Living in the Real World

From Jenny Allen: I don't have personal experience about other countries, but in Scotland where I live, peanut, egg and other child allergies are profoundly changing procedures and protocols in schools and nurseries. Baking and eating the baked items, used...

How Mercury Triggered The Age of Autism

Autism Public Service Announcement

Canary Party Vaccine Court Video

A Glimpse into Autism

Meet Our Advertisers


Olmsted's Original UPI Series

  • The Age of Autism Tag

« California Reports Tripling of Autism K-12 | Main | Contest to Celebrate the Launch of Vaccine Epidemic! »

Dr. Halvorsen on Wakefield, Witch Hunts and Vaccine Safety

Dr. Halvorsen By Anne Dachel

Several months ago, I interviewed British doctor Richard Halvorsen concerning the heated vaccine-autism controversy.  Dr. Halvorsen had gained a fair amount of attention in the British press. I contacted him recently to get his views on the allegations of fraud against Dr. Andrew Wakefield. He minced no words.

“The latest allegations against Dr Andrew Wakefield are quite extraordinary. It seems that certain factions of the medical establishment are intent on hounding him to the grave.

The accusations of journalist Brian Deer make no sense at all. They appear to centre around the fact that elements of the hospital medical records, as reported in the Lancet 1998 paper, are at odds with other aspects of the children's medical records, mainly those of the children's General Practitioners (GPs). This is hardly surprising as the hospital doctors who recorded the children's medical history (which was not, in any case, done by Dr Wakefield) would not have had access to the GPs' medical notes. Medical histories, taken at different times by different healthcare professionals will inevitably have some inconsistencies.

What is so disturbing is that the editor of the BMJ, who should have known better, appears to have fallen for Deer's spurious arguments hook, line and sinker.

We have to take a step back and wonder what is really going on here. To go to such extreme – and desperate lengths – to annihilate Dr Wakefield (the person, note, not the science) some people must be very afraid. Afraid, presumably, that parents might actually believe something that is blatantly obvious: that is that all vaccines can cause serious adverse reactions, including autism. By denying what is not only obvious but also supported by a wealth of scientific evidence these obsessive vaccine protagonists risk losing the trust of all parents and destroying the whole vaccine programme, the very thing that they are trying to prevent happening.”

Dr. Halvorsen has been telling the truth, fearlessly, for quite some time.

In October, 2009, the Telegraph in the UK ran the story, "I'm not opposed to jabs but there are serious worries" by Dr. Halvorsen. (HERE)  He talked about the pressure put on parents not to question vaccines and the harsh tactics employed by the government.  Furthermore, he said, “This climate of fear is ruthlessly exploited by the big pharmaceutical companies, which see vast profits in exaggerated health concerns.”

Halvorsen cited the sudden death of a young schoolgirl after receiving the cervical cancer vaccine as an example of a vaccine program gone wrong.  While he said he’s not opposed to vaccinations, he does believe that vaccine efficacy claims are overdone and side effects are not being recognized.  He referred to the plan to mass vaccinate for the swine flu as “madness.” 

“As a doctor, I have been concerned for some time about this issue. I should stress that I am not in any way opposed to vaccinations.

“Indeed I run an immunisation clinic which offers a wide range of vaccines as a protection against various diseases. But I am increasingly disturbed by the lack of any debate either about long-term vaccine safety or about the excessive influence of commercial interests.

“Contrary to what Government officials and pharmaceutical giants pretend, the health of future generations could be compromised if we are not allowed to question this official fixation with mass vaccination.

“In the research for my recent book on this subject, I discovered that not only are inoculations being introduced with less and less research on their safety, but, just as worryingly, they are being promoted for diseases which do not represent a widespread danger to the public.”

Back in July, 2009, Halvorsen had a piece in the UK Times (HERE) where he also called the H1N1 vaccination plan “madness.”

He didn’t think the outbreak of H1N1 was a major health threat and he worried that the vaccine wasn’t properly tested for side effects.  He also questioned its effectiveness. 

Perhaps the biggest concern is the speed at which the vaccine is being rushed out. Research for my book, The Truth about Vaccines, taught me how vaccines are increasingly being released on to the market with little testing of either safety or effectiveness, against infections that are rarely the threat that the Department of Health or pharmaceutical companies (who are finding the vaccine business an increasingly lucrative market) claim.”

As to the safety of the MMR, Dr. Halvorsen shares many of the same concerns as Andrew Wakefield.  This is what was said in a 2007 story in the Daily Mail (HERE) in Britain,  The truth about MMR.

“[Far from there being solid evidence of the vaccine's safety, Dr Halvorsen found that the safety trials on MMR followed up children for only three weeks so could not possibly detect side effects that appeared later.

Crucially, the MMR was the first ever vaccination to use three live viruses.

“Experts including Dr Halvorsen believe that in children with an impaired immune system (which may not be apparent), this could cause an abnormal immune reaction, damaging the gut and allowing harmful chemicals to penetrate the gut wall into the bloodstream.

“From there, they may attack the brain. Giving the vaccines singly, with a significant time period between (Dr Halvorsen recommends six months) is thought to reduce the risk in these susceptible children.

 “So there is no evidence of harm, but neither is there evidence of safety. Both Dr Wakefield and Dr Halvorsen are among a group of doctors who, for several years, have called in vain for a large-scale prospective trial over several years, following similar groups of children, who have been immunised either with the triple vaccine or with single vaccines.

“Last year, Dr Peter Fletcher, formerly Chief Scientific Officer at the Department of Health, accused the government of 'utterly inexplicable complacency' over MMR. (HERE) “As an expert witness for parents who believe their children were vaccine-damaged, Dr Fletcher studied thousands of documents.

“He has seen 'a steady accumulation of evidence' from scientists worldwide that the triple jab is causing brain damage in certain children.

“Questioning the government's stance has become 'heretical', according to Dr Halvorsen.”

All of this makes it clear that Richard Halvorsen shares many of the same concerns that Dr. Wakefield has when it comes to vaccine safety, specifically the safety of the MMR. 

Halvorsen talked about his book, The Truth about Vaccines, and especially about the subtitle, How we are being used as guinea pigs without our consent.(HERE) “[It] is admittedly rather controversial and was chosen by my publisher. Nevertheless, it accurately describes how vaccines are, with increasing frequency, being introduced on a mass scale with insufficient testing to ensure their safety. The introduction of the meningitis C vaccine into the UK in 1999 comes particularly to mind. This vaccine was introduced in a great rush with appallingly little safety testing and no proof whatsoever that it actually worked. The lack of research meant that a booster dose soon had to be added when it became clear that the effectiveness of three doses given in infancy wore off within a year. The MMR was also introduced with totally insufficient safety testing as described in Andrew Wakefield's and Scott Montgomery's paper Through a Glass Darkly.”

When I interviewed him last summer, he described the reaction of the British medical establishment and the Dept of Health to his book as “antagonistic.”  He did say, “I regularly come across doctors and other health professionals who share my concerns and are supportive of my stance. Indeed, I regularly see doctors and other health professionals with their babies in my children's immunisation clinic, BabyJabs.” (www.babyjabs.com)

Dr. Halvorsen himself runs a different kind of private practice in Britain.  He described it to me. 

“This service is unique in the UK and possibly unique in the world. It offers parents an informed choice of which vaccines they wish to give their child and how they wish them to be given; that is, whether they wish the vaccines to be started later, given with more space between them, less at any one time or even omitting some vaccines altogether. This service is very popular with parents but, because of the cost of importing many of the vaccines we offer, is unfortunately prohibitively expensive for many parents. This service is not offered by other doctors because it challenges the government's vaccine policy which is to give all children exactly the same vaccines at exactly the same ages, irrespective of the child's personal health or any family history of immune related or allergic diseases. Also you have to bear in mind that the vast majority of doctors in the UK work for the publicly funded National Health Service and are bound to follow government directives.

“I hear time and time again stories from parents, often intelligent and knowledgeable, who have been patronised and sometimes bullied by doctors over their concerns about vaccinating their child in the manner recommended. Though vaccination is ostensibly voluntary in the UK, a great deal of pressure is put on parents by health professionals in order to persuade them to comply with the NHS immunisation schedule. It is often argued that all that is needed is for these parents to be given the correct information and that they would then understand the need to immunise their children in the way suggested. However I find it most interesting that research repeatedly shows that those parents who have most concerns about vaccination schedules are those who are higher educated and in higher professional jobs, including working as health professionals. This evidence flies in the face of those who argue that they only need to get their message across for vaccination uptake to improve.

“Vaccines are being added to immunisation schedules around the world at an increasingly fast rate and it is likely that more will be introduced to the already congested childhood schedules in the near future.”

As to a link between vaccines and autism, Halvorsen said, “I am in little doubt that one of those environmental causes is immunisation; indeed that has been confirmed by the Hannah Poling ruling in the USA.  It is this link between vaccines and autism that has so concerned public health doctors, because if this is ever officially accepted then they fear that vaccination rates will plummet. I suspect that it is in an attempt to avoid this link between vaccines and autism that is contributing to governments' unwillingness to acknowledge the scale of the autism problem.  However, the sheer numbers of children affected will mean that governments will have to acknowledge the problem before long, but they will do their very best to ensure that the words autism and vaccines never occur in the same sentence.”

Halvorsen agrees with Wakefield.  “The advice I give about the MMR vaccine is largely based on the research undertaken by Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues and the advice he gave as a result of his research.”

“I left the NHS last year and am now able to devote more of my time to my dedicated children's immunisation service, BabyJabs, which offers parents an informed choice on whether or how to immunise their child. I do believe that vaccines offer benefits; however I am aware that these benefits are often exaggerated. I am only too well aware that vaccines can have side effects which can occasionally be serious and that these side effects are downplayed by those promoting vaccination. I am also aware that the seriousness of the illnesses that vaccines are designed to protect are sometimes exaggerated in order to encourage parents to vaccinate their child. I believe that this deceit is fundamentally dishonest and in contradiction to the ethical principle of informed consent. At BabyJabs, and by writing my book, I try to remedy this by offering information, gleaned after much research, that I believe to be honest and truthful. I am of course attacked for being biased and having conflicts of interests which is inevitable when I challenge the established view. Perhaps the most extraordinary accusation leveled against me is that I am 'anti-vaccine' a ridiculous assertion when I run an immunisation clinic!”

After learning all this about him, the burning question I had for Dr. Halvorsen was, Why Wakefield and not him?  For merely asking for more research on a link between vaccines and possible side effects, Wakefield has been attacked and demonized.  Every kind of allegation has been made against him.  How did Richard Halvorsen not merit the same treatment?  This is his explanation:

“I have been lucky not to have been attacked by the establishment in the same way that Andrew Wakefield has. However there are other factors apart from luck: Andrew Wakefield worked in a hospital department that received a large amount of research grants from vaccine manufacturing pharmaceutical companies. The hospital he worked in realised that his outspoken views could jeopardise their future source of funding. Andrew Wakefield was also a direct employee at his hospital whereas, as a GP, I have always been self-employed and therefore had the privilege of a certain amount of extra freedom.”

Anne Dachel is Media Editor of Age of Autism

 

 

 

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Guess I should've looked at the website before saying anything .

Can anyone post a list or link to alternatives to vaccination? I think this would be appreciated by many concerned parents and curious folks. Thank you.

Considering all the "research" (using that term loosely) that has been done, why can't anybody tell me for CERTAIN that my son isn't autistic because of the vaccines? I just watched a news segment from my hometown the other night about a doctor who refused to link autism to anything but genes, that's funny since he just went through a bunch of medical tests to assure us that it's not genetic and with hope they could find a reason. Well I have a 4 page vaccination report with my sons name on it, all given to him before he was 2 that maybe someone could look at to see if they think all those shots are really necessary. My son didn't even show signs of autism until he was 2 yrs old. He crawled, walked on time, was using a fork and spoon to eat and a cup without a lid. He called me mommy then and was able to tell me what he wanted to drink. He did everything my other children did, on time, and then all of a sudden, he stopped talking, stopped using a fork and wasnt able to focus long enough to hold a cup without spilling it. He is now 5 and I do everything I can to get him the help he needs, he's been in preschool for 3 years & regularly sees a behavioral psychologist, he's still in diapers and he still hasn't remembered how to call me mommy, so if anyone has any information that is helpful, I'll listen to that. Until then, I don't think the RX peeps are worried about scaring parents away from vaccines because of autism, I think they are scared that maybe we should be. Joni-IOWA

A big joke on French TV recounts a person who didn't like his diagnosis so went to 18 other doctors to get it confirmed.

He found he suffered from 19 different illnesses.

In true life Nancy Sokol Green improved on this with 23 visits to doctors before the penny dropped.

Her twice yearly house cleaning with nerve destroying chemicals at levels completely safe for humans was actually not completely safe.

Why did the first 22 doctors not blame Big Pharma insect treatment as plausible for her symptoms?

For the same reason doctors today cannot see that several nerve destroying injections into little babes can possibly harm them.

We still wait for the Almighty Dollar to drop.

I fully support Andrew Wakefield and his work which over the years is getting nearer to the truth.

Quite why a 12 year study by more than a dozen people still attracts criminal style debates over honesty et al almost invites a police investigation into vaccines rather as the UK police investigation into organophosphates.

Harry Clark was well and just 8 weeks and within hours dead after his several vaccines. The police were those responsible for getting the mother a double life term on no proper evidence.

They owe a duty to follow through on their tardy release with no apology for the family and Sally.

Even the two hundred fold toxicity of the vaccine used on Harry and the testimony (false) that after such a vaccine Harry would be less likely to die is for me perjury.

No tests for safety look at the toxicity of the mix that is injected into little babies and for me this is crime on the grand scale.

We should judge EVERY research article to the same degree of compliance as this retracted paper.

I can see fatal flaws in this paper but even worse in those of papers claiming no evidence of harm and yet in the detail the harm has been covered up.

Verstraeten for example shows that the link of thimerosal to autism is undeniable but the world seems to think it says the very opposite.

Only fools deny vaccines save lives but only fools inject toxic matter into babies when their response is so weak it needs to be injected 5 times over and denying known science that anaphylaxis and possible death is certain for some.

This is a must keep in your files
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2011/02/06/a-few-things-i-know/

Anytime a doctor comes at me with, you know, the attitude, I show them this.

Treegirl - Dr Alessio Fasano from the University of Maryland has a great review on leaky gut (intestinal permeability) in the January 2011 issue of Physiological Reviews. There is a copy available here:

http://somvweb.som.umaryland.edu/absolutenm/articlefiles/1445-Zonulin%20and%20Its%20Regulation%20of%20Intestinal%20Barrier%20Function,%20Physiol%20Rev%202011.pdf

He clearly implicates small bowel intestinal overgrowth and undigested fragments of gliadin, a protein in wheat gluten. These fragments trigger the release of zonulin causing the tight junctions between cells to open. He theorizes that the tight junctions opening serves some biological purpose when opened occasionally. In a pathological condition, they more or less get stuck open.

This gliadin fragment is in addition to the opioid peptide fragment or those linked to celiac disease. It's looking like wheat is pretty much poison for a rapidly increasing segment of society. Why it's happening is another story.

It's another possible explanation why GFCF is so helpful. It removes the opioid peptides and also allows the tight junctions to close.

The vax vs. unvax'ed studies can already be done by the insurance companies. A few years back I used to get letters reminding me to get my babies their shots. A combined 8 yrs later my 2 unvax'ed boys have cost the insurance company approximately $800 total in a handful of well child visits and about 3 sick visits. We've paid insurance rates of about $800-$1100 a month for our unvaxed family during that same time for a total paid to insurance of about $54,000.

So we paid into insurance $54K. Insurance paid out to the healthcare of our 2 unvax'ed 2 boys: $800 including 2 total prescriptions for antibiotics over 8 yrs combined between the 2 boys.

Bottom line: Unvaccinated Kids are Lucrative Business to Insurance Companies.

I think they figured that out. Hence the cessation of the reminders to vaccinate mailings.

Insurance companies have the vax vs. unvax data and could settle this debate tomorrow if they wanted to. Course that would piss off their partners the pharma cos so I doubt that will ever happen!

I got the "It would be unethical not to vax some babies" argument from a reporter whose mind was well formed by Dr. N-O.

I have always thought the reason there is no vax/unvax study is because the answer is already known. The unvax group would be extraordinarily more healthy.

So, going on from here, why can't we just assume that is the result? Why do we go on waiting for the study? Let's pretend the study has been done. Then what? Would parents still slow down on giving vaccines, or would they stop?

This is great that a physician asserts that the low rates of disease should be a factor in our vaccine decisions. This is a huge improvement over the status quo. If stopping vaccines because disease rates are low is ok, then parent abandonment of vaccines is not a problem. If some vaccines are "necessary" then we could "easily" jump back in when the disease starts causing more damage than the vaccines. Once that happens, we start over wondering which is worse.

I have wondered if vaccines have been tested for helicobacter pylori. YOu know..... the bacteria that causes ulcers.... Is this the cause of leaky gut???? Just throwing it out there as it crosses my mind once again.

The successful "witch hunt" and pathetic epidemeolgy is the only weapon/ bs/science that pharma has...

The vaccine industry has been "liability free" for 25 years and they like it that way.... as they destroy the UK & USA

This is an excellent interview which should be distributed far and wide. Thank you Anne.

Funny thing KB, my unvaccinated kids don't have any immune problems just my vaccinated. Same mom , same dad, same house and no autism. And I was really old when I had my NT kids and we were young when we had our autistic son. It was the vaccines for us.

Brian Deer considers it fraud that certain doctors' records do not report the same thing as other doctors' records do? I presume he knows a lot about what primary care physicians write and what they don't write. I have most of my son's records. I would have loved to have had an independent doctor like Dr. Wakefield for my son although my son was never diagnosed with bowel disease (which at autopsy was present). My son's medical records are so full of errors and misrepresentations that I am tempted to write a book about that. One of the doctors put into his report that Erik had cerebral palsy which he made up in order to protects himself. But he neglected to inform us that he had big time Vitamin D deficiency (my son had nearly 100 broken bones) and a very severe kidney problem which eventually killed him. So, it is a good thing that researchers don't have access to what other doctors have written. If the findings were always identical, why would there be a need to see a specialist. Apparently Brian Deer is lacking sufficient experience about why a specialist does not trust what has been reported in the past.

Actually Mary, if the child has XMRV, they would have an impaired immune system, even before a vaccine. And of course, if they swam in toxins in utero, there is some damage there too. I think the doctor is right, especially because XMRV ruins the tight junctions in the Blood Brain Barrier and Brain Capillaries and causes holes to be in the gut while your developing. So yeah. I also feel we inherit immune incompetence from our mothers or the learning of her immune system from her. This explains mothers with higher incidences of autoimmune disorders, and of course, we can blame the environment on that too. But if there is a retrovirus in the community, or at large, it would also explain that. I for one feel it's a combination. I recently found out that where all four of my children were born, was near the Santa Cruz Cement company, one of the five biggest emitters of mercury in the country! I was inflammed when I heard that one. Not only that, but we were somewhat on the downslope of a non existing eight hundreds silver mine which also put mercury into the water for a century. So, between that, my amalgams, my autoimmune issues, vaccines, the cement plant, semiconductor industries near by, and to top that off malathione helicopter spraying which is in essence mercury salts, I had not a chance to have healthy children. Such is the lott for many children today, they are already starting off with lowered cell immunity, have infections ingrained into their DNA, and have moms who have such poor immune responses, they are attacking fetal tissue brain material in utero. Then, we whamblast us with multiple vaccines which causes severe mitochondrial collapse and metabolic dissaray and toxicity. I mean, the measure of how we are as a society is how we treat our babies and the elderly. And I have to say, FLUNK!

“Experts including Dr Halvorsen believe that in children with an impaired immune system (which may not be apparent), this could cause an abnormal immune reaction, damaging the gut and allowing harmful chemicals to penetrate the gut wall into the bloodstream."

So, the kids have an "impaired immune system." Why do doctors tell themselves such obvious lies. Why can't they be honest with themselves and admit they are injecting poison.

Excellent article. I will share this article. Thank you! :)


QUESTION: Where are all the dead Amish children?

ANSWER: Not in the pediatricians' office, and not in special education classes. In fact, they can't be found. BECAUSE THERE AREN'T ANY.

Love this. Love Dr Halvorsen. His book helped reassure us about the decisions we'd made in regards to our children's vaccination status.

Outstanding work, Anne, as usual. Liked and posted to Facebook page.

Wonderful piece!
Saved it in my favorites...

Thank you Anne and thank you Dr. Halvorsen.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.