THANK YOU SIR! MAY I HAVE ANOTHER?

"Thank you sir! May I have another!"

The NYT (all the news that's fit to print as long as it promotes vaccines at all costs) reports on a mumps outbreak. Instead of asking why the vaccine is failing to protect recipients who'd already had two vaccinations against the disease, it calls for a third booster. Can you think of any other product where failure encourages more consumption?

Mumps Outbreak Prompts Questions

An alarming outbreak of the mumps two years ago has raised questions about whether an additional vaccination is needed. Read the full article HERE.

Comments

[George Mead]

2,000 measles cases is a crisis but 250,000 autism cases is business as usual? amazing!

[Sandy Gottstein]

Hey, healingjack, I hear ya'. That's why we have to educate ourselves about the long-term consequences of disease vs. the long-term consequences of vaccines. None of this comparing the INCIDENCE of disease with the grossly underestimated adverse effects of vaccines.

And we have to stop being easily manipulated by scare tactics.

I wrote about this earlier this year in my Scandals column "The Power of Fear" (http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Scandals/2008/Feb_11_08/Scandal85.htm ).

By the way, anyone who wants to be notified when there is a new Scandals column can do so by emailing me at sandy@vaccinationnews.org and write "subscribe Scandals" in the subject line.

[healingjack]

I saw on CNN yesterday a report about the "2006 Mumps outbreak" Apparently 7,000 people came down with mumps. Out of those 7,000 it resulted in 85 hospitalized and 0.......ZERO deaths. Compare those numbers to the rates of autism.....then we'll talk about an "outbreak!"

[Sandy Gottstein]

260,000 kids with autism is considered their worst nightmare. I guess they're hoping they will wake up and it will only have been a dream.

[Gatogorra]

Well, there's another example of product failure being used to promote increased consumption, also thanks to pharma. Polypharmacy is the practice of misinterpreting adverse reactions to one psychotrope as the emergence of another "underlying disorder" which then justifies adding another drug to the regimen and on and on. The same style of conflicted junk science which has been used to cover up vaccine damage and spin it into vaccine promotion has also been long used to cover up adverse psychoactive drug reactions.

I think this may be almost an exact parallel to mainstream medical authorities' handling of the mumps outbreak insofar as it's more than just a case of product failure but of a product actually causing the problem. Could it be that some individuals included in this recent outbreak are examples of children with lowered immunity/lack of antibody response to vaxes due to hypervaccination-- meaning too many shots made some chronically ill or prone to illness which is being used to justify...ugh...further shots?

[Craig Willoughby]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,349468,00.html

-gasp- 12 children came down with measles. Watch out! It's an epidemic! Hurry and get your child vaccinated with a vaccine that could give them autism and doesn't really work that well anyway. Hurry before its too late!

Anyone else notice that on the news yesterday? I could actually see the Big-pharma's PR reps feeding fear to the American Public so that they could push their poisonous product. 12 kids with measles is an epidemic. I wonder what 260,000 kids with autism is considered.