Exit Ebola?

Don't look now but the massive horrible awful Ebola epidemic in America is probably over. But Enterovirus 68 is just getting started. -0- Time to quite worrying about chickenpox vaccine coverage in Marin County and get with it re Ebola,...

How Mercury Triggered The Age of Autism

Conversation with the Authors of Plague

Autism Public Service Announcement

Canary Party Vaccine Court Video

A Glimpse into Autism

Meet Our Advertisers


Olmsted's Original UPI Series

  • The Age of Autism Tag

« Hacked Off Boss, Martin Moore, Sat on UK Government Panel with Editor who Hired Brian Deer | Main | Tics and Toxins: Leroy Put Student Playing Fields on FEMA Flood Hazard Land »

Alice Park and TIME: Great Media Frauds

ALice ParkBy Jake Crosby

Just recently, TIME Magazine writer Alice Park included Dr. Andrew Wakefield among the “Great Science Frauds” of all time in TIME “HealthLand” on January 12, 2012. But if there is anything one should know about Park, it’s that she is a great media accomplice of pharma in the vaccine injury cover-up.

In 2008, Alice Park penned an article titled “How Safe Are Vaccines?” timetabled to coincide with the Washington DC “Green Our Vaccines” rally. The piece drew public rebuke from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at the rally, who announced in front of the capital, “I called that woman who wrote that TIME Magazine article!” “That woman” was Alice Park.

It so happens that TIME Magazine was going through a makeover implemented by the corporate global consulting firm, McKinsey, which was still firmly under the leadership of Ian Davis, twin brother to the judge who killed MMR litigation in the UK. Their older brother, Crispin Davis, was the boss of Lancet Editor-in-Chief Richard Horton when Horton lied about not knowing of Dr. Wakefield’s involvement in litigation. McKinsey was also the location for a book party for congressionally reprimanded millionaire vaccine industrialist Paul Offit.

Other examples of TIME’s abhorrent coverage include a profile of Jenny McCarthy that questioned her son’s diagnosis of autism on the basis of speculation by unnamed doctors who never examined her child. The author, Karl Taro Greenfeld, is now a contributor to Alison Singer’s blog.

Editorial influence could have also played a role. TIME’s Senior Science and Technology Editor, Jeffrey Kluger once interviewed Jenny McCarthy with a barrage of loaded questions. Kluger had a history of writing about the vaccine industry even before he began covering this controversy.

In 2005, Kluger authored Splendid Solution, Jonas Salk and the Conquest of Polio. The book aimed to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the success of Salk’s polio vaccine. However, the book was full of errors.

Though Kluger received some fanfare for lauding the vaccine industry, particularly as an invited author to speak at the Wistar Institute – a research facility dedicated to vaccine development – others supportive of the vaccine industry were not so impressed. Dr. Michael Katz – Senior Vice President for Research and Global Programs at the March of Dimes – wrote in a scathing review for Neurology Today that Kluger’s book contained “NUMEROUS INACCURACIES” and “ERRORS IN SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION.”

These inaccuracies were not trivial, according to Katz:

Some reflect just ordinary inattention to specific details, but others reveal the author's apparent failure to understand the biology of vaccines.

Katz concluded (boldface mine):

When one reads the book, one inevitably wonders about what other unrecognized errors there are that may mar the text. This is why I cannot recommend this book to any audience.

In December 2011, Time Inc. named Laura Lang – a woman with no journalism experience – as chief executive. She previously worked in strategy for Pfizer and in product management for Bristol-Myers Squibb. Perhaps even more troubling, though is who sits on Time Warner’s board of directors – Fred Hassan – former chairman of PhRMA and CEO of Schering-Plough when it was merging with Merck. He was also president of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations.

Drug ads can be frequently seen in the pages of TIME magazine issues. Pharmaceutical companies supplied about 20% of the magazine’s advertising pages in recent issues, and Time magazine returned the favor. The January 9th issue ran an editorial titled “Drugs Zero In” lauding five new drugs including a flu vaccine by Novartis:

The U.S. is next: the company is building its first facility to manufacture these vaccines in North Carolina.

The January 16th issue included an ad from GlaxoSmithKline that read:

What's your reason for getting up-to-date on adult vaccines?

Like many people, I didn't always think about adult vaccinations as an important part of my health -until I learned that millions of US adults get sick and thousands die from vaccine-preventable diseases, some of which can be spread to others.

I also learned that immunity from certain vaccines fades over time, and new vaccines may have been developed since I was a child.   The CDC recommends multiple vaccines for adults, depending on age and risk of infection, to help protect against up to 14 diseases or more. These diseases include whooping cough, flu and hepatitis B.

You could be a risk for getting serious diseases. Talk to a healthcare professional about the vaccines you may need. Everyone has a reason to help protect their health. What's yours?

Visit helpreventdisease.com to learn more

The possible influences behind TIME Magazine’s coverage of this controversy and Park’s reporting in particular can be summed up as follows:

-A consulting agency led by a man whose brothers played instrumental roles in killing litigation against MMR manufacturers and organizing a witch hunt against the plaintiff’s top expert witness – Dr. Andrew Wakefield.

-Change in the company’s corporate leadership that now includes veterans of the pharmaceutical industry

-An editor who has written a book about Joan Salk.

-TIME’s substantial advertising revenues from the pharmaceutical industry.

And despite all this, TIME Magazine should still be regarded as the independent, premier national news magazine it once was?

Time to cancel your subscriptions to TIME, if you haven’t done so already.

Jake Crosby has Asperger Syndrome and is a contributing editor to Age of Autism. He is a 2011 graduate of Brandeis University with a BA in both History and Health: Science, Society and Policy. He currently attends The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services where he is studying for an MPH in epidemiology.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I see that the crack research team at Time forgot about the researcher who lied about global warming. "Climate Gate" did not seem to make the cut, I guess that when it's a fraud that cost the world billions of dollars, the cover up goes a little further then we would like to believe. Shame on you Time.

Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2012/01/13/great-science-frauds/#scientist-rogues-gallery-2#ixzz1lq3USiVy

Jen;
I am suprised that the name Connaught is still in use????
It was Connaught that made the DPT vaccines that damaged my children's health way back in the 80's! As so happened to many around that time period.

So, of course that name always catches my eye --esp since they have long since gone into hiding -

The National Vaccine Information Center - traced Connaught - laboriously being sold to different pharma - and many different name changes.

Even with all the selling offs and name changes though it can still be traced.

I am surprised that anyone would want that company's name beside their own?

Thanks for the info

John Stone, the phrase "long term credibility" got me to thinking, more like pondering. Borrowing from Tina Turner, "What's credibility got to do with it?" and..... What is the definition of "long term". Oh crap, now I'm going off the deep end.

I'm sorry but I don't agree with Sarah that Americans are too smart for this.

Most Americans buy this bull hook, line, and sinker. Until of course something happens in their own lives to look beyond what's in the MSM. Which as Barry said is all information funded by the pharmaceutical industry. You only need to watch any major network newscast to see who is funding the "news". It's so obvious and disturbing.

Great quotes Bob Mioffitt. Perfectly choosen.

Thanks for another great article Jake.

Another exceptional article Jake.

Have you ever met ANYONE defending the vaccine program if they don't stand to profit off/keep job/keep face by what they are saying? Exactly~

Nice one Jake and thanks.
it beggars belief imagine Dr Fiona Godlee of the BMJ relying on information from a journalist Brian Deer to prove herself. He is no medical expert and has a vendetta against Dr Wakefield.
I have been compiling a document collecting over 1,200 voices from parents worldwide who believe their child/children was injured by any vaccine. This document has been viewed by 115 countries.
Please add your voice to followingvaccinations.com

The only way to live with them is to insist on independant choice. It is a basic human right. Keep fighting for it.

Paul Taylor of the Toronto Globe and Mail (who has won some Connaught/pharma medal of excellence, mentioned first sentence in his bio) wrote a similar piece in the Globe and Mail just after Xmas. I let him know that there was quite a bit missing in his recycled article and some updates!


These two excellent RFK Jr. clips cover most of the scope of the media fraud / Autism problem...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCyEQ3wKQJk&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC7aed4ec88&feature=related

Dr. Boyd Haley on the IOM / Institute of Money (& medicine)

2000 IOM Conference / Research funding corruption at 2004 IOM Conference / NIH

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4115912987954370615&q=Boyd+Haley

Jake, you must have enough material for a book by now, "The Best Jokes of All Time."
Maurine

Jake .. your identification of the various pharmaceutical connections with Time's supposed "reporters" is remarkable.

Indeed, with the cast and connections with pharma you identified .. it would be all but impossible to read Time without having to discern what is "news" .. from .. what is "marketing".

As far as the internet being an "unreliable" source for information .. I think main-stream media "juournalism" was mostly responsible for predicting the catastrophy of Y2K, the existance of Saddam's vast storage of weapons of mass destruction, the H1N1 pandemic .. on and on ..

Two quotes come to mind .. Mark Twain .. who said:

"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed".

JFK .. who said:

"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie .. deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Belief in myth allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought".

Of course, there isn't the faintest way these people are going to retain long term credibility if this goes on.

Jake

It was very interesting listening to Ian Hislop of Private Eye giving evidence at the Leveson Inquiry the other week. He said something like when something appears in the mainstream media it acquires some kind of reality: if it is merely on the internet it is "just stuff". Well, up to a point Lord Gnome (the fictional proprietor of Privat Eye). We are, of course, rapidly arriving at the point where much of what is said on the web (if properly documented) has more credibility than the MSM which is preponderantly kite flying for vested interests backed up by unlimited financial resources.

Of course, the only answer for them is to clamp down on the web (and there is always another initiative). Readers should take a few moments to sign a petition against the latest (and forward to friends):

http://www.avaaz.org/en/eu_save_the_internet/?cl=1540630864&v=12293

John

I believe it goes well beyond just owning the mainstream media through lucrative drug ads. Mainstream media has been the key component of big pharamas' strategy for attacking the worlds' health, and it's been that way since day one.

It's been used since the 50's to fabricate pandemics, to create unfounded fears of everything from butter to the sun, to present their poisonous elixirs as life saving necessities, and most importantly, to silence and all voices of those who see through their lies.

Big pharma OWNS the media, and they've been using it for decades to keep themselves out of jail.... by keeping the public in the dark.

Umbrella corp (Pharma) owns the mainstream media via lucrative drug ads. Control the message and hopefully control the minds of the masses. Unfortunately for Pharma, Alice Park and the editors of Time Magazine, Americans are too independent minded to be so controlled/ brainwashed. We can see through propaganda to the truth.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

@AgeofAutism Tweets

follow me on Twitter

SPONSORS

  • HC Logo 2014
  • Canary final logo
  • VOR logo sidebar
  • Safeminds 2014 Logo
Age of Autism's Facebook Page