERS by publishing articles in the medical literature, through notices on the FDA website, and by revisions in the vaccines’ professional package inserts.


In addition to VAERS, CDC has two other systems to study the safety of licensed vaccines. Through their collaborative VSD Project, CDC and eight managed care organizations monitor vaccine safety and address gaps in scientific knowledge about rare and serious possible side effects following immunization by conducting careful descriptive epidemiologic and hypothesis-testing studies. The VSD monitors over 8 million people. It has studied their experience with a “rapid cycle analysis” method. This method repeatedly evaluates rates at which key suspected side effects have developed in vaccinees, so that should any of these side effects prove to have a statistical association with vaccination, it will become evident as early as possible.


We hope this information has been helpful.


If you should have any other questions or concerns regarding this subject, please feel free to contact a representative from FDA's Consumer Affairs Branch within the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at ocod@fda.hhs.gov or 301-827-2000.


Sincerely,

Jill Burkoff


Consumer Safety Officer

Office of Communication, Outreach and Development

Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

Food and Drug Administration


Phone: 301-827-2000


Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/FDACBER


This informal communication represents my best judgment at this time. It does not constitute an advisory opinion in accordance with 21 CFR 10.85, and does not necessarily represent the formal position of FDA or otherwise obligate the agency to the views expressed.

Shell Tzorfas

If we look closely to the link that contains vaccine reactions we can see that seizures, brain damages and more are stated to be so rare that it is hard to say if it happened by chance.
Here is the actual quote from the documents provided by Cathy and AoA. Thank you.

Serious problems: Long term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, and permanent brain damage have been reported. These problems happen so rarely that it is hard to tell whether they were actually caused by the vaccination or just happened afterward by chance.

Would someone please tell them that 1 in 50 kids having brain damage resulting in Autism, or 1 in 29 boys having Autism is not rare?

Shell of "Recovering Autism, ADHD & Special Needs."

Hera

In a way it seems imo that doctors are doing themselves out of their profession. After at least some doctors have been publicly denying that vaccine injuries exist, the result is that vaccines have already become something that can be given in a supermarket.

Kind of ironic if over the long term pediatricians will end up destroying their own practice, much of which seems to be based on giving shots.

I wonder how different the future of pediatrics would be if they actually worked on identifying who is likely to react badly to vaccines, reported vaccine injuries, and worked with parents to protect the vulnerable children from more ( or any )injury. Trust is something that is earned.

When our son was born with a rare genetic disability that both my husband and I tested negative for, they wanted to know about any toxins or exposures that might have caused the mutation. they looked at us, pen poised; any medications, pesticides, household cleaners? Anything at all? There was nothing, I did not even take Tylenol while pregnant. Our sons birth was planned, and we were very careful. Then we told them about my husbands reaction to a vaccine that left him allergic to his own sweat for nine months. The doctor and nurse in the room looked at each other meaningfully, and then PUT THE PEN DOWN. Anything else, they were willing to write, anything else could have been a cause or a toxic exposure, but not that.
In a way , I understood. they did not want to stir waves, no doubt felt their ability to help children with rare disorders was linked to their ability to go along with the crowd. But when you are in a situation where the pressure is such that the doctor cannot even write it down; you realize how often this kind of thing is probably happening.

Mandy Keese

My son had an adverse reaction to the flu shot....within 24 hours after receiving it. Months and months of medical appointments, EEGs, MRIs, etc followed. It was my experience that only one of the many doctors we saw through all of this would ever admit his symptoms were a result of the vaccine he had been given just 24 hours prior to developing seizures in which he had never had before. That one doctor said she would report his symptoms along with the Lot Number of the vaccine given "just in case" anyone else might report an adverse reaction to the same Lot Number. As the mother, I have no doubt in my mind that my son's new symptoms were a direct result of the flu shot he was given but had more than one doctor refuse to document this was related to his flu vaccine.

Maggi Magenpie

To those who think vaccine damage is a rare event. It considered such because of the lack of requirement for doctors & hospitals to report it. In many cases they completely ignored or denied the possibility of vaccine being involved. Many are not even trained to notice it!

Michele A.

Bob Moffitt...I think doctors ARE required to report adverse vaccine events. The problem is that so many of them DENY the reaction occurred...they will call it "coincidence" or say it is "normal" (as if "common" means the same thing as "normal"). I think the biggest problem of all is that most doctors are just as uneducated about vaccines as most parents are because they haven't taken any time to learn anything about them either. Unfortunately when a parent trusts an uninformed doctor as an expert it is a recipe for disaster. This will continue to be a problem as long as pHARMa has their tentacles in the medical schools...so we just need to keep talking and sharing info and hope that it will make others rethink what they thought they knew about vaccines.

Wendy Frye

It's been bugging me too lately, Cathy. I think it's the all out assault at every grocery, drug or other store that has a pharmacy PUSHING these things on me. I swear not a day goes by without seeing, hearing or reading about vaccines. This stuff is bit harmless, and it's not another product to be bandied about......

cmo

There is no such thing as a "vaccine commercial" as they would then be required to list the vaccine side effects, usually shown while people in the pharma commercial are "blowing up party balloons" or "planting flowers".

The mainstream media creates the vaccine shot hype and provides "flu shot/ or other vaccine commercials for free" nearly every week on the news.

It is often a "lead in story" shown a number of times earlier in the day, which I assume they are well paid for.

Benedetta

There is an advertisment on TV of a little short bull dog. THe ad goes -- that the dog may look tough but it has food sensitivities and so the owner must take care to give it a special dog food free of wheat, soy -- on and on - including egg.

SO what is making big tough bull dogs be sensitive to stuff.
I mean mine loves cow manure, and chicken poop but she can't handle dog food that is not gluten free.

Is that not what we are all noticing symptoms of food allergies -- that is as far as we recognize food sensitivity and are not clueless.

Carolyn Flannery

I want to see a "know the signs"
Campaign that explains the progressively worse reactions to each vaccine.
For example: if your child reacts in xyz symptoms to first vaccine then consider delaying all others .
Better yet, we need to get found in search engines when someone looks for symptoms that may be warning signs of injuries caused by vaccines. Example: high pitched scream.
Obviously we can't stop these atrocities yet but we can educate educate educate. Were it not for all the parents out there I would not have stopped my sons vax at 18 months. He is recovering. I thank you all for speaking out when you were so ridiculed and I pay it forward by doing the same. Only fewer and fewer people are ridiculing as the truth reaches critical mass.

barbaraj

great plan Bob Moffit.. I'd add...to simply list the visits that occur within FIVE years following vaccinations, those five years that in previous studies have shown degrees of immune dysfunction, then compare those records to ANY non vaccinated child in the same practice would be so telling. Guess what? They have , they all have that information, and they are ignoring it, they don't like it so they can.

nhokkanen

One false argument by vaccine injury denialists is that people who promote informed consent are recklessly unconcerned about disease. If anything, the opposite is true -- victims of vaccine failure lack disease protection and are evermore careful about hygiene and preventing exposures.

Vaccine injury victims are also more in tune with the effects of disease; some even were stricken with the disease from vaccines designed to prevent it. The people in India who've developed paralysis from the oral polio vaccine deserve the same compassion and medical treatment as the people in the U.S. who've spent decades in an iron lung after contracting poliomyelitis.

How sad that so many people have to be reminded to show vaccine injury victims the same sympathy they have for victims of disease. They've bought into the utilitarian convenience implied by the lopsided equation "benefits outweigh risks."

For medical professionals, causal guilt gets in the way of even the mere acknowledgment of vaccine injury. This is where "science" loses out to human failing. Denial is quick, easy and costs nothing... except one's morals. And denial is easy to justify when mob mentality rules the uninjured majority.

Linda

Cathy, I wish you could rewrite the CDC produced Vaccine Information Sheets that are currently just another part of a deceptive marketing program designed to give the false impression of informed consent while coercing the public into accepting the vaccines through disease mongering and misinformation. The VIS is really a VMS. These tools are designed with two goals, one is to have the reader follow through with the vaccination and the other is to satisfy the legal requirement for informed consent.

Laura Hayes

Thanks, Cathy, for yet another well-written, educational, thought-provoking article. Keep writing, keep talking, and keep sharing truth. We ARE making a difference out there (proof: note all the pushback from Big pHARMa in so many different forms across the country…vaccine ad after vaccine ad…billboards…legislation everywhere to eliminate/restrict exemptions…pharma shills madly posting after every single vaccine-related article…pathetic books being published by the likes of Paul prOffit…etc.).

Note, too, how other health-related issues are beginning to dovetail with our agenda (our agenda being that of providing true informed consent, not lying to parents and the public, fully disclosing information, exposing that "safety" and "efficacy" data are provided by the industries that are profiting from the products, bans on mandating, forcing, or coercing any medical treatment or procedure, as all can harm and/or kill, etc.). For example, our agenda is lining up with those wanting the labeling of GMO-containing foods, who also want the truth told about the dangers of GMOs and glyphosates. Our agenda is lining up with those wanting the dangers of toxic pesticides and chemicals, used everywhere we and our vulnerable children are, made known, and subsequently, stopped. Our agenda is lining up with those who are tired of more forced medication in the form of fluoridated water. Our agenda is lining up with those who have seen devastation in themselves or their loved ones from dangerous prescription drugs that have left their recipients with health and/or behavioral issues, or worse, killed them. Our agenda is lining up with those who want choices in their medical treatments (think alternative treatments for cancer), and want those choices covered, not denied, by their insurance plans. I could go on, but you get the picture.

Slowly, but surely, Americans are realizing they're being duped in every arena by those profiting from dangerous, ineffective, deadly products. I am constantly introducing people to one another, and being introduced to others, as new alliances are being forged amongst the ever-growing number of us who see the writing on the wall, and are adamant about helping others to see it, steer clear of it, and put an immediate stop to it. Keep on keeping on, Cathy, and everyone else, too!

Bob Moffitt

@ Zed .. I agree .. I am dreaming.

Why should those so worried about parents suddenly refusing to voluntarily participate in US childhood vaccination policies .. as US parents have always done .. have any reason to calm their fears by installing the two suggestions I made?

After all .. it is much easier to continue "demonizing" those reluctant parents .. aided and abetted by a very compliant main-stream media .. by holding them responsible for any outbreak of a supposedly "vaccine preventable disease" .. such as .. whooping cough ..

One thing I know for certain .. these people are not stupid .. and .. there is just too much RISK to their now .. risk-free empire .. to mess it all up by "doing the right thing" .. such as .. "informing parents" and accurately "reporting adverse events".

Benedetta

Oh, you guys go back to sleep.
Vaccine injuries are "Rare Events".

Zed

Yes, Bob, you're dreaming. Because if they don't report it….it's like it never even happened.

TannersDad Tim

We don't sleep at night due to concern for our loved ones. I just wonder hw Doctors can. - TannersDad Tim

Bob Moffitt

Not only do many doctors not give adequate warnings regarding the potential side-effects of the vaccines they are so eager to administer to toddlers .. doctors are also less likely to "voluntarily report" adverse effects following the vaccines .. which by some estimates .. indicate that less than 10% of adverse events are ever reported.

Since so many complain about the growing numbers of parents reluctant to vaccinate their children according to the recommended and approved schedule of public health officials .. why not try to regain the trust of those now reluctant parents by issuing new regulations:

#1 .. Require doctors to have parents sign a declaration that parents have read the Vaccine Information Sheet (VIS).. and .. doctors have answered all questions that parents may have regarding that information.

#2 .. Mandate that doctors report all side-effects following vaccines within 30 days .. with the added responsibility to report all serious "diagnosed and treated" events to the vaccinated child .. within the same three year parental requirement for autism.

In other words ... it would be MANDATORY for doctors .. up to three years after vaccinations .. to report the following "diagnosed and treated" events: SIDS, seizures, autism, GBS, brain swelling, anaphylaxis, Cardiac arrest, Ataxia, Narcolepsy, Myalgia, Urticarial, Edema, Paralysis, Infertility, Death.

Imagine that .. well informed parents .. accompanied by mandatory reporting of adverse events following vaccinations.

Well .. I can dream can't I?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)