Free Download Post Couric Vaccine Program: Gardasil A License to Kill?
Louis Conte Speaks on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Court Problems

Dachel Media Review: Tasing Kids, Police Database

Online newsBy Anne Dachel

Read Anne's comments and view the links after the jump.

Dec 9, 2013, Wayne Police creating autism/special needs database

Dec 8, 2013, TIME: Susan Boyle Reveals She Has Asperger's--The British singer says the diagnosis was a relief

Dec 6, 2013, NBC5, West Palm Beach: Impact 5 Autism special, followed by Contact 5 Investigators special Saturday at 8 p.m.

Dec 6, 2013, The UK Dail Mail: Police use 50,000-volt Taser on 15-year-old schoolboy with learning difficulties after being called in over 'scuffle'

Dec 6, 2013, The Atlantic: How to Read About Science

Dec 6, 2013, Hartford Courant: Manchester 'Sensory Santa' Opens Merry Tradition To Autistic Kids And Their Families

Taking into consideration the recent missing person incidents that have occurred in the metropolitan area involving autistic individuals, the Wayne Police Department, in a proactive effort, is reaching out in hopes of better serving the autistic and special needs community. The department is adding pertinent information and photographs into its database of autistic and special needs individuals residing in Wayne Township in the event they go missing. . . .

Everywhere evidence mounts showing autism is a critical condition that we have never had to deal with previously---still we refuse to take any action to address this. I guess we'll just go on pretending that this is normal and acceptable to the bitter end. I posted one comment.


British singer Susan Boyle said her diagnosis of Asperger's syndrome, a form of autism, was a relief.

The 52-year-old, who rose to fame for her rendition of Les Miserables's "I Dreamed a Dream" on Britain's Got Talent, told the Observer newspaper that she found out a year ago that she had Asperger's and an above-average IQ, the Associated Press reports.

"I have always known that I have had an unfair label put upon me," Boyle said. "Now I have a clearer understanding of what's wrong and I feel relieved and a bit more relaxed about myself."

Boyle, who struggled in school as a child, was treated for nervous exhaustion after her famous performance on "Britain's Got Talent" in 2009. She said she was happy to have a better understanding of the hurdles she faces.

NBC5, West Palm Beach

On Saturday, December 7 at 8 p.m. WPTV NewsChannel 5 presents an Impact 5 Autism: Connecting the Pieces half-hour special.

With the number of cases increasing, the show provides viewers with more information about autism, a better understanding of how it affects families, and advice on the best way to communicate with adults on the autism spectrum.

We can predict what's going to be said by the experts (and if "experts" say it, it must be true).

Autism won't be a "crisis," merely a puzzle no one has completely figured out yet. The very title, "connecting the pieces," tells us exactly that.

Notice that the experts are going to help us "understand what autism is and HOW it affects so many people." No one is focused on WHY it affects so many people and we'll all get this strong message: Autism is---it's a given. Our job is to learn how to deal with it.

These reports do the most harm. They convince us that all that can be done is being done. It may be "the fastest growing developmental disability in the United States," but we're not not interested in why it's happening. I'm sure there's be some vague reference to a broader definition and greater awareness and PERHAPS unknown environmental factors, but they'll quickly move on to talking about the need for services.

Most of all, the experts won't be alarmed about a disorder that's rampant among our kids with no known cause. And if they're not worried, parents shouldn't be either.

Autism is treated just like breast cancer. There's a lot of awareness, walks, pink ribbons, calls for a cure, BUT NO ONE TALKS ABOUT WHY BREAST CANCER IS NOW AN EPIDEMIC.

American Cancer Society: "Breast cancer is the most common cancer among American women, except for skin cancers. About 1 in 8 (12%) women in the US will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime."

Thirty, forty, fifty years ago, breast cancer didn't strike so many women. Why doesn't anyone talk about finding the cause? There's no way this is due to greater awareness and better diagnosing, but no one seems to care about preventing breast cancer.

I guess the real message with all the ribbons for all the causes is that there's no money to be made in prevention and that since so many of our chronic and soaring health conditions are industry-made, it's better not to ask why.

The UK Daily Mail

A schoolboy with learning difficuties was hit with a 50,000-volt Taser by police at a special school.

Officers were called to Chelfham Senior School near Plymouth, a special needs school owned by the exclusive Priory Group following an alleged assault on a teacher in a 'scuffle' with pupils.

A 15-year-old was shotwith the electric stun gun after several police units arrived at the school grounds to find three boys allegedly holding two knives.

Police confirmed last night that no officers were injured.

The male teacher in his late 40s suffered chest and facial injuries, which were not thought to be knife related.

The victim was treated at the scene by paramedics before being taken to Derriford Hospital.

Campaigners reacted with fury yesterday, saying the use of Taser on a vulnerable boy with a complex learning difficulty flouts the guidelines and may have been excessive.

The incident at the school, which specialises in children with learning difficulties including behavioural, emotional and social difficulties and autism, happened at 9.20 pm on December 1, but police did not release any details at the time. . . .

Our society is oblivious to what's happening to our children. First they're damaged by an unchecked, unsafe vaccine schedule, then when the resulting behavior puts themselves and others at risk, they're further victimized. Will this become the standard response when a police action involves the developmentally disabled?

 The Atlantic

If you took to heart the recent cover story in The Economist, "How Science Goes Wrong," you might be tempted throw your hands up and stop reading about scientific research entirely. The piece describes how scientists often fail to reproduce some of the most frequently cited findings in their fields, calling their conclusions into question. Science writers have also come under fire recently, most notably Malcolm Gladwell, who according to critics in the The Atlantic, The Wall Street Journal, and Slate among others, cherry-picks research to fit his thesis and hangs major arguments on poorly replicated studies in his latest book, David and Goliath.

Even a good study has limitations and weaknesses. Usually the researchers are direct about these in academic papers, and do a decent job of explaining how they might detract from the study's conclusions. Look for science writers to be similarly frank. Examples of weaknesses include: samples that are either very small (which makes it difficult to find a statistically significant difference) or very large (which means tiny, basically meaningless effects might still be statistically significant), or are somehow unrepresentative of the population they're trying to understand (studying animals to learn about human diseases, for example).

Over time, if the research appears to converge on a particular conclusion-the overwhelming consensus that there is no link between autism and vaccines, for example-then you should probably take it seriously.

Now I have posted on the Atlantic before. I signed on with my Facebook and my photo and my name were on etc., but when I tried to post my comment, I got this in RED:

"You do not have permission to post on this thread"

Seriously, it's a pointless article defending scientific studies in the face of increasing criticism.

Either Jennifer Richler is extremely naïve or she thinks we are. There's nothing about WHO FUNDED THE STUDY, which I think is the most important thing to ask.

Maybe the whole reason for the story was to get this sentence. . . .

"Over time, if the research appears to converge on a particular conclusion-the overwhelming consensus that there is no link between autism and vaccines, for example-then you should probably take it seriously."

So, if enough studies have the same findings, the results should be believed. Then what does it mean when, despite over a dozen major studies denying a link, the public just isn't buying it?

Hartford  (CT) Courant

Santa Claus is a boisterous guy, with his loud red suit, booming laugh and bouncing belly.

The jolly old elf can intimidate some children (remember the department store scene in "A Christmas Story"?) - but especially kids with autism.

Autistic children can have trouble not only with a big, bearded man quizzing them on their behavior, but also with the typically bustling scene in Santa's court. Ray Lepak of Manchester said he learned of the problem a few years ago when his grandson, Ben, was age 4 or 5. Ben, now 12, remains nonverbal and easily distracted, so visiting a mall Santa was out of the question.

"He'd probably be good for a minute and then he'd bolt," Lepak said. . . .

Lepak went on to perform the role for other autistic children. His "Sensory Santa" is part of a growing trend throughout the nation, according to Lisa Goring of Autism Speaks, a nonprofit research and advocacy organization.

Some autistic children have a heightened sensitivity to sounds, smells and lights, "and all of those things in the mall environment are difficult," said Goring, vice president of family services for the New York City-based organization. Adding Santa to the mix is even more troublesome. Autistic children can have difficulty relating to someone they don't know and also with the concept of the Santa Claus character, Goring said. It's better for those kids, she said, to approach the traditional visit in a quieter, less stimulating way.

We're told why autistic kids can't handle the traditional visits to Santa. They can't handle the "sounds, smells, and lights" normally found in the mall. We learn that autistic kids can be nonverbal and they can bolt, when stressed.

That's just the way autism affects kids. I'm sorry if you can't remember kids like this when you were young. We just didn't recognize them back then. Now we do and there's a "growing trend across the nation" to have 'Sensory Santa' and 'Caring Claus' to accommodate these kids.

Actually, this is Autism 101. It teaches the public about autism. These kids can bolt, they have sensory issues, they may not talk. BUT, that's just autism. So if you have a child like this, don't worry. We're doing lots of things to address this problem.

 Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


"We learn that autistic kids can be nonverbal and they can bolt, when stressed."

IMO autistic kids have a fully functional thinking capacity on MANY levels. For example I believe MANY have figured out "vaccination" is harming them in the LONG TERM. In this respect they are far more advanced in knowledge than their parents who are forcing the harm on them if albeit in good faith. The harmed child being the IMMEDIATE and principal victim has the most to lose.

This is easy for a mother to test. When taking the child to get shot up give the child a choice at each step of the way.

1) Today is the day for your shots Johnny. Do you want to go?

2) Here is the building where you will be given your shots. Do you want to go in?

3) Here is the office where you will be given your shots. Do you want to go in?

I would place a LOT of credence on my child's answers and all the subtle context the child gives in the Q&A process. If they want to get shot up ask them why.

Shooting up ANY child who cannot communicate on the above level is IMO Unconscionable.

As always IMO no "vaccinations" for nothing no time.


"I guess the real message with all the ribbons for all the causes is that there's no money to be made in prevention and that since so many of our chronic and soaring health conditions are industry-made, it's better not to ask why."

50 years ago when I heard statements like this I said; NO WAY. The good honest people in the Medical Profession would NEVER allow it.

After 40 years of viewing it on a daily basis I now say; It is self evident. The good honest people in the Medical Profession are, so far, POWERLESS to prevent it. Money, greed and power rule this deeply sick country of mostly good honest people.

In my fondest dreams I see the exposure of the Structure of Evil by the truth about AUTISM at last being revealed to hundreds of millions of mothers et al. It just could happen in my dwindling years.


"Thirty, forty, fifty years ago, breast cancer didn't strike so many women. Why doesn't anyone talk about finding the cause? There's no way this is due to greater awareness and better diagnosing, but no one seems to care about preventing breast cancer."

Yes I believe you are correct; the Breast Cancer epidemic is being used as a model for man (CDC) made autism, the ASDs and all the diseases of "vaccination".

The Medical Industrial Complex has been EXTREMELY successful in selling women the Breast Cancer deadly fraud for most of my 70 years.

A simple switch away from MOST cancer causing, Breast Cancer Metastasizing mammograms to the infinitely safer FAR more efficacious THERMOGRAMS would save uncountable lives. It would take a lot of the FEAR out of Breast cancer.

Why cannot this be done? One simple reason is the Medical Industrial Complex has hundreds of billions invested in the Mammogram infrastructure. Another good reason is the switch would take a lot of FEAR out of Breast Cancer. But as we should know by now FEAR is desired by the Medical Industrial Complex. FEAR and authority are the principal drivers behind the "vaccination" deadly fraud.

Avoid Getting Zapped to Avoid Breast Cancer and MORE

"Medical radiation is a necessary co-factor in about 75 percent of recent cases of breast cancer in the United States." Doctor John William Gofman PhD , Note does this help explain why the RATE of breast cancer creeps ever higher as we "test" more and more?

"Isn't it ironic that the mammogram—the principal diagnostic test given to women to help detect and prevent breast cancer—is actually responsible for increasing your risk for developing it in the future?" Note well Ladies do we put up with this outrage or do we say NO

“Medical radiation is a highly important cause (probably the principal cause) of cancer mortality in the United States during the Twentieth Century. Medical radiation means, primarily, exposure by xrays (including fluoroscopy and CT scans). Medical radiation, received even at very low and moderate doses, is an important cause of death from Ischemic Heart Disease; the probable mechanism is radiation-induction of mutations in the coronary arteries, resulting in dysfunctional clones (mini-tumors) of smooth muscle cells.” Radiation from Medical Procedure in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease Note this means NO, NONE not at the doctors not at the dentist not at the airport unless the risk/reward is shown to favor the radiation. Make the doc give you the hard numbers

moon batchelder

this is why i homeschool. my autistic daughter has meltdowns that would most surely get her abused in our current public school set ups...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)