Dachel Media Update: Autism in America
Dachel Media Update: In Vitro, Sped Costs

Call to Action As Minnesota Vaccine Safety Advocates Fight Proposed Rule Changes

Canary Party Action AlertA call to action from our sponsor, The Canary Party:

By Patti Carroll

Several months ago, it was brought to the attention of vaccine safety groups in Minnesota that the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) was proposing to add more shots to their recommended schedule, and lower the recommended age for other shots on the schedule.  Luckily, we have a really strong group of advocates here, and representatives from several groups came together to plan what to do. We knew we would have a battle on our hands, as attempts to fight changes a decade ago were unsuccessful.  In fact, MDH’s recommended changes to the vaccine schedule have never been successfully stopped.  But that would never stop us from trying.

The rule in Minnesota is that if at least 25 people write in to oppose the changes, then a hearing before an administrative law judge must occur.  If not, MDH can simply adopt the changes that they themselves have recommended.  So step one was to get at least 25 people to write in to the administrative law judge, opposing the rule changes.  We sent out an action alert, and about 100 people wrote in contesting the rule changes.  So a hearing was set up for June 27, 2013.

Next step for the team – what could we actually fight here?  The administrative law judge’s job was to determine:

1.    Did the MDH have the authority to make these changes?
2.    Did the MDH follow all the required procedures when making these proposals?
3.    Were the proposed changes necessary and reasonable?

Knowing they had the authority to make these recommendations (whether or not we believe this authority is justified in the first place), and knowing they had followed the necessary steps to propose the changes, we knew our strongest argument would be on whether these changes were needed and reasonable.  As we pored over the lengthy SONAR document (Statement Of Need And Reasonableness) put together by an advisory group appointed by MDH, it became clear that their arguments were shaky.  They made these proposals in order to bring Minnesota into alignment with the CDC recommended schedule, but of course the CDC schedule has never been proven to be safe, and has come under intense scrutiny recently by members of congress.  And there is no need to mandate some of these vaccines, since the number of people getting the diseases is actually DECLINING in Minnesota in the age ranges for which they are recommending the new requirements.

Which begs the question – why?  And why now?  As we all know, there are fights heating up in many other states to take away individuals’ rights to opt out of vaccines.  Minnesota Commissioner of Health Ed Ehlinger has publicly stated that he supports removing the rights of Minnesotans to choose when and how to vaccinate their children.  Perhaps these changes are simply a way to get more vaccines on the schedule before MDH then tries to remove our rights to refuse them.

So for the past several months, our little band of advocates worked tirelessly  to hone our arguments, get the press involved, reach out to medical professionals to submit testimony, fact-check the SONAR document, write and submit our own testimony, and contact parents to urge them to attend the hearing.  We had multiple meetings and conference calls, with representatives from several Minnesota groups attending when they could, including The Minnesota Natural Health Coalition, Vaccine Awareness Minnesota, DAMS (Dental Amalgam Mercury Syndrome), BEATMN (Biological & Educational Autism Treatments MN), The Minnesota Natural Health Legal Reform Project, The Canary Party and the  Vaccine Safety Council of Minnesota.  We were contacted by concerned individuals from all over the country.  Minnesotans I had not met before reached out to me through CP and VSCM, asking if we were involved and what they could do.  Two of them came and testified. 
We had two parents of children who were killed by vaccines (but were unable to travel here) submit powerful testimony that was read to the judge by members of our group.  And when I called my friend Karen Kain to ask if she would come and testify, she did not even hesitate. 


Karen Kain

We reached out to attorneys with the National Health Freedom Action group, asking if they could analyze the legal aspects of the proposed changes, and I was excited to find out a few days before the hearing that Ann Tenner would come and testify for us on behalf of that group. 


Ann Tenner

Friendly groups sent out our action alerts to their readership.  And several knowledgeable doctors sent in their comments.

The day of the hearing we had two people planning to testify for us that had to leave before they were given an opportunity to speak.  One of them had to rush home to take care of his severely vaccine-injured son with autism.  I was afraid we would be outnumbered and overwhelmed.  But surprisingly, there were more people testifying against the rule changes than for them.  And we had far stronger arguments.


After hearing a recitation of all the rules and statute numbers being followed in this proceeding, we heard Kris Ehresmann, Director of the Infectious Disease Epidemiology Prevention and Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Health (and a proud voting member of ACIP) give a lengthy address.  She mentioned a polio outbreak in Kenya to throw out the overused “Vaccine-preventable disease is just a plane ride away” statement.  She spoke of the Vaccine Safety Datalink as if it held proof that vaccines were safe - but failed to mention that the public and independent researchers cannot access this database, so we really don’t know.  She spoke of the decreased number of antigens children receive today in vaccines compared to the number in the 1960’s, but failed to mention additional adjuvants, preservatives, formaldehyde, and other vaccine ingredients.  Interestingly, a law was just passed in Minnesota banning formaldehyde in certain children’s products, as it is a known carcinogen – except that vaccines were excluded from this ban. 

There were many generalizations and omissions in Ms. Ehresmann’s presentation, and I encourage readers to watch the video of her testimony. 


Kris Ehresmann


She spoke for 13 minutes, and then the MDH had two special “panel” members present their testimony.  Remember, this was a public hearing, and all attendees had been instructed that our testimony should not exceed 5 minutes.  The judge stated that once everyone had a chance to present, people could come back up if they had anything further to say, but until everyone in the room had had an opportunity to speak we were to keep our comments within 5 minutes.  This seemed fair, but then why did the MDH and their panel members get more time to speak? 

Dr. Robert Jacobson, president of the MN chapter of the AAP, gave expected testimony during his uninterrupted 17-minute speech, including stating that “babies still die from the measles” (although he failed to mention that the last known death in Minnesota related to measles was caused by a measles VACCINE, and that was 22 years ago).  He repeated the “safe and effective” mantra, spoke of diseases being spread by the unvaccinated (despite the fact that during the small but much-publicized measles outbreak in MN in 2011, between 23% and 38% of those who got the measles WERE vaccinated), and he parroted the “plane ride away” statement.  (Honestly, these people need to get some new catch phrases!)  And note that when Dr. Jacobson introduced himself, it was as a pediatrician, AAP president and a father.  He did not disclose his financial interest in the meningococcal vaccine – the one he is enthusiastically recommending we now require for all Minnesota 7th graders. 

But here is what really struck me about Dr. Jacobson’s testimony:  He gave a description of a child he treated who had contracted HIB (Haemophilus Influenza type B), which is a horrible disease where “Infants would come to the hospital in the middle of the night with high fevers, inconsolable, and not completely with it.  Their skin was blotchy and discolored, and they could not feed”.  (This is nearly an exact description of what happened to my son after he received seven vaccines in one visit)  Dr. Jacobson then said “One such baby, really a toddler, recently walking and talking, now reduced to a red-faced, inconsolable terror.  His mother could not comfort him, he did not seem to hear her voice, and her touch seemed to burn his skin” – a description eerily similar to thousands of reports of vaccine reactions.  He went on, “The child never spoke again, never heard his mother’s voice again”.  I sat in stunned silence.  How did we get to the point where doctors are capable of showing such tremendous concern in the rare cases when babies contract these symptoms from a disease, but can turn around and be shockingly dismissive and indifferent when a child exhibits the exact same symptoms due to a vaccine? 

 Video testimony from Ms. Ehresmann, Dr. Jacobson and some of the vaccine safety advocates who spoke can be seen on the Canary Party YouTube channel.    We made many excellent points, including the fact that there are actually more children ages 0-4 that are reported being injured or killed by the Hepatitis B vaccine than who actually get the disease itself.  Conflicts of interest in the rulemaking groups were called out.  And most importantly, the officials’ blanket statements that these vaccines “have a proven record of safety” ring quite hollow when you see and hear stories of children who were killed or permanently brain-damaged by them.  The vaccines certainly weren’t safe for those children.   I left the hearing feeling that we had done a good job of educating the judge and giving him some concrete facts.

So - what happens from here and what can you do to help?

Now that the hearing is over we move into the next phase:  Until July 17th at 4:30 pm Central Time, anyone can submit further information – comments, studies or testimony to the judge.  He has promised to read it all.  Everything that has been submitted up until that point will be put on the MDH website for everyone to see.  Then we will have 5 business days to specifically rebut anything submitted up until then.  So from July 17 at 4:30 CT through July 24 at 4:30 CT all comments must be in reference to testimony, comments or studies already submitted by either side.  No new arguments can be introduced during the final comment period.

Here is the link to the SONAR document:  http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/immunize/immrule/sonar.pdf

Please take the time to review this document, and watch the videos to take note of any erroneous statements.  Send in your comments, supporting documentation or studies, or your own personal testimony.  Anyone can comment – you do not need to live in Minnesota, or even in the U.S. 

There was an issue with the email address provided below, and it appears emails were not getting through.  We have updated the address and suggest that you please please send your comments to me at pcarroll8@msn.com, along with the address below and I will make sure they get to the judge.  Thank you.

Send your testimony to:  Judge Eric L. Lipman - Assistant Chief Administrative Law Judge
Email address: rulecomments.oah@state.mn.us (updated email address.)

Be sure to use: Docket# 8-0900-30570 in the subject line of any correspondence
If you want to mail, deliver or fax your testimony, Judge Lipman can be reached at:

Office of Administrative Hearings
Street Address:  600 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN  55101
Mailing Address:  P.O. Box 64620, St. Paul, MN  55164-0620
Telephone: (651) 361-7842 
Facsimile: (651) 361-7936

Again, be sure to reference the docket number 8-0900-30570 in your submission, and be sure your comments REACH the judge no later than 4:30 pm CT on July 17, and that your rebuttals REACH the judge no later than 4:30 pm CT on July 24, 2013.

For other states that are or will be fighting similar battles, the Canary Party will put the documents that were submitted into a database on our website to help you easily access important information.  And I will put out a post when a decision is reached here.  Sadly though, even if the judge rules in our favor, MDH can go ahead with these rule changes. 

Huge thanks to:  Nancy, Chris, Jerri, Wayne, Jennifer, Paul, Leo, Jody, AJ, Lee, Karen, Kate, Ann, Diane, Deanna, Michael, Ginger, Sherri, everyone who wrote in, everyone who helped gather data, and to anyone who will join us in fighting these rule changes.

Will we win this battle in Minnesota?  It’s hard to say, but if the judge hears the truth from enough sources and bases his decision on the facts instead of generally accepted medical dogma – we certainly should.


Patti Carroll

Patti Carroll is mom to two beautiful children, one of whom was permanently brain-damaged by his “Well Baby” vaccines.  She has devoted over a decade to advocating for families dealing with autism, and fighting to expose the truth about the damage being caused by vaccines.  She works as an ECFE paraprofessional, and volunteers for many autism advocacy organizations.  Patti serves on the board of the Vaccine Safety Council of Minnesota and is acting Executive Director of The Canary Party.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Vaccine Information

The loading of the schedule is a national, coordinated plan. Adding vaccines for mild infections, or those not contractible in the school setting, guarantees a rise in the non-medical exemption rates. That rise can then be pointed to as evidence that non-medical exemptions need to be eliminated, while never putting in context the ever expanding schedule. This happened in Washington. In 2008 Chicken Pox and Hep B were added as school requirements, and the exemption rate rose. Vaccine proponents rely on the fact that unless a legislator or citizen has young children they have no idea what the current vaccine schedule comprises, or that an exemption is required even to opt out of a single dose of a vaccine. When these uninformed people hear, "exemptions are rising", they think every exemption is a completely unvaccinated child opting out of the handful of shots they remember. They are surprised to hear that Chicken Pox is required, or vaccines for sexually transmitted diseases. The field is being set now to require all citizens to be mandated the use of any "evidence based treatment", i.e. anyone who has a cholesterol level above a threshold will take statins or lose health insurance orpay a higher rate; blood pressure / blood sugar above a level will require medication, etc.
That is the real endgame.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/125111197/Adult-Mandates
http://www.scribd.com/doc/125116467/Hep-B-School-Mandates

PJ Carroll

Laura -
Yes! I am so sorry. You are not the first person to bring this up, so I called and emailed the judge yesterday. I spoke to one of his assistants, who confirmed that the email address was correct. Then I got an email from the judge (using that address), also telling me it was the correct address to use.

But he also attached a copy of the procedures, which had a slightly different address:

rulecomments.oah@state.mn.us

There is no "ead" in this address. So when I replied to ask him to confirm which of the two addresses people should be using, I got a "delay" notification several hours later. And still no confirmation that it went through. Oy vey!

What I suggest is that for now, people send their input to BOTH email addresses. I will try to get this sorted out as soon as possible. Thanks for taking action, and thanks for your kind comments!

Benedetta

nhokkanen!!!!!
THANKS for passing on that information.
The first workds out of Kris Ehresmann mouth - I am the mother of two fully vaccinated teenagers.

Never mind that one has autism.

Good LORD! She talks and acts like a woman that would do what ever it takes to get ahead in this world. This is exactly what John Stone and Bob Moffit was talking about in another blog that there is something wrong with our soceity, and that it makes it so the wrong people can rise to the top.

Laura Hayes

Hi Patti,

Just watched your excellent testimony! You did a wonderful job highlighting a number of important points, and you hit just the right tone. I sure hope the judge has the ears to hear.

Also, I sent this article to a group email list I have, soliciting their support in writing letters to the judge. One M.D. on my list already tried to send something to the email address above, and it didn't go through. Has anyone else experienced that problem? I intend to send something to the judge this weekend, and will try the email given above myself, but in the interim, I thought I would just ask if anyone else has had trouble getting their communication to go through.

Thank you for all of your hard work, Patti!

nhokkanen

Denial in Minnesota runs high, like its autism rate.

Kris Ehresmann, MDH director of infectious diseases, has a son with autism.

Dr. Robert Jacobson, a Mayo/Merck vaccine researcher, has a wife with severe asthma.

These people have disincentives against connecting the dots.

They cannot conceive that the products they promote could be having effects other than their primary intent.

My thanks to the Minnesota autism parents, natural health practitioners and health freedom advocates working together again to call the public's attention to the many deficiencies and dangers in our nation's mediocre vaccine program.

Anne Dachel

I want to thank all those who tried to wake people up at this hearing. The tired mantra, "Vaccines are safe, vaccines save lives" is being challenged in lots of places.

They don't have to prove safety. Everyone involved in this is protected from liability.

I agree that everything should stop until we have a simple, retrospective study of never vaccinated and fully vaccinated kids. Ms. Ehresmann should have been the loudest voice calling for such a study instead of pretending that it would be unethical to do one. The CDC does retrospective studies all the time.
Anne Dachel, Media

IAngus Files

Well done all better to have tried ..than not tried despite the odds..well done you all!

Angus

PJ Carroll

cmo -
We were meeting with and supporting Representative Karen Clark of Minneapolis (very high Somali population in her district) when she approached the MDH a couple years ago proposing they perform an autism causation study in the Somali kids.

MDH response: "We have to count them first!"

But that's what they had just spent two years doing, in order to come up with their statement that Somali children were accessing autism-related special education services at 2-7 times the rate of the general population. This announcement was made in March of 2009, and they had ZERO plan of action - except to find better ways to count these kids. I contacted Coleen Boyle of the CDC after the announcement to ask what they planned to do, and her response was the same.

And now for the past two years, the CDC, Autism Speaks, the University of Minnesota, and a local Somali group they are paying have spent lord knows how much money to determine whether the prevalence of autism in the Somali kids is higher than in the general population.

I call it "Brick Township - chapter two"

Does it really matter if the prevalence is higher or the same? Even if they manage to massage the data enough to report that autism affects Somali kids at the same rate as non-Somali kids, it's still a CRISIS at 1 in 50!

What is so appalling to me is that they had the perfect opportunity to perform a medical study on a unique group that had never seen autism in their children until they immigrated to the United States.

And the Minnesota Department of Health chose instead to turn their backs on these severely-affected children.

Benedetta

I too and the mother of two fully vaccinated young adults.

And how are the health of those teenagers of yours?
Hmmmmm
Any anger issues, depression issues? Perfect health then?

Linda

"Sadly though, even if the judge rules in our favor, MDH can go ahead with these rule changes."

I applaud all who have stepped up to attend this hearing, but I'm confused. If the judge doesn't have the power to stop the changes, what's the point of the hearing?

cmo

Has anyone from the ...MDH yet made any effort... to investigate the "Somilai / 1 in 28 Autism cluster" in Minnesota ?

R's dad

My deep gratitude and admiration to all those involved in this issue. You are indeed working for all of us and our children.

Bob Moffitt

Extremely difficult to hear Ms.Ehresmann testimony at this hearing. As you said .. "There were many generalizations and omissions in Ms. Ehresmann’s presentation".

Unfortunately, these very same "generalizations and omissions" are routinely made .. over and over again .. from Maine to California .. North Dakota to Texas .. by public health officials in hearings such as this. Their narrative never changes .. vaccines are miracles and there is absolutely no limit to the numbers of vaccines children can receive.

Ms. Ehresmann said "Everyday a baby's immunological system faces more challenges in the environment than in the vaccines.

Yes .. and that baby's God given immunological system protects that baby from "breathing, ingesting or touching" those everyday environmental challenges. Unfortunately for that baby .. God's immune system cannot protect it from the environmental challenges (formaldehyde, mercury or aluminum to name just three of many more) that are INJECTED directly into the child by means of a vaccine .. thereby denying that child the benefit of God's natural immune protection system that has protected mankind since the beginning of time.

By the way .. Ms. Ehresmann stated the ACIP would not recommend the simultaneous administration of vaccines unless studies showed it to be both .. safe and effective.

Perhaps Ms Ehresmann should direct the ACIP to inform the IOM on the "studies" they claim to show the simultaneous administration of vaccines is safe and harmless .. because .. the IOM most recent report on vaccines .. Jan 16, 2013 .. "IOM Report Details Strategy for Monitoring Safety of Childhood Immunization Scheduled" . concluded with the following observation:


"However, the elements of the schedule -- the number, frequency, timing, order, and age at which vaccines are given -- are not well-defined in existing research and should be improved."

That IOM statement seems to question ACIP "studies" showing simultaneous administration of vaccines has been proven "safe and harmless".

oy vey, oy vey

Thank you Patti and everyone involved with this great effort. Since anyone can write them(and b eing that I was born and raised in Mpls and have many relatives here) you can be sure I will tell them the story of both of my vaccine injured grandchildren. Cannot thank you all enough for your hard efforts. You are working for all of us and our children.
Maurine

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)